llvm dev - Jun 2016 - [Openmp-dev] parallel-lib: New LLVM Suproject

Hi Andrey,

Sorry, I definitely misspoke when I said it was likely for OpenMP stuff to
end up in this new project. I meant to say that it was possible in the long
run, but there are no plans for that now.

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:55 AM Andrey Bokhanko <andreybokhanko at
gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Jason Henline via Openmp-dev <
> openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> it seems likely that other OpenMP stuff could end up in there in the
long
>> run.
>>
>
> Huh? What makes you think so?
>
> Have you consulted with OpenMP developers and users?
>
> Yours,
> Andrey
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160616/2e9a174f/attachment.html>

I don't think it's overstepping to say that at all - I'd love for
the
Intel and "OpenMP" guys to consider this a viable home. If the
libtarget stuff from omp really wants to play nice with llvm projects
as a whole, this will be that common denominator place where reviews
and feedback can combine.

To put this another way - I'd be slightly disappointed if people
working on OpenMP wouldn't consider this.
The things they are working on can/should be shareable across multiple
programming models..

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:30 AM, Jason Henline <jhen at google.com>
wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> Sorry, I definitely misspoke when I said it was likely for OpenMP stuff to
> end up in this new project. I meant to say that it was possible in the long
> run, but there are no plans for that now.
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:55 AM Andrey Bokhanko <andreybokhanko at
gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Jason Henline via Openmp-dev
>> <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> it seems likely that other OpenMP stuff could end up in there in
the long
>>> run.
>>
>>
>> Huh? What makes you think so?
>>
>> Have you consulted with OpenMP developers and users?
>>
>> Yours,
>> Andrey
>>
>

Jason,

No worries -- I just wanted to stress that relocation of libomp from a
separate project to the new "parallel" one is not guaranteed and
should be
guided by the best interests of its developers and users.

Yours,
Andrey


On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Jason Henline <jhen at google.com>
wrote:
> Hi Andrey,
>
> Sorry, I definitely misspoke when I said it was likely for OpenMP stuff to
> end up in this new project. I meant to say that it was possible in the long
> run, but there are no plans for that now.
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:55 AM Andrey Bokhanko <andreybokhanko at
gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Jason Henline via Openmp-dev <
>> openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>>> it seems likely that other OpenMP stuff could end up in there in
the
>>> long run.
>>>
>>
>> Huh? What makes you think so?
>>
>> Have you consulted with OpenMP developers and users?
>>
>> Yours,
>> Andrey
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160617/cc694cda/attachment.html>

Tanya,

I just set up the parallel-libs project in SVN (r273452), so I think it is
ready to have the mailing lists created and the post-commit hooks set up.
Again, I'm glad to moderate the mailing lists.

Thanks for all your help

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 8:03 AM Andrey Bokhanko <andreybokhanko at
gmail.com>
wrote:
> Jason,
>
> No worries -- I just wanted to stress that relocation of libomp from a
> separate project to the new "parallel" one is not guaranteed and
should be
> guided by the best interests of its developers and users.
>
> Yours,
> Andrey
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Jason Henline <jhen at google.com>
wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrey,
>>
>> Sorry, I definitely misspoke when I said it was likely for OpenMP stuff
>> to end up in this new project. I meant to say that it was possible in
the
>> long run, but there are no plans for that now.
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:55 AM Andrey Bokhanko <
>> andreybokhanko at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Jason Henline via Openmp-dev <
>>> openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> it seems likely that other OpenMP stuff could end up in there
in the
>>>> long run.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Huh? What makes you think so?
>>>
>>> Have you consulted with OpenMP developers and users?
>>>
>>> Yours,
>>> Andrey
>>>
>>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160622/1927eb67/attachment.html>