I know that Rails 3 ideal of unobtrusive javascript will result in the removal of all inline javascript. But where does that leave RJS? It looks like PrototypeGenerator is still a part of the Rails core, so I''m going to assume that RJS templates will remain unchanged. Still looks like gems/plugins such JRals will be necessary for use of other JS frameworks. Can anyone confirm or deny the fate of RJS in Rails 3? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
On Feb 12, 7:49 pm, Emery Finkelstein <emery.finkelst...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> I know that Rails 3 ideal of unobtrusive javascript will result in the > removal of all inline javascript. But where does that leave RJS? > > It looks like PrototypeGenerator is still a part of the Rails core, so > I''m going to assume that RJS templates will remain unchanged. Still > looks like gems/plugins such JRals will be necessary for use of other > JS frameworks. > > Can anyone confirm or deny the fate of RJS in Rails 3?Lazy answer: grab the beta and find out! Fred -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
On Feb 12, 1:49 pm, Emery Finkelstein <emery.finkelst...-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> I know that Rails 3 ideal of unobtrusive javascript will result in the > removal of all inline javascript. But where does that leave RJS? > > It looks like PrototypeGenerator is still a part of the Rails core, so > I''m going to assume that RJS templates will remain unchanged. Still > looks like gems/plugins such JRals will be necessary for use of other > JS frameworks. > > Can anyone confirm or deny the fate of RJS in Rails 3?I believe that RJS will still exist, and it will still use prototype by default; but in Rails 3, it''s easier to swap in other "RJS adapters,: and I think that Rails 3 will ship with a jQuery adapter as well in case you don''t want to use prototype. But it''s not been easy for me to keep up with the details in Rails 3, so I might be wrong and getting the latest beta build is the best way to go . (Seems to me Rails 3 has been driven by Yehuda more than the community, I don''t think there was a roadmap for project plan of any sort that would helped to alleviate questions like this one). Jeff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.