| Thursday June 30 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:48PM |
0 |
LLVM buildmaster will be restarted around 5 PM today |
| 11:31PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] Sequential ID Git hook |
| 11:14PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] Sequential ID Git hook |
| 11:01PM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct |
| 10:36PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct |
| 10:34PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct |
| 10:17PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] Sequential ID Git hook |
| 10:11PM |
5 |
[cfe-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct |
| 9:45PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct |
| 8:37PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct |
| 8:34PM |
1 |
Entry for llvm.org/ProjectsWithLLVM - Terra programming language |
| 8:23PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct |
| 8:18PM |
0 |
FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct |
| 7:25PM |
5 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] Sequential ID Git hook |
| 7:18PM |
0 |
[lldb-dev] FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct |
| 6:55PM |
9 |
FYI: Landing the initial draft for an LLVM Code of Conduct |
| 5:54PM |
2 |
PSA: llvm::cl now supports subcommands |
| 5:41PM |
1 |
[Proposal][RFC] Strided Memory Access Vectorization |
| 4:59PM |
1 |
Implementing stack probes |
| 4:49PM |
1 |
avx512 JIT backend generates wrong code on <4 x float> |
| 4:48PM |
0 |
[lldb-dev] Sequential ID Git hook |
| 4:33PM |
6 |
[lldb-dev] Sequential ID Git hook |
| 4:32PM |
0 |
Help required regarding IPRA and Local Function optimization |
| 4:16PM |
0 |
Sequential ID Git hook |
| 3:49PM |
1 |
Representing MIPS ABI information in the triple as ARM/X86 do for EABI/EABIHF/X32 |
| 3:31PM |
0 |
New Aggressive Dead Code Elimination (updated) |
| 3:29PM |
2 |
Implementing stack probes |
| 3:23PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 3:05PM |
0 |
Optimizations hindered by GVN widening |
| 12:55PM |
0 |
Building LLVM under Cygwin32 fails |
| 11:59AM |
1 |
How can I make llvm intrinsic functions declarations survive from optimizations. |
| 11:42AM |
6 |
Sequential ID Git hook |
| 11:38AM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] SAFECode's Memory Policy Hardening - Midterm Report - Zhengyang Liu |
| 10:56AM |
0 |
NVPTX compilation problems - ptxas error |
| 10:45AM |
0 |
LLVM APT authentication problem |
| 9:05AM |
1 |
Use iterator misunderstanding? |
| 8:51AM |
4 |
Help required regarding IPRA and Local Function optimization |
| 8:26AM |
2 |
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 8:16AM |
3 |
Building LLVM under Cygwin32 fails |
| 4:50AM |
0 |
[Proposal][RFC] Strided Memory Access Vectorization |
| 4:14AM |
0 |
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 4:03AM |
2 |
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 12:52AM |
1 |
Noob: need help with go bindings |
| 12:18AM |
0 |
FoldItoFPtoI patch |
| 12:01AM |
1 |
Regarding ScalarEvolution's loop backedge computation |
| |
| Wednesday June 29 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 10:48PM |
3 |
Regarding ScalarEvolution's loop backedge computation |
| 9:43PM |
0 |
Question about VectorLegalizer::ExpandStore() with v4i1 |
| 9:03PM |
1 |
clang-ppc64be-linux-lnt flakiness |
| 7:50PM |
0 |
Representing MIPS ABI information in the triple as ARM/X86 do for EABI/EABIHF/X32 |
| 7:48PM |
0 |
avx512 JIT backend generates wrong code on <4 x float> |
| 7:41PM |
2 |
avx512 JIT backend generates wrong code on <4 x float> |
| 7:34PM |
1 |
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 7:18PM |
0 |
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 7:14PM |
2 |
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 7:05PM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 7:04PM |
0 |
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 7:00PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 6:51PM |
2 |
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 5:19PM |
1 |
x86: How to Force 2-byte `jmp` instruction in lowering |
| 5:05PM |
0 |
x86: How to Force 2-byte `jmp` instruction in lowering |
| 4:44PM |
0 |
[intern ad] Compiler internship position in Samsung Austin R&D Center |
| 4:28PM |
0 |
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 4:27PM |
2 |
x86: How to Force 2-byte `jmp` instruction in lowering |
| 4:21PM |
0 |
Tail call optimization is getting affected due to local function related optimization with IPRA |
| 3:50PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 2:38PM |
1 |
x86: How to Force 2-byte `jmp` instruction in lowering |
| 2:11PM |
1 |
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 2:03PM |
0 |
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 1:28PM |
0 |
The clang for centos6 are need GLIBC_2.14, but we only have GLIB 2.12 by default. |
| 12:59PM |
0 |
Instruction selection problem with type i64 - mistaken as v8i64? |
| 8:47AM |
3 |
The clang for centos6 are need GLIBC_2.14, but we only have GLIB 2.12 by default. |
| 8:02AM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Implementation of the packing transformation |
| 7:35AM |
0 |
Noob: need help with go bindings |
| 6:49AM |
0 |
x86: How to Force 2-byte `jmp` instruction in lowering |
| 2:42AM |
2 |
clang-ppc64be-linux-lnt flakiness |
| 2:17AM |
2 |
x86: How to Force 2-byte `jmp` instruction in lowering |
| 2:14AM |
0 |
x86: How to Force 2-byte `jmp` instruction in lowering |
| 2:06AM |
2 |
x86: How to Force 2-byte `jmp` instruction in lowering |
| 12:22AM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] [lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| |
| Tuesday June 28 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:32PM |
2 |
Noob: need help with go bindings |
| 11:22PM |
0 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 10:54PM |
0 |
LLVM buildmaster will be restarted tonight |
| 9:37PM |
2 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 9:04PM |
0 |
Question about changes to 'SelectionDAGISel.h' |
| 8:38PM |
0 |
[lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 8:26PM |
0 |
[lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 8:17PM |
5 |
[cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] [lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 8:16PM |
1 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 7:55PM |
0 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 7:45PM |
6 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 7:43PM |
2 |
Instruction selection problem with type i64 - mistaken as v8i64? |
| 7:40PM |
0 |
SD virt regs question |
| 7:29PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 7:24PM |
0 |
Buildbot numbers for the last week of 6/19/2016 - 6/25/2016 |
| 7:22PM |
2 |
[lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 7:07PM |
0 |
[BUG] 3.8 alignment/struct padding |
| 7:04PM |
2 |
Tail call optimization is getting affected due to local function related optimization with IPRA |
| 7:01PM |
0 |
Tail call optimization is getting affected due to local function related optimization with IPRA |
| 6:59PM |
2 |
[BUG] 3.8 alignment/struct padding |
| 6:34PM |
0 |
LNT Python problem? |
| 6:34PM |
2 |
Tail call optimization is getting affected due to local function related optimization with IPRA |
| 6:27PM |
0 |
Tail call optimization is getting affected due to local function related optimization with IPRA |
| 6:26PM |
0 |
The clang for centos6 are need GLIBC_2.14, but we only have GLIB 2.12 by default. |
| 6:13PM |
2 |
The clang for centos6 are need GLIBC_2.14, but we only have GLIB 2.12 by default. |
| 5:55PM |
2 |
Question about changes to 'SelectionDAGISel.h' |
| 5:48PM |
0 |
[IPRA] Do we required more aggressive shrink-wrapping optimization? |
| 5:43PM |
3 |
[IPRA] Do we required more aggressive shrink-wrapping optimization? |
| 5:15PM |
0 |
The clang for centos6 are need GLIBC_2.14, but we only have GLIB 2.12 by default. |
| 5:09PM |
2 |
Tail call optimization is getting affected due to local function related optimization with IPRA |
| 4:53PM |
0 |
Tail call optimization is getting affected due to local function related optimization with IPRA |
| 4:50PM |
3 |
The clang for centos6 are need GLIBC_2.14, but we only have GLIB 2.12 by default. |
| 4:48PM |
0 |
The clang for centos6 are need GLIBC_2.14, but we only have GLIB 2.12 by default. |
| 4:43PM |
2 |
The clang for centos6 are need GLIBC_2.14, but we only have GLIB 2.12 by default. |
| 4:33PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 4:01PM |
0 |
Question about changes to 'SelectionDAGISel.h' |
| 3:53PM |
3 |
Question about changes to 'SelectionDAGISel.h' |
| 3:48PM |
0 |
Question about changes to 'SelectionDAGISel.h' |
| 3:46PM |
0 |
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 3:40PM |
0 |
[lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 2:51PM |
1 |
SVN almost dead, bots crazy |
| 2:49PM |
0 |
SVN almost dead, bots crazy |
| 2:41PM |
2 |
Tail call optimization is getting affected due to local function related optimization with IPRA |
| 2:39PM |
2 |
SVN almost dead, bots crazy |
| 1:59PM |
0 |
Finding caller-saved registers at a function call site |
| 1:15PM |
0 |
Question about Instruction Selection |
| 12:49PM |
2 |
Question about Instruction Selection |
| 12:44PM |
0 |
ENABLE_TIMESTAMPS and update to CMake v3.5.2 |
| 12:25PM |
3 |
ENABLE_TIMESTAMPS and update to CMake v3.5.2 |
| 12:11PM |
0 |
Question about Instruction Selection |
| 11:49AM |
2 |
Question about VectorLegalizer::ExpandStore() with v4i1 |
| 11:42AM |
2 |
Question about Instruction Selection |
| 10:30AM |
0 |
mutateType on AllocaInst problem |
| 9:45AM |
0 |
Question about VectorLegalizer::ExpandStore() with v4i1 |
| 9:21AM |
2 |
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 8:53AM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Implementation of the packing transformation |
| 8:50AM |
2 |
LNT Python problem? |
| 7:31AM |
2 |
XRay: Demo on x86_64/Linux almost done; some questions. |
| 5:55AM |
0 |
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 2:57AM |
5 |
[lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| |
| Monday June 27 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:57PM |
0 |
[lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 10:40PM |
2 |
[lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 10:38PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 10:30PM |
0 |
Filter optimization remarks by the hotness of the code region |
| 10:29PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 8:05PM |
3 |
Finding caller-saved registers at a function call site |
| 7:37PM |
0 |
Finding caller-saved registers at a function call site |
| 6:58PM |
0 |
Why not do machine instruction scheduling in SSA form? |
| 6:29PM |
0 |
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs? |
| 6:19PM |
1 |
Loop unrolling parameters |
| 6:14PM |
0 |
[MemorySSA] Potential bug in MemoryUse defining access calculation |
| 5:52PM |
1 |
Building an array in a section from multiple object files |
| 5:27PM |
2 |
[MemorySSA] Potential bug in MemoryUse defining access calculation |
| 5:23PM |
0 |
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs? |
| 5:16PM |
2 |
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs? |
| 4:25PM |
0 |
Tail call optimization is getting affected due to local function related optimization with IPRA |
| 4:13PM |
6 |
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 4:03PM |
0 |
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 3:36PM |
0 |
How to traverse llvm DAG for analysis |
| 3:26PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 3:10PM |
2 |
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 3:03PM |
2 |
How to traverse llvm DAG for analysis |
| 2:51PM |
0 |
LLVM Weekly - #130, Jun 27th 2016 |
| 2:39PM |
0 |
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 2:28PM |
3 |
Finding caller-saved registers at a function call site |
| 2:10PM |
1 |
[GSoC'16] Weekly Status - June 27 - Zhengyang Liu |
| 11:39AM |
3 |
Why not do machine instruction scheduling in SSA form? |
| 11:00AM |
1 |
Parsing llvm IR |
| 10:48AM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Implementation of the packing transformation |
| 10:18AM |
3 |
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 10:14AM |
0 |
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs? |
| 7:39AM |
5 |
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs? |
| 7:16AM |
0 |
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs? |
| 7:12AM |
2 |
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs? |
| 6:04AM |
0 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 6:00AM |
2 |
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs? |
| 5:50AM |
0 |
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs? |
| 5:21AM |
2 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 4:53AM |
0 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 4:39AM |
2 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 4:30AM |
0 |
Building an array in a section from multiple object files |
| 12:20AM |
0 |
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| |
| Sunday June 26 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:32PM |
2 |
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 10:46PM |
1 |
Can some categories be added to the "LLD" bugzilla product? |
| 10:02PM |
0 |
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 9:39PM |
7 |
Git Move: GitHub+modules proposal |
| 8:20PM |
4 |
[cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 5:01PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 4:35PM |
3 |
Tail call optimization is getting affected due to local function related optimization with IPRA |
| 2:21PM |
2 |
What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 12:48PM |
3 |
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs? |
| 12:31PM |
0 |
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs? |
| 11:48AM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] [Weekly Status] Interprocedural Register Allocation |
| 8:45AM |
2 |
[LLVM/Clang v3.8.1] Missing Git branches/tags and source-tarballs? |
| 2:38AM |
0 |
Memory scope proposal |
| |
| Saturday June 25 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 7:56PM |
0 |
Tail call optimization is getting affected due to local function related optimization with IPRA |
| 5:33PM |
3 |
Tail call optimization is getting affected due to local function related optimization with IPRA |
| 4:44PM |
0 |
Get variable declaration type as String sometimes gives me wrong types. |
| 3:05PM |
2 |
Memory scope proposal |
| 2:17PM |
0 |
ASTVisitor Tutorial Makefile |
| 2:08PM |
0 |
[isl-dev] Application of a piecewise quasi-affine transformation to a band node |
| 6:52AM |
2 |
Question about VectorLegalizer::ExpandStore() with v4i1 |
| 2:03AM |
0 |
Unit testing generated IR |
| 12:55AM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 12:43AM |
2 |
What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| |
| Friday June 24 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:41PM |
0 |
What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 10:49PM |
0 |
Can some categories be added to the "LLD" bugzilla product? |
| 10:36PM |
0 |
Suggestion / Help regarding new calling convention |
| 8:50PM |
3 |
creating Intrinsic DAG Node |
| 6:35PM |
2 |
Suggestion / Help regarding new calling convention |
| 6:33PM |
0 |
Strange opt result |
| 3:47PM |
0 |
creating Intrinsic DAG Node |
| 3:32PM |
2 |
Strange opt result |
| 2:53PM |
2 |
creating Intrinsic DAG Node |
| 2:49PM |
0 |
creating Intrinsic DAG Node |
| 12:59PM |
1 |
Newbie developer looking to contribute |
| 12:51PM |
0 |
[llvm-foundation] apt repositories back! |
| 12:36PM |
2 |
[llvm-foundation] apt repositories back! |
| 12:04PM |
0 |
Application of a piecewise quasi-affine transformation to a band node |
| 10:02AM |
7 |
Representing MIPS ABI information in the triple as ARM/X86 do for EABI/EABIHF/X32 |
| 7:45AM |
2 |
Questions on LLVM vectorization diagnostics |
| 7:22AM |
6 |
RFC: Strong GC References in LLVM |
| 4:07AM |
0 |
Regarding a TODO in InstructionCombining |
| 2:31AM |
0 |
RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 12:38AM |
0 |
Fwd: Buildbot numbers for the last week of 6/12/2016 - 6/18/2016 |
| |
| Thursday June 23 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 7:06PM |
3 |
[Proposal][RFC] Cache aware Loop Cost Analysis |
| 6:23PM |
2 |
Building an array in a section from multiple object files |
| 6:15PM |
4 |
[cfe-dev] clang++ build from source is not able to find C++ headers |
| 6:04PM |
0 |
[Proposal][RFC] Cache aware Loop Cost Analysis |
| 5:58PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] clang++ build from source is not able to find C++ headers |
| 5:56PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] clang++ build from source is not able to find C++ headers |
| 5:45PM |
0 |
Questions on LLVM vectorization diagnostics |
| 5:35PM |
0 |
Building an array in a section from multiple object files |
| 5:28PM |
2 |
[Proposal][RFC] Cache aware Loop Cost Analysis |
| 5:26PM |
2 |
Building an array in a section from multiple object files |
| 5:13PM |
0 |
[llvm-foundation] apt repositories back! |
| 5:09PM |
1 |
AVX512 instruction generated when JIT compiling for an avx2 architecture |
| 5:07PM |
0 |
AVX512 instruction generated when JIT compiling for an avx2 architecture |
| 5:00PM |
2 |
AVX512 instruction generated when JIT compiling for an avx2 architecture |
| 4:56PM |
3 |
apt repositories back! |
| 4:56PM |
0 |
AVX512 instruction generated when JIT compiling for an avx2 architecture |
| 4:53PM |
2 |
AVX512 instruction generated when JIT compiling for an avx2 architecture |
| 3:44PM |
0 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 3:32PM |
1 |
DAGCombiner folds (xor (and x, y), y) -> (and (not x), y). Can I do the reverse for a target? |
| 3:20PM |
4 |
Questions on LLVM vectorization diagnostics |
| 2:06PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] clang++ build from source is not able to find C++ headers |
| 1:31PM |
2 |
clang++ build from source is not able to find C++ headers |
| 12:29PM |
1 |
Help building llvm on freebsd 8.4 |
| 10:49AM |
0 |
[Release-testers] 3.8.1-final has been tagged |
| 10:08AM |
2 |
[Release-testers] 3.8.1-final has been tagged |
| 9:56AM |
0 |
[Release-testers] 3.8.1-final has been tagged |
| 9:42AM |
0 |
[lld] support --trace-symbol option |
| 9:37AM |
3 |
Can some categories be added to the "LLD" bugzilla product? |
| 9:05AM |
0 |
Help building llvm on freebsd 8.4 |
| 8:52AM |
1 |
[Release-testers] 3.8.1-final has been tagged |
| 7:44AM |
0 |
How can I make llvm intrinsic functions declarations survive from optimizations. |
| 6:46AM |
2 |
How can I make llvm intrinsic functions declarations survive from optimizations. |
| 4:24AM |
0 |
[Proposal][RFC] Cache aware Loop Cost Analysis |
| 2:36AM |
2 |
RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 1:33AM |
1 |
[GSoC 2016] Polly as an Analysis pass - Midterm report |
| 12:59AM |
2 |
Help building llvm on freebsd 8.4 |
| 12:55AM |
0 |
3.8.1-final has been tagged |
| |
| Wednesday June 22 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 9:42PM |
1 |
Help building llvm on freebsd 8.4 |
| 9:01PM |
0 |
Finding caller-saved registers at a function call site |
| 9:01PM |
0 |
Help building llvm on freebsd 8.4 |
| 8:50PM |
0 |
Memory scope proposal |
| 8:44PM |
7 |
3.8.1-final has been tagged |
| 8:36PM |
0 |
x86: How to Force 2-byte `jmp` instruction in lowering |
| 8:10PM |
1 |
LLVM Backend Issues |
| 8:05PM |
4 |
Help building llvm on freebsd 8.4 |
| 7:55PM |
3 |
Finding caller-saved registers at a function call site |
| 7:23PM |
0 |
LLVM Backend Issues |
| 6:25PM |
2 |
LLVM Backend Issues |
| 6:00PM |
1 |
[RFC] Allow loop vectorizer to choose vector widths that generate illegal types |
| 5:40PM |
2 |
x86: How to Force 2-byte `jmp` instruction in lowering |
| 5:27PM |
1 |
[iovisor-dev] [PATCH, BPF 0/5] Minor improvements to the bpf backend |
| 5:15PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Polly as an Analysis pass - Midterm report |
| 4:47PM |
1 |
pass invalidation |
| 4:36PM |
0 |
x86: How to Force 2-byte `jmp` instruction in lowering |
| 4:14PM |
3 |
x86: How to Force 2-byte `jmp` instruction in lowering |
| 3:45PM |
0 |
[RFC] Allow loop vectorizer to choose vector widths that generate illegal types |
| 2:39PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Enabling Polyhedral Optimizations in Julia - Midterm Report |
| 1:14PM |
0 |
Few mistakes on TypeBuilder.h |
| 1:04PM |
0 |
x86: How to Force 2-byte `jmp` instruction in lowering |
| 9:06AM |
0 |
[LLD] thunk implementation correctness depends on order of input section. |
| 7:10AM |
2 |
x86: How to Force 2-byte `jmp` instruction in lowering |
| 6:15AM |
0 |
pass invalidation |
| 6:02AM |
0 |
pass invalidation |
| 5:40AM |
2 |
[LLD] thunk implementation correctness depends on order of input section. |
| 2:29AM |
0 |
[LLD] thunk implementation correctness depends on order of input section. |
| 2:09AM |
1 |
dumb question about CG ISel pattern matching |
| 12:15AM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Enabling Polyhedral Optimizations in Julia - Midterm Report |
| |
| Tuesday June 21 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:37PM |
0 |
Job Ad: Open Position in Apple's LLVM Compiler Team |
| 11:07PM |
1 |
[GSoC 2016] Better Alias Analysis By Default - Mid Term Summary |
| 10:50PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Better Alias Analysis By Default - Mid Term Summary |
| 10:29PM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Better Alias Analysis By Default - Mid Term Summary |
| 8:47PM |
1 |
Supporting sub commands in LLVM command line tools |
| 8:18PM |
1 |
DAGCombiner folds (xor (and x, y), y) -> (and (not x), y). Can I do the reverse for a target? |
| 6:07PM |
0 |
Publication: "Archer: Effectively Spotting Data Races in Large OpenMP Applications" |
| 6:06PM |
0 |
Suggestion / Help regarding new calling convention |
| 5:08PM |
0 |
Dragonegg on GCC-6 |
| 4:49PM |
1 |
DAGCombiner folds (xor (and x, y), y) -> (and (not x), y). Can I do the reverse for a target? |
| 4:48PM |
1 |
Attempt to modify memory sanitizer for support of X86 |
| 4:45PM |
0 |
Dragonegg on GCC-6 |
| 4:27PM |
3 |
Suggestion / Help regarding new calling convention |
| 4:19PM |
0 |
LLVM Backend Issues |
| 4:12PM |
3 |
LLVM Backend Issues |
| 4:01PM |
5 |
pass invalidation |
| 3:28PM |
0 |
Suggestion / Help regarding new calling convention |
| 2:50PM |
0 |
function call replacement |
| 2:18PM |
0 |
FireFox-46.0.1 build with interprocedural register allocation enabled |
| 2:07PM |
0 |
What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 1:18PM |
2 |
Publication and project for inclusion? |
| 12:38PM |
2 |
[LLD] thunk implementation correctness depends on order of input section. |
| 11:40AM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] [Release-testers] 3.8.1-rc1 has been tagged |
| 10:41AM |
0 |
[Release-testers] 3.8.1-rc1 has been tagged |
| 9:42AM |
2 |
[lld] support --trace-symbol option |
| 8:45AM |
0 |
what became LLC -march=cpp? |
| 8:43AM |
2 |
what became LLC -march=cpp? |
| 8:29AM |
1 |
FireFox-46.0.1 build with interprocedural register allocation enabled |
| 8:10AM |
3 |
function call replacement |
| 7:34AM |
1 |
[GSoC 2016] Improvement of vectorization process in Polly - Mid term report |
| 6:38AM |
5 |
What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 4:56AM |
0 |
What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 4:29AM |
2 |
Suggestion / Help regarding new calling convention |
| 3:56AM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] [Weekly Status] Interprocedural Register Allocation |
| 3:28AM |
0 |
FireFox-46.0.1 build with interprocedural register allocation enabled |
| 3:28AM |
0 |
FireFox-46.0.1 build with interprocedural register allocation enabled |
| 12:28AM |
0 |
FireFox-46.0.1 build with interprocedural register allocation enabled |
| |
| Monday June 20 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:27PM |
0 |
RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 11:00PM |
6 |
RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 10:32PM |
1 |
Quality of LLVM headers |
| 8:50PM |
0 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 8:46PM |
0 |
pass invalidation |
| 8:30PM |
0 |
FireFox-46.0.1 build with interprocedural register allocation enabled |
| 8:17PM |
2 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 8:15PM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] [Weekly Status] Interprocedural Register Allocation |
| 7:53PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] [Weekly Status] Interprocedural Register Allocation |
| 7:22PM |
4 |
FireFox-46.0.1 build with interprocedural register allocation enabled |
| 7:16PM |
0 |
Quality of LLVM headers |
| 7:07PM |
2 |
Quality of LLVM headers |
| 7:01PM |
0 |
Suggestion / Help regarding new calling convention |
| 7:00PM |
2 |
FireFox-46.0.1 build with interprocedural register allocation enabled |
| 6:59PM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] [Weekly Status] Interprocedural Register Allocation |
| 5:59PM |
0 |
Quality of LLVM headers |
| 5:05PM |
2 |
Quality of LLVM headers |
| 4:36PM |
0 |
FireFox-46.0.1 build with interprocedural register allocation enabled |
| 4:35PM |
0 |
FireFox-46.0.1 build with interprocedural register allocation enabled |
| 4:18PM |
1 |
Suggestion / Help regarding new calling convention |
| 3:43PM |
1 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 3:25PM |
0 |
Suggestion / Help regarding new calling convention |
| 3:12PM |
0 |
Suggestion / Help regarding new calling convention |
| 3:01PM |
0 |
Question about Safecode optimizations |
| 2:45PM |
0 |
function call replacement |
| 2:39PM |
7 |
Suggestion / Help regarding new calling convention |
| 1:02PM |
0 |
RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 12:28PM |
0 |
Pointer to a vector as an argument to memcpy |
| 12:00PM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Polly as an Analysis pass - Midterm report |
| 11:17AM |
0 |
LLVM Weekly - #129, Jun 20th 2016 |
| 11:17AM |
3 |
function call replacement |
| 10:40AM |
0 |
[GSoC'16] Weekly Status - June 19 - Zhengyang Liu |
| 10:21AM |
0 |
Linker failures in debug build - compiler/linker poll? |
| 9:40AM |
0 |
Pre-built snapshots of trunk |
| 9:17AM |
3 |
Pre-built snapshots of trunk |
| 8:01AM |
0 |
Pre-built snapshots of trunk |
| 6:51AM |
1 |
Question about Safecode optimizations |
| 6:47AM |
0 |
llvm-bjdump and ELF-ARM/Thumb |
| 5:37AM |
2 |
llvm-bjdump and ELF-ARM/Thumb |
| 4:40AM |
1 |
commad "dot" cannot show the complete the control-flow graph in the QED-CFCSS |
| 4:37AM |
2 |
FireFox-46.0.1 build with interprocedural register allocation enabled |
| 1:29AM |
0 |
the branch injection for test on QED:CFCSS |
| |
| Sunday June 19 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 10:45PM |
0 |
RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 10:44PM |
0 |
FireFox-46.0.1 build with interprocedural register allocation enabled |
| 8:52PM |
3 |
Pre-built snapshots of trunk |
| 7:24PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] [Weekly Status] Interprocedural Register Allocation |
| 6:41PM |
8 |
FireFox-46.0.1 build with interprocedural register allocation enabled |
| 5:36PM |
0 |
pass invalidation |
| 5:26PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] [Weekly Status] Interprocedural Register Allocation |
| 5:21PM |
3 |
What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 4:36PM |
1 |
[patch] fix Thumb text sections' flags under COFF/Windows |
| 3:57PM |
0 |
Quality of LLVM headers |
| 3:24PM |
2 |
Quality of LLVM headers |
| 3:05PM |
4 |
pass invalidation |
| 2:51PM |
0 |
[CSI] RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 2:31PM |
2 |
Linker failures in debug build - compiler/linker poll? |
| 1:03PM |
0 |
llvm-bjdump and ELF-ARM/Thumb |
| 12:49PM |
2 |
RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 12:45PM |
2 |
llvm-bjdump and ELF-ARM/Thumb |
| 11:29AM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] [Weekly Status] Interprocedural Register Allocation |
| 9:28AM |
0 |
pass invalidation |
| 7:59AM |
0 |
pass invalidation |
| 7:25AM |
0 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 7:01AM |
0 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 5:44AM |
6 |
pass invalidation |
| 4:20AM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 4:16AM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 12:45AM |
0 |
Failed to build r273101 |
| |
| Saturday June 18 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 10:58PM |
0 |
Supporting sub commands in LLVM command line tools |
| 6:51PM |
0 |
data flow graph |
| 6:43PM |
1 |
[GSoC 2016] Capture Tracking Improvements - Mid term report |
| 6:38PM |
2 |
data flow graph |
| 6:24PM |
0 |
data flow graph |
| 5:18PM |
0 |
llvm-dev Digest, Vol 144, Issue 93 |
| 11:34AM |
1 |
Linker failures in debug build - compiler/linker poll? |
| 11:01AM |
2 |
Supporting sub commands in LLVM command line tools |
| 10:34AM |
1 |
[Release-testers] 3.8.1-rc1 has been tagged |
| 8:31AM |
0 |
[Release-testers] 3.8.1-rc1 has been tagged |
| 6:20AM |
1 |
Supporting sub commands in LLVM command line tools |
| 5:46AM |
1 |
Supporting sub commands in LLVM command line tools |
| 5:37AM |
0 |
Supporting sub commands in LLVM command line tools |
| 5:29AM |
2 |
Supporting sub commands in LLVM command line tools |
| 1:58AM |
0 |
Supporting sub commands in LLVM command line tools |
| 12:30AM |
2 |
[Proposal][RFC] Strided Memory Access Vectorization |
| 12:00AM |
4 |
Supporting sub commands in LLVM command line tools |
| |
| Friday June 17 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:40PM |
1 |
[Proposal][RFC] Strided Memory Access Vectorization |
| 9:27PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Capture Tracking Improvements - Mid term report |
| 8:25PM |
0 |
RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 6:56PM |
0 |
RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 6:54PM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Capture Tracking Improvements - Mid term report |
| 6:42PM |
4 |
RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 6:27PM |
0 |
RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 5:32PM |
0 |
RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 5:13PM |
0 |
Attempt to modify memory sanitizer for support of X86 |
| 3:03PM |
0 |
[Openmp-dev] parallel-lib: New LLVM Suproject |
| 1:29PM |
3 |
RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 1:18PM |
0 |
question about ARM 32 big endian |
| 12:02PM |
2 |
Attempt to modify memory sanitizer for support of X86 |
| 10:22AM |
2 |
question about ARM 32 big endian |
| 7:49AM |
3 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 7:27AM |
0 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 7:10AM |
2 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 6:51AM |
0 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 6:38AM |
1 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 6:07AM |
2 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 6:05AM |
0 |
[Proposal][RFC] Strided Memory Access Vectorization |
| 5:48AM |
0 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 5:47AM |
0 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 5:36AM |
2 |
RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 5:16AM |
5 |
RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 4:53AM |
5 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 12:13AM |
1 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| |
| Thursday June 16 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:43PM |
0 |
BrainF |
| 11:02PM |
1 |
assumptions about assume, was: RE: Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 10:27PM |
0 |
RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 9:50PM |
2 |
RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 9:03PM |
1 |
[iovisor-dev] [PATCH, BPF 1/5] BPF: Use a provisional ELF e_machine value |
| 8:59PM |
0 |
[iovisor-dev] [PATCH, BPF 1/5] BPF: Use a provisional ELF e_machine value |
| 8:55PM |
0 |
RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 8:50PM |
0 |
[iovisor-dev] [PATCH, BPF 5/5] BPF: Add 32-bit and pattern |
| 8:29PM |
1 |
Compiling llvm+clang v3.5 with Visual Studio 2015 |
| 8:25PM |
0 |
[iovisor-dev] [PATCH, BPF 4/5] BPF: Add 32-bit move patterns |
| 7:55PM |
2 |
[iovisor-dev] [PATCH, BPF 1/5] BPF: Use a provisional ELF e_machine value |
| 7:51PM |
0 |
RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 7:48PM |
0 |
RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 7:42PM |
0 |
RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 7:30PM |
3 |
[Openmp-dev] parallel-lib: New LLVM Suproject |
| 7:29PM |
2 |
GlobalContext |
| 6:55PM |
0 |
[Openmp-dev] parallel-lib: New LLVM Suproject |
| 6:23PM |
4 |
RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 6:12PM |
0 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 6:05PM |
2 |
[Openmp-dev] parallel-lib: New LLVM Suproject |
| 5:59PM |
0 |
[Openmp-dev] parallel-lib: New LLVM Suproject |
| 5:52PM |
0 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 5:50PM |
3 |
parallel-lib: New LLVM Suproject |
| 5:45PM |
2 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 5:23PM |
0 |
[RFC] Allow loop vectorizer to choose vector widths that generate illegal types |
| 5:13PM |
0 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 5:02PM |
0 |
[lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 4:57PM |
0 |
[iovisor-dev] [PATCH, BPF 1/5] BPF: Use a provisional ELF e_machine value |
| 4:37PM |
0 |
__clang_call_terminate referenced in ...; defined in discarded section |
| 4:14PM |
0 |
RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 4:09PM |
0 |
[RFC] Allow loop vectorizer to choose vector widths that generate illegal types |
| 4:01PM |
10 |
RFC: Comprehensive Static Instrumentation |
| 2:15PM |
2 |
data flow graph |
| 2:15PM |
2 |
[RFC] Allow loop vectorizer to choose vector widths that generate illegal types |
| 2:04PM |
0 |
Save dag dot files |
| 1:23PM |
0 |
LLVM IR symbolic address operand to be treated as immediate value |
| 1:10PM |
0 |
Adapting TableGen |
| 11:48AM |
5 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 9:46AM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 8:43AM |
0 |
Sincos for X86_64's GNUX32 and ARM's GNUEABI/GNUEABIHF enviroments |
| 7:41AM |
0 |
[RFC] Allow loop vectorizer to choose vector widths that generate illegal types |
| 7:20AM |
1 |
[RFC] Allow loop vectorizer to choose vector widths that generate illegal types |
| 6:46AM |
0 |
[RFC] Allow loop vectorizer to choose vector widths that generate illegal types |
| 6:24AM |
2 |
[RFC] Allow loop vectorizer to choose vector widths that generate illegal types |
| 5:41AM |
1 |
[iovisor-dev] [PATCH, BPF 5/5] BPF: Add 32-bit and pattern |
| 5:38AM |
1 |
[iovisor-dev] [PATCH, BPF 4/5] BPF: Add 32-bit move patterns |
| 5:23AM |
1 |
[iovisor-dev] [PATCH, BPF 2/5] BPF: Rearrange instruction classes |
| 5:14AM |
2 |
[iovisor-dev] [PATCH, BPF 1/5] BPF: Use a provisional ELF e_machine value |
| 3:44AM |
0 |
parallel-lib: New LLVM Suproject |
| |
| Wednesday June 15 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:40PM |
3 |
[Proposal][RFC] Strided Memory Access Vectorization |
| 11:12PM |
0 |
[RFC] Allow loop vectorizer to choose vector widths that generate illegal types |
| 10:47PM |
8 |
[RFC] Allow loop vectorizer to choose vector widths that generate illegal types |
| 9:29PM |
1 |
How to get all opcode of the same type? |
| 8:38PM |
0 |
[Proposal][RFC] Strided Memory Access |
| 4:12PM |
0 |
[Proposal][RFC] Cache aware Loop Cost Analysis |
| 2:10PM |
0 |
[RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| 10:24AM |
2 |
Sincos for X86_64's GNUX32 and ARM's GNUEABI/GNUEABIHF enviroments |
| 10:22AM |
1 |
LLVM as a project dependency |
| 6:29AM |
0 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 6:16AM |
0 |
[Proposal][RFC] Strided Memory Access Vectorization |
| 4:41AM |
1 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 4:21AM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 3:15AM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] [Weekly Status] Interprocedural Register Allocation |
| 3:10AM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] [Weekly Status] Interprocedural Register Allocation |
| 2:52AM |
1 |
Stack maps on AArch64 |
| 2:51AM |
1 |
(no subject) |
| 2:04AM |
0 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 1:59AM |
0 |
Buildbot numbers for the last week of 6/05/2016 - 6/11/2016 |
| 1:48AM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 1:22AM |
2 |
[RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| 1:09AM |
0 |
[RFC] Embedded bitcode and related upstream (Part II) |
| 12:46AM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] [Weekly Status] Interprocedural Register Allocation |
| |
| Tuesday June 14 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:47PM |
1 |
LLVM IR intrinsics placeholder for strings (inline assembly) |
| 11:23PM |
2 |
Buildbot numbers for the last week of 6/05/2016 - 6/11/2016 |
| 11:20PM |
0 |
llvm intrinsics/libc/libm question |
| 11:14PM |
0 |
Stack maps on AArch64 |
| 11:01PM |
1 |
[RFC] Embedded bitcode and related upstream (Part II) |
| 10:27PM |
0 |
[RFC] Embedded bitcode and related upstream (Part II) |
| 9:53PM |
1 |
Type discrepancies in LLVM Bitcode |
| 8:25PM |
0 |
[RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| 7:51PM |
0 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 7:49PM |
0 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 6:51PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 6:48PM |
4 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 6:22PM |
4 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 6:11PM |
0 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 5:54PM |
0 |
BuildMaster Problems? |
| 5:45PM |
3 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 5:39PM |
2 |
BuildMaster Problems? |
| 5:38PM |
0 |
[RFC] LLVM Directory Structure Changes (was Re: [PATCH] D20992: [CMake] Add LLVM runtimes directory) |
| 5:36PM |
0 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 5:19PM |
5 |
[RFC] LLVM Directory Structure Changes (was Re: [PATCH] D20992: [CMake] Add LLVM runtimes directory) |
| 5:15PM |
2 |
llvm intrinsics/libc/libm question |
| 4:40PM |
0 |
[RFC] LLVM Directory Structure Changes (was Re: [PATCH] D20992: [CMake] Add LLVM runtimes directory) |
| 3:58PM |
0 |
llvm intrinsics/libc/libm question |
| 1:21PM |
1 |
Calling a null pointer. How undefined it is? |
| 9:12AM |
0 |
LLVM IR intrinsics placeholder for strings [was Re: Back end with special loop instructions (using LLVM IR intrinsics)] |
| 9:06AM |
0 |
Calling a null pointer. How undefined it is? |
| 8:32AM |
4 |
[cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 7:43AM |
3 |
[lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 4:15AM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Mid Term Report |
| 4:07AM |
2 |
Calling a null pointer. How undefined it is? |
| 4:04AM |
0 |
[lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 3:07AM |
0 |
clang-ppc64be-linux-lnt flakiness |
| 2:52AM |
1 |
Is addrspace info available during instruction scheduling? |
| 1:27AM |
2 |
Stack maps on AArch64 |
| 1:06AM |
0 |
LLVM APT packages - when will they be back? |
| 12:56AM |
2 |
[lldb-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 12:38AM |
0 |
Stack maps on AArch64 |
| 12:03AM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 12:01AM |
0 |
What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| |
| Monday June 13 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:54PM |
11 |
What version comes after 3.9? (Was: [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers) |
| 11:42PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM loop vectorizer - changing vectorized code |
| 11:03PM |
2 |
[Proposal][RFC] Cache aware Loop Cost Analysis |
| 10:59PM |
1 |
Loop vectorizer Queires |
| 10:24PM |
0 |
Loop vectorizer Queires |
| 10:07PM |
0 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 10:05PM |
2 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 10:03PM |
2 |
Loop vectorizer Queires |
| 8:07PM |
2 |
Stack maps on AArch64 |
| 7:31PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM loop vectorizer - changing vectorized code |
| 7:22PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM loop vectorizer - changing vectorized code |
| 7:14PM |
0 |
Is addrspace info available during instruction scheduling? |
| 6:55PM |
2 |
Is addrspace info available during instruction scheduling? |
| 6:44PM |
2 |
LLVM IR intrinsics placeholder for strings [was Re: Back end with special loop instructions (using LLVM IR intrinsics)] |
| 6:23PM |
0 |
[3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers |
| 6:01PM |
2 |
parallel-lib: New LLVM Suproject |
| 5:58PM |
3 |
LLVM APT packages - when will they be back? |
| 5:30PM |
2 |
[lldb-dev] [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers |
| 5:22PM |
0 |
[lldb-dev] [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers |
| 5:02PM |
2 |
[3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers |
| 4:58PM |
0 |
Stack maps on AArch64 |
| 4:37PM |
5 |
[RFC] Embedded bitcode and related upstream (Part II) |
| 4:26PM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers |
| 4:24PM |
0 |
[3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers |
| 2:47PM |
4 |
[3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers |
| 2:24PM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers |
| 2:11PM |
0 |
[3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers |
| 1:23PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers |
| 1:14PM |
7 |
[3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers |
| 1:06PM |
0 |
[3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers |
| 12:49PM |
0 |
Semantics of preserve_all calling convention |
| 12:03PM |
0 |
LLVM Weekly - #128, June 13th 2016 |
| 10:03AM |
0 |
GSoC Midterms |
| 9:08AM |
1 |
[GSoC 2016] [Weekly Status] Capture Tracking Improvements |
| 9:04AM |
0 |
[GSoC'16] Weekly Status - Zhengyang Liu |
| 8:59AM |
1 |
[GSoC'16] Weekly Status - Zhengyang Liu |
| 6:44AM |
0 |
[RFC] Embedded bitcode and related upstream (Part II) |
| 4:50AM |
0 |
GEP index canonicalization |
| 1:40AM |
3 |
[RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| 12:19AM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [Release-testers] 3.8.1-rc1 has been tagged |
| |
| Sunday June 12 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 6:38PM |
0 |
[RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| 6:31PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] [Release-testers] 3.8.1-rc1 has been tagged |
| 4:31PM |
2 |
[RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| 4:09PM |
2 |
Regarding a TODO in InstructionCombining |
| 2:32PM |
2 |
clang-ppc64be-linux-lnt flakiness |
| 2:26PM |
0 |
clang-ppc64be-linux-lnt flakiness |
| 1:11PM |
1 |
Can I dump LLVM IR after each pass in Clang BackendUtil.cpp |
| 12:38PM |
0 |
Can I dump LLVM IR after each pass in Clang BackendUtil.cpp |
| 12:27PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers |
| 12:04PM |
0 |
Tracing global variables use in llvm |
| 11:51AM |
4 |
[RFC] LLVM Directory Structure Changes (was Re: [PATCH] D20992: [CMake] Add LLVM runtimes directory) |
| 9:33AM |
0 |
Tracing global variables use in llvm |
| 8:41AM |
2 |
clang-ppc64be-linux-lnt flakiness |
| 4:49AM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] [Weekly Status] Interprocedural Register Allocation |
| 4:46AM |
0 |
C/c++ source file VS LLVM module NamedMetadata |
| 4:16AM |
0 |
[RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| 4:11AM |
2 |
[RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| 1:17AM |
2 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 1:09AM |
0 |
[RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| 1:08AM |
0 |
[RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| 1:07AM |
0 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 12:47AM |
2 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 12:43AM |
2 |
[RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| |
| Saturday June 11 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:35PM |
0 |
[RFC] LLVM Directory Structure Changes (was Re: [PATCH] D20992: [CMake] Add LLVM runtimes directory) |
| 10:18PM |
1 |
Temporary alternative: [was: Re: IMPORTANT: APT repo temporary switched off] |
| 7:26PM |
0 |
Temporary alternative: [was: Re: IMPORTANT: APT repo temporary switched off] |
| 7:22PM |
2 |
Temporary alternative: [was: Re: IMPORTANT: APT repo temporary switched off] |
| 5:57PM |
0 |
Temporary alternative: [was: Re: IMPORTANT: APT repo temporary switched off] |
| 5:52PM |
2 |
Temporary alternative: [was: Re: IMPORTANT: APT repo temporary switched off] |
| 4:32PM |
1 |
Module with a Target-incompatible DataLayout attached |
| 3:59PM |
1 |
SegFault creating a ExecutionEngine |
| 2:54PM |
0 |
SegFault creating a ExecutionEngine |
| 9:35AM |
0 |
SegFault creating a ExecutionEngine |
| 9:29AM |
3 |
SegFault creating a ExecutionEngine |
| 7:58AM |
1 |
Unable to build and install LLVM on Mac OSX 10.11 |
| 5:32AM |
0 |
[RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| 4:58AM |
0 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 4:01AM |
0 |
LLVM meeting at HPCA/PPoPP/CGO 2017 in Austin |
| 2:40AM |
4 |
[RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| 2:33AM |
1 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 2:00AM |
2 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 1:32AM |
0 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 12:59AM |
4 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 12:38AM |
0 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 12:38AM |
1 |
Notice of Green Dragon downtime |
| 12:34AM |
3 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 12:25AM |
0 |
[RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| 12:06AM |
1 |
MCJIT -- Poor run-time performance for Fibonacci example in LLVM 3.8.1 |
| 12:05AM |
0 |
Fwd: [RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| |
| Friday June 10 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:34PM |
1 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 11:13PM |
0 |
[Release-testers] 3.8.1-rc1 has been tagged |
| 11:09PM |
0 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 11:08PM |
2 |
[RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| 10:59PM |
3 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 10:45PM |
0 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 10:23PM |
2 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 9:00PM |
0 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 8:38PM |
6 |
[3.9 Release] Release plan and call for testers |
| 7:00PM |
0 |
Temporary alternative: [was: Re: IMPORTANT: APT repo temporary switched off] |
| 6:41PM |
2 |
[RFC] LLVM Directory Structure Changes (was Re: [PATCH] D20992: [CMake] Add LLVM runtimes directory) |
| 6:25PM |
1 |
[lldb-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 6:23PM |
0 |
[RFC] LLVM Directory Structure Changes (was Re: [PATCH] D20992: [CMake] Add LLVM runtimes directory) |
| 5:52PM |
4 |
[RFC] LLVM Directory Structure Changes (was Re: [PATCH] D20992: [CMake] Add LLVM runtimes directory) |
| 5:42PM |
4 |
Early CSE clobbering llvm.assume |
| 4:13PM |
1 |
Windows: How to catch C++ exceptions in runtime-compiled code? |
| 2:07PM |
0 |
Windows: How to catch C++ exceptions in runtime-compiled code? |
| 1:36PM |
0 |
[RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| 1:13PM |
0 |
TableGen operand question |
| 12:38PM |
0 |
MCJIT -- Poor run-time performance for Fibonacci example in LLVM 3.8.1 |
| 11:09AM |
0 |
Switching to git (Windows experience) (was re:[cfe-dev] Github anyone?) |
| 9:45AM |
5 |
[Release-testers] 3.8.1-rc1 has been tagged |
| 9:23AM |
2 |
Windows: How to catch C++ exceptions in runtime-compiled code? |
| 4:45AM |
0 |
Doubts on SSA Update |
| 4:31AM |
2 |
MCJIT -- Poor run-time performance for Fibonacci example in LLVM 3.8.1 |
| 12:31AM |
2 |
[RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| |
| Thursday June 9 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:50PM |
0 |
[RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| 10:39PM |
1 |
type-inference in tblgen for instrinfo |
| 9:40PM |
0 |
Gluing arbitrary nodes together |
| 9:33PM |
2 |
[RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| 9:09PM |
0 |
[RFC] LLVM Directory Structure Changes (was Re: [PATCH] D20992: [CMake] Add LLVM runtimes directory) |
| 8:39PM |
2 |
[RFC] LLVM Directory Structure Changes (was Re: [PATCH] D20992: [CMake] Add LLVM runtimes directory) |
| 8:17PM |
1 |
Fwd: [RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| 7:32PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Capture Tracking - False Positives |
| 7:26PM |
0 |
[RFC] LLVM Directory Structure Changes (was Re: [PATCH] D20992: [CMake] Add LLVM runtimes directory) |
| 7:06PM |
2 |
[RFC] LLVM Directory Structure Changes (was Re: [PATCH] D20992: [CMake] Add LLVM runtimes directory) |
| 6:29PM |
0 |
Fwd: [RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| 6:27PM |
0 |
macosx triple |
| 6:26PM |
0 |
[RFC] LLVM Directory Structure Changes (was Re: [PATCH] D20992: [CMake] Add LLVM runtimes directory) |
| 6:25PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Capture Tracking Improvements - BackgroundInformation |
| 6:23PM |
1 |
[RFC] LLVM Directory Structure Changes (was Re: [PATCH] D20992: [CMake] Add LLVM runtimes directory) |
| 6:13PM |
0 |
[RFC] LLVM Directory Structure Changes (was Re: [PATCH] D20992: [CMake] Add LLVM runtimes directory) |
| 6:10PM |
0 |
[RFC] LLVM Directory Structure Changes (was Re: [PATCH] D20992: [CMake] Add LLVM runtimes directory) |
| 5:53PM |
2 |
[RFC] LLVM Directory Structure Changes (was Re: [PATCH] D20992: [CMake] Add LLVM runtimes directory) |
| 5:49PM |
0 |
[RFC] LLVM Directory Structure Changes (was Re: [PATCH] D20992: [CMake] Add LLVM runtimes directory) |
| 5:43PM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Capture Tracking Improvements - BackgroundInformation |
| 5:20PM |
9 |
[RFC] LLVM Directory Structure Changes (was Re: [PATCH] D20992: [CMake] Add LLVM runtimes directory) |
| 5:16PM |
2 |
Fwd: [RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| 5:11PM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Capture Tracking - False Positives |
| 4:33PM |
1 |
[Proposal][RFC] Cache aware Loop Cost Analysis |
| 4:21PM |
2 |
[Proposal][RFC] Cache aware Loop Cost Analysis |
| 4:08PM |
0 |
[Release-testers] 3.8.1-rc1 has been tagged |
| 3:57PM |
0 |
Unable to build and install LLVM on Mac OSX 10.11 |
| 10:48AM |
2 |
Unable to build and install LLVM on Mac OSX 10.11 |
| 10:26AM |
2 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 10:12AM |
0 |
Fatpointer Pass already existing? |
| 9:57AM |
2 |
Fatpointer Pass already existing? |
| 9:41AM |
4 |
TableGen operand question |
| 8:33AM |
0 |
Fwd: [RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| 8:25AM |
0 |
[RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| 5:57AM |
6 |
Fwd: [RFC] LLVM Coroutines |
| 4:24AM |
0 |
RFC: a renaming/redesign for LLVM's bitset metadata |
| 3:14AM |
0 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 12:54AM |
0 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 12:35AM |
1 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 12:11AM |
0 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| |
| Wednesday June 8 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:48PM |
2 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 11:38PM |
2 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 11:20PM |
2 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 10:54PM |
0 |
LNT General Failure |
| 10:22PM |
1 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 10:13PM |
1 |
Instruction Itineraries: question about operand latencies |
| 10:10PM |
0 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 9:55PM |
1 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 9:54PM |
2 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 9:25PM |
0 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 9:06PM |
0 |
enable a disabled target feature through clang |
| 7:36PM |
0 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 7:31PM |
0 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 7:26PM |
0 |
default value for a newly created clang option |
| 7:07PM |
3 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 6:58PM |
2 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 6:26PM |
2 |
default value for a newly created clang option |
| 6:14PM |
0 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 5:57PM |
0 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 5:43PM |
0 |
llvm intrinsics/libc/libm question |
| 5:26PM |
0 |
[Proposal][RFC] Cache aware Loop Cost Analysis |
| 4:50PM |
0 |
[Proposal][RFC] Cache aware Loop Cost Analysis |
| 4:39PM |
0 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 4:32PM |
0 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 3:50PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] 3.8.1-rc1 has been tagged |
| 11:19AM |
12 |
Intended behavior of CGSCC pass manager. |
| 11:18AM |
1 |
Allow reopening on Phabricator |
| 11:01AM |
0 |
Allow reopening on Phabricator |
| 7:58AM |
5 |
[Proposal][RFC] Cache aware Loop Cost Analysis |
| 4:16AM |
2 |
Allow reopening on Phabricator |
| 4:12AM |
9 |
3.8.1-rc1 has been tagged |
| 3:57AM |
0 |
Instruction Itineraries: question about operand latencies |
| 2:02AM |
2 |
Instruction Itineraries: question about operand latencies |
| |
| Tuesday June 7 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:06PM |
4 |
llvm intrinsics/libc/libm question |
| 11:02PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Capture Tracking Improvements - BackgroundInformation |
| 10:29PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM loop vectorizer |
| 10:05PM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 8:57PM |
0 |
llvm intrinsics/libc/libm question |
| 8:56PM |
0 |
Doubts |
| 8:45PM |
2 |
llvm intrinsics/libc/libm question |
| 8:38PM |
0 |
llvm intrinsics/libc/libm question |
| 8:24PM |
3 |
llvm intrinsics/libc/libm question |
| 7:54PM |
1 |
lld/x86_64 linux elf invalid link_map |
| 7:15PM |
0 |
Allow reopening on Phabricator |
| 7:14PM |
2 |
Allow reopening on Phabricator |
| 6:28PM |
0 |
lld/x86_64 linux elf invalid link_map |
| 5:37PM |
0 |
DIBuilder and related C bindings |
| 4:42PM |
1 |
llvm intrinsics/libc/libm question |
| 4:37PM |
2 |
Doubts |
| 4:23PM |
0 |
llvm intrinsics/libc/libm question |
| 3:13PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 3:04PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 3:03PM |
3 |
llvm intrinsics/libc/libm question |
| 2:54PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 2:36PM |
0 |
PACT-2016 ACM Student Research Competition (SRC) |
| 1:08PM |
1 |
Statepoints with non SP-relative addresses |
| 9:51AM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 9:21AM |
3 |
NVPTX compilation problems - ptxas error |
| 8:34AM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 7:18AM |
2 |
lld/x86_64 linux elf invalid link_map |
| 4:43AM |
3 |
PACT-2016 ACM Student Research Competition (SRC) |
| 4:09AM |
0 |
RFC [ThinLTO]: An embedded summary encoding to support CFI and vtable opt |
| 3:16AM |
0 |
RFC: a renaming/redesign for LLVM's bitset metadata |
| 2:17AM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| |
| Monday June 6 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:57PM |
0 |
Buildbot numbers for the last week of 5/29/2016 - 6/04/2016 |
| 10:10PM |
0 |
Instruction Itineraries: question about operand latencies |
| 10:06PM |
1 |
Compiling for more than one target at once |
| 9:17PM |
0 |
Floating Point SCEV Analysis |
| 8:29PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 7:51PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 7:34PM |
1 |
LLD: Using sendfile(2) to copy file contents |
| 7:20PM |
0 |
LLD: Using sendfile(2) to copy file contents |
| 7:17PM |
2 |
LLD: Using sendfile(2) to copy file contents |
| 7:11PM |
0 |
LLD: Using sendfile(2) to copy file contents |
| 6:41PM |
2 |
LLD: Using sendfile(2) to copy file contents |
| 6:37PM |
2 |
Instruction Itineraries: question about operand latencies |
| 6:22PM |
1 |
Naïve question about LLVM and Mac OS X (El Capitan) |
| 5:54PM |
0 |
Vector SETCC fails at instruction selection |
| 5:49PM |
0 |
LLD: Using sendfile(2) to copy file contents |
| 5:07PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 3:44PM |
3 |
[lldb-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 3:32PM |
0 |
[lldb-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 3:32PM |
0 |
Doubts |
| 3:16PM |
2 |
Doubts |
| 2:52PM |
0 |
LLVM Weekly - #127, June 6th 2016 |
| 2:10PM |
0 |
LLVM ignoring cross_compilation flag |
| 9:24AM |
0 |
LLD: Using sendfile(2) to copy file contents |
| 5:22AM |
0 |
Doubts |
| 1:04AM |
1 |
PTX generation from CUDA file for compute capability 1.0 (sm_10) |
| |
| Sunday June 5 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 9:05PM |
2 |
Doubts |
| 8:48PM |
0 |
LLD: Using sendfile(2) to copy file contents |
| 8:27PM |
1 |
intrinsic for memory mapped IO? |
| 8:19PM |
6 |
LLD: Using sendfile(2) to copy file contents |
| 6:16PM |
0 |
Doubts |
| 5:46PM |
1 |
Checking if pointer dependency is on function arguments |
| 4:43PM |
1 |
Undefined reference while linking with 3.8 and GCC5 |
| 4:40PM |
1 |
Migration help required for 3.3 to 3.8 |
| 3:37PM |
0 |
Migration help required for 3.3 to 3.8 |
| 3:22PM |
2 |
Migration help required for 3.3 to 3.8 |
| 2:21PM |
0 |
Back end with special loop instructions (using LLVM IR intrinsics) |
| 1:56PM |
3 |
Doubts |
| 4:46AM |
0 |
What kind of testcases should be required to test IPRA? |
| 4:44AM |
2 |
What kind of testcases should be required to test IPRA? |
| 3:45AM |
0 |
What kind of testcases should be required to test IPRA? |
| 3:32AM |
2 |
What kind of testcases should be required to test IPRA? |
| 3:26AM |
0 |
What kind of testcases should be required to test IPRA? |
| 3:18AM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] [Weekly Status] Interprocedural Register Allocation |
| 2:56AM |
2 |
What kind of testcases should be required to test IPRA? |
| |
| Saturday June 4 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 8:52PM |
0 |
PBQP register allocation and copy propagation |
| 6:05PM |
0 |
Adding source location information to crash dumps |
| 3:49PM |
0 |
How to recompile functions with ORC JIT? |
| 2:24PM |
0 |
LLVMLinkModules2() C-API question |
| 1:05PM |
2 |
PBQP register allocation and copy propagation |
| 12:01PM |
2 |
LLVMLinkModules2() C-API question |
| 10:27AM |
2 |
Adding source location information to crash dumps |
| 5:06AM |
3 |
[lldb-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 4:15AM |
4 |
Gluing arbitrary nodes together |
| 3:22AM |
0 |
3.8.1 Release Update |
| 1:28AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM loop vectorizer |
| 1:13AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM loop vectorizer |
| 1:06AM |
0 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| |
| Friday June 3 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 9:14PM |
0 |
PBQP register allocation and copy propagation |
| 8:33PM |
1 |
Which register allocator is used for each -O level? |
| 8:02PM |
0 |
[lld] r271569 - Start adding tlsdesc support for aarch64. |
| 8:00PM |
1 |
[LLVM Social in Warsaw] Clang-tidy Code Dojo |
| 7:23PM |
0 |
[RFC][LLD][ARM] Initial ARM port for LLD |
| 7:23PM |
3 |
[lld] r271569 - Start adding tlsdesc support for aarch64. |
| 6:36PM |
6 |
[RFC] Embedded bitcode and related upstream (Part II) |
| 6:20PM |
1 |
Switching to git (Windows experience) (was re:[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?) |
| 6:09PM |
2 |
PBQP register allocation and copy propagation |
| 6:08PM |
0 |
Custom assembler subset |
| 6:06PM |
0 |
Switching to git (Windows experience) (was re:[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?) |
| 6:04PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 6:03PM |
0 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 5:56PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 5:47PM |
0 |
[lld] r271569 - Start adding tlsdesc support for aarch64. |
| 5:30PM |
0 |
New to LLVM, need some help with JIT |
| 5:11PM |
2 |
Custom assembler subset |
| 5:05PM |
1 |
CMake version specific tweaks in compiler-rt |
| 5:04PM |
0 |
PBQP register allocation and copy propagation |
| 4:29PM |
3 |
[lld] r271569 - Start adding tlsdesc support for aarch64. |
| 4:10PM |
0 |
[lld] r271569 - Start adding tlsdesc support for aarch64. |
| 3:53PM |
0 |
Custom assembler subset |
| 3:38PM |
0 |
CMake version specific tweaks in compiler-rt |
| 3:07PM |
0 |
Fwd: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender |
| 2:50PM |
0 |
Switching to git (Windows experience) (was re:[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?) |
| 2:42PM |
2 |
Switching to git (Windows experience) (was re:[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?) |
| 2:31PM |
0 |
Switching to git (Windows experience) (was re:[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?) |
| 2:01PM |
2 |
Switching to git (Windows experience) (was re:[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?) |
| 1:46PM |
4 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 1:32PM |
2 |
PBQP register allocation and copy propagation |
| 1:17PM |
0 |
Switching to git (Windows experience) (was, re:[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?) |
| 12:31PM |
3 |
Switching to git (Windows experience) (was re:[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?) |
| 11:41AM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Parameters of a target architecture |
| 10:12AM |
2 |
[lld] r271569 - Start adding tlsdesc support for aarch64. |
| 9:49AM |
0 |
BPF backend with vector operations - error "Could not infer all types in, pattern!" |
| 9:44AM |
1 |
Status of the official LLVM APT repositories |
| 9:29AM |
0 |
Switching to git (Windows experience) (was re:[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?) |
| 9:28AM |
2 |
[RFC][LLD][ARM] Initial ARM port for LLD |
| 9:03AM |
3 |
Switching to git (Windows experience) (was re:[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?) |
| 5:39AM |
1 |
GitHub anyone? |
| 3:16AM |
1 |
Strong compilation scheme of acquire loads to PPC |
| 2:47AM |
3 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 2:41AM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 1:41AM |
5 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 1:07AM |
0 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 12:57AM |
2 |
Buildbot to build with LLD and LLVM STL |
| 12:53AM |
0 |
[lld] r271569 - Start adding tlsdesc support for aarch64. |
| 12:45AM |
2 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 12:30AM |
0 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 12:21AM |
4 |
[lld] r271569 - Start adding tlsdesc support for aarch64. |
| |
| Thursday June 2 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:36PM |
2 |
New to LLVM, need some help with JIT |
| 11:28PM |
1 |
GitHub anyone? |
| 10:45PM |
0 |
Floating Point SCEV Analysis |
| 10:22PM |
0 |
[lld] r271569 - Start adding tlsdesc support for aarch64. |
| 9:59PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 9:51PM |
4 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 9:31PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 8:54PM |
0 |
issue: IMPORTANT: APT repo temporary switched off |
| 8:19PM |
2 |
[lld] r271569 - Start adding tlsdesc support for aarch64. |
| 7:41PM |
2 |
issue: IMPORTANT: APT repo temporary switched off |
| 7:38PM |
4 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 7:36PM |
0 |
Switching to git (Windows experience) (was re:[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?) |
| 7:31PM |
2 |
BPF backend with vector operations - error "Could not infer all types in, pattern!" |
| 7:27PM |
2 |
Switching to git (Windows experience) (was re:[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?) |
| 6:56PM |
0 |
PBQP register allocation and copy propagation |
| 6:54PM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 6:54PM |
2 |
CMake version specific tweaks in compiler-rt |
| 6:51PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 6:50PM |
0 |
issue: IMPORTANT: APT repo temporary switched off |
| 6:48PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 6:42PM |
0 |
GitHub anyone? |
| 6:27PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 6:25PM |
2 |
issue: IMPORTANT: APT repo temporary switched off |
| 6:22PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 6:22PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 6:20PM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 6:18PM |
0 |
GitHub anyone? |
| 6:18PM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 6:15PM |
4 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 6:15PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 6:06PM |
0 |
GitHub anyone? |
| 6:06PM |
2 |
GitHub anyone? |
| 6:03PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [lldb-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 6:01PM |
0 |
GitHub anyone? |
| 5:59PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 5:58PM |
0 |
-Wmisleading-indentation violations |
| 5:53PM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 5:50PM |
0 |
Switching to git (Windows experience) (was re:[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?) |
| 5:22PM |
2 |
PBQP register allocation and copy propagation |
| 5:17PM |
0 |
[Job Posting] LLVM at Cray |
| 5:14PM |
0 |
Lowering For Loops to use architecture "loop" instruction |
| 5:07PM |
0 |
PTX generation from CUDA file for compute capability 1.0 (sm_10) |
| 4:55PM |
0 |
LLD's default --build-id choice |
| 4:28PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 4:26PM |
1 |
Lowering For Loops to use architecture "loop" instruction |
| 4:21PM |
7 |
GitHub anyone? |
| 4:05PM |
0 |
Immediate operand for load instruction, in back end |
| 4:04PM |
2 |
Switching to git (Windows experience) (was re:[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?) |
| 3:48PM |
0 |
GitHub anyone? |
| 3:42PM |
1 |
[Sparc] Lowering of Complex number for ABI compliance |
| 2:56PM |
4 |
Floating Point SCEV Analysis |
| 2:18PM |
0 |
Orc/MCJIT: Relocations vs pointers to functions |
| 2:00PM |
0 |
Switching to git (Windows experience) (was re:[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?) |
| 1:48PM |
0 |
Floating Point SCEV Analysis |
| 12:43PM |
7 |
Switching to git (Windows experience) (was re:[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone?) |
| 11:57AM |
4 |
[GSoC 2016] Parameters of a target architecture |
| 9:02AM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 8:12AM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Capture Tracking Improvements - BackgroundInformation |
| 8:08AM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 7:34AM |
0 |
PTX generation from CUDA file for compute capability 1.0 (sm_10) |
| 7:24AM |
0 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 7:23AM |
3 |
PTX generation from CUDA file for compute capability 1.0 (sm_10) |
| 7:10AM |
0 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 6:36AM |
0 |
PTX generation from CUDA file for compute capability 1.0 (sm_10) |
| 6:02AM |
0 |
-Wmisleading-indentation violations |
| 5:51AM |
6 |
-Wmisleading-indentation violations |
| 5:21AM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 5:18AM |
5 |
PTX generation from CUDA file for compute capability 1.0 (sm_10) |
| 4:55AM |
0 |
What kind of testcases should be required to test IPRA? |
| 4:32AM |
2 |
What kind of testcases should be required to test IPRA? |
| 3:47AM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 3:43AM |
0 |
Lowering For Loops to use architecture "loop" instruction |
| 3:18AM |
4 |
Lowering For Loops to use architecture "loop" instruction |
| 1:53AM |
0 |
GitHub anyone? |
| 12:46AM |
2 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 12:03AM |
3 |
LLD's default --build-id choice |
| |
| Wednesday June 1 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:57PM |
0 |
LLD's default --build-id choice |
| 11:56PM |
1 |
[llvm-foundation] IMPORTANT: APT repo temporary switched off |
| 11:48PM |
2 |
Custom assembler subset |
| 10:48PM |
5 |
RFC: a renaming/redesign for LLVM's bitset metadata |
| 10:41PM |
1 |
LLD's default --build-id choice |
| 10:37PM |
0 |
Bug 23231 - support symbol version script / --version-script option |
| 10:32PM |
0 |
LLD's default --build-id choice |
| 10:21PM |
6 |
LLD's default --build-id choice |
| 9:57PM |
2 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 9:45PM |
0 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 9:25PM |
1 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 9:18PM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 9:09PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 9:07PM |
0 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 8:46PM |
0 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 8:21PM |
1 |
GitHub anyone? |
| 8:20PM |
2 |
GitHub anyone? |
| 8:18PM |
0 |
Equivalent of --bindir in cmake |
| 8:15PM |
0 |
IMPORTANT: APT repo temporary switched off |
| 8:10PM |
1 |
command line options to force function/loop alignments. |
| 8:07PM |
0 |
GitHub anyone? |
| 7:57PM |
0 |
IMPORTANT: APT repo temporary switched off |
| 7:54PM |
0 |
[llvm-foundation] IMPORTANT: APT repo temporary switched off |
| 7:31PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 7:25PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 7:10PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 7:02PM |
0 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 6:55PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 6:51PM |
6 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 6:42PM |
0 |
Adding BB input/output registers during ISel |
| 6:36PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 6:31PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 6:28PM |
3 |
[llvm-foundation] IMPORTANT: APT repo temporary switched off |
| 6:20PM |
0 |
[llvm-foundation] IMPORTANT: APT repo temporary switched off |
| 6:18PM |
8 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 6:07PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 5:40PM |
3 |
[llvm-foundation] IMPORTANT: APT repo temporary switched off |
| 5:39PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 5:34PM |
0 |
[llvm-foundation] IMPORTANT: APT repo temporary switched off |
| 5:19PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 5:12PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 5:09PM |
2 |
[llvm-foundation] IMPORTANT: APT repo temporary switched off |
| 4:59PM |
0 |
[llvm-foundation] IMPORTANT: APT repo temporary switched off |
| 4:25PM |
0 |
Adding BB input/output registers during ISel |
| 4:14PM |
0 |
linkonce_odr & coff |
| 4:06PM |
2 |
linkonce_odr & coff |
| 4:05PM |
3 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 4:04PM |
0 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 4:02PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 3:53PM |
2 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 3:43PM |
3 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 3:38PM |
0 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 3:29PM |
2 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 3:21PM |
0 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 3:13PM |
4 |
Adding BB input/output registers during ISel |
| 3:11PM |
0 |
command line options to force function/loop alignments. |
| 2:42PM |
5 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 1:08PM |
0 |
GDB pretty printers for LLVM ADTs |
| 12:52PM |
0 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 12:07PM |
2 |
Fwd: command line options to force function/loop alignments. |
| 11:46AM |
2 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 11:28AM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] [Polly] Implementation of tiling, interchanging and unrolling of specific loops based on the algorithm for the analytical modeling |
| 11:23AM |
1 |
Constants.cpp get() assertion failed |
| 11:22AM |
0 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 11:17AM |
0 |
GitHub anyone? |
| 9:44AM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 7:00AM |
0 |
Signed Division and InstCombine |
| 5:19AM |
3 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 4:16AM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 3:22AM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 3:21AM |
0 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 1:09AM |
1 |
GDB pretty printers for LLVM ADTs |
| 1:02AM |
4 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 12:07AM |
0 |
Loads and stores of unsized types? |
| 12:04AM |
0 |
[RFC] Changing `lit` default output |
| 12:01AM |
2 |
[RFC] Changing `lit` default output |