On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Tim Northover via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On 31 May 2016 at 12:31, Renato Golin via cfe-dev
> <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> > What do people think? Any issue not covered that we should?
>
> I'm in favour of the move. Git-svn just about works most of the time,
> but I find it makes committing to release branches particularly
> painful. It also randomly corrupts its database occasionally, just for
> the giggles I assume.
>
I get hit by that every so often :-(.
As others have mentioned, the monotonically incrementing ids are extremely
useful, particularly when bisecting across clang/llvm. I think that
Medhi's suggestion may be a viable solution.
As long as a mechanism for bisecting across the repositories is worked out,
definitely a +1 from me.
> Tim.
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
>
--
Saleem Abdulrasool
compnerd (at) compnerd (dot) org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160531/02d14cfa/attachment.html>