llvm dev - Jun 2016 - [Release-testers] 3.8.1-final has been tagged

Hi,

I've tagged 3.8.1-final, so testers can start building the final
binaries.

-Tom

On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> I've tagged 3.8.1-final, so testers can start building the final
> binaries.
Windows is ready: (sha1sum)

ef70473d25b6d05a46d37a985766cf31274e1088  LLVM-3.8.1-win32.exe
f11f075ea2d3ad1344c4af49e44b5fd8ddb65eb1  LLVM-3.8.1-win64.exe

It was built with the attached batch file.

Cheers,
Hans
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: build_llvm_381._bat_
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2905 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160622/2b31a17f/attachment.obj>

ARM looks good, the binaries have been uploaded.

Regards,
Diana

On 23 June 2016 at 03:55, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers
<release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>> I've tagged 3.8.1-final, so testers can start building the final
>> binaries.
>
> Windows is ready: (sha1sum)
>
> ef70473d25b6d05a46d37a985766cf31274e1088  LLVM-3.8.1-win32.exe
> f11f075ea2d3ad1344c4af49e44b5fd8ddb65eb1  LLVM-3.8.1-win64.exe
>
> It was built with the attached batch file.
>
> Cheers,
> Hans
>
> _______________________________________________
> Release-testers mailing list
> Release-testers at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
>

Hi,
one minor gripe:
configure still says
PACKAGE_VERSION='3.8.0'
PACKAGE_STRING='LLVM 3.8.0'

This caused our tarball generation scripts to mess up and name the tarballs
3.8.0 -- I've fixed the script to look at CMakeLists.txt instead and now
(so far) all is good, but while configure is still there it should probably
reflect the version info correctly.

ttyl
bero


On 22 June 2016 at 22:44, Tom Stellard via Release-testers <
release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've tagged 3.8.1-final, so testers can start building the final
> binaries.
>
> -Tom
> _______________________________________________
> Release-testers mailing list
> Release-testers at lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160623/0f04baac/attachment.html>

On 23 June 2016 at 10:56, Bernhard Rosenkränzer <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> This caused our tarball generation scripts to mess up and name the tarballs
> 3.8.0 -- I've fixed the script to look at CMakeLists.txt instead and
now (so
> far) all is good, but while configure is still there it should probably
> reflect the version info correctly.
Hi Bero,

If anything, the configure file should be removed. :)

It was deprecated a long time ago and it's only there for legacy
reasons. If you want to use LLVM as your base toolchain, I strongly
suggest you move to CMake.

cheers,
--renato

PS: For now, a post-fix should be applied to the 3.8.1-final anyway.

On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:56:55AM +0200, Bernhard Rosenkränzer
wrote:
> Hi,
> one minor gripe:
> configure still says
> PACKAGE_VERSION='3.8.0'
> PACKAGE_STRING='LLVM 3.8.0'
> 
> This caused our tarball generation scripts to mess up and name the tarballs
> 3.8.0 -- I've fixed the script to look at CMakeLists.txt instead and
now
> (so far) all is good, but while configure is still there it should probably
> reflect the version info correctly.
> 
Unfortunately, I think it's too late to fix this now that -final has been
tagged.  I don't think this should be a huge issue since all the binaries
are built using CMake.  People building from source can always patch their
code if the want.

-Tom
> ttyl
> bero
> 
> 
> On 22 June 2016 at 22:44, Tom Stellard via Release-testers <
> release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've tagged 3.8.1-final, so testers can start building the final
> > binaries.
> >
> > -Tom
> > _______________________________________________
> > Release-testers mailing list
> > Release-testers at lists.llvm.org
> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers
> >

All good from my side:
  clang+llvm-3.8.1-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz (sha1sum
0ded83c843a97909b8abd369613d9afe21084280)
  clang+llvm-3.8.1-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz (sha1sum
0691b050a347e95301ca59a06084ecc32b3262b0)
  clang+llvm-3.8.1-x86_64-linux-gnu-debian8.tar.xz (sha1sum
667cfe6629d7ce1066de26c04b0efc16af18fdf9)

I had two extra failures in the 'make check-all' part of the
mipsel-linux-gnu build that I didn't have in rc1 but they passed when I
re-ran them. The tests were:
    Clang :: Tooling/auto-detect-from-source-parent.cpp
    Clang :: VFS/include-real-from-virtual.c
________________________________________
From: Release-testers [release-testers-bounces at lists.llvm.org] on behalf of
Tom Stellard via Release-testers [release-testers at lists.llvm.org]
Sent: 22 June 2016 21:44
To: release-testers at lists.llvm.org; cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org; llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org
Subject: [Release-testers] 3.8.1-final has been tagged

Hi,

I've tagged 3.8.1-final, so testers can start building the final
binaries.

-Tom
_______________________________________________
Release-testers mailing list
Release-testers at lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-testers

Le 22/06/2016 à 22:44, Tom Stellard via Release-testers a écrit
:
> Hi,
>
> I've tagged 3.8.1-final, so testers can start building the final
> binaries.
>
>
Uploaded in Debian, mostly works.
Mostly because it is failing to link because of a OOM issue.

Seems that adding -gsplit-dwarf to the CXXFLAGS improves the situation.

Sylvestre