On 11 July 2016 at 17:06, Asiri Rathnayake <asiri.rathnayake at gmail.com> wrote:> Ignore me please, noted that you said it's the identical configuration with > just the library re-ordering. > > Shall I revert the link ordering until we have time to investigate?I can't see anything wrong in reverting the order, though. Maybe it's best, so we make sure it wasn't the problem. cheers, --renato
Reverted the library order in r275088: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=275088 Will have to wait for a buildmaster restart unfortunately (unless there's a way to test this configuration locally?) Thanks. / Asiri On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:> On 11 July 2016 at 17:06, Asiri Rathnayake <asiri.rathnayake at gmail.com> > wrote: > > Ignore me please, noted that you said it's the identical configuration > with > > just the library re-ordering. > > > > Shall I revert the link ordering until we have time to investigate? > > I can't see anything wrong in reverting the order, though. Maybe it's > best, so we make sure it wasn't the problem. > > cheers, > --renato >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160711/d2f00497/attachment.html>
It should be fine to wait, the libcxx bot only builds once in a while, and it's mostly Marshall... :-) Thanks! On 11 Jul 2016 8:22 p.m., "Asiri Rathnayake" <asiri.rathnayake at gmail.com> wrote:> Reverted the library order in r275088: > > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=275088 > > Will have to wait for a buildmaster restart unfortunately (unless there's > a way to test this configuration locally?) > > Thanks. > > / Asiri > > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> > wrote: > >> On 11 July 2016 at 17:06, Asiri Rathnayake <asiri.rathnayake at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Ignore me please, noted that you said it's the identical configuration >> with >> > just the library re-ordering. >> > >> > Shall I revert the link ordering until we have time to investigate? >> >> I can't see anything wrong in reverting the order, though. Maybe it's >> best, so we make sure it wasn't the problem. >> >> cheers, >> --renato >> > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160711/1c4a31cb/attachment.html>