search for: emery

....host.com:/tmp Everytime I run this command with one of the users, I get this error: "building file list ... pop_dir /tmp : Permission denied" The strange thing is that I have about 5 users who have the same permissions to run this command, but only one of them gets it. Any ideas? -- Emery Gu?vremont, Systems administrator and Customer Support Administrateur des syst?mes et Service ? la client?le emery@cynovad.com 1-800-595-9059 ext: 214

dear redhat, i examined a friend's system today, to help him configure it. assuming that he just "installed" from scratch the samba package, it appears that you have provided a default smb.conf file for redhat 6.1 that puts samba private configuration files in /etc. the suggested options, for example show "smbpasswd file = /etc/smbpasswd". this is REALLY bad. 1) you

Greetings, I was hoping to get some feedback on a plugin I wrote. The plugin is called conflict_warnings and is currently available from my github repository at http://github.com/EmFi/conflict_warnings The purpose of the plugin is to provide a simple methods of preventing data inconsistencies that could arise from multiple users interacting with the same resource. Under basic operation a

I know that Rails 3 ideal of unobtrusive javascript will result in the removal of all inline javascript. But where does that leave RJS? It looks like PrototypeGenerator is still a part of the Rails core, so I''m going to assume that RJS templates will remain unchanged. Still looks like gems/plugins such JRals will be necessary for use of other JS frameworks. Can anyone confirm or deny

...Systemd socket activation Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: samba at emery.neomailbox.net QAContact: rsync-qa at samba.org Created attachment 8430 --> https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=8430 rsyncd.socket Attached are systemd service files for starting rsync daemons on socket connections. It works just like inetd, a new daemon for each connecti...

...e does not have to be run (unless it is a global regression). > > There are situations where we see commit which make things slower then faster again, but so far those seem to be from experimental features being switched on then off. This is an interesting paper: http://people.cs.umass.edu/~emery/pubs/stabilizer-asplos13.pdf "However, caches and branch predictors make performance dependent on machine-specific parameters and the exact layout of code, stack frames, and heap objects. A single binary constitutes just one sample from the space of program layouts, regardless of the number o...

I appologize in advance if this is a "stupid user problem" but here goes. I have a RH 6.1 machine with PAM 0.75. I installed OpenSSL and OpenSSH (2.9p1). ssh works fine however when I try to run sshd and then ssh into this same machine I get Failed Password for user x. I copied the RH sshd.pam file into /etc/pam.d/sshd. I even deleted the user and readded it. He can log onto the

On 19 April 2013 17:48, Török Edwin <edwin at etorok.net> wrote: > Otherwise what might seem like a 20% improvement > could very well be just a 0.2% improvement in practice. > This is (maybe to a lesser extent) what happens with most of our benchmarks, and running them 3 times doesn't add that much confidence but makes it run much slower. I end up treating the test-suite as

On 04/15/2013 11:01 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Török Edwin <edwin+ml-debian at etorok.net> wrote: >> On 04/03/2013 01:20 AM, Renato Golin wrote: >>> Hi Torok, >>> >>> I've used a hard-coded list on the input parameter and still got some output (slightly) scrambled between two different bots... >>> >>>

...read-write shares (defining it on a share by share basis), so I would imagine that wouldn't be causing an issue with my anonymous share. Thoughts? Help is appreciated. -- Jason Bailey Region IT/IS Manager Gull Communications jason.bailey at sunad.com (435) 637-0732 x31 (435) 637-2716 Fax * Emery County Progress * Richfield Reaper * Sun Advocate * Uintah Basin Standard * Vernal Express

I'm just starting with rsync(). I grabbed the 3.0.7 source and built it on Mac OS X.6.5 (./configure and ./make reported no problems.) When I try running with -X or -A, I get the following error messages: rsync: unpack_smb_acl: sys_acl_get_info(): Unknown error: 0 (0) rsync: unpack_smb_acl: sys_acl_get_info(): Unknown error: 0 (0) A quick look at the buglist didn't reveal anything to

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1470 Summary: adjust Linux out-of-memory killer to stop sshd being killed Classification: Unclassified Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.0p1 Platform: All URL: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=34176 7 OS/Version: Linux

...acking at the present time. I might be able troubleshoot this by process of elimination if I could find the information that I needed. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance! -- Jason Bailey Region IT/IS Manager Gull Communications jason.bailey at sunad.com (435) 637-0732 x31 (435) 637-2716 Fax * Emery County Progress * Richfield Reaper * Sun Advocate * Uintah Basin Standard * Vernal Express

...9, David Tweed <david.tweed at arm.com> wrote: > (I've very rarely had O3 optimzation, rather than some program specific > subset of the options, acheive any non-noise-level speed-up over O2 with > gcc/g++.) > Hi David, You surely remember this: http://plasma.cs.umass.edu/emery/stabilizer "We find that, while -O2 has a significant impact relative to -O1, the performance impact of -O3 over -O2 optimizations is indistinguishable from random noise." Under that view, if the LLVM vectorizer was well enough understood I would > think it would be good to include a...

This is probably another area where a bit of dynamic behavior could help. When we find a regressions, kick off some runs to bisect back to where it manifests. This is what we would be doing manually anyway. We could just search back with the set of regressing benchmarks, meaning the whole suite does not have to be run (unless it is a global regression). There are situations where we see commit

...config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM my_pool ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t3d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t5d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 c1t6d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares c1t7d0 AVAIL errors: No known data errors ============================================= Message was edited by: cemery This message posted from opensolaris.org -------------- next part -------------- zpool status my_pool , shows a pulled disk c1t6d0 as ONLINE ??? New server build, on a SunFire t5220, and this is our first rollout of ZFS and Zpools. Have 8 disks, boot disk is hardware mirrored (c1t0d0 + c1t1d...

On 30 June 2013 10:14, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > 1. Increasing sample size to at least 5-10 > That's not feasible on slower systems. A single data point takes 1 hour on the fastest ARM board I can get (Chromebook). Getting 10 samples at different commits will give you similar accuracy if behaviour doesn't change, and you can rely on 10-point

Friends, I have updated my Asterisk 1.2 presentation with the latest information. It is still available in the same place as before: http://www.astricon.net/asterisk1-2/ Please continue to test the beta of Asterisk 1.2, available at ftp.digium.com. We need all the feedback we can get. If you are a developer and have some time for community work, please check in with the bug tracker and help us

Hi, I would like to start a discussion about enabling the loop vectorizer by default for -Os. The loop vectorizer can accelerate many workloads and enabling it for -Os and -O2 has obvious performance benefits. At the same time the loop vectorizer can increase the code size because of two reasons. First, to vectorize some loops we have to keep the original loop around in order to handle the last

We have giving you winner after winner this year and things are only getting better! We called it! CYTV is up BIG on good volume over the last 2 weeks. We hope you took a position early and are smiling right now. If you didn't, don't worry. CHINA YOUTV CORP (CYTV) Get in now .40 Recent News China YouTV's JV Partner Signed Agreement for a Chinese Provincial Portal's DV