| Tuesday May 31 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:53PM |
0 |
[RFC] Changing `lit` default output |
| 11:52PM |
0 |
[RFC] Changing `lit` default output |
| 11:48PM |
4 |
[RFC] Changing `lit` default output |
| 11:39PM |
0 |
Buildbot numbers for the last week of 5/22/2016 - 5/28/2016 |
| 11:19PM |
0 |
Fwd: [PATCH] D20841: TII: Add documentation about conditional exits. NFC |
| 11:12PM |
1 |
Signed Division and InstCombine |
| 11:07PM |
0 |
June LLVM bay-area social is this Thursday! |
| 11:06PM |
2 |
GitHub anyone? |
| 11:02PM |
0 |
Signed Division and InstCombine |
| 10:56PM |
0 |
[RFC] Using segmentation to harden SafeStack |
| 10:54PM |
0 |
GitHub anyone? |
| 10:50PM |
2 |
Signed Division and InstCombine |
| 10:42PM |
0 |
Signed Division and InstCombine |
| 10:38PM |
2 |
GitHub anyone? |
| 10:34PM |
3 |
Signed Division and InstCombine |
| 10:01PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 9:43PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 9:38PM |
0 |
GitHub anyone? |
| 9:07PM |
1 |
[lldb-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 9:05PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 9:01PM |
2 |
GitHub anyone? |
| 8:59PM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 8:45PM |
7 |
GitHub anyone? |
| 8:45PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 8:42PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 8:42PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 8:31PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 8:31PM |
0 |
GitHub anyone? |
| 8:28PM |
6 |
GitHub anyone? |
| 8:27PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 8:24PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 8:23PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 8:16PM |
0 |
GitHub anyone? |
| 7:51PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 7:49PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] GitHub anyone? |
| 7:31PM |
30 |
GitHub anyone? |
| 7:12PM |
0 |
[lldb-dev] TODAY! Updating to CMake 3.4.3 |
| 6:22PM |
2 |
TODAY! Updating to CMake 3.4.3 |
| 6:15PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] [Polly] Implementation of tiling, interchanging and unrolling of specific loops based on the algorithm for the analytical modeling |
| 5:33PM |
0 |
[llvm-foundation] IMPORTANT: APT repo temporary switched off |
| 5:27PM |
10 |
IMPORTANT: APT repo temporary switched off |
| 4:57PM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] [Polly] Implementation of tiling, interchanging and unrolling of specific loops based on the algorithm for the analytical modeling |
| 2:27PM |
0 |
[RFC] Thoughts on a bitcode symbol table |
| 2:24PM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 2:16PM |
1 |
LNT General Failure |
| 2:06PM |
0 |
LNT General Failure |
| 2:03PM |
0 |
LNT General Failure |
| 2:01PM |
2 |
LNT General Failure |
| 1:47PM |
3 |
Bug 23231 - support symbol version script / --version-script option |
| 1:44PM |
0 |
va_arg on Windows 64 bits |
| 1:41PM |
2 |
LNT General Failure |
| 1:34PM |
0 |
LNT General Failure |
| 1:21PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 8:08AM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 8:04AM |
0 |
How to avoid register spills at wide integer addition? |
| 7:43AM |
0 |
AMDGPUPromoteAlloca assume 3-dims enabled? |
| |
| Monday May 30 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:56PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 11:55PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 11:30PM |
1 |
Back end with special loop instructions |
| 11:04PM |
3 |
Loads and stores of unsized types? |
| 11:02PM |
0 |
sum elements in the vector |
| 10:15PM |
5 |
[GSoC 2016] Capture Tracking Improvements - BackgroundInformation |
| 10:09PM |
2 |
Back end with special loop instructions |
| 8:56PM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 8:33PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 8:28PM |
0 |
Fwd: Assertion failing on LLVM intrinsics instruction |
| 7:27PM |
0 |
warning during intrinsic defintion |
| 7:01PM |
3 |
LNT General Failure |
| 6:41PM |
0 |
LNT General Failure |
| 6:40PM |
3 |
Floating Point SCEV Analysis |
| 4:51PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 4:34PM |
1 |
Why can't clang -emit-llvm when linking? |
| 4:17PM |
0 |
Why can't clang -emit-llvm when linking? |
| 12:50PM |
0 |
LLVM Weekly - #126, May 30th 2016 |
| 12:33PM |
2 |
Why can't clang -emit-llvm when linking? |
| 11:25AM |
2 |
LNT General Failure |
| 11:17AM |
0 |
LNT General Failure |
| 10:18AM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 6:59AM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 6:31AM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 6:28AM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 6:13AM |
7 |
[cfe-dev] How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 2:12AM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 12:44AM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 12:16AM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 12:10AM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| |
| Sunday May 29 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 8:27PM |
4 |
[cfe-dev] How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 6:16PM |
0 |
problems with objects larger than PTRDIFF_MAX |
| 3:55PM |
0 |
Better way to define instructions using multiclasses? |
| 2:36PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 1:18PM |
2 |
problems with objects larger than PTRDIFF_MAX |
| 12:28PM |
3 |
LNT General Failure |
| 10:41AM |
1 |
How to find variable names from LLVM IR? |
| |
| Saturday May 28 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 4:10PM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Capture Tracking Improvements - Background Information |
| 2:48PM |
1 |
Determination of statements that contain only matrix multiplication |
| 2:01PM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] [Weekly Status] Interprocedural Register Allocation |
| 6:50AM |
0 |
[LibFuzzer] Recent performance regression due to r270942 |
| 4:26AM |
2 |
[LibFuzzer] Recent performance regression due to r270942 |
| 3:59AM |
4 |
sum elements in the vector |
| 2:55AM |
0 |
[LibFuzzer] Recent performance regression due to r270942 |
| 2:16AM |
1 |
Updating RegMask inline |
| 2:10AM |
0 |
Updating RegMask inline |
| 2:03AM |
2 |
Updating RegMask inline |
| 2:02AM |
0 |
Updating RegMask inline |
| 1:59AM |
3 |
Updating RegMask inline |
| 1:58AM |
1 |
Updating RegMask inline |
| 1:55AM |
0 |
Updating RegMask inline |
| 1:18AM |
2 |
[LibFuzzer] Recent performance regression due to r270942 |
| |
| Friday May 27 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 10:50PM |
0 |
sum elements in the vector |
| 10:15PM |
0 |
Handling post-inc users in LSR |
| 10:15PM |
1 |
How to recompile functions with ORC JIT? |
| 9:50PM |
2 |
Handling post-inc users in LSR |
| 8:54PM |
1 |
How to make -enable-misched the default? |
| 8:31PM |
1 |
[LLVM LTO]internalize pass |
| 8:26PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] Setting up a silent buildslave |
| 8:04PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] Setting up a silent buildslave |
| 7:45PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] Setting up a silent buildslave |
| 7:26PM |
2 |
Setting up a silent buildslave |
| 6:53PM |
3 |
Updating RegMask inline |
| 6:51PM |
0 |
Updating RegMask inline |
| 6:49PM |
2 |
Updating RegMask inline |
| 5:47PM |
0 |
[LLVM LTO]internalize pass |
| 5:38PM |
0 |
How to recompile functions with ORC JIT? |
| 4:57PM |
2 |
[LLVM LTO]internalize pass |
| 3:48PM |
3 |
[RFC] Thoughts on a bitcode symbol table |
| 1:41PM |
1 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 1:23PM |
1 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 12:55PM |
0 |
[LLVM LTO]internalize pass |
| 11:02AM |
1 |
ORC and MCJIT clients: Heads up, API breaking changes in the pipeline. |
| 10:43AM |
2 |
[LLVM LTO]internalize pass |
| 9:21AM |
1 |
Adapting and open-sourcing PGI's Fortran frontend for LLVM |
| 9:08AM |
3 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 6:49AM |
2 |
How to recompile functions with ORC JIT? |
| |
| Thursday May 26 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:56PM |
0 |
RFC: LNT/Test-suite support for custom metrics and test parameterization |
| 11:25PM |
0 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 9:32PM |
0 |
Adapting and open-sourcing PGI's Fortran frontend for LLVM |
| 9:06PM |
2 |
Adapting and open-sourcing PGI's Fortran frontend for LLVM |
| 8:57PM |
0 |
Adapting and open-sourcing PGI's Fortran frontend for LLVM |
| 8:13PM |
0 |
Adapting and open-sourcing PGI's Fortran frontend for LLVM |
| 7:59PM |
0 |
SCEV/IndVars Code Owner Nomination |
| 7:35PM |
2 |
enabling interleaved access loop vectorization |
| 7:28PM |
1 |
Stack maps on AArch64 |
| 6:57PM |
3 |
Adapting and open-sourcing PGI's Fortran frontend for LLVM |
| 6:46PM |
2 |
Stack maps on AArch64 |
| 6:25PM |
0 |
enabling interleaved access loop vectorization |
| 6:21PM |
0 |
Clarifying pointer aliasing rules |
| 6:12PM |
2 |
enabling interleaved access loop vectorization |
| 4:17PM |
0 |
Adapting and open-sourcing PGI's Fortran frontend for LLVM |
| 4:13PM |
1 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 3:47PM |
2 |
Adapting and open-sourcing PGI's Fortran frontend for LLVM |
| 3:46PM |
0 |
Runtime interception: design problem |
| 3:01PM |
0 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 2:53PM |
3 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 2:35PM |
0 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 2:08PM |
2 |
RFC: LNT/Test-suite support for custom metrics and test parameterization |
| 9:38AM |
1 |
[Attn: Bot Owners!] Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 |
| 8:57AM |
1 |
Runtime interception: design problem |
| 5:46AM |
0 |
c++ programs type name changed in llvm ir after linking |
| 5:45AM |
1 |
dumb question about tblgen |
| 5:30AM |
0 |
SCEV/IndVars Code Owner Nomination |
| 5:20AM |
0 |
dumb question about tblgen |
| 4:30AM |
2 |
dumb question about tblgen |
| 3:12AM |
0 |
dumb question about tblgen |
| 2:07AM |
3 |
dumb question about tblgen |
| 2:02AM |
0 |
Potential ambiguity in the grammar of LLVM IR assembly |
| 1:59AM |
1 |
Potential ambiguity in the grammar of LLVM IR assembly |
| 1:59AM |
1 |
Potential ambiguity in the grammar of LLVM IR assembly |
| 1:55AM |
2 |
Potential ambiguity in the grammar of LLVM IR assembly |
| 12:42AM |
0 |
Potential ambiguity in the grammar of LLVM IR assembly |
| 12:24AM |
0 |
dumb question about tblgen |
| 12:23AM |
2 |
SCEV/IndVars Code Owner Nomination |
| 12:06AM |
2 |
dumb question about tblgen |
| |
| Wednesday May 25 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:34PM |
0 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 11:29PM |
2 |
warning during intrinsic defintion |
| 11:27PM |
0 |
SCEV/IndVars Code Owner Nomination |
| 11:17PM |
4 |
SCEV/IndVars Code Owner Nomination |
| 11:10PM |
4 |
Potential ambiguity in the grammar of LLVM IR assembly |
| 10:07PM |
0 |
Status of the official LLVM APT repositories |
| 10:03PM |
0 |
[Attn: Bot Owners!] Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 |
| 9:19PM |
2 |
LLVM-HPC2016 Workshop at SC16 - Call for papers |
| 9:17PM |
3 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 7:12PM |
0 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 7:01PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 6:44PM |
1 |
Liveness of AL, AH and AX in x86 backend |
| 6:23PM |
0 |
RFC: LNT/Test-suite support for custom metrics and test parameterization |
| 5:58PM |
1 |
Force spill of vector variables |
| 5:35PM |
0 |
Liveness of AL, AH and AX in x86 backend |
| 5:27PM |
1 |
examples / ParallelJIT |
| 4:35PM |
0 |
Phabricator not getting all comments sent by email? |
| 4:22PM |
2 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 3:20PM |
3 |
Phabricator not getting all comments sent by email? |
| 3:11PM |
0 |
Runtime interception: design problem |
| 1:05PM |
4 |
Runtime interception: design problem |
| 12:05PM |
1 |
Live interval analysis on LLVM IR (not on Machine instructions) |
| 10:43AM |
0 |
RFC: LNT/Test-suite support for custom metrics and test parameterization |
| 10:08AM |
0 |
PassManager insights? |
| 8:54AM |
4 |
RFC: LNT/Test-suite support for custom metrics and test parameterization |
| 7:04AM |
1 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 6:26AM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 6:04AM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 5:16AM |
3 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 5:08AM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 4:38AM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 4:17AM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 3:16AM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 3:14AM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 2:34AM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 1:09AM |
0 |
running intrinsics from C code |
| 12:21AM |
0 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 12:04AM |
2 |
running intrinsics from C code |
| |
| Tuesday May 24 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:10PM |
1 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 10:50PM |
0 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 10:41PM |
6 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 10:23PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 9:06PM |
2 |
ORC and MCJIT clients: Heads up, API breaking changes in the pipeline. |
| 8:59PM |
1 |
Liveness of AL, AH and AX in x86 backend |
| 8:54PM |
3 |
[Attn: Bot Owners!] Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 |
| 8:25PM |
0 |
Liveness of AL, AH and AX in x86 backend |
| 8:02PM |
3 |
Liveness of AL, AH and AX in x86 backend |
| 7:15PM |
1 |
Undefined symbols in llvm-objdump linkage on x86_64-apple-darwin15 |
| 7:03PM |
0 |
Undefined symbols in llvm-objdump linkage on x86_64-apple-darwin15 |
| 6:37PM |
2 |
Undefined symbols in llvm-objdump linkage on x86_64-apple-darwin15 |
| 6:28PM |
0 |
Undefined symbols in llvm-objdump linkage on x86_64-apple-darwin15 |
| 6:01PM |
3 |
Liveness of AL, AH and AX in x86 backend |
| 6:00PM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 6:00PM |
2 |
Undefined symbols in llvm-objdump linkage on x86_64-apple-darwin15 |
| 5:40PM |
0 |
Liveness of AL, AH and AX in x86 backend |
| 5:35PM |
0 |
Undefined symbols in llvm-objdump linkage on x86_64-apple-darwin15 |
| 5:28PM |
2 |
Undefined symbols in llvm-objdump linkage on x86_64-apple-darwin15 |
| 5:24PM |
0 |
Undefined symbols in llvm-objdump linkage on x86_64-apple-darwin15 |
| 5:22PM |
2 |
Undefined symbols in llvm-objdump linkage on x86_64-apple-darwin15 |
| 5:10PM |
0 |
Liveness of AL, AH and AX in x86 backend |
| 5:03PM |
3 |
Liveness of AL, AH and AX in x86 backend |
| 4:09PM |
0 |
Liveness of AL, AH and AX in x86 backend |
| 4:08PM |
0 |
Undefined symbols in llvm-objdump linkage on x86_64-apple-darwin15 |
| 3:07PM |
2 |
Undefined symbols in llvm-objdump linkage on x86_64-apple-darwin15 |
| 3:03PM |
5 |
Liveness of AL, AH and AX in x86 backend |
| 3:00PM |
1 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 2:13PM |
0 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 2:10PM |
2 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 2:05PM |
0 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 1:51PM |
12 |
RFC: FileCheck Enhancements |
| 9:39AM |
1 |
BitcodeReader non explicit error |
| 3:56AM |
0 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| 3:23AM |
5 |
The state of IRPGO (3 remaining work items) |
| |
| Monday May 23 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:29PM |
0 |
Buildbot numbers for the week of 5/15/2016 - 5/21/2016 |
| 9:38PM |
0 |
difference between built-in and inline assembly |
| 7:51PM |
0 |
Code owner for MSP430 target? |
| 7:48PM |
0 |
sum elements in the vector |
| 7:43PM |
2 |
sum elements in the vector |
| 5:58PM |
2 |
Code owner for MSP430 target? |
| 5:01PM |
0 |
SelectionDAGISel::Select's API considered harmful |
| 4:48PM |
0 |
What's "register pressure set" |
| 4:30PM |
0 |
Interested in writing for the LLVM blog? |
| 3:59PM |
2 |
SelectionDAGISel::Select's API considered harmful |
| 2:47PM |
1 |
BoundsChecking Pass |
| 2:32PM |
0 |
Is the CppBackend still supported? |
| 2:01PM |
2 |
Is the CppBackend still supported? |
| 12:35PM |
0 |
A "Cross-Platform Runtime Library API" in LLVM IR |
| 12:18PM |
1 |
Code owner for MSP430 target? |
| 12:06PM |
0 |
Code owner for MSP430 target? |
| 12:00PM |
3 |
A "Cross-Platform Runtime Library API" in LLVM IR |
| 11:46AM |
3 |
Code owner for MSP430 target? |
| 11:35AM |
0 |
A "Cross-Platform Runtime Library API" in LLVM IR |
| 11:19AM |
3 |
A "Cross-Platform Runtime Library API" in LLVM IR |
| 11:16AM |
0 |
A "Cross-Platform Runtime Library API" in LLVM IR |
| 11:06AM |
3 |
A "Cross-Platform Runtime Library API" in LLVM IR |
| 11:00AM |
0 |
A "Cross-Platform Runtime Library API" in LLVM IR |
| 10:55AM |
0 |
LLVM Weekly - #125, May 23rd 2016 |
| 10:51AM |
1 |
Andersens analysis ? |
| 10:15AM |
0 |
Update frequency of the LLVM APT repositories |
| 9:28AM |
3 |
A "Cross-Platform Runtime Library API" in LLVM IR |
| 9:13AM |
0 |
A "Cross-Platform Runtime Library API" in LLVM IR |
| 8:18AM |
2 |
A "Cross-Platform Runtime Library API" in LLVM IR |
| 8:11AM |
0 |
A "Cross-Platform Runtime Library API" in LLVM IR |
| 7:57AM |
3 |
What's "register pressure set" |
| 6:54AM |
0 |
[BUG] Mismatch between assembler & disassembler of X86 RIP-relative instruction |
| 6:44AM |
2 |
[BUG] Mismatch between assembler & disassembler of X86 RIP-relative instruction |
| 1:13AM |
0 |
Using an MCStreamer Directly to produce an object file? |
| |
| Sunday May 22 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 9:33PM |
0 |
BoundsChecking Pass |
| 7:32PM |
2 |
A "Cross-Platform Runtime Library API" in LLVM IR |
| 7:23PM |
1 |
External function resolution: MCJIT vs ORC JIT |
| 7:17PM |
3 |
Shader bytecode JIT |
| 7:06PM |
0 |
A "Cross-Platform Runtime Library API" in LLVM IR |
| 5:31PM |
2 |
A "Cross-Platform Runtime Library API" in LLVM IR |
| 5:16PM |
0 |
Using clang to recognize illegal reference acceess |
| 2:14PM |
1 |
Is the CppBackend still supported? |
| 12:37PM |
0 |
Is the CppBackend still supported? |
| |
| Saturday May 21 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 5:57PM |
0 |
SelectionDAGISel::Select's API considered harmful |
| 4:15PM |
0 |
Live interval analysis on LLVM IR (not on Machine instructions) |
| 4:09PM |
2 |
Live interval analysis on LLVM IR (not on Machine instructions) |
| 1:11PM |
0 |
Stackoverflow Teams: LLVM |
| 5:00AM |
1 |
Is there a way to force debug_frame to be enabled on SEH windows? |
| 4:22AM |
0 |
Using_an_MCStreamer_Directly_to_produce_an_o bject_file? |
| 3:41AM |
0 |
llvm-dev Digest, Vol 143, Issue 118 |
| 12:34AM |
1 |
Using an MCStreamer Directly to produce an object file? |
| |
| Friday May 20 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 6:59PM |
1 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 6:58PM |
1 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 6:37PM |
0 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 6:31PM |
0 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 6:06PM |
0 |
Phabricator not getting all comments sent by email? |
| 5:30PM |
0 |
External function resolution: MCJIT vs ORC JIT |
| 5:12PM |
0 |
Transferring SelectionDAG code ownership |
| 5:04PM |
5 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 5:02PM |
0 |
RFC: LNT/Test-suite support for custom metrics and test parameterization |
| 4:58PM |
0 |
problems with objects larger than PTRDIFF_MAX |
| 1:07PM |
0 |
Determination of statements that contain only matrix multiplication |
| 1:05PM |
0 |
Determination of statements that contain only matrix multiplication |
| 12:01PM |
2 |
elf for mips in lld |
| 11:55AM |
0 |
Transferring SelectionDAG code ownership |
| 10:16AM |
2 |
BoundsChecking Pass |
| 9:17AM |
2 |
Determination of statements that contain only matrix multiplication |
| 8:31AM |
3 |
problems with objects larger than PTRDIFF_MAX |
| 2:03AM |
0 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 12:08AM |
0 |
underfined symbol in pass object after building r270133 |
| |
| Thursday May 19 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:00PM |
1 |
Transferring SelectionDAG code ownership |
| 10:54PM |
0 |
Transferring SelectionDAG code ownership |
| 10:40PM |
7 |
Transferring SelectionDAG code ownership |
| 8:11PM |
0 |
Phabricator not getting all comments sent by email? |
| 7:54PM |
3 |
Phabricator not getting all comments sent by email? |
| 7:22PM |
1 |
Testing CFL alias analysis |
| 7:21PM |
0 |
Phabricator not getting all comments sent by email? |
| 7:16PM |
0 |
sum elements in the vector |
| 7:03PM |
0 |
Testing CFL alias analysis |
| 6:59PM |
4 |
Phabricator not getting all comments sent by email? |
| 6:57PM |
2 |
External function resolution: MCJIT vs ORC JIT |
| 5:56PM |
0 |
Automake Assembler Assumptions with LLVM-MC |
| 4:34PM |
0 |
Coverage Update on http://llvm.org/reports/coverage/ |
| 4:13PM |
2 |
Coverage Update on http://llvm.org/reports/coverage/ |
| 3:59PM |
0 |
Coverage Update on http://llvm.org/reports/coverage/ |
| 2:58PM |
1 |
Determination of statements that contain only matrix multiplication |
| 2:23PM |
0 |
BLX relocation regression on Thumb2 bot |
| 2:09PM |
0 |
Determination of statements that contain only matrix multiplication |
| 2:03PM |
3 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 1:33PM |
4 |
Automake Assembler Assumptions with LLVM-MC |
| 10:03AM |
2 |
BLX relocation regression on Thumb2 bot |
| 4:42AM |
0 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 12:56AM |
4 |
GEP index canonicalization |
| |
| Wednesday May 18 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:32PM |
0 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 8:52PM |
0 |
External function resolution: MCJIT vs ORC JIT |
| 8:41PM |
1 |
Optimization remarks for non-temporal stores |
| 7:22PM |
1 |
Cambridge LLVM Social, May 25th |
| 7:21PM |
0 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 7:17PM |
4 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 6:12PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 6:00PM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 5:55PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 5:55PM |
0 |
sum elements in the vector |
| 5:46PM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 5:35PM |
2 |
BE8 elf format on gold |
| 4:32PM |
1 |
[GSoC 2016] Introduction - "Enabling Polyhedral Optimizations in Julia" |
| 4:32PM |
0 |
BLX relocation regression on Thumb2 bot |
| 4:32PM |
0 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 4:27PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Introduction - "Enabling Polyhedral Optimizations in Julia" |
| 2:33PM |
2 |
BLX relocation regression on Thumb2 bot |
| 2:12PM |
0 |
BLX relocation regression on Thumb2 bot |
| 2:10PM |
0 |
Backward references in assembly absolute expressions |
| 1:46PM |
0 |
BE8 elf format on gold |
| 1:27PM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Introduction - "Enabling Polyhedral Optimizations in Julia" |
| 1:25PM |
0 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 1:10PM |
0 |
Automake Assembler Assumptions with LLVM-MC |
| 12:56PM |
3 |
sum elements in the vector |
| 12:46PM |
1 |
LLVM issuse:AArch64 TargetParser |
| 12:35PM |
2 |
Automake Assembler Assumptions with LLVM-MC |
| 12:31PM |
0 |
LLVM issuse:AArch64 TargetParser |
| 12:21PM |
2 |
LLVM issuse:AArch64 TargetParser |
| 12:17PM |
0 |
LLVM issuse:AArch64 TargetParser |
| 11:12AM |
3 |
BLX relocation regression on Thumb2 bot |
| 9:58AM |
2 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 9:23AM |
1 |
opt: symbol lookup error: |
| 8:27AM |
2 |
BE8 elf format on gold |
| 8:20AM |
0 |
Interested in writing for the LLVM blog? |
| 8:18AM |
2 |
Memory scope proposal |
| 7:59AM |
3 |
Interested in writing for the LLVM blog? |
| 6:45AM |
0 |
Interested in writing for the LLVM blog? |
| 4:27AM |
4 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 3:50AM |
0 |
llvm-toolchain-3.8 on lower arm targets, specifically Debian armel and Raspbian. |
| 3:49AM |
0 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 2:07AM |
1 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 1:39AM |
0 |
[RFC] Disabling DAG combines in /O0 |
| 1:14AM |
0 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 12:17AM |
2 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| |
| Tuesday May 17 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 10:49PM |
0 |
Interested in writing for the LLVM blog? |
| 10:41PM |
3 |
Interested in writing for the LLVM blog? |
| 10:15PM |
2 |
llvm-toolchain-3.8 on lower arm targets, specifically Debian armel and Raspbian. |
| 9:59PM |
0 |
Backward references in assembly absolute expressions |
| 9:46PM |
0 |
Interested in writing for the LLVM blog? |
| 9:41PM |
5 |
Interested in writing for the LLVM blog? |
| 9:38PM |
0 |
llvm-toolchain-3.8 on lower arm targets, specifically Debian armel and Raspbian. |
| 9:23PM |
0 |
-mllvm -inline-threshold no longer honored? |
| 8:54PM |
0 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 8:36PM |
2 |
llvm-toolchain-3.8 on lower arm targets, specifically Debian armel and Raspbian. |
| 8:02PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 7:44PM |
0 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 7:43PM |
3 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 7:40PM |
0 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 7:36PM |
1 |
Coverage Update on http://llvm.org/reports/coverage/ |
| 7:30PM |
4 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 7:24PM |
0 |
Coverage Update on http://llvm.org/reports/coverage/ |
| 7:13PM |
3 |
External function resolution: MCJIT vs ORC JIT |
| 7:04PM |
0 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 6:31PM |
2 |
Coverage Update on http://llvm.org/reports/coverage/ |
| 6:21PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 5:43PM |
3 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 5:14PM |
2 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 5:13PM |
3 |
-mllvm -inline-threshold no longer honored? |
| 5:07PM |
0 |
llvm-toolchain-3.8 on lower arm targets, specifically Debian armel and Raspbian. |
| 4:25PM |
0 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 4:10PM |
0 |
Struggling to define a simple instruction |
| 4:06PM |
1 |
clang dependency generation (-Mxx) with -emit-llvm |
| 3:57PM |
2 |
Function arguments pass by value or by reference. |
| 3:51PM |
2 |
How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 2:45PM |
0 |
Function arguments pass by value or by reference. |
| 2:37PM |
4 |
Determination of statements that contain only matrix multiplication |
| 1:25PM |
0 |
[RFC] Disabling DAG combines in /O0 |
| 12:02PM |
2 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 11:47AM |
0 |
Determination of statements that contain only matrix multiplication |
| 10:14AM |
0 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 9:13AM |
2 |
Function arguments pass by value or by reference. |
| 8:33AM |
0 |
How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 5:25AM |
3 |
llvm-toolchain-3.8 on lower arm targets, specifically Debian armel and Raspbian. |
| 4:00AM |
0 |
Default Implementation for Pseudo Instructions |
| 1:36AM |
5 |
[RFC] Disabling DAG combines in /O0 |
| 1:31AM |
0 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 1:20AM |
2 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 1:14AM |
1 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 1:07AM |
0 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 12:35AM |
0 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 12:31AM |
2 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 12:12AM |
0 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 12:06AM |
0 |
RFC: callee saved register verifier |
| |
| Monday May 16 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 10:50PM |
0 |
sum elements in the vector |
| 10:03PM |
0 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 9:56PM |
0 |
Struggling to define a simple instruction |
| 9:42PM |
6 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 9:19PM |
2 |
Testing CFL alias analysis |
| 9:10PM |
0 |
Buildbot numbers for the last week of 5/08/2016 - 5/14/2016 |
| 8:45PM |
1 |
Does anyone need these zorg modules? |
| 8:26PM |
1 |
Post SSA, not tracking liveness |
| 7:56PM |
2 |
SDNode type UNDEF in new llvm-backend |
| 6:58PM |
0 |
Coverage Update on http://llvm.org/reports/coverage/ |
| 6:31PM |
0 |
sum elements in the vector |
| 6:21PM |
0 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 5:52PM |
2 |
Determination of statements that contain only matrix multiplication |
| 5:19PM |
5 |
Coverage Update on http://llvm.org/reports/coverage/ |
| 4:53PM |
0 |
r267690 - [Clang][BuiltIn][AVX512]Adding intrinsics for vmovntdqa vmovntpd vmovntps instruction set |
| 2:46PM |
0 |
Integrated Assembler is now the default for mips-* and mipsel-* triples. |
| 2:39PM |
2 |
How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 1:07PM |
4 |
Working on FP SCEV Analysis |
| 11:24AM |
0 |
LLVM Weekly - #124, May 16th 2016 |
| 10:11AM |
4 |
sum elements in the vector |
| 9:56AM |
1 |
[llvm dev] do we have allocator hook to use maximum different registers? |
| 4:12AM |
1 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 4:11AM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 1:15AM |
0 |
sum elements in the vector |
| 12:53AM |
0 |
Access to dynamic execution information. |
| |
| Sunday May 15 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 8:46PM |
2 |
RFC: callee saved register verifier |
| 6:21PM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 12:55PM |
2 |
r267690 - [Clang][BuiltIn][AVX512]Adding intrinsics for vmovntdqa vmovntpd vmovntps instruction set |
| 7:43AM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| |
| Saturday May 14 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 5:44PM |
0 |
[GSoc 2016] Introduction - Capture Tracking Improvements |
| 4:58PM |
1 |
llvm:opt<> objects in libraries |
| 4:33PM |
3 |
Integrated Assembler is now the default for mips-* and mipsel-* triples. |
| 9:20AM |
1 |
[cfe-dev] LLVM Releases: Upstream vs. Downstream / Distros |
| |
| Friday May 13 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:10PM |
0 |
RFC: callee saved register verifier |
| 10:51PM |
2 |
RFC: callee saved register verifier |
| 10:45PM |
0 |
RFC: callee saved register verifier |
| 10:32PM |
4 |
RFC: callee saved register verifier |
| 8:29PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Improving the quality of debug locations / DbgValueHistoryCalculator |
| 7:51PM |
0 |
[RFC] Disabling DAG combines in /O0 |
| 7:21PM |
3 |
[RFC] Disabling DAG combines in /O0 |
| 6:27PM |
1 |
Creating and using "shared library" of LLVM IR |
| 6:14PM |
0 |
How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 6:00PM |
0 |
Creating and using "shared library" of LLVM IR |
| 5:56PM |
3 |
Creating and using "shared library" of LLVM IR |
| 5:44PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] LLVM Releases: Upstream vs. Downstream / Distros |
| 5:40PM |
0 |
Creating and using "shared library" of LLVM IR |
| 5:27PM |
2 |
Creating and using "shared library" of LLVM IR |
| 3:27PM |
2 |
LLVM Releases: Upstream vs. Downstream / Distros |
| 3:14PM |
0 |
[RFC] Fail early on unimplementable append linkage uses |
| 2:35PM |
3 |
Access to dynamic execution information. |
| 2:18PM |
2 |
How to debug if LTO generate wrong code? |
| 2:11PM |
0 |
[RFC] Fail early on unimplementable append linkage uses |
| 12:56PM |
2 |
[RFC] Fail early on unimplementable append linkage uses |
| 12:51PM |
0 |
[RFC] Fail early on unimplementable append linkage uses |
| 12:43PM |
4 |
[RFC] Fail early on unimplementable append linkage uses |
| 10:52AM |
1 |
LLVM CFLAliasAnalysis Inter-Procedural Queries not working |
| 7:36AM |
0 |
A question about AArch64 Cortex-A57 subtarget definition |
| 6:21AM |
4 |
RFC: LNT/Test-suite support for custom metrics and test parameterization |
| 4:53AM |
1 |
[GSoC 2016] Introduction & Feedback - Better Alias Analysis |
| 2:30AM |
1 |
Filter optimization remarks by the hotness of the code region |
| 2:17AM |
0 |
Filter optimization remarks by the hotness of the code region |
| 12:13AM |
2 |
A question about AArch64 Cortex-A57 subtarget definition |
| |
| Thursday May 12 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:39PM |
0 |
Deleting function IR after codegen |
| 11:32PM |
2 |
Deleting function IR after codegen |
| 11:11PM |
0 |
Deleting function IR after codegen |
| 11:05PM |
1 |
specify dag pattern for an instructions |
| 9:30PM |
1 |
Before we go cleaning up LLVM+Clang of all Static Analyzer Warnings... |
| 9:20PM |
1 |
Handling misaligned array accesses |
| 9:05PM |
0 |
Before we go cleaning up LLVM+Clang of all Static Analyzer Warnings... |
| 9:04PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Improving the quality of debug locations / DbgValueHistoryCalculator |
| 8:32PM |
0 |
Questions on Clang's documentation of Modules |
| 8:06PM |
1 |
LLVM Releases: Upstream vs. Downstream / Distros |
| 7:06PM |
2 |
Orc/MCJIT: Relocations vs pointers to functions |
| 6:33PM |
2 |
Before we go cleaning up LLVM+Clang of all Static Analyzer Warnings... |
| 6:33PM |
3 |
llvm IR to C/C++ conversion |
| 6:30PM |
0 |
Orc/MCJIT: Relocations vs pointers to functions |
| 6:00PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Improving the quality of debug locations / DbgValueHistoryCalculator |
| 5:46PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Introduction & Feedback - Better Alias Analysis |
| 5:29PM |
0 |
[RFC] New diagnostic handler for llc |
| 5:16PM |
3 |
[RFC] New diagnostic handler for llc |
| 4:21PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Improving the quality of debug locations / DbgValueHistoryCalculator |
| 4:15PM |
0 |
LLVM Releases: Upstream vs. Downstream / Distros |
| 4:12PM |
0 |
LLVM Releases: Upstream vs. Downstream / Distros |
| 4:07PM |
2 |
LLVM Releases: Upstream vs. Downstream / Distros |
| 4:07PM |
2 |
LLVM Releases: Upstream vs. Downstream / Distros |
| 3:57PM |
0 |
LLVM Releases: Upstream vs. Downstream / Distros |
| 3:53PM |
0 |
LLVM Releases: Upstream vs. Downstream / Distros |
| 3:47PM |
2 |
LLVM Releases: Upstream vs. Downstream / Distros |
| 3:40PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] LLVM Releases: Upstream vs. Downstream / Distros |
| 3:27PM |
1 |
LLVM Releases: Upstream vs. Downstream / Distros |
| 3:22PM |
0 |
LLVM Releases: Upstream vs. Downstream / Distros |
| 2:56PM |
7 |
LLVM Releases: Upstream vs. Downstream / Distros |
| 2:00PM |
0 |
Why LR is saved before calling a 'noreturn' function ? |
| 1:46PM |
0 |
[GSoC'16] Introduction - SAFECode Memory Policy Hardening - Zhengyang Liu |
| 1:26PM |
3 |
Why LR is saved before calling a 'noreturn' function ? |
| 1:19PM |
0 |
[RFC] New diagnostic handler for llc |
| 1:09PM |
1 |
How to determine it is a function pointer or not? |
| 12:20PM |
4 |
[RFC] New diagnostic handler for llc |
| 11:18AM |
0 |
ARM ILP32 Data model.... |
| 10:57AM |
1 |
questions about temporary variables in IntermidateRepresentation(IR) |
| 10:38AM |
2 |
ARM ILP32 Data model.... |
| 9:27AM |
1 |
non-temporal loads and stores |
| 8:20AM |
0 |
Assembler directive for extended precision float? |
| 7:38AM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Introduction & Feedback - Better Alias Analysis |
| 7:29AM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Introduction & Feedback - Better Alias Analysis |
| 6:40AM |
2 |
Questions on Clang's documentation of Modules |
| 4:57AM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Introduction & Feedback - Better Alias Analysis |
| 4:07AM |
3 |
sum elements in the vector |
| 2:46AM |
0 |
"No machine model for <op> on processor"? |
| 12:16AM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Introduction & Feedback - Better Alias Analysis |
| 12:10AM |
0 |
LLVM Releases: Upstream vs. Downstream / Distros |
| |
| Wednesday May 11 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 10:47PM |
0 |
LLVM Releases: Upstream vs. Downstream / Distros |
| 10:31PM |
0 |
llvm-foundation mailing list created |
| 10:02PM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Introduction & Feedback - Better Alias Analysis |
| 9:53PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Improving the quality of debug locations / DbgValueHistoryCalculator |
| 9:52PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Improving the quality of debug locations / DbgValueHistoryCalculator |
| 9:26PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [OpenCL] Question about pre-linking passes required to build OpenCL program |
| 9:14PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Improving the quality of debug locations / DbgValueHistoryCalculator |
| 9:09PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Improving the quality of debug locations / DbgValueHistoryCalculator |
| 8:43PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Improving the quality of debug locations / DbgValueHistoryCalculator |
| 8:16PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Improving the quality of debug locations / DbgValueHistoryCalculator |
| 8:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Improving the quality of debug locations / DbgValueHistoryCalculator |
| 6:19PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 6:18PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm |
| 6:16PM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 6:14PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 6:10PM |
6 |
LLVM Releases: Upstream vs. Downstream / Distros |
| 5:51PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm |
| 5:49PM |
3 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 5:47PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 5:46PM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 5:45PM |
4 |
Filter optimization remarks by the hotness of the code region |
| 5:39PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm |
| 4:16PM |
0 |
LLVM Releases: Upstream vs. Downstream / Distros |
| 2:59PM |
1 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 2:17PM |
1 |
Selecting optimization passes in the JIT |
| 2:08PM |
7 |
LLVM Releases: Upstream vs. Downstream / Distros |
| 2:04PM |
1 |
confused GetElementPtr, how to use it properly. |
| 1:47PM |
2 |
Orc/MCJIT: Relocations vs pointers to functions |
| 12:44PM |
0 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 12:27PM |
1 |
operation about confused Load GetElementPtr inst. |
| 10:37AM |
0 |
Filter optimization remarks by the hotness of the code region |
| 10:31AM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 8:53AM |
2 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 8:15AM |
3 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 6:47AM |
0 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 6:32AM |
2 |
RFC: Up front type information generation in clang and llvm |
| 6:15AM |
2 |
Filter optimization remarks by the hotness of the code region |
| 6:09AM |
1 |
Can't compile LLVM project on Linux Debian |
| 6:07AM |
1 |
Non-void function does not return value |
| 4:32AM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 4:13AM |
4 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 1:10AM |
2 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 1:06AM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 12:48AM |
2 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 12:39AM |
0 |
Filter optimization remarks by the hotness of the code region |
| 12:32AM |
1 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 12:32AM |
1 |
[llvm dev] do we have allocator hook to use maximum different registers? |
| |
| Tuesday May 10 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:55PM |
0 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 10:49PM |
0 |
Atomic LL/SC loops in llvm |
| 10:28PM |
2 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 10:03PM |
0 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 9:24PM |
0 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 9:17PM |
3 |
[OpenCL] Question about pre-linking passes required to build OpenCL program |
| 9:13PM |
0 |
How to extend alias analysis to enable further optimisations? |
| 9:08PM |
2 |
Atomic LL/SC loops in llvm |
| 9:05PM |
0 |
[Openmp-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 9:04PM |
0 |
Atomic LL/SC loops in llvm |
| 8:50PM |
1 |
Atomic LL/SC loops in llvm |
| 8:41PM |
0 |
[llvm dev] do we have allocator hook to use maximum different registers? |
| 8:29PM |
3 |
[llvm dev] do we have allocator hook to use maximum different registers? |
| 8:26PM |
2 |
How to extend alias analysis to enable further optimisations? |
| 8:02PM |
0 |
Atomic LL/SC loops in llvm |
| 7:59PM |
3 |
[GSoC 2016] Interprocedural Register Allocation - Introduction and Feedback |
| 7:28PM |
2 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 7:22PM |
4 |
Atomic LL/SC loops in llvm |
| 7:02PM |
0 |
typedef not present in the python AST |
| 6:45PM |
0 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 5:48PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Introduction - "Enabling Polyhedral Optimizations in Julia" |
| 5:45PM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Introduction - "Enabling Polyhedral Optimizations in Julia" |
| 5:37PM |
1 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 5:28PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 5:21PM |
1 |
Do LLVM passes have different behavior depending on the target triple and/or the optimization level selected? |
| 3:35PM |
0 |
Some questions about phase ordering in OPT and LLC |
| 3:32PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 3:21PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Introduction - "Enabling Polyhedral Optimizations in Julia" |
| 2:25PM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Introduction - "Enabling Polyhedral Optimizations in Julia" |
| 1:17PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Introduction - "Enabling Polyhedral Optimizations in Julia" |
| 12:59PM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Introduction - "Enabling Polyhedral Optimizations in Julia" |
| 10:52AM |
0 |
How to register a pass as being optional? |
| 10:45AM |
0 |
C++ CreateConstGEP questions |
| 7:24AM |
1 |
Did llvm.org just run out of disk space? |
| 6:59AM |
0 |
Did llvm.org just run out of disk space? |
| 6:46AM |
2 |
Did llvm.org just run out of disk space? |
| 5:16AM |
2 |
Some questions about phase ordering in OPT and LLC |
| 3:12AM |
0 |
Problem on cross-compiling compiler-rt |
| 1:53AM |
0 |
Unnecessary spill/fill issue |
| 12:26AM |
2 |
How to register a pass as being optional? |
| |
| Monday May 9 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:42PM |
4 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 11:26PM |
0 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 10:38PM |
2 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 10:17PM |
0 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 10:09PM |
1 |
Unnecessary spill/fill issue |
| 9:55PM |
0 |
Some questions about phase ordering in OPT and LLC |
| 9:41PM |
0 |
Unnecessary spill/fill issue |
| 9:33PM |
2 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 9:31PM |
2 |
Some questions about phase ordering in OPT and LLC |
| 8:55PM |
0 |
Buildbot numbers for the last week of 5/01/2016 - 5/07/2016 |
| 8:55PM |
0 |
Buildbot numbers for week of 4/24/2016 - 4/30/2016 |
| 8:53PM |
0 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 8:11PM |
2 |
C++ CreateConstGEP questions |
| 8:08PM |
1 |
x.with.overflow semantics question |
| 8:07PM |
0 |
Some questions about phase ordering in OPT and LLC |
| 7:47PM |
0 |
x.with.overflow semantics question |
| 7:47PM |
0 |
Replacing an instruction in a post-RA pass |
| 7:43PM |
2 |
Replacing an instruction in a post-RA pass |
| 6:35PM |
0 |
Is it possible to avoid inserting spill/split code in certain instruction sequence in RA? |
| 6:30PM |
2 |
Is it possible to avoid inserting spill/split code in certain instruction sequence in RA? |
| 6:28PM |
0 |
sum elements in the vector |
| 6:19PM |
0 |
Fwd: sum elements in the vector |
| 6:07PM |
4 |
[cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 6:03PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 5:45PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 5:43PM |
4 |
Some questions about phase ordering in OPT and LLC |
| 5:32PM |
5 |
[cfe-dev] [Openmp-dev] RFC: Proposing an LLVM subproject for parallelism runtime and support libraries |
| 5:22PM |
3 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 4:14PM |
0 |
access to MIOperandInfo values in asm string |
| 4:05PM |
0 |
Missing kill flag on Machine Instruction operands |
| 4:02PM |
0 |
Removing pointers from MCInstrDesc for less relocations |
| 3:56PM |
2 |
Removing pointers from MCInstrDesc for less relocations |
| 3:37PM |
2 |
Missing kill flag on Machine Instruction operands |
| 3:22PM |
0 |
Building LLVM 3.8 and later with 2016 Intel C++ compiler |
| 3:13PM |
2 |
Building LLVM 3.8 and later with 2016 Intel C++ compiler |
| 2:59PM |
2 |
Status of the official LLVM APT repositories |
| 2:45PM |
0 |
Status of the official LLVM APT repositories |
| 2:34PM |
4 |
Status of the official LLVM APT repositories |
| 1:34PM |
1 |
Resolve line numbers with LLVM symbolizer |
| 1:02PM |
0 |
Is the CppBackend still supported? |
| 12:25PM |
1 |
Debug info scope of explicit casting type does not seem correct |
| 10:19AM |
0 |
Removing pointers from MCInstrDesc for less relocations |
| 8:39AM |
0 |
LLVM issuse:AArch64 TargetParser |
| 8:24AM |
0 |
LLVM Weekly - #123, May 9th 2016 |
| 8:19AM |
2 |
LLVM issuse:AArch64 TargetParser |
| 6:14AM |
2 |
x.with.overflow semantics question |
| 3:35AM |
2 |
Removing pointers from MCInstrDesc for less relocations |
| 2:07AM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| |
| Sunday May 8 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:59PM |
1 |
About Clang llvm PGO |
| 9:31PM |
0 |
Status of the official LLVM APT repositories |
| 9:14PM |
0 |
x.with.overflow semantics question |
| 9:14PM |
0 |
About Clang llvm PGO |
| 8:57PM |
3 |
x.with.overflow semantics question |
| 8:31PM |
0 |
x.with.overflow semantics question |
| 8:22PM |
2 |
x.with.overflow semantics question |
| 3:18PM |
1 |
build issue in llvm-clang cross tool chain for arm target |
| 3:11PM |
0 |
Debug info scope of explicit casting type does not seem correct |
| 2:22PM |
0 |
build issue in llvm-clang cross tool chain for arm target |
| 2:13PM |
1 |
facing issue for building llvm-clang cross tool chain for arm target |
| 8:13AM |
2 |
Debug info scope of explicit casting type does not seem correct |
| 4:13AM |
2 |
typedef not present in the python AST |
| |
| Saturday May 7 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:43PM |
1 |
[GSoC 2016] Introduction - Polly as an Analysis pass in LLVM |
| 6:55PM |
2 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 6:38PM |
0 |
Debug info scope of explicit casting type does not seem correct |
| 5:27PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Introduction - Polly as an Analysis pass in LLVM |
| 2:59PM |
3 |
[GSoC 2016] Introduction - Polly as an Analysis pass in LLVM |
| 12:54PM |
0 |
DSA - CallTargets output |
| 10:02AM |
2 |
Debug info scope of explicit casting type does not seem correct |
| 9:17AM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 5:54AM |
1 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 12:08AM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 12:06AM |
2 |
About Clang llvm PGO |
| |
| Friday May 6 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:47PM |
1 |
[IndVarSimplify] Narrow IV's are not eliminated resulting in inefficient code |
| 11:45PM |
1 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 11:38PM |
0 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 11:25PM |
2 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 11:06PM |
3 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 11:01PM |
0 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 10:53PM |
2 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 10:48PM |
0 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 10:41PM |
1 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 10:40PM |
2 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 10:31PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 10:17PM |
0 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 10:13PM |
4 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 9:57PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 9:35PM |
2 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 9:29PM |
2 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 9:23PM |
0 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 9:21PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 9:14PM |
0 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 9:10PM |
4 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 9:09PM |
0 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 8:57PM |
1 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 8:55PM |
2 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 8:54PM |
1 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 8:49PM |
0 |
machine-cse after RA ? |
| 8:49PM |
1 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 8:46PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 8:38PM |
2 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 8:30PM |
0 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 8:21PM |
0 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 8:20PM |
3 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 8:17PM |
10 |
RFC: metadata attachments for global variables |
| 8:16PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 8:08PM |
0 |
Passing structs in C calling convention |
| 8:04PM |
3 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 7:56PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 7:47PM |
3 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 7:39PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 6:46PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 6:34PM |
2 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 6:28PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 6:16PM |
2 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 6:04PM |
1 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 6:03PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 5:44PM |
3 |
Unnecessary spill/fill issue |
| 5:43PM |
6 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 5:28PM |
3 |
build issue in llvm-clang cross tool chain for arm target |
| 4:41PM |
1 |
OrcLazyJIT for windows |
| 4:16PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 4:02PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 3:30PM |
1 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 2:59PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 2:55PM |
4 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 2:53PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 1:47PM |
2 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 12:39PM |
0 |
DFW Area LLVM Social |
| 11:32AM |
2 |
Passing structs in C calling convention |
| 10:09AM |
0 |
Before we go cleaning up LLVM+Clang of all Static Analyzer Warnings... |
| 9:14AM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 7:17AM |
0 |
Link Module with blocks cause module destruction assert |
| 7:15AM |
0 |
LLVM issuse:AArch64 TargetParser |
| 5:20AM |
1 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 4:54AM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 4:41AM |
2 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 4:01AM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 3:34AM |
1 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 3:08AM |
1 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 2:37AM |
1 |
Spill code |
| 2:21AM |
0 |
Spill code |
| 2:10AM |
2 |
Spill code |
| 2:09AM |
1 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 1:53AM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 1:15AM |
2 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 12:55AM |
2 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 12:52AM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 12:45AM |
0 |
RFC: Adding an itanium c++ demangler to lib/Support |
| 12:36AM |
2 |
Problem on cross-compiling compiler-rt |
| 12:10AM |
2 |
RFC: Adding an itanium c++ demangler to lib/Support |
| 12:09AM |
1 |
OPERAND_MEMORY in MCOperandInfo |
| 12:06AM |
4 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| |
| Thursday May 5 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:55PM |
1 |
How to use -ds-aa in llvm |
| 11:53PM |
1 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 11:44PM |
2 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 11:35PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 11:34PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 11:30PM |
2 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 11:26PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 11:02PM |
5 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 11:00PM |
1 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 10:51PM |
0 |
[ThinLTO] RFC: ThinLTO distributed backend interface |
| 10:33PM |
1 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 10:31PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 10:22PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 10:18PM |
7 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 10:06PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 10:01PM |
0 |
how to build poolalloc |
| 9:53PM |
0 |
Problem on cross-compiling compiler-rt |
| 9:49PM |
3 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 9:39PM |
2 |
SelectionDAGISel::Select's API considered harmful |
| 9:38PM |
3 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 9:19PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 8:52PM |
1 |
Status of new pass manager work |
| 8:50PM |
0 |
Status of new pass manager work |
| 8:47PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 8:39PM |
0 |
Disable ARM specific pass. |
| 8:29PM |
2 |
Disable ARM specific pass. |
| 8:24PM |
2 |
Status of new pass manager work |
| 8:08PM |
2 |
Problem on cross-compiling compiler-rt |
| 8:03PM |
3 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 7:42PM |
1 |
Before we go cleaning up LLVM+Clang of all Static Analyzer Warnings... |
| 7:12PM |
0 |
Status of new pass manager work |
| 7:11PM |
0 |
Problem on cross-compiling compiler-rt |
| 7:10PM |
1 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 7:06PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 6:57PM |
1 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 6:50PM |
0 |
Before we go cleaning up LLVM+Clang of all Static Analyzer Warnings... |
| 6:50PM |
0 |
RFC: Adding an itanium c++ demangler to lib/Support |
| 6:49PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 6:49PM |
1 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 6:48PM |
3 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 6:47PM |
4 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 6:43PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 6:42PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 6:42PM |
2 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 6:33PM |
2 |
Problem on cross-compiling compiler-rt |
| 6:30PM |
3 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 6:20PM |
4 |
Before we go cleaning up LLVM+Clang of all Static Analyzer Warnings... |
| 6:15PM |
1 |
Conditional tablegen expressions with math ops? |
| 6:14PM |
3 |
RFC: Adding an itanium c++ demangler to lib/Support |
| 5:58PM |
0 |
RFC: Adding an itanium c++ demangler to lib/Support |
| 5:27PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 5:08PM |
0 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 5:07PM |
2 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 4:35PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 4:16PM |
2 |
LLVM issuse:AArch64 TargetParser |
| 4:05PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 3:53PM |
8 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 3:23PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 2:52PM |
6 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 2:41PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 1:37PM |
3 |
RFC: Adding an itanium c++ demangler to lib/Support |
| 1:02PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 12:58PM |
0 |
RFC: Adding an itanium c++ demangler to lib/Support |
| 12:51PM |
1 |
MCJIT - missing DataLayout? |
| 12:48PM |
0 |
MCJIT - missing DataLayout? |
| 12:47PM |
4 |
RFC: Adding an itanium c++ demangler to lib/Support |
| 12:44PM |
7 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 12:23PM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 12:01PM |
0 |
LLVM issuse:AArch64 TargetParser |
| 11:59AM |
1 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 11:58AM |
2 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 11:42AM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 11:32AM |
4 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 11:14AM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 10:42AM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 10:36AM |
0 |
No remapping of clone instruction in CloneBasicBlock |
| 10:25AM |
0 |
LLVM cross compilation for arm target |
| 10:20AM |
2 |
LLVM cross compilation for arm target |
| 10:11AM |
4 |
LLVM issuse:AArch64 TargetParser |
| 9:54AM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 9:41AM |
6 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 9:34AM |
2 |
MCJIT - missing DataLayout? |
| 8:58AM |
0 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 8:47AM |
2 |
No remapping of clone instruction in CloneBasicBlock |
| 8:29AM |
3 |
Status of new pass manager work |
| 8:21AM |
12 |
Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct |
| 8:05AM |
0 |
typos in BackEnds.rst |
| 5:37AM |
1 |
Code which should exit 1 is exiting 0 |
| 3:06AM |
2 |
struct layout in AIX |
| 1:19AM |
0 |
RFC [ThinLTO]: An embedded summary encoding to support CFI and vtable opt |
| 1:09AM |
0 |
OrcLazyJIT for windows |
| 1:04AM |
0 |
Code which should exit 1 is exiting 0 |
| 12:41AM |
0 |
Code which should exit 1 is exiting 0 |
| 12:32AM |
0 |
Code which should exit 1 is exiting 0 |
| 12:25AM |
6 |
Code which should exit 1 is exiting 0 |
| 12:08AM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] Fwd: Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 |
| 12:07AM |
5 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| |
| Wednesday May 4 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:54PM |
0 |
Filter optimization remarks by the hotness of the code region |
| 11:41PM |
0 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 10:34PM |
0 |
Is the CppBackend still supported? |
| 10:31PM |
1 |
status of IPO/IPCP? |
| 10:12PM |
2 |
Is the CppBackend still supported? |
| 10:10PM |
0 |
Is the CppBackend still supported? |
| 10:02PM |
4 |
RFC [ThinLTO]: An embedded summary encoding to support CFI and vtable opt |
| 9:48PM |
2 |
Is the CppBackend still supported? |
| 9:39PM |
2 |
OrcLazyJIT for windows |
| 8:01PM |
1 |
Is the CppBackend still supported? |
| 7:18PM |
0 |
Is the CppBackend still supported? |
| 6:38PM |
0 |
[Job Ad] LLVM Compiler Engineer Position at Octasic Inc. |
| 6:35PM |
0 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 6:21PM |
0 |
OrcLazyJIT for windows |
| 6:17PM |
2 |
OrcLazyJIT for windows |
| 6:12PM |
4 |
Filter optimization remarks by the hotness of the code region |
| 4:50PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] Fwd: Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 |
| 4:07PM |
2 |
OpenMP 4.x Target Backend |
| 3:47PM |
1 |
RFC [ThinLTO]: Promoting more aggressively in order to reduce incremental link time and allow sharing between linkage units |
| 3:21PM |
3 |
Is the CppBackend still supported? |
| 3:19PM |
0 |
RFC [ThinLTO]: Promoting more aggressively in order to reduce incremental link time and allow sharing between linkage units |
| 2:58PM |
0 |
raw_pwrite_stream on a non-fixed-size buffer? |
| 2:47PM |
2 |
raw_pwrite_stream on a non-fixed-size buffer? |
| 1:26PM |
1 |
Clang 3.8 and gcc 5.2 has difference in symbol names |
| 1:01PM |
0 |
Clang 3.8 and gcc 5.2 has difference in symbol names |
| 12:52PM |
2 |
Clang 3.8 and gcc 5.2 has difference in symbol names |
| 12:34PM |
1 |
questions about AliasAnalysis(Basic Alias Analysis) in llvm3.3 |
| 10:10AM |
0 |
Is the CppBackend still supported? |
| 8:35AM |
2 |
Is the CppBackend still supported? |
| 6:52AM |
0 |
status of IPO/IPCP? |
| 6:18AM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Attaining 90% of the turbo boost peak with a C version of Matrix-Matrix Multiplication |
| 6:01AM |
3 |
status of IPO/IPCP? |
| 5:48AM |
0 |
llvm dynamic execution trace |
| 5:35AM |
0 |
RFC [ThinLTO]: Promoting more aggressively in order to reduce incremental link time and allow sharing between linkage units |
| 5:25AM |
3 |
RFC [ThinLTO]: Promoting more aggressively in order to reduce incremental link time and allow sharing between linkage units |
| 5:10AM |
2 |
llvm dynamic execution trace |
| 5:04AM |
0 |
RFC [ThinLTO]: Promoting more aggressively in order to reduce incremental link time and allow sharing between linkage units |
| 5:01AM |
2 |
RFC [ThinLTO]: Promoting more aggressively in order to reduce incremental link time and allow sharing between linkage units |
| 5:00AM |
1 |
GVN pass: does global value numbering remove duplicate computations in loops? |
| 4:50AM |
0 |
status of IPO/IPCP? |
| 4:21AM |
0 |
GVN pass: does global value numbering remove duplicate computations in loops? |
| 4:18AM |
0 |
llvm dynamic execution trace |
| 4:05AM |
2 |
llvm dynamic execution trace |
| 4:01AM |
0 |
RFC [ThinLTO]: Promoting more aggressively in order to reduce incremental link time and allow sharing between linkage units |
| 2:42AM |
2 |
GVN pass: does global value numbering remove duplicate computations in loops? |
| 2:24AM |
0 |
Problem on cross-compiling compiler-rt |
| 1:39AM |
1 |
Conditional tablegen expressions with math ops? |
| 1:32AM |
0 |
Conditional tablegen expressions with math ops? |
| 1:01AM |
0 |
GVN pass: does global value numbering remove duplicate computations in loops? |
| 12:55AM |
2 |
GVN pass: does global value numbering remove duplicate computations in loops? |
| 12:39AM |
0 |
GVN pass: does global value numbering remove duplicate computations in loops? |
| 12:25AM |
2 |
GVN pass: does global value numbering remove duplicate computations in loops? |
| 12:20AM |
4 |
Conditional tablegen expressions with math ops? |
| |
| Tuesday May 3 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:40PM |
1 |
[RFC] Non-Temporal hints from Loop Vectorizer |
| 10:55PM |
0 |
Reasoning about known bits of the absolute value of a signed integer |
| 10:06PM |
2 |
status of IPO/IPCP? |
| 9:27PM |
1 |
enable/disable features through clang |
| 8:47PM |
0 |
enable/disable features through clang |
| 8:36PM |
0 |
[RFC] Non-Temporal hints from Loop Vectorizer |
| 8:36PM |
0 |
Is the CppBackend still supported? |
| 8:23PM |
5 |
Is the CppBackend still supported? |
| 8:14PM |
0 |
Is the CppBackend still supported? |
| 8:11PM |
0 |
RFC: Should the default LLVM build be deterministic? |
| 7:45PM |
1 |
RFC: Should the default LLVM build be deterministic? |
| 7:45PM |
2 |
[RFC] Non-Temporal hints from Loop Vectorizer |
| 7:29PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] Fwd: Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 |
| 7:13PM |
0 |
Is the CppBackend still supported? |
| 6:53PM |
0 |
[MemorySSA] Potential CachingMemorySSAWalker bug |
| 6:30PM |
0 |
Linux/ARM: Segfault issue when we build clang sources including __thread variable using -O2 flag |
| 5:26PM |
0 |
[RFC] Non-Temporal hints from Loop Vectorizer |
| 5:21PM |
0 |
[RFC] Non-Temporal hints from Loop Vectorizer |
| 5:01PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] Fwd: Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 |
| 4:53PM |
0 |
RFC: Should the default LLVM build be deterministic? |
| 4:50PM |
0 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 4:31PM |
3 |
Reasoning about known bits of the absolute value of a signed integer |
| 4:28PM |
2 |
Problem on cross-compiling compiler-rt |
| 4:07PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] Fwd: Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 |
| 3:57PM |
8 |
RFC: Should the default LLVM build be deterministic? |
| 3:44PM |
0 |
compiler-rt: inconsistant build of i386 support on x86_64 |
| 3:26PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] Fwd: Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 |
| 3:12PM |
2 |
[cfe-dev] Fwd: Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 |
| 2:28PM |
2 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 2:04PM |
0 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 1:55PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] Fwd: Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 |
| 11:04AM |
4 |
Is the CppBackend still supported? |
| 10:40AM |
6 |
[RFC] Non-Temporal hints from Loop Vectorizer |
| 8:55AM |
0 |
Linux/ARM: Segfault issue when we build clang sources including __thread variable using -O2 flag |
| 8:14AM |
4 |
Linux/ARM: Segfault issue when we build clang sources including __thread variable using -O2 flag |
| 7:09AM |
0 |
Problem on cross-compiling compiler-rt |
| 6:42AM |
2 |
Problem on cross-compiling compiler-rt |
| 5:45AM |
0 |
May LLVM bay-area social is this Thursday! |
| |
| Monday May 2 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:45PM |
0 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 11:17PM |
2 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 11:05PM |
3 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 11:03PM |
4 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 10:45PM |
0 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 10:01PM |
0 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 9:57PM |
2 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 9:48PM |
0 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 9:43PM |
0 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 9:39PM |
2 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 9:33PM |
0 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 9:26PM |
2 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 9:05PM |
0 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 8:35PM |
10 |
[RFC] Helping release management |
| 7:22PM |
2 |
[MemorySSA] Potential CachingMemorySSAWalker bug |
| 7:01PM |
0 |
[cfe-dev] Fwd: Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 |
| 6:34PM |
0 |
[MemorySSA] Potential CachingMemorySSAWalker bug |
| 6:32PM |
2 |
[MemorySSA] Potential CachingMemorySSAWalker bug |
| 6:16PM |
0 |
[MemorySSA] Potential CachingMemorySSAWalker bug |
| 6:07PM |
2 |
[GSoC 2016] Attaining 90% of the turbo boost peak with a C version of Matrix-Matrix Multiplication |
| 6:03PM |
0 |
[GSoC 2016] Introduction of "Improvement of vectorization process in Polly" |
| 5:48PM |
5 |
[cfe-dev] Fwd: Raising CMake minimum version to 3.4.3 |
| 5:46PM |
0 |
How to convert assembly code to executable |
| 5:42PM |
1 |
(Orc)JIT and weak symbol resolution |
| 5:32PM |
3 |
enable/disable features through clang |
| 3:28PM |
0 |
LLVM Weekly - #122, May 2nd 2016 |
| 2:46PM |
0 |
Memory scope proposal |
| 2:27PM |
3 |
How to convert assembly code to executable |
| 1:07AM |
3 |
Status of the official LLVM APT repositories |
| |
| Sunday May 1 2016 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 4:53PM |
0 |
r267690 - [Clang][BuiltIn][AVX512]Adding intrinsics for vmovntdqa vmovntpd vmovntps instruction set |
| 1:51PM |
0 |
Missing clang-modernize in 3.8 (Debian 8 Jessie) |
| 1:04PM |
2 |
r267690 - [Clang][BuiltIn][AVX512]Adding intrinsics for vmovntdqa vmovntpd vmovntps instruction set |
| 12:21PM |
1 |
basic blocks with input and output parameters instead of phis |
| 8:11AM |
0 |
Status of the official LLVM APT repositories |