llvm dev - Jun 2016 - The clang for centos6 are need GLIBC_2.14, but we only have GLIB 2.12 by default.

[root at localhost clang+llvm-3.8.0-linux-x86_64-centos6]# cd bin
[root at localhost bin]# ./clang
./clang: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by
./clang)
./clang: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by
./clang)
./clang: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.14' not found
(required by ./clang)
./clang: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.18' not found
(required by ./clang)
./clang: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `CXXABI_1.3.5' not found
(required by ./clang)
./clang: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found
(required by ./clang)


-- 
         此致
礼
罗勇刚
Yours
    sincerely,
Yonggang Luo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160629/30513778/attachment.html>

Yes, I believe it was built against centos 6.7.  I wanted to build it
against an older release but couldn't quite bootstrap it without newer
libstdc++.

Sorry, it would be clearer if I'd have made the package name include
"centos6.7".

On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:43 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org
> wrote:
> [root at localhost clang+llvm-3.8.0-linux-x86_64-centos6]# cd bin
> [root at localhost bin]# ./clang
> ./clang: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by
> ./clang)
> ./clang: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by
> ./clang)
> ./clang: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.14' not found
> (required by ./clang)
> ./clang: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.18' not found
> (required by ./clang)
> ./clang: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `CXXABI_1.3.5' not found
> (required by ./clang)
> ./clang: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found
> (required by ./clang)
>
>
> --
>          此致
> 礼
> 罗勇刚
> Yours
>     sincerely,
> Yonggang Luo
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
>

-- 
-Brian
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160628/fa786b45/attachment.html>

So CentOS before 6.7 is not an option after all?
Is that possible to use clang on CentOS 6.6 and before?

On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Yes, I believe it was built against centos 6.7.  I wanted to build it
> against an older release but couldn't quite bootstrap it without newer
> libstdc++.
>
> Sorry, it would be clearer if I'd have made the package name include
> "centos6.7".
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 11:43 AM, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) <
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> [root at localhost clang+llvm-3.8.0-linux-x86_64-centos6]# cd bin
>> [root at localhost bin]# ./clang
>> ./clang: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required
by
>> ./clang)
>> ./clang: /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required
by
>> ./clang)
>> ./clang: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.14' not
found
>> (required by ./clang)
>> ./clang: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.18' not
found
>> (required by ./clang)
>> ./clang: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `CXXABI_1.3.5' not
found
>> (required by ./clang)
>> ./clang: /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not
found
>> (required by ./clang)
>>
>>
>> --
>>          此致
>> 礼
>> 罗勇刚
>> Yours
>>     sincerely,
>> Yonggang Luo
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> -Brian
>


-- 
         此致
礼
罗勇刚
Yours
    sincerely,
Yonggang Luo
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160629/e81249ca/attachment.html>