llvm dev - May 2016 - [RFC] Helping release management

> On May 2, 2016, at 2:48 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 02:39:12PM -0700, Quentin Colombet wrote:
>> Hi Joerg,
>> 
>>> On May 2, 2016, at 2:33 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 01:35:27PM -0700, Quentin Colombet via
llvm-dev wrote:
>>>> 1. Use [Fix] for commit related to bug fixes.
>>> 
>>> I'm not really such a big fan of this format, adds too much
noise.
>> 
>> What alternatives do you have in mind? 
> 
> If the goal is to help with release management, handle it similar to
> phabricator etc, i.e. "MT3.8: yes" or so as data.
This is a post commit thing, right?

I do not think people actively set properties (in the SVN sense) on their
commits or are you referring to something else?
> 
> Joerg
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev

On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 02:57:45PM -0700, Quentin Colombet
wrote:
> 
> > On May 2, 2016, at 2:48 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 02:39:12PM -0700, Quentin Colombet wrote:
> >> Hi Joerg,
> >> 
> >>> On May 2, 2016, at 2:33 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 01:35:27PM -0700, Quentin Colombet via
llvm-dev wrote:
> >>>> 1. Use [Fix] for commit related to bug fixes.
> >>> 
> >>> I'm not really such a big fan of this format, adds too
much noise.
> >> 
> >> What alternatives do you have in mind? 
> > 
> > If the goal is to help with release management, handle it similar to
> > phabricator etc, i.e. "MT3.8: yes" or so as data.
> 
> This is a post commit thing, right?
> 
> I do not think people actively set properties (in the SVN sense) on their
commits or are you referring to something else?
Just include it in the commit message. That's easy to process with tools
already.

Joerg

> On May 2, 2016, at 3:01 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 02:57:45PM -0700, Quentin Colombet wrote:
>> 
>>> On May 2, 2016, at 2:48 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 02:39:12PM -0700, Quentin Colombet wrote:
>>>> Hi Joerg,
>>>> 
>>>>> On May 2, 2016, at 2:33 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 01:35:27PM -0700, Quentin Colombet
via llvm-dev wrote:
>>>>>> 1. Use [Fix] for commit related to bug fixes.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'm not really such a big fan of this format, adds too
much noise.
>>>> 
>>>> What alternatives do you have in mind? 
>>> 
>>> If the goal is to help with release management, handle it similar
to
>>> phabricator etc, i.e. "MT3.8: yes" or so as data.
>> 
>> This is a post commit thing, right?
>> 
>> I do not think people actively set properties (in the SVN sense) on
their commits or are you referring to something else?
> 
> Just include it in the commit message. That's easy to process with
tools
> already.
Oh ok, then you are suggesting a tagging mechanism like I was :).
> 
> Joerg
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
<http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160502/e14231fe/attachment.html>