| Sunday July 31 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:22PM |
0 |
IR @llvm.dbg.value entries for variables when a phi node has been created |
| 10:50PM |
2 |
[Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 1 has been tagged |
| 7:38PM |
1 |
[Release-testers] [3.9 Release] Release Candidate 1 has been tagged |
| 6:03PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 4:48PM |
2 |
Implementing Data Flow Integrity |
| 4:20PM |
0 |
[Openmp-dev] How to get the function definition of a kmpc_micro call |
| 10:01AM |
0 |
[3.9 Release] Release Candidate 1 has been tagged |
| 7:56AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 7:25AM |
1 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 7:24AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 7:06AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:38AM |
4 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 12:53AM |
1 |
Upgrading to MSVC 2015 |
| 12:49AM |
4 |
bot clang-x86-ninja-win7 missing llvm/lib/DebugInfo/MSF/LLVMBuild.txt |
| |
| Saturday July 30 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 7:40PM |
0 |
Upgrading to MSVC 2015 |
| 6:23PM |
0 |
llvm-link unifies identified structs? |
| 5:58PM |
2 |
Upgrading to MSVC 2015 |
| 1:45PM |
1 |
[ThinLTO] assert(GS != DefinedGlobals.end()) failed in FunctionImport.cpp |
| 1:31PM |
2 |
llvm.org svn issue? |
| 11:32AM |
1 |
Tree conflict on 'include/llvm/DebugInfo/Msf and lib/DebugInfo/Msf |
| 10:21AM |
0 |
How to build new instruction algorithm for cluster VLIW architecture in llvm |
| 6:56AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 6:45AM |
1 |
XRay: Demo on x86_64/Linux almost done; some questions. |
| 6:37AM |
2 |
[ThinLTO] assert(GS != DefinedGlobals.end()) failed in FunctionImport.cpp |
| 2:14AM |
1 |
Instruction selection bug for vector store with FixedStack |
| 2:09AM |
0 |
How to get the function definition of a kmpc_micro call |
| 2:08AM |
3 |
Reasoning about results of min and max with a constant |
| 1:10AM |
1 |
[ORC JIT] Exposing IndirectStubsManager from CompileOnDemandLayer.h |
| |
| Friday July 29 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:17PM |
0 |
[ORC JIT] Exposing IndirectStubsManager from CompileOnDemandLayer.h |
| 10:57PM |
12 |
[3.9 Release] Release Candidate 1 has been tagged |
| 10:53PM |
2 |
[ORC JIT] Exposing IndirectStubsManager from CompileOnDemandLayer.h |
| 10:52PM |
0 |
[ThinLTO] assert(GS != DefinedGlobals.end()) failed in FunctionImport.cpp |
| 10:40PM |
2 |
[ThinLTO] assert(GS != DefinedGlobals.end()) failed in FunctionImport.cpp |
| 10:30PM |
0 |
[ThinLTO] assert(GS != DefinedGlobals.end()) failed in FunctionImport.cpp |
| 9:51PM |
2 |
Memory usage with MCJit |
| 9:25PM |
2 |
[ThinLTO] assert(GS != DefinedGlobals.end()) failed in FunctionImport.cpp |
| 9:18PM |
0 |
Upgrading to MSVC 2015 |
| 9:02PM |
2 |
Upgrading to MSVC 2015 |
| 9:00PM |
0 |
Upgrading to MSVC 2015 |
| 8:23PM |
2 |
Upgrading to MSVC 2015 |
| 8:18PM |
2 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 8:04PM |
1 |
Understanding failed assert in reg pressure reduction list scheduler |
| 7:46PM |
0 |
Understanding failed assert in reg pressure reduction list scheduler |
| 7:38PM |
2 |
Understanding failed assert in reg pressure reduction list scheduler |
| 7:26PM |
3 |
IR @llvm.dbg.value entries for variables when a phi node has been created |
| 7:07PM |
2 |
XRay: Demo on x86_64/Linux almost done; some questions. |
| 6:50PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 6:34PM |
0 |
Upgrading to MSVC 2015 |
| 6:29PM |
2 |
Upgrading to MSVC 2015 |
| 6:17PM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 6:07PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 6:00PM |
0 |
XRay: Demo on x86_64/Linux almost done; some questions. |
| 5:57PM |
2 |
Help with ISEL matching for an SDAG |
| 5:48PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:44PM |
0 |
PIC preferred too strongly, even at CodeModel::Large? |
| 5:36PM |
2 |
A thought to improve IPRA |
| 5:14PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:07PM |
0 |
Branch profiling in older llvm revision |
| 5:04PM |
0 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 5:04PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:01PM |
2 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 5:01PM |
4 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:00PM |
0 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 4:57PM |
2 |
PIC preferred too strongly, even at CodeModel::Large? |
| 4:50PM |
2 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 3:51PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 3:22PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 3:10PM |
0 |
[ORC JIT] Exposing IndirectStubsManager from CompileOnDemandLayer.h |
| 2:52PM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 2:51PM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 2:26PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 2:05PM |
0 |
[ThinLTO] assert(GS != DefinedGlobals.end()) failed in FunctionImport.cpp |
| 1:58PM |
1 |
XRay: Demo on x86_64/Linux almost done; some questions. |
| 1:27PM |
2 |
[GPUCC] link against libdevice |
| 12:47PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 12:41PM |
0 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 12:38PM |
0 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 12:04PM |
7 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 11:58AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 11:35AM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 11:16AM |
2 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 11:09AM |
2 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 11:08AM |
0 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 10:02AM |
0 |
A thought to improve IPRA |
| 9:19AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 8:47AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 8:36AM |
1 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 7:43AM |
0 |
XRay: Demo on x86_64/Linux almost done; some questions. |
| 4:11AM |
5 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 3:31AM |
2 |
A thought to improve IPRA |
| 3:28AM |
0 |
debugger |
| 3:21AM |
2 |
Gauging interest in generating PDBs from LLVM-backed languages |
| 2:50AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 2:32AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 2:14AM |
0 |
PIC preferred too strongly, even at CodeModel::Large? |
| 1:41AM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 1:23AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 1:13AM |
4 |
PIC preferred too strongly, even at CodeModel::Large? |
| 12:18AM |
3 |
[ThinLTO] assert(GS != DefinedGlobals.end()) failed in FunctionImport.cpp |
| 12:08AM |
0 |
[ThinLTO] assert(GS != DefinedGlobals.end()) failed in FunctionImport.cpp |
| |
| Thursday July 28 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:38PM |
2 |
[ThinLTO] assert(GS != DefinedGlobals.end()) failed in FunctionImport.cpp |
| 11:18PM |
0 |
Help wanted: Overloading an Intinsic |
| 11:14PM |
4 |
XRay: Demo on x86_64/Linux almost done; some questions. |
| 10:19PM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 9:21PM |
1 |
Liveness of virtual registers |
| 9:20PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 9:12PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 9:10PM |
0 |
Liveness of virtual registers |
| 9:01PM |
2 |
Liveness of virtual registers |
| 8:52PM |
0 |
Liveness of virtual registers |
| 8:49PM |
2 |
Liveness of virtual registers |
| 8:42PM |
0 |
Liveness of virtual registers |
| 8:41PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 8:37PM |
2 |
Liveness of virtual registers |
| 8:15PM |
1 |
[GlobalISel] Can we drop RegisterBankInfo::getInstrAlternativeMappings() ? |
| 8:06PM |
1 |
A thought to improve IPRA |
| 7:59PM |
0 |
A thought to improve IPRA |
| 7:30PM |
2 |
[ORC JIT] Exposing IndirectStubsManager from CompileOnDemandLayer.h |
| 7:05PM |
1 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 7:01PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 6:28PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:42PM |
1 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:21PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 4:59PM |
2 |
Exception Handling Deep Dive at Dev Meeting |
| 4:32PM |
0 |
Exception Handling Deep Dive at Dev Meeting |
| 2:49PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 2:30PM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 1:53PM |
0 |
How to use map/set in LLVM to disable automatic sorting? |
| 9:07AM |
2 |
Exception Handling Deep Dive at Dev Meeting |
| 8:42AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 7:59AM |
3 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 7:36AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 3:10AM |
0 |
RFC: SIMD math-function library |
| 2:43AM |
2 |
RFC: SIMD math-function library |
| 2:29AM |
0 |
RFC: SIMD math-function library |
| 12:19AM |
1 |
Hitting assertion failure related to vectorization + instcombine |
| |
| Wednesday July 27 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:54PM |
0 |
Hitting assertion failure related to vectorization + instcombine |
| 9:59PM |
1 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 9:24PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 8:32PM |
3 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 8:02PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 7:50PM |
1 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 7:18PM |
1 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 7:10PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 6:46PM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 6:38PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 6:33PM |
3 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 6:32PM |
3 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 6:30PM |
0 |
[X86] Adding a new instruction JUMPB |
| 6:30PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 6:29PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 6:29PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 6:22PM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 6:20PM |
2 |
help please: how to sort the contents of a "SymbolTableListTraits<GlobalVariable>"? |
| 6:04PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 6:03PM |
3 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 6:00PM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:41PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:37PM |
3 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:21PM |
3 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:17PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 4:47PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 3:46PM |
5 |
RFC: SIMD math-function library |
| 3:25PM |
4 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 3:10PM |
2 |
llvm-link unifies identified structs? |
| 2:13PM |
2 |
Remove zext-unfolding from InstCombine |
| 1:41PM |
0 |
RFC: Enabling Module passes post-ISel |
| 12:44PM |
1 |
'invalid subroutine type ref' when linking custom metadata |
| 10:58AM |
0 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 10:40AM |
1 |
[PATCH] Add support for the 'unless' matcher in the dynamic layer. |
| 9:16AM |
0 |
[PGO] cmake: Check for opagent.h when building with -DLLVM_USE_OPROFILE=ON |
| 7:06AM |
0 |
Gauging interest in generating PDBs from LLVM-backed languages |
| 2:02AM |
3 |
Gauging interest in generating PDBs from LLVM-backed languages |
| 12:44AM |
0 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 12:31AM |
2 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 12:22AM |
0 |
Buildbot numbers for the week of 7/10/2016 - 7/16/2016 |
| 12:21AM |
1 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 12:18AM |
1 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 12:15AM |
0 |
Buildbot numbers for the last week of 7/17/2016 - 7/23/2016 |
| 12:14AM |
1 |
Buildbot numbers for the week of 7/10/2016 - 7/16/2016 |
| 12:11AM |
0 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| |
| Tuesday July 26 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:50PM |
2 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 11:40PM |
0 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 11:36PM |
0 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 11:06PM |
0 |
[PATCH] Add support for the 'unless' matcher in the dynamic layer. |
| 11:02PM |
2 |
[PATCH] Add support for the 'unless' matcher in the dynamic layer. |
| 10:29PM |
0 |
[PATCH] Add support for the 'unless' matcher in the dynamic layer. |
| 10:21PM |
2 |
Help wanted: Overloading an Intinsic |
| 10:20PM |
2 |
[PATCH] Add support for the 'unless' matcher in the dynamic layer. |
| 10:05PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Interprocedural use-def chains |
| 9:51PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Interprocedural use-def chains |
| 9:41PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Interprocedural use-def chains |
| 9:32PM |
2 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 7:30PM |
0 |
Gauging interest in generating PDBs from LLVM-backed languages |
| 7:16PM |
0 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 7:07PM |
6 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 6:53PM |
0 |
Alias Analysis with inbound GEPs |
| 6:52PM |
2 |
Gauging interest in generating PDBs from LLVM-backed languages |
| 6:37PM |
2 |
Alias Analysis with inbound GEPs |
| 6:28PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 6:14PM |
1 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 6:10PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 6:02PM |
0 |
[RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental |
| 6:00PM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:59PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:58PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:45PM |
0 |
LLVM social Asia |
| 5:42PM |
4 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:40PM |
0 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 5:36PM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:33PM |
2 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 5:32PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:28PM |
0 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 5:27PM |
0 |
grouping global variables by alignment: safe to do at LLVM level, or only at Clang level? |
| 5:02PM |
2 |
grouping global variables by alignment: safe to do at LLVM level, or only at Clang level? |
| 5:00PM |
4 |
[RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental |
| 4:59PM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 4:54PM |
0 |
grouping global variables by alignment: safe to do at LLVM level, or only at Clang level? |
| 4:50PM |
2 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 4:46PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 4:36PM |
3 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 4:34PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 3:46PM |
4 |
grouping global variables by alignment: safe to do at LLVM level, or only at Clang level? |
| 3:02PM |
0 |
Gauging interest in generating PDBs from LLVM-backed languages |
| 2:11PM |
0 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 2:03PM |
0 |
Alias Analysis with inbound GEPs |
| 2:00PM |
1 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 1:13PM |
1 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 12:57PM |
2 |
LLVM social Asia |
| 12:32PM |
2 |
Alias Analysis with inbound GEPs |
| 11:49AM |
0 |
Alias Analysis with inbound GEPs |
| 11:21AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 11:08AM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 9:58AM |
0 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 9:15AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 9:09AM |
56 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 8:32AM |
3 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 7:51AM |
1 |
LLVM social Asia |
| 7:33AM |
0 |
LLVM Social in Berlin, Germany |
| 6:22AM |
0 |
'invalid subroutine type ref' when linking custom metadata |
| 3:53AM |
4 |
'invalid subroutine type ref' when linking custom metadata |
| 3:53AM |
0 |
grouping global variables by alignment: safe to do at LLVM level, or only at Clang level? |
| 3:49AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 3:46AM |
2 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 2:13AM |
0 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 1:59AM |
1 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 1:32AM |
2 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 1:22AM |
0 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 12:54AM |
5 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 12:47AM |
0 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 12:15AM |
1 |
[RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental |
| 12:06AM |
2 |
[RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental |
| |
| Monday July 25 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:58PM |
0 |
Alias Analysis with inbound GEPs |
| 11:57PM |
1 |
grouping global variables by alignment: safe to do at LLVM level, or only at Clang level? |
| 11:52PM |
0 |
grouping global variables by alignment: safe to do at LLVM level, or only at Clang level? |
| 11:49PM |
0 |
[RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental |
| 11:25PM |
0 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 11:18PM |
6 |
Target Acceptance Policy |
| 11:18PM |
2 |
[RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental |
| 11:08PM |
0 |
[RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental |
| 11:02PM |
4 |
Alias Analysis with inbound GEPs |
| 11:02PM |
3 |
[RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental |
| 10:48PM |
0 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 10:40PM |
3 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 10:36PM |
7 |
grouping global variables by alignment: safe to do at LLVM level, or only at Clang level? |
| 10:04PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 9:06PM |
0 |
Alias Analysis with inbound GEPs |
| 8:55PM |
1 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 8:40PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 8:33PM |
0 |
[RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental |
| 8:25PM |
2 |
[RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental |
| 8:03PM |
1 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 7:47PM |
0 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 7:46PM |
2 |
Alias Analysis with inbound GEPs |
| 6:46PM |
0 |
[RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental |
| 6:44PM |
0 |
No luck contacting Chris Lattner re commit access |
| 6:34PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 6:07PM |
2 |
Hitting assertion failure related to vectorization + instcombine |
| 5:29PM |
0 |
FreeBSD user willing to try fix a unit test? |
| 5:16PM |
0 |
Alias Analysis with inbound GEPs |
| 4:54PM |
6 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 4:42PM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] [Weekly Status] Interprocedural Register Allocation |
| 4:27PM |
0 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 4:27PM |
2 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 3:10PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 3:08PM |
0 |
[llvm-3.8.1] /usr/bin/objcopy: unrecognized option '--extract-dwo' |
| 3:07PM |
0 |
Memory usage with MCJit |
| 2:45PM |
3 |
Alias Analysis with inbound GEPs |
| 2:24PM |
0 |
LLVM Weekly - #134, Jul 25th 2016 |
| 2:12PM |
4 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 2:10PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 1:55PM |
3 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 1:29PM |
1 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 12:34PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 11:40AM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 11:16AM |
0 |
[RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental |
| 11:09AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 10:59AM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 10:58AM |
0 |
No luck contacting Chris Lattner re commit access |
| 10:30AM |
4 |
No luck contacting Chris Lattner re commit access |
| 10:28AM |
0 |
Improving deb packages |
| 10:24AM |
0 |
[RFC] Embedded bitcode and related upstream (Part II) |
| 10:19AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 7:34AM |
0 |
[GSoC'16] Weekly Status - July 25 - Zhengyang Liu |
| 7:19AM |
3 |
How to use map/set in LLVM to disable automatic sorting? |
| 1:18AM |
3 |
Gauging interest in generating PDBs from LLVM-backed languages |
| |
| Sunday July 24 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 10:04PM |
1 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:46PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 3:58PM |
3 |
[llvm-3.8.1] /usr/bin/objcopy: unrecognized option '--extract-dwo' |
| 3:50PM |
2 |
Memory usage with MCJit |
| 1:45PM |
0 |
[PGO] cmake: Check for opagent.h when building with -DLLVM_USE_OPROFILE=ON |
| 9:58AM |
0 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 8:50AM |
0 |
[llvm-toolchain v3.8.1] LTO: Linking clang hangs with ld.gold and LLVMgold.so plugin |
| 6:43AM |
1 |
Getting bc files of some multithreading workloads |
| |
| Saturday July 23 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:01PM |
2 |
FreeBSD user willing to try fix a unit test? |
| 9:59PM |
3 |
[llvm-toolchain v3.8.1] LTO: Linking clang hangs with ld.gold and LLVMgold.so plugin |
| 9:42PM |
2 |
Improving deb packages |
| 8:53PM |
0 |
[llvm-toolchain v3.8.1] LTO: Linking clang hangs with ld.gold and LLVMgold.so plugin |
| 7:44PM |
0 |
Docs bots email |
| 6:08PM |
0 |
FreeBSD user willing to try fix a unit test? |
| 5:48PM |
2 |
[llvm-toolchain v3.8.1] LTO: Linking clang hangs with ld.gold and LLVMgold.so plugin |
| 5:12PM |
1 |
Delta reduction of front-end bugs: New tool |
| 11:38AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 11:33AM |
0 |
Loop optimizations implemented in the front end (source-to-source transformation) |
| 9:42AM |
0 |
[llvm-toolchain v3.8.1] LTO: Linking clang hangs with ld.gold and LLVMgold.so plugin |
| 6:12AM |
0 |
Handy file storage for LLD/ELF --reproduce |
| 5:41AM |
1 |
Creating llvm/DebugInfo/Msf folder |
| 4:12AM |
1 |
What is the update on the AVR backend integration for the 3.9 release? |
| 3:05AM |
1 |
Query regarding function signature mismatch |
| 2:39AM |
3 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 2:28AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 1:13AM |
0 |
[ThinLTO] Using two different IRMovers for the same composite module? (related to PR28180) |
| 1:02AM |
0 |
difference between llvm-gcc and clang |
| 12:20AM |
2 |
difference between llvm-gcc and clang |
| |
| Friday July 22 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:58PM |
0 |
Old mailing list links broken. |
| 11:42PM |
3 |
[ThinLTO] Using two different IRMovers for the same composite module? (related to PR28180) |
| 11:42PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 11:41PM |
2 |
Old mailing list links broken. |
| 11:35PM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 11:13PM |
0 |
ThinLTO status in trunk? |
| 10:34PM |
3 |
ThinLTO status in trunk? |
| 9:52PM |
0 |
[ThinLTO] Using two different IRMovers for the same composite module? (related to PR28180) |
| 9:52PM |
1 |
RFC: shipping llvm-lit |
| 9:47PM |
2 |
[ThinLTO] Using two different IRMovers for the same composite module? (related to PR28180) |
| 9:44PM |
0 |
[ThinLTO] Using two different IRMovers for the same composite module? (related to PR28180) |
| 9:37PM |
0 |
Old mailing list links broken. |
| 9:35PM |
0 |
ThinLTO status in trunk? |
| 9:34PM |
3 |
[ThinLTO] Using two different IRMovers for the same composite module? (related to PR28180) |
| 9:31PM |
2 |
ThinLTO status in trunk? |
| 9:22PM |
0 |
HEAD compilation causes gcc internal error |
| 9:18PM |
2 |
HEAD compilation causes gcc internal error |
| 9:16PM |
0 |
[ThinLTO] Using two different IRMovers for the same composite module? (related to PR28180) |
| 9:11PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 9:04PM |
4 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 8:50PM |
2 |
[ThinLTO] Using two different IRMovers for the same composite module? (related to PR28180) |
| 8:48PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 8:39PM |
3 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 8:22PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 8:18PM |
4 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 8:17PM |
1 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 8:08PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 8:02PM |
0 |
Creating llvm/DebugInfo/Msf folder |
| 7:36PM |
0 |
ThinLTO status in trunk? |
| 7:15PM |
4 |
ThinLTO status in trunk? |
| 6:52PM |
0 |
HEAD compilation causes gcc internal error |
| 6:52PM |
1 |
InlineAsm and allocation to wrong register for indirect access |
| 6:51PM |
2 |
HEAD compilation causes gcc internal error |
| 6:11PM |
0 |
HEAD compilation causes gcc internal error |
| 6:08PM |
2 |
HEAD compilation causes gcc internal error |
| 5:56PM |
2 |
Creating llvm/DebugInfo/Msf folder |
| 5:52PM |
0 |
Creating llvm/DebugInfo/Msf folder |
| 5:50PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 4:07PM |
2 |
Creating llvm/DebugInfo/Msf folder |
| 3:57PM |
1 |
"trunc"s generated by LSR cause problem for SCEV |
| 2:08PM |
0 |
Hitting assertion failure related to vectorization + instcombine |
| 1:45PM |
2 |
Hitting assertion failure related to vectorization + instcombine |
| 1:33PM |
4 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 1:01PM |
0 |
Getting the memory address of all Objects at runtime |
| 12:56PM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 12:40PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 10:40AM |
8 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 10:16AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 9:30AM |
0 |
InlineAsm and allocation to wrong register for indirect access |
| 8:55AM |
4 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 8:16AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 7:51AM |
3 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 7:31AM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 6:59AM |
3 |
Old mailing list links broken. |
| 6:14AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:48AM |
1 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 3:48AM |
0 |
Problem of array index manipulation collection of LLVM IR |
| 1:14AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 1:08AM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 12:16AM |
4 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| |
| Thursday July 21 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:51PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 11:39PM |
4 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 11:25PM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 10:18PM |
1 |
load instruction erroneously removed by GVN v2 |
| 10:16PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 9:56PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 9:41PM |
2 |
FreeBSD user willing to try fix a unit test? |
| 9:33PM |
3 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 9:32PM |
5 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 9:29PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 9:12PM |
0 |
difference between llvm-gcc and clang |
| 9:11PM |
0 |
difference between llvm-gcc and clang |
| 9:11PM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 9:02PM |
4 |
difference between llvm-gcc and clang |
| 8:55PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 8:08PM |
1 |
RFC: LLVM Coroutine Representation, Round 2 |
| 7:57PM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 7:17PM |
4 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 7:14PM |
0 |
llvm-dev Digest, Vol 145, Issue 105 |
| 6:59PM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 6:43PM |
0 |
RFC: LLVM Coroutine Representation, Round 2 |
| 6:03PM |
3 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:44PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:30PM |
2 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 5:12PM |
3 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:11PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:06PM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:03PM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 4:58PM |
2 |
RFC: LLVM Coroutine Representation, Round 2 |
| 4:51PM |
0 |
Remove zext-unfolding from InstCombine |
| 4:49PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 4:46PM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 4:39PM |
4 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 4:39PM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 4:26PM |
3 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 4:16PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 3:22PM |
3 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 3:11PM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 3:00PM |
2 |
InlineAsm and allocation to wrong register for indirect access |
| 2:45PM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 12:07PM |
2 |
Remove zext-unfolding from InstCombine |
| 12:07PM |
3 |
Fwd: Problem of array index manipulation collection of LLVM IR |
| 11:04AM |
1 |
A "Java Backend" |
| 10:01AM |
3 |
[llvm-toolchain v3.8.1] LTO: Linking clang hangs with ld.gold and LLVMgold.so plugin |
| 9:51AM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 9:36AM |
0 |
A "Java Backend" |
| 8:59AM |
0 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 8:31AM |
2 |
A "Java Backend" |
| 7:19AM |
1 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 7:11AM |
0 |
A "Java Backend" |
| 6:53AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 6:51AM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 6:12AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 6:03AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 5:47AM |
1 |
Add addRequired<>() for different Pass |
| 3:39AM |
1 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 3:39AM |
0 |
Code owner for Mips |
| 3:01AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 2:41AM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 2:38AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 2:08AM |
5 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 2:06AM |
3 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 1:26AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 1:18AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 1:06AM |
3 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 1:05AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 1:02AM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 1:00AM |
5 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 12:56AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 12:53AM |
1 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 12:46AM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 12:39AM |
3 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 12:36AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 12:25AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 12:23AM |
2 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 12:06AM |
4 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 12:02AM |
0 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| |
| Wednesday July 20 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:58PM |
0 |
load instruction erroneously removed by GVN v2 |
| 11:39PM |
11 |
[RFC] One or many git repositories? |
| 10:42PM |
0 |
[Openmp-dev] PSA: LLVM parallel-libs subproject is set up |
| 10:11PM |
1 |
RFC: LLVM Coroutine Representation, Round 2 |
| 9:59PM |
0 |
Hitting assertion failure related to vectorization + instcombine |
| 9:44PM |
2 |
load instruction erroneously removed by GVN v2 |
| 9:23PM |
1 |
RFC: LLVM Coroutine Representation, Round 2 |
| 8:39PM |
1 |
[CMake] LLVM_PROGRAM_PREFIX support |
| 8:20PM |
1 |
is clang+llvm-3.8.1-x86_64-linux-gnu-ubuntu-14.04.tar.xz truncated? |
| 8:17PM |
2 |
PSA: LLVM parallel-libs subproject is set up |
| 8:03PM |
2 |
Hitting assertion failure related to vectorization + instcombine |
| 7:52PM |
0 |
[CMake] LLVM_PROGRAM_PREFIX support |
| 7:49PM |
0 |
Hitting assertion failure related to vectorization + instcombine |
| 7:47PM |
3 |
[CMake] LLVM_PROGRAM_PREFIX support |
| 7:44PM |
2 |
Hitting assertion failure related to vectorization + instcombine |
| 6:32PM |
0 |
load instruction erroneously removed by GVN v2 |
| 6:24PM |
2 |
load instruction erroneously removed by GVN v2 |
| 6:06PM |
0 |
load instruction erroneously removed by GVN v2 |
| 5:49PM |
1 |
CMake configuration errors |
| 4:56PM |
2 |
load instruction erroneously removed by GVN v2 |
| 4:39PM |
0 |
Buildbots stuck? |
| 4:29PM |
0 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 4:13PM |
0 |
Buildmaster restart in few minutes |
| 2:20PM |
2 |
Buildbots stuck? |
| 1:51PM |
0 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 1:36PM |
0 |
Flaky ASAN test on Windows? |
| 1:09PM |
2 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 12:38PM |
2 |
Code owner for Mips |
| 10:58AM |
0 |
[XRay] Build instrumented Clang, some analysis results |
| 10:40AM |
0 |
[RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental |
| 10:26AM |
2 |
[XRay] Build instrumented Clang, some analysis results |
| 10:25AM |
2 |
Flaky ASAN test on Windows? |
| 10:02AM |
0 |
[XRay] Build instrumented Clang, some analysis results |
| 9:50AM |
1 |
Question about LSAN sanitizer on AARCH64 |
| 9:39AM |
1 |
Issuing a warning from llc |
| 8:51AM |
1 |
state of webassembly |
| 7:48AM |
2 |
[XRay] Build instrumented Clang, some analysis results |
| 5:55AM |
0 |
RFC: inbounds on getelementptr indices for global splitting |
| 3:20AM |
0 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 1:06AM |
0 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 1:03AM |
2 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 1:00AM |
0 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 12:59AM |
1 |
Recompile (and re-link) a function at runtime using ORC JIT for an ARM platform |
| 12:54AM |
2 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 12:10AM |
0 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 12:01AM |
2 |
GitHub Hooks |
| |
| Tuesday July 19 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:59PM |
0 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 11:54PM |
0 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 11:52PM |
2 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 11:48PM |
0 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 11:44PM |
4 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 11:36PM |
0 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 11:06PM |
0 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 11:00PM |
2 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 10:59PM |
3 |
[RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental |
| 10:47PM |
0 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 10:32PM |
2 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 10:16PM |
0 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 9:59PM |
3 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 9:35PM |
0 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 9:29PM |
1 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 9:26PM |
1 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 9:09PM |
0 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 8:46PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Subregister liveness tracking |
| 8:44PM |
0 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 8:27PM |
10 |
GitHub Hooks |
| 8:05PM |
2 |
[RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental |
| 7:57PM |
0 |
[RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental |
| 6:40PM |
0 |
Check sub register relations in RA |
| 5:42PM |
2 |
Check sub register relations in RA |
| 5:42PM |
2 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 4:52PM |
0 |
[RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental |
| 4:42PM |
10 |
[RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental |
| 4:26PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Subregister liveness tracking |
| 4:04PM |
0 |
[RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental |
| 3:54PM |
0 |
X86ISelLowering: Promote 'add nsw' to a wider type |
| 3:28PM |
0 |
A "Java Backend" |
| 3:13PM |
3 |
X86ISelLowering: Promote 'add nsw' to a wider type |
| 2:52PM |
3 |
A "Java Backend" |
| 2:17PM |
2 |
[RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental |
| 2:16PM |
4 |
RFC: Enabling Module passes post-ISel |
| 1:51PM |
0 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 1:48PM |
2 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 1:36PM |
0 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 11:12AM |
0 |
[RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental |
| 8:40AM |
0 |
A "Java Backend" |
| 7:21AM |
0 |
RFC: Enabling Module passes post-ISel |
| 4:09AM |
0 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 3:53AM |
5 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 3:53AM |
2 |
[RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental |
| 3:29AM |
0 |
RFC: inbounds on getelementptr indices for global splitting |
| 3:06AM |
5 |
A "Java Backend" |
| 1:52AM |
1 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 1:42AM |
0 |
llvm-dev Digest, Vol 145, Issue 65 |
| 1:16AM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 1:13AM |
2 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 1:02AM |
4 |
RFC: inbounds on getelementptr indices for global splitting |
| |
| Monday July 18 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:56PM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 11:46PM |
2 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 8:51PM |
0 |
LLVM buildmaster will be restarted tonight |
| 6:57PM |
0 |
[3.9 Release] We have branched |
| 6:54PM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 6:18PM |
0 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 4:45PM |
0 |
Recompile (and re-link) a function at runtime using ORC JIT for an ARM platform |
| 4:44PM |
1 |
RFC: Coroutine Optimization Passes |
| 2:46PM |
0 |
[Attn: out of tree code owners] Changes to intrinsic properties |
| 2:23PM |
0 |
LLVM Weekly - #133, Jul 18th 2016 |
| 2:04PM |
0 |
GitHub Proposal: Final Cut |
| 12:39PM |
1 |
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs? |
| 11:27AM |
4 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 12:15AM |
0 |
RFC: Enabling Module passes post-ISel |
| |
| Sunday July 17 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 7:52PM |
1 |
RFC: Enabling Module passes post-ISel |
| 6:29PM |
1 |
llvm PeepholeOptimizer + optimizeLoadInstr question |
| 5:57PM |
0 |
RFC: Enabling Module passes post-ISel |
| 4:34PM |
6 |
RFC: Enabling Module passes post-ISel |
| 3:03PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] [Weekly Status] Interprocedural Register Allocation |
| 9:38AM |
0 |
llvm-dev Digest, Vol 145, Issue 76 |
| |
| Saturday July 16 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 8:00PM |
0 |
Instruction selection problem with type i64 - mistaken as v8i64? |
| 5:29PM |
1 |
** lists.llvm.org Maintenance Today ** |
| 10:31AM |
1 |
Invalid binary tarball for LLVM 3.8.1, Ubuntu 14.04 |
| 6:44AM |
0 |
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs? |
| 4:05AM |
0 |
Optimizations using profile information |
| 3:40AM |
3 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 3:39AM |
0 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 3:06AM |
3 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 1:57AM |
2 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 1:51AM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 1:26AM |
2 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 12:48AM |
0 |
More function signatures for LLVMRunFunction? |
| 12:40AM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 12:37AM |
2 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 12:36AM |
0 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 12:32AM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 12:25AM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 12:24AM |
3 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| |
| Friday July 15 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:48PM |
2 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 11:31PM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 11:27PM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 11:21PM |
4 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 11:00PM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 10:38PM |
4 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 10:20PM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 9:54PM |
3 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 9:54PM |
1 |
RFC: To add __attribute__((regmask("preserve/clobbered list here"))) in clang |
| 9:44PM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 9:36PM |
2 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 9:30PM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 8:48PM |
0 |
RFC: To add __attribute__((regmask("preserve/clobbered list here"))) in clang |
| 7:50PM |
1 |
AArch64 testsuite buildbots timeout |
| 7:36PM |
3 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 7:36PM |
0 |
AArch64 testsuite buildbots timeout |
| 7:21PM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 6:48PM |
2 |
More function signatures for LLVMRunFunction? |
| 6:33PM |
0 |
RFC: To add __attribute__((regmask("preserve/clobbered list here"))) in clang |
| 6:27PM |
4 |
RFC: To add __attribute__((regmask("preserve/clobbered list here"))) in clang |
| 6:24PM |
2 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 6:06PM |
0 |
clone function |
| 5:16PM |
0 |
RFC: SIMD math-function library |
| 4:19PM |
0 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 4:12PM |
0 |
TableGen change in LLVM 3.9 allows only prefix instruction notation |
| 3:58PM |
5 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 3:40PM |
1 |
Preventing LLVM from optimizing out a variable |
| 2:46PM |
0 |
Porting Automation |
| 2:17PM |
1 |
RFC: Coroutine Optimization Passes |
| 1:05PM |
0 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 12:46PM |
3 |
LLVM Social in Berlin, Germany |
| 12:40PM |
2 |
TableGen change in LLVM 3.9 allows only prefix instruction notation |
| 10:14AM |
2 |
Optimizations using profile information |
| 8:41AM |
2 |
Recompile (and re-link) a function at runtime using ORC JIT for an ARM platform |
| 8:26AM |
0 |
adding sanitizers for llvm generated code |
| 8:15AM |
2 |
clone function |
| 7:56AM |
0 |
PassManager interface question |
| 7:37AM |
1 |
Problem logging into phabricator using GitHub credentials |
| 7:02AM |
3 |
RFC: SIMD math-function library |
| 6:33AM |
2 |
Porting Automation |
| 6:09AM |
1 |
RFC: SIMD math-function library |
| 5:48AM |
0 |
RFC: Coroutine Optimization Passes |
| 4:55AM |
0 |
RFC: SIMD math-function library |
| 4:45AM |
0 |
RFC: SIMD math-function library |
| 4:37AM |
3 |
RFC: SIMD math-function library |
| 4:28AM |
4 |
RFC: Coroutine Optimization Passes |
| 3:53AM |
0 |
RFC: SIMD math-function library |
| 3:50AM |
0 |
asm printer pass leaves empty file |
| 3:41AM |
0 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 3:39AM |
0 |
RFC: Coroutine Optimization Passes |
| 3:27AM |
0 |
Problem logging into phabricator using GitHub credentials |
| 3:24AM |
2 |
Problem logging into phabricator using GitHub credentials |
| 3:21AM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 3:04AM |
0 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 3:04AM |
4 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 2:58AM |
2 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 2:52AM |
2 |
RFC: Coroutine Optimization Passes |
| 2:48AM |
0 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 2:43AM |
2 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 2:37AM |
0 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 2:21AM |
5 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 1:35AM |
0 |
More function signatures for LLVMRunFunction? |
| 12:53AM |
2 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 12:03AM |
2 |
Handy file storage for LLD/ELF --reproduce |
| |
| Thursday July 14 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:49PM |
0 |
Handy file storage for LLD/ELF --reproduce |
| 11:48PM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 11:03PM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 10:40PM |
5 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 10:28PM |
0 |
Preventing LLVM from optimizing out a variable |
| 10:10PM |
1 |
Let's stop using target specific intrinsics in generic code |
| 10:08PM |
0 |
Let's stop using target specific intrinsics in generic code |
| 9:55PM |
0 |
Full-time job ad: Program Analysis Engineer @ Apple |
| 9:32PM |
0 |
[RFC] ASan: Reify all information relevant for diagnostics |
| 9:03PM |
4 |
Let's stop using target specific intrinsics in generic code |
| 7:07PM |
0 |
clone function |
| 5:58PM |
0 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| 2:58PM |
2 |
clone function |
| 2:10PM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] AArch64 testsuite buildbots timeout |
| 1:57PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] AArch64 testsuite buildbots timeout |
| 1:50PM |
4 |
AArch64 testsuite buildbots timeout |
| 1:27PM |
0 |
Enabled HTTPS for reviews.llvm.org (Arcanist certificate reinstallation required) |
| 1:26PM |
2 |
Enabled HTTPS for reviews.llvm.org (Arcanist certificate reinstallation required) |
| 1:22PM |
0 |
Enabled HTTPS for reviews.llvm.org (Arcanist certificate reinstallation required) |
| 1:14PM |
2 |
Enabled HTTPS for reviews.llvm.org (Arcanist certificate reinstallation required) |
| 11:19AM |
0 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| 11:06AM |
2 |
[X86] Adding a new instruction JUMPB |
| 10:26AM |
0 |
RFC: YAML mappings with keys that are unknown at compile time |
| 9:11AM |
0 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 7:51AM |
4 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| |
| Wednesday July 13 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:48PM |
0 |
Interested in being on the LLVM Foundation Board of Directors? |
| 11:47PM |
0 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| 11:28PM |
2 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| 11:25PM |
0 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| 11:24PM |
2 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| 9:51PM |
0 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 9:46PM |
2 |
Handy file storage for LLD/ELF --reproduce |
| 9:00PM |
0 |
LLVM Social in Berlin, Germany |
| 8:57PM |
1 |
How to get analysis in a class which is not a LLVM pass? |
| 8:52PM |
4 |
LLVM Social in Berlin, Germany |
| 8:49PM |
0 |
Heads-up: Change output change in MIR testing |
| 8:06PM |
0 |
How to get analysis in a class which is not a LLVM pass? |
| 7:42PM |
1 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| 7:40PM |
0 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| 7:26PM |
6 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| 6:46PM |
0 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| 6:19PM |
1 |
Why LLVM generate two induction variables in IR level for the same induction variable in C source code |
| 5:54PM |
0 |
IR -> source pretty printing? |
| 5:07PM |
3 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 4:57PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [RFC] __attribute__((internal_linkage)) |
| 4:53PM |
0 |
Handy file storage for LLD/ELF --reproduce |
| 4:45PM |
0 |
RFC: SIMD math-function library |
| 3:14PM |
2 |
Handy file storage for LLD/ELF --reproduce |
| 2:51PM |
2 |
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs? |
| 2:48PM |
0 |
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs? |
| 2:19PM |
0 |
Handy file storage for LLD/ELF --reproduce |
| 2:00PM |
3 |
IR -> source pretty printing? |
| 1:36PM |
0 |
Initial SelectionDAG and stopping a MVT to be selected |
| 12:28PM |
1 |
3.8.0 tar balls substituted for 3.8.1 ones? |
| 11:45AM |
7 |
RFC: SIMD math-function library |
| 9:21AM |
1 |
MCJIT emitting optimization diagnostics on stdout/stderr |
| 9:02AM |
0 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 8:50AM |
2 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 8:48AM |
0 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 8:40AM |
0 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 8:33AM |
0 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 8:05AM |
0 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 8:03AM |
2 |
How to get analysis in a class which is not a LLVM pass? |
| 7:56AM |
3 |
Handy file storage for LLD/ELF --reproduce |
| 7:47AM |
2 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 7:39AM |
4 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 7:34AM |
3 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 7:25AM |
0 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 6:39AM |
3 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 6:35AM |
0 |
[compiler-rt] dd santizer build failed for x86_64 |
| 6:34AM |
0 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 6:32AM |
3 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 6:00AM |
1 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 5:57AM |
0 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 4:00AM |
0 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 1:38AM |
3 |
[cfe-dev] [RFC] __attribute__((internal_linkage)) |
| 1:16AM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [RFC] __attribute__((internal_linkage)) |
| 1:15AM |
5 |
[PM] I think that the new PM needs to learn about inter-analysis dependencies... |
| 1:11AM |
3 |
[cfe-dev] [RFC] __attribute__((internal_linkage)) |
| 12:19AM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| |
| Tuesday July 12 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:42PM |
2 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 10:29PM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 7:55PM |
2 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| 7:30PM |
0 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| 7:20PM |
3 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| 7:08PM |
1 |
extra loads in nested for-loop |
| 6:58PM |
0 |
extra loads in nested for-loop |
| 4:10PM |
1 |
Not able to use PGO with LLVM+Clang built from source |
| 3:37PM |
0 |
Not able to use PGO with LLVM+Clang built from source |
| 2:32PM |
1 |
Strange verifier error with LLVM 3.9 |
| 2:10PM |
3 |
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs? |
| 1:10PM |
1 |
Use different LLVM IR functions for unsafe-fp / code gen options |
| 11:53AM |
1 |
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs? |
| 11:34AM |
0 |
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs? |
| 9:40AM |
3 |
Not able to use PGO with LLVM+Clang built from source |
| 7:48AM |
0 |
Should analyses be able to hold AssertingVH to IR? (related to PR28400) |
| 7:47AM |
0 |
[PATCH] D22161: SystemZ: Avoid implicit iterator conversions, NFC |
| 6:38AM |
3 |
Should analyses be able to hold AssertingVH to IR? (related to PR28400) |
| 6:21AM |
2 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 6:17AM |
0 |
Should analyses be able to hold AssertingVH to IR? (related to PR28400) |
| 6:06AM |
2 |
Should analyses be able to hold AssertingVH to IR? (related to PR28400) |
| 3:41AM |
0 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| 2:51AM |
0 |
Should analyses be able to hold AssertingVH to IR? (related to PR28400) |
| 2:48AM |
3 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| 2:46AM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 2:05AM |
0 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| 1:51AM |
0 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| 1:49AM |
1 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 1:45AM |
2 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| |
| Monday July 11 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:52PM |
0 |
Buildbot numbers for the week of 7/03/2016 - 7/09/2016 |
| 11:52PM |
0 |
Buildbot numbers for the week of 6/26/2016 - 7/02/2016 |
| 11:33PM |
0 |
Suggestion to Stop Cross Posting Discussions |
| 11:26PM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 11:21PM |
2 |
extra loads in nested for-loop |
| 10:56PM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 10:44PM |
4 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 10:43PM |
0 |
Suggestion to Stop Cross Posting Discussions |
| 10:34PM |
2 |
Suggestion to Stop Cross Posting Discussions |
| 9:46PM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 9:28PM |
0 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 9:21PM |
0 |
Implementation of DWARF expression parser |
| 9:20PM |
0 |
extra loads in nested for-loop |
| 9:13PM |
2 |
[PATCH] D22161: SystemZ: Avoid implicit iterator conversions, NFC |
| 8:45PM |
5 |
Preventing LLVM from optimizing out a variable |
| 8:27PM |
2 |
extra loads in nested for-loop |
| 7:22PM |
0 |
LibC++ failure on ARM |
| 6:39PM |
0 |
Silent Build Maser 8014 offline? |
| 6:22PM |
1 |
How to set up a git mirror for a new LLVM suproject |
| 6:03PM |
1 |
creating Intrinsic DAG Node |
| 4:34PM |
2 |
LibC++ failure on ARM |
| 4:16PM |
0 |
LLVM Weekly - #132, Jul 11th 2016 |
| 4:06PM |
0 |
LibC++ failure on ARM |
| 3:59PM |
2 |
LibC++ failure on ARM |
| 3:01PM |
0 |
LibC++ failure on ARM |
| 2:39PM |
2 |
LibC++ failure on ARM |
| 2:30PM |
0 |
LibC++ failure on ARM |
| 2:15PM |
2 |
LibC++ failure on ARM |
| 2:10PM |
3 |
Silent Build Maser 8014 offline? |
| 1:47PM |
1 |
RFC: LLVM Coroutine Representation, Round 2 |
| 1:46PM |
1 |
gdb debug llvm pass |
| 1:09PM |
0 |
[GSoC'16] Weekly Status - July 11 - Zhengyang Liu |
| 12:27PM |
0 |
Clang 3.8: Solaris 10 build |
| 12:16PM |
2 |
More function signatures for LLVMRunFunction? |
| 8:10AM |
3 |
Suggestion to Stop Cross Posting Discussions |
| 5:42AM |
0 |
Apply CFCSS pass to SPEC2006 |
| |
| Sunday July 10 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 7:20PM |
1 |
C++ program using your own pass |
| 6:08PM |
1 |
llvm 3.8.1 Release |
| 8:05AM |
0 |
Memory scope proposal |
| 7:15AM |
2 |
Implementation of DWARF expression parser |
| 4:42AM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] [Weekly Status] Interprocedural Register Allocation |
| 12:42AM |
1 |
[GSoC 2016] Enabling Polyhedral Optimizations in Julia - Midterm Report |
| |
| Saturday July 9 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 4:26AM |
0 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| 2:55AM |
0 |
Suggestion to Stop Cross Posting Discussions |
| 2:45AM |
3 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| |
| Friday July 8 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 9:18PM |
2 |
Incremental compilation and recognizing distinct bitcode |
| 7:14PM |
1 |
compile fails |
| 7:03PM |
0 |
llvm 3.8.1 Release |
| 6:56PM |
3 |
A thought to improve IPRA |
| 6:48PM |
0 |
A thought to improve IPRA |
| 6:41PM |
2 |
A thought to improve IPRA |
| 6:18PM |
1 |
Running verify between every opt pass? |
| 6:17PM |
0 |
LLVM buildmaster will be restarted tonight |
| 6:16PM |
0 |
A thought to improve IPRA |
| 6:16PM |
0 |
Running verify between every opt pass? |
| 6:15PM |
1 |
Representing MIPS ABI information in the triple as ARM/X86 do for EABI/EABIHF/X32 |
| 6:12PM |
2 |
A thought to improve IPRA |
| 5:57PM |
2 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| 5:43PM |
3 |
llvm 3.8.1 Release |
| 5:24PM |
0 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| 5:23PM |
0 |
Representing MIPS ABI information in the triple as ARM/X86 do for EABI/EABIHF/X32 |
| 4:56PM |
1 |
omp critical supported in llvm? |
| 12:31PM |
0 |
Dynamic selection of assembly mnemonic strings |
| 11:58AM |
2 |
Dynamic selection of assembly mnemonic strings |
| 11:32AM |
0 |
Dynamic selection of assembly mnemonic strings |
| 11:24AM |
2 |
Dynamic selection of assembly mnemonic strings |
| 10:44AM |
0 |
Representing MIPS ABI information in the triple as ARM/X86 do for EABI/EABIHF/X32 |
| 8:12AM |
2 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| 7:38AM |
3 |
Running verify between every opt pass? |
| 4:17AM |
0 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| 12:56AM |
2 |
[llvm-foundation] Sequential ID Git hook |
| |
| Thursday July 7 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:57PM |
0 |
XRay: Demo on x86_64/Linux almost done; some questions. |
| 9:29PM |
0 |
Fw: Configure error on Solaris 10 |
| 9:15PM |
0 |
ObjectCache and getFunctionAddress issue |
| 9:07PM |
0 |
Configure error on Solaris 10 |
| 9:03PM |
2 |
Configure error on Solaris 10 |
| 8:52PM |
0 |
Configure error on Solaris 10 |
| 7:26PM |
1 |
Status of stack walking in LLVM on Win64? |
| 6:35PM |
0 |
Status of stack walking in LLVM on Win64? |
| 5:36PM |
3 |
Configure error on Solaris 10 |
| 4:15PM |
1 |
Status of stack walking in LLVM on Win64? |
| 4:03PM |
1 |
Poly Perf 11 broken? |
| 3:36PM |
0 |
Poly Perf 11 broken? |
| 3:10PM |
2 |
Poly Perf 11 broken? |
| 1:36PM |
0 |
Not creating irreducible loops in jump threading |
| 9:52AM |
2 |
ObjectCache and getFunctionAddress issue |
| 9:28AM |
4 |
Suggestion to Stop Cross Posting Discussions |
| 4:39AM |
0 |
Can we get interprocedural register allocation work across module boundary? |
| 2:39AM |
0 |
Suggestion to Stop Cross Posting Discussions |
| 2:37AM |
2 |
Suggestion to Stop Cross Posting Discussions |
| |
| Wednesday July 6 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 10:51PM |
1 |
Wiring a function into a new DICompileUnit |
| 9:24PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] clang++ build from source is not able to find C++ headers |
| 9:17PM |
3 |
[cfe-dev] clang++ build from source is not able to find C++ headers |
| 9:09PM |
3 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| 8:33PM |
0 |
Loop unrolling parameters |
| 8:21PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] clang++ build from source is not able to find C++ headers |
| 8:01PM |
0 |
GCC prerequisites for building LLVM head? |
| 7:09PM |
0 |
Path condition propagation |
| 6:59PM |
2 |
Status of stack walking in LLVM on Win64? |
| 6:49PM |
1 |
Regarding ScalarEvolution's loop backedge computation |
| 6:43PM |
2 |
GCC prerequisites for building LLVM head? |
| 6:35PM |
0 |
GCC prerequisites for building LLVM head? |
| 6:16PM |
1 |
Updating release docs and minimal tools |
| 6:02PM |
2 |
GCC prerequisites for building LLVM head? |
| 5:36PM |
1 |
Automatically scaled offset Load/stores for arrays |
| 4:50PM |
0 |
IPRA, interprocedural register allocation, question |
| 4:24PM |
0 |
llvm 3.8.1 Release |
| 4:07PM |
0 |
Status of stack walking in LLVM on Win64? |
| 3:49PM |
2 |
llvm 3.8.1 Release |
| 3:20PM |
1 |
[Openmp-dev] [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct |
| 3:16PM |
0 |
[Openmp-dev] [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct |
| 3:03PM |
1 |
Suggestion to Stop Cross Posting Discussions |
| 2:46PM |
0 |
creating Intrinsic DAG Node |
| 10:28AM |
0 |
Entry for llvm.org/ProjectsWithLLVM - Terra programming language |
| 10:09AM |
0 |
GCC prerequisites for building LLVM head? |
| 10:04AM |
2 |
GCC prerequisites for building LLVM head? |
| 9:12AM |
0 |
GCC prerequisites for building LLVM head? |
| 9:11AM |
0 |
Suggestion to Stop Cross Posting Discussions |
| 8:52AM |
0 |
Suggestion to Stop Cross Posting Discussions |
| 8:48AM |
2 |
[Openmp-dev] [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct |
| 8:10AM |
3 |
Suggestion to Stop Cross Posting Discussions |
| 7:46AM |
3 |
GCC prerequisites for building LLVM head? |
| 7:06AM |
0 |
llvm 3.8.1 Release |
| 4:32AM |
0 |
Suggestion to Stop Cross Posting Discussions |
| 3:28AM |
2 |
Can we get interprocedural register allocation work across module boundary? |
| 2:58AM |
2 |
Is llvm-dev no longer the place for 'Projects built with LLVM' submissions? |
| 1:56AM |
4 |
Should analyses be able to hold AssertingVH to IR? (related to PR28400) |
| 1:01AM |
0 |
Regarding ScalarEvolution's loop backedge computation |
| 1:01AM |
0 |
Updating release docs and minimal tools |
| |
| Tuesday July 5 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:50PM |
0 |
Suggestion to Stop Cross Posting Discussions |
| 11:32PM |
0 |
July LLVM bay-area social is this Thursday! |
| 11:31PM |
2 |
Suggestion to Stop Cross Posting Discussions |
| 11:25PM |
0 |
Adding a NOP bitcode instruction |
| 11:23PM |
0 |
Suggestion to Stop Cross Posting Discussions |
| 11:19PM |
0 |
llvm 3.8.1 Release |
| 11:14PM |
4 |
llvm 3.8.1 Release |
| 11:12PM |
0 |
llvm 3.8.1 Release |
| 11:03PM |
0 |
Sequential ID Git hook |
| 10:51PM |
2 |
llvm 3.8.1 Release |
| 10:49PM |
1 |
IR "canonicalization" |
| 10:49PM |
2 |
Adding a NOP bitcode instruction |
| 10:42PM |
1 |
missing opt in DAGCombiner ? |
| 10:30PM |
0 |
2016 LLVM Developers' Meeting - Bay Area: Registration Opening Today! |
| 10:14PM |
2 |
2016 LLVM Developers' Meeting - Bay Area: Registration Opening Today! |
| 10:05PM |
4 |
Suggestion to Stop Cross Posting Discussions |
| 9:45PM |
2 |
Sequential ID Git hook |
| 9:29PM |
0 |
2016 LLVM Developers' Meeting - Bay Area: Registration Opening Today! |
| 8:44PM |
1 |
Code owner for the XCore backend |
| 7:40PM |
1 |
Optimization issues (Alias Analysis?) |
| 7:04PM |
2 |
Suggestion to Stop Cross Posting Discussions |
| 6:59PM |
0 |
Suggestion to Stop Cross Posting Discussions |
| 6:52PM |
0 |
Optimization issues (Alias Analysis?) |
| 6:51PM |
4 |
Suggestion to Stop Cross Posting Discussions |
| 6:24PM |
0 |
Can we get interprocedural register allocation work across module boundary? |
| 6:09PM |
0 |
[Proposal][RFC] Cache aware Loop Cost Analysis |
| 4:28PM |
2 |
Can we get interprocedural register allocation work across module boundary? |
| 4:17PM |
2 |
List of optimizers |
| 4:03PM |
0 |
List of optimizers |
| 3:31PM |
2 |
List of optimizers |
| 3:27PM |
0 |
NVPTX compilation problems - ptxas error |
| 12:53PM |
2 |
Representing MIPS ABI information in the triple as ARM/X86 do for EABI/EABIHF/X32 |
| 11:13AM |
1 |
[llvm-foundation] Sequential ID Git hook |
| 10:44AM |
0 |
Sequential ID Git hook |
| 7:56AM |
1 |
[GSoC 2016] Implementation of the packing transformation |
| 6:55AM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Implementation of the packing transformation |
| |
| Monday July 4 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 10:45PM |
2 |
Status of stack walking in LLVM on Win64? |
| 5:17PM |
0 |
LLVM Weekly - #131, Jul 4th 2016 |
| 5:09PM |
2 |
[RFC] ASan: Reify all information relevant for diagnostics |
| 4:33PM |
2 |
LLVM Cauldron 2016 (Sep 8th, Hebden Bridge, UK) registration and call for papers now open |
| 4:05PM |
2 |
Optimization issues (Alias Analysis?) |
| 3:15PM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] Sequential ID Git hook |
| 2:21PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] Sequential ID Git hook |
| 11:27AM |
0 |
[lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct |
| 11:13AM |
4 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] Sequential ID Git hook |
| 10:33AM |
1 |
will 3.8.1 ever really have release tarballs? |
| 8:48AM |
3 |
Updating release docs and minimal tools |
| 8:27AM |
0 |
[XRay] RFC: LLVM-side Changes for nop-sleds |
| 8:20AM |
0 |
will 3.8.1 ever really have release tarballs? |
| 7:46AM |
2 |
will 3.8.1 ever really have release tarballs? |
| 7:39AM |
0 |
[XRay] RFC: LLVM-side Changes for nop-sleds |
| 6:44AM |
0 |
Status of stack walking in LLVM on Win64? |
| 6:22AM |
3 |
Status of stack walking in LLVM on Win64? |
| 6:05AM |
0 |
Status of stack walking in LLVM on Win64? |
| 5:50AM |
4 |
[XRay] RFC: LLVM-side Changes for nop-sleds |
| 5:34AM |
2 |
Status of stack walking in LLVM on Win64? |
| 5:01AM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] Sequential ID Git hook |
| 3:44AM |
0 |
Simple program fails to compile depending on target os |
| 2:51AM |
2 |
Simple program fails to compile depending on target os |
| 2:19AM |
0 |
Simple program fails to compile depending on target os |
| 1:37AM |
1 |
try/catch with std::errc::bad_address |
| 1:26AM |
2 |
Simple program fails to compile depending on target os |
| 12:49AM |
0 |
Status of stack walking in LLVM on Win64? |
| 12:40AM |
2 |
Path condition propagation |
| |
| Sunday July 3 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:42PM |
3 |
[lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct |
| 11:40PM |
0 |
Path condition propagation |
| 11:39PM |
2 |
Memory scope proposal |
| 11:13PM |
2 |
Path condition propagation |
| 10:23PM |
0 |
Path condition propagation |
| 9:58PM |
2 |
Path condition propagation |
| 9:51PM |
0 |
Path condition propagation |
| 9:17PM |
2 |
Status of stack walking in LLVM on Win64? |
| 5:48PM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] Sequential ID Git hook |
| 12:13PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] [Weekly Status] Interprocedural Register Allocation |
| 11:12AM |
0 |
[GSoC'16] Weekly Status - July 3 - Zhengyang Liu |
| 10:43AM |
0 |
clib `open` writes a linefeed to stdout when used in the JIT |
| 10:34AM |
2 |
clib `open` writes a linefeed to stdout when used in the JIT |
| 9:48AM |
0 |
Status of stack walking in LLVM on Win64? |
| 9:18AM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Implementation of the packing transformation |
| 12:22AM |
2 |
Status of stack walking in LLVM on Win64? |
| |
| Saturday July 2 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 7:16PM |
1 |
clang-ppc64be-linux-lnt flakiness |
| 3:29PM |
0 |
clang-ppc64be-linux-lnt flakiness |
| 11:45AM |
0 |
Help required regarding IPRA and Local Function optimization |
| 1:34AM |
3 |
2016 LLVM Developers' Meeting - Bay Area: Call for Papers! |
| |
| Friday July 1 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:37PM |
0 |
Help required regarding IPRA and Local Function optimization |
| 11:22PM |
0 |
[IPRA] Do we required more aggressive shrink-wrapping optimization? |
| 10:05PM |
0 |
Representing MIPS ABI information in the triple as ARM/X86 do for EABI/EABIHF/X32 |
| 9:52PM |
0 |
[lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct |
| 9:38PM |
1 |
Missing TargetPrefix for NVVM intrinsics |
| 9:35PM |
0 |
Missing TargetPrefix for NVVM intrinsics |
| 8:18PM |
0 |
How to resolve conflicts between sanitizer_common and system headers |
| 8:03PM |
2 |
How to resolve conflicts between sanitizer_common and system headers |
| 7:10PM |
0 |
How to resolve conflicts between sanitizer_common and system headers |
| 7:01PM |
2 |
Missing TargetPrefix for NVVM intrinsics |
| 6:53PM |
2 |
How to resolve conflicts between sanitizer_common and system headers |
| 6:32PM |
2 |
2016 LLVM Developers' Meeting - Bay Area: Registration Opening Today! |
| 6:16PM |
1 |
NDEBUG in Header Files |
| 5:57PM |
1 |
Implementing stack probes |
| 5:51PM |
1 |
Understanding a failure from ESan |
| 5:32PM |
3 |
[cfe-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct |
| 5:11PM |
0 |
NDEBUG in Header Files |
| 5:05PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct |
| 4:32PM |
0 |
[lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] Sequential ID Git hook |
| 4:09PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] Sequential ID Git hook |
| 3:18PM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] Sequential ID Git hook |
| 3:00PM |
0 |
PSA: llvm::cl now supports subcommands |
| 2:46PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct |
| 2:27PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct |
| 12:37PM |
2 |
NDEBUG in Header Files |
| 10:07AM |
0 |
Match LLVM IR back to assembly |
| 10:06AM |
0 |
[Proposal][RFC] Strided Memory Access Vectorization |
| 9:51AM |
0 |
Implementing stack probes |
| 8:06AM |
1 |
Path condition propagation |
| 7:19AM |
0 |
Path condition propagation |
| 3:45AM |
2 |
Path condition propagation |
| 2:41AM |
3 |
Path condition propagation |
| 1:45AM |
0 |
Path condition propagation |
| 1:09AM |
3 |
Path condition propagation |
| 1:05AM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] Sequential ID Git hook |