llvm dev - Jun 2016 - [Openmp-dev] parallel-lib: New LLVM Suproject

Would it be parallel-libs/libomptarget/
or
parallel-libs/omp/libomptarget/

To me the second way seems better because it seems likely that other OpenMP
stuff could end up in there in the long run.

Once we decide on which code to share, I think we will end up with new
directories at the top level for those common components.

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:59 AM C Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com>
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:50 AM, Jason Henline via Openmp-dev
> <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > Thanks for your help, Tanya!
> >
> > I haven't created the project in SVN yet. Am I able to set it up
myself
> on
> > the LLVM servers, or does someone else need to do that part?
> >
> > I'll be glad to volunteer to moderate the new mailing lists.
> >
> > We will want a website. I think there will be a top-level docs
directory
> for
> > the project and a docs directory for each subproject. To begin with,
> > StreamExecutor will be the only subproject so the structure will look
> > something like this:
> >
> > parallel-libs/
> >   docs/
> >   stream_executor/
> >     docs/
> >
> > Does that seem like a reasonable way to set it up?
>
> What will it look like when they add the liboffload from OMP?
>
> Would it be parallel-libs/libomptarget/
> or
> parallel-libs/omp/libomptarget/
>
> If there's any code in SE which is "common" and can or should
be
> reused to consumed - maybe give some long term consideration to
> superficial refactoring. This "lib/API" design mentality is
common in
> llvm/clang and it would be nice if it was mirrored here.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160616/8d2e0c84/attachment.html>

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Jason Henline via Openmp-dev <
openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> it seems likely that other OpenMP stuff could end up in there in the long
> run.
>
Huh? What makes you think so?

Have you consulted with OpenMP developers and users?

Yours,
Andrey
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160616/9c405c13/attachment-0001.html>

Hi Andrey,

Sorry, I definitely misspoke when I said it was likely for OpenMP stuff to
end up in this new project. I meant to say that it was possible in the long
run, but there are no plans for that now.

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:55 AM Andrey Bokhanko <andreybokhanko at
gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Jason Henline via Openmp-dev <
> openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>> it seems likely that other OpenMP stuff could end up in there in the
long
>> run.
>>
>
> Huh? What makes you think so?
>
> Have you consulted with OpenMP developers and users?
>
> Yours,
> Andrey
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160616/2e9a174f/attachment.html>