Saturday June 30 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
8:28PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llc -O# / opt -O# differences |
8:07PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm.org down? |
7:48PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] llvm.org down? |
6:09PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llc -O# / opt -O# differences |
5:21PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering |
3:01PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ConstantExpr refactoring |
2:58PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] gcc bug?..segfault problem with getElfArchType. |
2:13PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering |
12:22PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering |
12:10PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] ConstantExpr refactoring |
12:13AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Scheduler Roadmap |
12:03AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering |
|
Friday June 29 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:47PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Comment "FIXME" in X86MachObjectWriter::RecordX86Relocation |
10:40PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ConstantExpr refactoring |
10:34PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ConstantExpr refactoring |
10:10PM |
6 |
[LLVMdev] ConstantExpr refactoring |
9:56PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Request for merge: GHC/ARM calling convention. |
9:49PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering |
9:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Request for merge: GHC/ARM calling convention. |
9:11PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering |
5:47PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Problem compiling with clang + gold plugin: no archive symbol table |
5:44PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Another LLVM JIT extension to Python |
5:06PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
4:53PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Comment "FIXME" in X86MachObjectWriter::RecordX86Relocation |
4:46PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Request for merge: GHC/ARM calling convention. |
3:58PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Comment "FIXME" in X86MachObjectWriter::RecordX86Relocation |
3:27PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Apply Thumb2 ROR optimization only when Thumb2 is supported |
3:21PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
2:59PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
2:32PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Why some registered passes are not available through opt? |
2:29PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
2:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
1:07PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
12:52PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Question for users of the CMake build system: |
12:18PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Why some registered passes are not available through opt? |
12:06PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Why some registered passes are not available through opt? |
11:40AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Question for users of the CMake build system: |
9:47AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Another LLVM JIT extension to Python |
9:07AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Problem compiling with clang + gold plugin: no archive symbol table |
8:17AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Problem compiling with clang + gold plugin: no archive symbol table |
6:24AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Why some registered passes are not available through opt? |
6:02AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Error using llcj |
6:01AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llcj : Error |
3:54AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Removing the separation between opt and codegen? |
3:13AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Reasoning about Floating Point in Optimizations |
2:55AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
|
Thursday June 28 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:06PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Another LLVM JIT extension to Python |
11:01PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Any way to use a pass in opt, that does not have normal constructor? |
10:18PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Problem compiling with clang + gold plugin: no archive symbol table |
10:05PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Problem compiling with clang + gold plugin: no archive symbol table |
10:04PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Why does llvm bitcast a struct pointer to an integer pointer? |
9:58PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Problem compiling with clang + gold plugin: no archive symbol table |
8:03PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] A common runtime environment / object model for AOT compiled languages? |
7:45PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] recursing llvm |
7:40PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Why some registered passes are not available through opt? |
6:08PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] recursing llvm |
3:04PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] buildbot with -vectorize |
2:10PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
2:04PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] buildbot with -vectorize |
12:51PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] buildbot with -vectorize |
12:50PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] buildbot with -vectorize |
12:08PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Is cross-compiling for ARM on x86 with llvm/Clang possible? |
12:06PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
9:33AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm dwarf emission |
9:29AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llvm dwarf emission |
9:28AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Refactoring the DFA generator |
9:15AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm dwarf emission |
8:45AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
8:25AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] llvm dwarf emission |
7:58AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
6:58AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Moving DebugInfo module to VMCore |
5:48AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] recursing llvm |
5:31AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] One problem to discuss |
2:26AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Counting instructions in MCJIT |
1:26AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 8-bit DIV IR irregularities |
12:28AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] recursing llvm |
12:22AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] 8-bit DIV IR irregularities |
12:22AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Moving DebugInfo module to VMCore |
12:00AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] recursing llvm |
|
Wednesday June 27 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:20PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Moving DebugInfo module to VMCore |
11:08PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Moving DebugInfo module to VMCore |
11:07PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 8-bit DIV IR irregularities |
11:02PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] 8-bit DIV IR irregularities |
10:35PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
10:13PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
9:47PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
8:57PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
8:17PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Creating a new project using LLVM |
8:16PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Generate assembly without sqrt.d |
7:42PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Refactoring the DFA generator |
6:58PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
4:49PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Interprocedural slicing using LLVM |
2:44PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
1:45PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is cross-compiling for ARM on x86 with llvm/Clang possible? |
1:20PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
1:19PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
1:16PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Instcombine increases the number of instructions? |
1:01PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
12:55PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
12:55PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
12:29PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
12:25PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] How to make a cross compiler for xilinx microblaze |
12:24PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Is cross-compiling for ARM on x86 with llvm/Clang possible? |
11:34AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Backend failure in LegalizeDAG due to unimplemented expand in target lowering |
9:52AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
9:22AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Counting instructions in MCJIT |
8:58AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Performance of JNI in VMKit |
7:57AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Instcombine increases the number of instructions? |
7:50AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] What's the difference between using llvm-link and using llvm gold plugin? |
7:44AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Compiler warnings with gcc-4.7.1 |
7:43AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Error using llcj |
7:41AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Creating a new project using LLVM |
4:51AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Creating a new project using LLVM |
1:01AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Compiler warnings with gcc-4.7.1 |
12:15AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Compiler warnings with gcc-4.7.1 |
|
Tuesday June 26 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:47PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] What's the difference between using llvm-link and using llvm gold plugin? |
11:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] What's the difference between using llvm-link and using llvm gold plugin? |
10:39PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] What's the difference between using llvm-link and using llvm gold plugin? |
10:27PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to make a cross compiler for xilinx microblaze |
10:07PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Interprocedural slicing using LLVM |
10:04PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] What's the difference between using llvm-link and using llvm gold plugin? |
8:46PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] What's the difference between using llvm-link and using llvm gold plugin? |
5:59PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Instcombine increases the number of instructions? |
5:19PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Develop on trunk. |
4:54PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Error compiling llvm/clang with clang+libc++ with -std=cxx0x |
4:43PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Develop on trunk. |
3:42PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] How to make a cross compiler for xilinx microblaze |
2:33PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Does anaysis group only contain passes? |
2:11PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] reducing llc's memory consumption |
10:43AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Proposed Enhancement to AddressSanitizer: Initialization Order |
8:30AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Error compiling llvm/clang with clang+libc++ with -std=cxx0x |
8:04AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Refactoring the DFA generator |
7:41AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question |
7:37AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question |
7:06AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question |
2:44AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Refactoring the DFA generator |
2:22AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Error compiling llvm/clang with clang+libc++ with -std=cxx0x |
1:55AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Does anaysis group only contain passes? |
|
Monday June 25 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
8:40PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Bay Area LLVM Social - July |
8:34PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Bay Area LLVM Social - July |
8:31PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling slowdown? |
8:15PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Bay Area LLVM Social - July |
6:39PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Boolean floats and v4i1 |
3:18PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RE : RE : Is llc broken for Cortex-A9 + neon ? |
2:59PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Refactoring the DFA generator |
2:38PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question |
2:34PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Does anaysis group only contain passes? |
1:46PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] RE : Is llc broken for Cortex-A9 + neon ? |
1:43PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question |
1:39PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RE : Is llc broken for Cortex-A9 + neon ? |
1:33PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] RE : Is llc broken for Cortex-A9 + neon ? |
1:31PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is llc broken for Cortex-A9 + neon ? |
1:04PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Is llc broken for Cortex-A9 + neon ? |
12:52PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Boolean floats and v4i1 |
12:00PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] AddressSanitizer+CMake unittest question |
10:21AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] "ninja update" not working. |
10:17AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] getting identifier for alloca instruction and basic blocks |
10:01AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] PATCH: AddressSanitizer: Fix errors about mis-matched exception specifiers for intercepted libc functions on Linux |
10:00AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] PATCH: AddressSanitizer: Fix errors about mis-matched exception specifiers for intercepted libc functions on Linux |
9:47AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] PATCH: AddressSanitizer: Fix errors about mis-matched exception specifiers for intercepted libc functions on Linux |
9:42AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] PATCH: AddressSanitizer: Fix errors about mis-matched exception specifiers for intercepted libc functions on Linux |
9:25AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] PATCH: AddressSanitizer: Fix errors about mis-matched exception specifiers for intercepted libc functions on Linux |
9:10AM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] PATCH: AddressSanitizer: Fix errors about mis-matched exception specifiers for intercepted libc functions on Linux |
7:34AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] cindex.py using find_library |
5:45AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Boolean floats and v4i1 |
3:28AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Boolean floats and v4i1 |
|
Sunday June 24 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:50PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] cindex.py using find_library |
10:13PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Request for merge: GHC/ARM calling convention. |
7:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Problems building LLVM under Visual Studio |
6:36PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] APFloat::PPCDoubleDouble arithmetic |
5:11PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Problems building LLVM under Visual Studio |
5:09PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Complex load patterns and token factors |
3:37PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Does anaysis group only contain passes? |
2:18PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Request for merge: GHC/ARM calling convention. |
12:56PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Complex load patterns and token factors |
12:44PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] buildbot with -vectorize |
12:42PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] buildbot with -vectorize |
10:04AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] branch to a native instruction address from LLVM IR. |
9:18AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Complex load patterns and token factors |
6:17AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] buildbot with -vectorize |
3:42AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] buildbot with -vectorize |
3:00AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Complex load patterns and token factors |
2:25AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Complex load patterns and token factors |
2:18AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Complex load patterns and token factors |
12:49AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Compilation error on OpenInidana: LibraryDependencies.inc missing |
|
Saturday June 23 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:00PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] getting identifier for alloca instruction and basic blocks |
9:28PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Complex load patterns and token factors |
9:10PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Complex load patterns and token factors |
8:39PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] State of 'llvm.pcmarker' Intrinsic |
8:27PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] State of 'llvm.pcmarker' Intrinsic |
8:17PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] State of 'llvm.pcmarker' Intrinsic |
5:27PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Does call instruction (LLVM-IR) terminate a basic block? |
4:11PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Makefiles as G-d and Nature Intended Them. |
11:42AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788) |
10:19AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Performance of JNI in VMKit |
8:36AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Why can not sparcv9 backend handle i64 produced by FrameIndex? |
2:51AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
12:35AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788) |
|
Friday June 22 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
9:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] mapping a virtual register to a specific address |
8:20PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Inconsistent naming of SSE intrinsics? |
7:13PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Best location for testing-type tools? |
7:04PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] mapping a virtual register to a specific address |
6:46PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] mapping a virtual register to a specific address |
6:32PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Extending llvm with data types which can be accessible only through interfaces. |
5:57PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Compile error of latest Dragonegg on Ubuntu with GCC 4.5 |
5:48PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Extending llvm with data types which can be accessible only through interfaces. |
5:24PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Extending llvm with data types which can be accessible only through interfaces. |
4:34PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
3:36PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
3:27PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788) |
3:19PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Questions about the equality between two llvm types |
3:12PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] C Bindings |
10:27AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] is configure+make dead yet? |
10:10AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] is configure+make dead yet? |
10:03AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Cloning block for newbie |
8:00AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Compile error of latest Dragonegg on Ubuntu with GCC 4.5 |
7:38AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] problem using 128-bit integer on x86-32 |
5:42AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] is configure+make dead yet? |
1:31AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Compile error of latest Dragonegg on Ubuntu with GCC 4.5 |
1:12AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to generate a non-fatal error from the backend |
|
Thursday June 21 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:08PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] is configure+make dead yet? |
10:55PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Features.h not being found now on trunk compiling under Debian Sid |
10:46PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] is configure+make dead yet? |
9:31PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] "make install" fails in a cross-compilation mode with turned on optimization |
8:24PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Cloning block for newbie |
8:20PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] problem using 128-bit integer on x86-32 |
7:40PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788) |
6:40PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
6:35PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] How to define macros in a tablegen file? |
6:34PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
6:19PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM stack |
5:49PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
5:47PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Cloning block for newbie |
5:21PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
3:33PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] How to define macros in a tablegen file? |
3:31PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] How to define macros in a tablegen file? |
3:23PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Readnone/Readonly Function Attributes and Optimization |
2:25PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] buildbot with -vectorize |
2:23PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] buildbot with -vectorize |
2:22PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] is configure+make dead yet? |
10:43AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
10:06AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code? |
10:00AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
9:57AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Error: unsupported GC: vmkit |
9:44AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code? |
9:39AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
9:39AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code? |
9:34AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
9:34AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code? |
9:31AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788) |
9:30AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code? |
9:29AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code? |
9:23AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code? |
8:52AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code? |
8:45AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
8:43AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
8:42AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code? |
8:10AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code? |
8:10AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
8:04AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code? |
7:52AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code? |
7:50AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
7:45AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] is configure+make dead yet? |
7:23AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Readnone/Readonly Function Attributes and Optimization |
7:21AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code? |
6:55AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
6:44AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Is NASM supported by LLVM? |
6:31AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] strange floating point problem |
6:30AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is NASM supported by LLVM? |
5:47AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
5:12AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Is NASM supported by LLVM? |
2:22AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is cross-compiling for ARM on x86 with llvm/Clang possible? |
12:19AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] is configure+make dead yet? |
12:13AM |
27 |
[LLVMdev] is configure+make dead yet? |
|
Wednesday June 20 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:13PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Strong PHI elimination asserts in RegisterCoalescer.C:1388 |
11:06PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Compiling a Module to ASM |
11:03PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] buildbot with -vectorize |
10:54PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Strong PHI elimination asserts in RegisterCoalescer.C:1388 |
10:47PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Strong PHI elimination asserts in RegisterCoalescer.C:1388 |
9:48PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is Loop Dependence Analysis Printing Correct Stats? |
9:33PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Is Loop Dependence Analysis Printing Correct Stats? |
9:26PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Readnone/Readonly Function Attributes and Optimization |
9:07PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] buildbot with -vectorize |
9:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] How to define macros in a tablegen file? |
8:49PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] strange floating point problem |
8:40PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] How to define macros in a tablegen file? |
8:39PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to define macros in a tablegen file? |
8:29PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788) |
8:07PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] object construction patterns and unique_ptr |
7:59PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] "make install" fails in a cross-compilation mode with turned on optimization |
7:36PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] object construction patterns and unique_ptr |
7:08PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Build llvm/clang with cmake vs configure produces different set of artifacts |
7:04PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Delete DyldObj when ELFObjectImage is destroyed |
5:34PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to define macros in a tablegen file? |
5:33PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Refactoring the DFA generator |
5:26PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to define macros in a tablegen file? |
5:14PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] How to define macros in a tablegen file? |
4:26PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Cambridge LLVM Social |
4:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Cambridge LLVM Social |
4:21PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Cambridge LLVM Social |
4:19PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788) |
4:00PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] A question about LLVM and x86 instruction mapping |
3:21PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Back-end: how to test all lowering condition |
3:05PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Work in your project |
2:53PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Redundancy in Named Metadata |
2:14PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Back-end: how to test all lowering condition |
1:50PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Back-end: how to test all lowering condition |
1:04PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Performance of JNI in VMKit |
12:50PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] another SCEV surprise |
9:18AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] another SCEV surprise |
7:40AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Is cross-compiling for ARM on x86 with llvm/Clang possible? |
7:38AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Exception handling slowdown? |
7:28AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] object construction patterns and unique_ptr |
6:05AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code? |
5:59AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code? |
5:46AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code? |
5:39AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code? |
5:21AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] another SCEV surprise |
4:07AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code? |
3:12AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: How can AddressSanitizer, ThreadSanitizer, and similar runtime libraries leverage shared library code? |
12:24AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] recursing llvm |
|
Tuesday June 19 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:29PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to define macros in a tablegen file? |
10:38PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to define macros in a tablegen file? |
10:32PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 64-bit lli can't run 32-bit bitcode? |
8:51PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] object construction patterns and unique_ptr |
7:19PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] Object in a try-catch block not being destroyed even after an exception |
6:18PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] object construction patterns and unique_ptr |
5:49PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] object construction patterns and unique_ptr |
5:31PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] object construction patterns and unique_ptr |
1:32PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] llvm::Triple error in new backend |
1:00PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Ninja (make replacement) |
11:14AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [LLVMDev] Object in a try-catch block not being destroyed even after an exception |
8:12AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is cross-compiling for ARM on x86 with llvm/Clang possible? |
7:47AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Is cross-compiling for ARM on x86 with llvm/Clang possible? |
7:45AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Best way to replace LLVM IR operation with code containing control flow? |
7:34AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] MemorySanitizer, a tool that finds uninitialized reads and more |
6:48AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] mc jit |
6:41AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] mc jit |
6:22AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] mc jit |
3:49AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] mc jit |
3:24AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] mc jit |
2:38AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Cast Pointer Address to Functions |
2:21AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Cast Pointer Address to Functions |
2:21AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] mc jit |
1:08AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm/include/Support/FileSystem.h |
|
Monday June 18 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:56PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] mc jit |
11:36PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] object construction patterns and unique_ptr |
9:22PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Best way to replace LLVM IR operation with code containing control flow? |
9:17PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] paper on speculative analysis of C/C++ code? |
9:15PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] paper on speculative analysis of C/C++ code? |
8:22PM |
6 |
[LLVMdev] object construction patterns and unique_ptr |
8:09PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Cast Pointer Address to Functions |
7:03PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Dragonegg in Fedora! |
6:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] An LLVM target option matrix. |
5:56PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Ninja (make replacement) |
5:55PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: "Building with MinGW on Windows" (DOC, 2ND TRY) |
5:25PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Ninja (make replacement) |
5:15PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Any Work Done/ Going on for OpenMP Support in Clang? |
5:15PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Playing with lli-Interpreter |
4:19PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] MemorySanitizer, a tool that finds uninitialized reads and more |
3:36PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Replace constant with variable |
2:44PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] MemorySanitizer, a tool that finds uninitialized reads and more |
2:30PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] MemorySanitizer, a tool that finds uninitialized reads and more |
1:52PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] MemorySanitizer, a tool that finds uninitialized reads and more |
1:43PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] MemorySanitizer, a tool that finds uninitialized reads and more |
1:19PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] MemorySanitizer, a tool that finds uninitialized reads and more |
1:18PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] MinGW 4.7.0-compiled Clang Mis-compiles Simple Programs |
1:07PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] MemorySanitizer, a tool that finds uninitialized reads and more |
12:59PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is cross-compiling for ARM on x86 with llvm/Clang possible? |
12:55PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: "Building with MinGW on Windows" (DOC, 2ND TRY) |
12:24PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: "Building with MinGW on Windows" (DOC, 2ND TRY) |
12:18PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Which pass converts call printf to puts? |
12:09PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Which pass converts call printf to puts? |
11:47AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Which pass converts call printf to puts? |
11:31AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Which pass converts call printf to puts? |
11:27AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Problem compiling llvm-gcc (needed for KLEE) |
11:17AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: "Building with MinGW on Windows" (DOC, 2ND TRY) |
11:16AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Which pass converts call printf to puts? |
10:55AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Replace constant with variable |
10:39AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] MemorySanitizer, a tool that finds uninitialized reads and more |
10:36AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is cross-compiling for ARM on x86 with llvm/Clang possible? |
10:25AM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: "Building with MinGW on Windows" (DOC, 2ND TRY) |
9:46AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] "ninja update" not working. |
9:32AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] "ninja update" not working. |
8:47AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Refactoring the DFA generator |
8:18AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] The porting issue from llvm-2.8 to llvm-3.0 |
8:08AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Which pass converts call printf to puts? |
4:30AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] MIPS positions for LLVM |
3:03AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] SCEV not simplifying |
1:29AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Ninja (make replacement) |
12:23AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Ninja (make replacement) |
|
Sunday June 17 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:54PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Ninja (make replacement) |
11:39PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Ninja (make replacement) |
11:30PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Ninja (make replacement) |
11:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Ninja (make replacement) |
10:32PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] What's Going Wrong with GCC 4.6.3 + dragonegg 3.1 |
10:16PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Ninja (make replacement) |
9:11PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Fwd: RFC: "Building with MinGW on Windows" (DOC, NEW) |
3:58PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] Which pass converts call printf to puts? |
1:11PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Fwd: RFC: "Building with MinGW on Windows" (DOC, NEW) |
12:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Fwd: RFC: "Building with MinGW on Windows" (DOC, NEW) |
11:47AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] BlockAddress instruction is copied instead of cloned during module link? |
11:43AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Adding code after compilation |
10:59AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Fwd: RFC: "Building with MinGW on Windows" (DOC, NEW) |
6:29AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Compiling libc++ from within llvm (3.1) |
3:50AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Building lld with Visual Studio 2012 RC |
3:23AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Building lld with Visual Studio 2012 RC |
1:22AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Building lld with Visual Studio 2012 RC |
12:08AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Fwd: RFC: "Building with MinGW on Windows" (DOC, NEW) |
12:07AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM Sphinx intro buried in lld doc? |
|
Saturday June 16 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:15PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Building lld with Visual Studio 2012 RC |
10:51PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] object construction patterns and unique_ptr |
9:14PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] -Wunused-private-field warnings |
7:38PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] How to Run OpenMP application Using "lli" |
6:41PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] What's Going Wrong with GCC 4.6.3 + dragonegg 3.1 |
6:19PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] What's Going Wrong with GCC 4.6.3 + dragonegg 3.1 |
4:53PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] How to build an LLVM pass through visual studio |
1:55PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Set Moderation Bit of corina s |
12:25PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] Fwd: RFC: "Building with MinGW on Windows" (DOC, NEW) |
11:20AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Is cross-compiling for ARM on x86 with llvm/Clang possible? |
9:59AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] broken dotty? |
7:29AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Fwd: RFC: "Building with MinGW on Windows" (DOC, NEW) |
6:52AM |
9 |
[LLVMdev] Fwd: RFC: "Building with MinGW on Windows" (DOC, NEW) |
6:27AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] (no subject) |
6:03AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Fwd: RFC: "Building with MinGW on Windows" (DOC, NEW) |
6:02AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: "Building with MinGW on Windows" (DOC, NEW) |
3:04AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Windows development and "virus" in LLVM test suite |
2:52AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] SCEV not simplifying |
1:27AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: Technical Writing FAQ (DRAFT PROPOSAL) |
12:51AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM Sphinx intro buried in lld doc? |
12:12AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Windows development and "virus" in LLVM test suite |
12:02AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Windows development and "virus" in LLVM test suite |
|
Friday June 15 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:44PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM Sphinx intro buried in lld doc? |
11:24PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Windows development and "virus" in LLVM test suite |
11:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Windows development and "virus" in LLVM test suite |
10:48PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] object construction patterns and unique_ptr |
10:10PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Post-RA Def/Use Information |
10:08PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Develop on trunk. |
10:07PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Post-RA Def/Use Information |
10:00PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Post-RA Def/Use Information |
9:54PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Post-RA Def/Use Information |
9:38PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Windows development and "virus" in LLVM test suite |
9:32PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Windows development and "virus" in LLVM test suite |
9:19PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Windows development and "virus" in LLVM test suite |
9:16PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Windows development and "virus" in LLVM test suite |
9:09PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Windows development and "virus" in LLVM test suite |
9:00PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Windows development and "virus" in LLVM test suite |
8:56PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788) |
8:53PM |
6 |
[LLVMdev] Windows development and "virus" in LLVM test suite |
8:48PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Windows development and "virus" in LLVM test suite |
8:02PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Windows development and "virus" in LLVM test suite |
7:31PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Refactoring the DFA generator |
6:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788) |
5:15PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] C++ Expression Template Benchmarks for GCC/Clang/Intel/PGI/MSVC |
5:09PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788) |
4:16PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] C++ Expression Template Benchmarks for GCC/Clang/Intel/PGI/MSVC |
3:50PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] A simple tutorial on generating PTX assembler out of Ada source code using LLVM NVPTX backend |
3:20PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm dev positions at MIPS |
3:06PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Recover variable name after mem2reg |
8:29AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Random, tiny question about doxygen comment style |
8:21AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Random, tiny question about doxygen comment style |
7:40AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] A simple tutorial on generating PTX assembler out of Ada source code using LLVM NVPTX backend |
7:06AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] A simple tutorial on generating PTX assembler out of Ada source code using LLVM NVPTX backend |
5:25AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Random, tiny question about doxygen comment style |
|
Thursday June 14 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
8:33PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788) |
7:15PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Refactoring the DFA generator |
7:13PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Installation Error |
6:58PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Structs passed by value |
6:56PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] A simple tutorial on generating PTX assembler out of Ada source code using LLVM NVPTX backend |
6:19PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Missing symbols when loading opt plugins |
5:57PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Assert in live update from MI scheduler. |
1:22PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Refactoring the DFA generator |
10:19AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788) |
7:19AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Bitcode Instruction ID |
5:08AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Develop on trunk. |
4:44AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Develop on trunk. |
4:17AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Develop on trunk. |
3:28AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] non-SSA IR generation |
3:23AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Default to "reply all" for mailing list messages? |
3:11AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Default to "reply all" for mailing list messages? |
3:10AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Develop on trunk. |
3:01AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Default to "reply all" for mailing list messages? |
2:56AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Develop on trunk. |
2:42AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Default to "reply all" for mailing list messages? |
12:32AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Bitcode Instruction ID |
|
Wednesday June 13 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:58PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Develop on trunk. |
11:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Anybody translating the LLVM FAQ from HTML to Sphinx? |
11:52PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Anybody translating the LLVM FAQ from HTML to Sphinx? |
11:47PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] Anybody translating the LLVM FAQ from HTML to Sphinx? |
11:47PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Develop on trunk. |
11:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Anybody translating the LLVM FAQ from HTML to Sphinx? |
11:37PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Develop on trunk. |
11:03PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Develop on trunk. |
11:02PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Anybody translating the LLVM FAQ from HTML to Sphinx? |
10:44PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] generating pass timing info in a JIT context |
10:41PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Develop on trunk. |
10:25PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Assert in live update from MI scheduler. |
9:40PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Ninja build available for Visual Studio users |
9:33PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Ninja build available for Visual Studio users |
9:00PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] non-SSA IR generation |
8:28PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Assert in live update from MI scheduler. |
8:17PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] non-SSA IR generation |
8:15PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Assert in live update from MI scheduler. |
6:59PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Develop on trunk. |
6:43PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Develop on trunk. |
6:38PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Assert in live update from MI scheduler. |
6:24PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] For linkonce_odr NVPTX generates .weak, but even newest PTXAS can't handle it |
5:53PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-mc problem after a pass |
5:49PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Assert in live update from MI scheduler. |
4:55PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Structs passed by value |
3:20PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Instructions working on 64bit registers without true support for 64bit operations |
3:09PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM target specific built-ins |
2:53PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [REQUEST] VMKIT: cross compilation |
2:49PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Patch] compiler-rt lib/int_endianness.h |
2:20PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] The porting issue from llvm-2.8 to llvm-3.0 |
2:15PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Assert in live update from MI scheduler. |
1:42PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LNT always using clang++ as linker command |
1:16PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM target specific built-ins |
12:51PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-mc problem after a pass |
11:04AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Instructions working on 64bit registers without true support for 64bit operations |
9:34AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] The porting issue from llvm-2.8 to llvm-3.0 |
3:33AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Ninja build available for Visual Studio users |
3:20AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Assert in live update from MI scheduler. |
2:45AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Latency of true depency of store followed by aliased load in ScheduleDAGInstrs |
2:05AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Questions about llvm/Object/COFF.h |
12:12AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] mips16 patch8 |
|
Tuesday June 12 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:11PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] For linkonce_odr NVPTX generates .weak, but even newest PTXAS can't handle it |
8:33PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] output -stats to file.txt |
8:31PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] output -stats to file.txt |
8:26PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] output -stats to file.txt |
8:26PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788) |
8:08PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Questions about llvm/Object/COFF.h |
7:03PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] output -stats to file.txt |
6:53PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788) |
6:35PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] output -stats to file.txt |
6:21PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788) |
6:05PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788) |
5:22PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Assert in live update from MI scheduler. |
4:45PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788) |
4:39PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788) |
4:36PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788) |
4:25PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] DFAPacketizer with StateTrans != 0 Assertion |
3:30PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] DFAPacketizer with StateTrans != 0 Assertion |
3:09PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788) |
2:48PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] DFAPacketizer with StateTrans != 0 Assertion |
2:41PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788) |
2:20PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Latency of true depency of store followed by aliased load in ScheduleDAGInstrs |
1:33PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] DFAPacketizer with StateTrans != 0 Assertion |
1:07PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Analysing annotations in llvm |
11:38AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang |
11:34AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang |
11:23AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang |
11:09AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang |
11:01AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang |
10:48AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang |
10:42AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang |
10:38AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Mips nomicromips? |
10:32AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang |
10:28AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang |
10:26AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang |
9:15AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] buildbot with -vectorize |
7:38AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang |
7:36AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang |
5:30AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Why always abort in verifyFunction? |
2:39AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Questions about llvm/Object/COFF.h |
2:11AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Why always abort in verifyFunction? |
12:41AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Questions about llvm/Object/COFF.h |
|
Monday June 11 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:04PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] include files |
9:18PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is it possible to generate a Clang annotated AST? |
8:19PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Windows strategy? |
7:47PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm Greater Toronto Area social |
7:39PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Windows strategy? |
7:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] scoreboard hazard det. and instruction groupings |
7:09PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Windows strategy? |
7:08PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Final Windows MinGW buildbot slave document... |
7:07PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] scoreboard hazard det. and instruction groupings |
7:02PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] scoreboard hazard det. and instruction groupings |
6:35PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Windows strategy? |
5:52PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] Windows strategy? |
5:48PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] scoreboard hazard det. and instruction groupings |
4:30PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] scoreboard hazard det. and instruction groupings |
4:07PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] anti-dependency breaking and mask/shift dependencies |
3:56PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] anti-dependency breaking and mask/shift dependencies |
3:25PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Volunteers needed: Unit test scaffolding for lib/CodeGen |
3:07PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] anti-dependency breaking and mask/shift dependencies |
2:22PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VMKIT: Assertion at build |
1:51PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] VMKIT: Assertion at build |
11:04AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Clang64 on Windows using Mingw64 yields many linking errors? |
9:44AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Why always abort in verifyFunction? |
8:53AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Clang64 on Windows using Mingw64 yields many linking errors? |
8:41AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Why always abort in verifyFunction? |
|
Sunday June 10 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
8:09PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VMKIT: Assertion at build |
7:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Shared libraries and windows ? |
4:32PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] anti-dependency breaking and mask/shift dependencies |
5:12AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] anti-dependency breaking and mask/shift dependencies |
12:25AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Why no setAddressSpace method? |
|
Saturday June 9 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:09PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Extracting an AST to Graphviz using Clang |
9:56PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Extracting an AST to Graphviz using Clang |
9:52PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Extracting an AST to Graphviz using Clang |
9:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Extracting an AST to Graphviz using Clang |
9:31PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Extracting an AST to Graphviz using Clang |
9:10PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Extracting an AST to Graphviz using Clang |
8:29PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Extracting an AST to Graphviz using Clang |
8:27PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Extracting an AST to Graphviz using Clang |
8:10PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Extracting an AST to Graphviz using Clang |
7:17PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Extracting an AST to Graphviz using Clang |
6:54PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Extracting an AST to Graphviz using Clang |
5:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] announcing C-Reduce, a test-case reducer for C/C++ programs |
4:14PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VMKIT: Assertion at build |
4:40AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Final Windows MinGW buildbot slave document... |
12:07AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Build error fails at MachineInstr const* for the past two days |
|
Friday June 8 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:20PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Dragonegg in Fedora! |
11:14PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Windows C++ ABI: Reverse Engineering Articles (FYI) |
7:52PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Build error fails at MachineInstr const* for the past two days |
6:11PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Strong vs. default phi elimination and single-reg classes |
5:29PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang |
5:23PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang |
5:21PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang |
5:00PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang |
4:35PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Instruction bundles before RA: Rematerialization |
4:28PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] PATCH: add new test tool: obj2yaml |
4:24PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Strong vs. default phi elimination and single-reg classes |
4:18PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] MC disassembler for ARM |
4:06PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang |
4:02PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Strong vs. default phi elimination and single-reg classes |
3:56PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] StrongPHIElimination |
3:49PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Strong vs. default phi elimination and single-reg classes |
3:11PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Instruction bundles before RA: Rematerialization |
1:40PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] MC disassembler for ARM |
1:09PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Paris LLVM Meetup 26. June at IRILL (with clang bug squashing) |
12:58PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang |
10:26AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang |
9:13AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Canonical compilers for building LLVM? |
7:10AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang |
5:54AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Strong vs. default phi elimination and single-reg classes |
5:14AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Strong vs. default phi elimination and single-reg classes |
4:42AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Predicate registers/condition codes question |
3:13AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is it possible to convert C++ code to C++/CX code via a plugin of clang? |
2:31AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Strong vs. default phi elimination and single-reg classes |
|
Thursday June 7 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:06PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] add x32 psABI support |
9:39PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] problem with llvm-config when building 3.1 for Linux-to-Windows cross development |
9:32PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] VMKIT: Assertion at build |
9:10PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Instruction Cleanup Questions |
9:09PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Instruction Cleanup Questions |
9:04PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang |
8:59PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VMKIT: Assertion at build |
8:48PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] mov or copy instruction |
8:42PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Instruction Cleanup Questions |
8:39PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang |
7:43PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] How to implement new ELF 64 bit relocation (N64) |
7:22PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang |
6:41PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Instruction bundles before RA: Rematerialization |
6:13PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] dynamic linkage for jit |
6:02PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Instruction bundles before RA: Rematerialization |
5:59PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to use LLVM optimizations with clang |
5:27PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] MC disassembler for ARM |
5:25PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Instruction bundles before RA: Rematerialization |
4:49PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] linker_private* linkage |
4:14PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] debug info question |
3:47PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] VMKIT: Assertion at build |
3:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VMKIT: Assertion at build |
2:53PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] MC disassembler for ARM |
2:27PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] VMKIT: Assertion at build |
1:54PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VMKIT: Assertion at build |
1:51PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] VMKIT: Assertion at build |
1:49PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] 32-bit in-tree Polly build with CMake |
1:46PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] no differnce in the execution time between seq. and parallel programs |
1:26PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 32-bit in-tree Polly build with CMake |
12:41PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] 32-bit in-tree Polly build with CMake |
12:11PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] MC disassembler for ARM |
10:52AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] TCE 1.6 released |
10:23AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Is it possible to convert C++ code to C++/CX code via a plugin of clang? |
9:17AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] MC disassembler for ARM |
8:48AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] 8975 - llc should warn about invalid target triple |
8:34AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Instruction Cleanup Questions |
8:30AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] problem with llvm-config when building 3.1 for Linux-to-Windows cross development |
8:25AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Instruction bundles before RA: Rematerialization |
7:57AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Instruction Cleanup Questions |
5:37AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Instruction Cleanup Questions |
4:39AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Upgrading from llvm 2.8 to 3.0/3.1 |
3:26AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Clang-test and Windows |
12:01AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-dev 2012 meet videos |
|
Wednesday June 6 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:30PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] 8975 - llc should warn about invalid target triple |
8:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] sample of running google c++ lint script |
7:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] MC disassembler for ARM |
7:55PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] sample of running google c++ lint script |
7:43PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] sample of running google c++ lint script |
7:35PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VMKIT: Assertion at build |
4:43PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Instruction bundles before RA: Rematerialization |
3:21PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] no differnce in the execution time between seq. and parallel programs |
3:20PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LIT Any/All options |
2:38PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] no differnce in the execution time between seq. and parallel programs |
11:28AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] MC disassembler for ARM |
11:01AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Compile-rt throw error undeclared identifier 'O_CLOEXEC' |
10:33AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Compile-rt throw error undeclared identifier 'O_CLOEXEC' |
10:30AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-dev 2012 meet videos |
10:15AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Compile-rt throw error undeclared identifier 'O_CLOEXEC' |
10:09AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-dev 2012 meet videos |
9:53AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Instruction bundles before RA: Rematerialization |
8:21AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-tv |
8:06AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Decimal Floating Point |
7:41AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-dev 2012 meet videos |
5:36AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] MC disassembler for ARM |
5:05AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM Bay-Area Social! |
3:33AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-tv |
2:44AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] MC disassembler for ARM |
1:00AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-tv |
12:45AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-tv |
|
Tuesday June 5 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
8:03PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] SUBALLOCATOR |
7:49PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] no differnce in the execution time between seq. and parallel programs |
7:26PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Purdue LLVM Social |
6:48PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Cambridge LLVM Social |
6:17PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] add x32 psABI support |
6:11PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to unroll loops in opposite loop nest order |
3:54PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Function Pass Manager |
3:43PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] sample of running google c++ lint script |
3:39PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Function Pass Manager |
3:24PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] no differnce in the execution time between seq. and parallel programs |
3:24PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] no differnce in the execution time between seq. and parallel programs |
3:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-tv |
3:08PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] CrashRecoveryContext on Windows |
2:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] alloc_size metadata |
2:54PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] alloc_size metadata |
2:31PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Function Pass Manager |
1:08PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] VMKIT: Assertion at build |
11:50AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] sample of running google c++ lint script |
11:08AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] vmkit: Requires JAVA_HOME |
11:06AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] vmkit: Requires JAVA_HOME |
10:20AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to unroll loops in opposite loop nest order |
9:37AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788) |
8:18AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] alloc_size metadata |
5:54AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-? new mailing list? |
5:00AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] technical debt |
4:01AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] technical debt |
3:48AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] technical debt |
3:33AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] alloc_size metadata |
3:10AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Big endian ARM? |
3:06AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Have you guys met this issue about "typeinfo" & "vtable" of, ASTConsumer and PluginASTAction? |
2:36AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Have you guys met this issue about "typeinfo" & "vtable" of ASTConsumer and PluginASTAction? |
2:27AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-? new mailing list? |
1:49AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits][PATHCH] Bug 12530 - llvm-link dropping debug-information for local |
1:04AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Allow per-thread re-direction of outs()/errs() |
12:56AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] sample of running google c++ lint script |
12:42AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] technical debt |
12:17AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] technical debt |
12:05AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] technical debt |
|
Monday June 4 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] technical debt |
11:53PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] technical debt |
11:35PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Inconsistent use of size_t in SmallVector.h |
10:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-? new mailing list? |
10:52PM |
7 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-? new mailing list? |
10:43PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Allow per-thread re-direction of outs()/errs() |
10:25PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] technical debt |
10:22PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] style guidelines |
10:10PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788) |
9:29PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] style guidelines |
9:18PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] technical debt |
8:48PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Allow per-thread re-direction of outs()/errs() |
6:46PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Allow per-thread re-direction of outs()/errs() |
6:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] alloc_size metadata |
6:05PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] installation query |
5:52PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] alloc_size metadata |
5:37PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] alloc_size metadata |
5:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: R600, a new backend for AMD GPUs |
5:01PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-announce] Have you guys met an issue about "typeinfo & vtable"? |
4:41PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Predicate registers/condition codes question |
4:30PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] llc support for ARM predication ? |
4:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Predicate registers/condition codes question |
4:22PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Predicate registers/condition codes question |
2:49PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Patch, RFC] Re: Adding support for explicitly specified TLS models (PR9788) |
12:54PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Clang 3.1 __builtin_ia32_pcmpeqd128 doesn't work anymore |
12:37PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llc unhandled attribute |
12:28PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Clang 3.1 __builtin_ia32_pcmpeqd128 doesn't work anymore |
12:26PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Clang 3.1 __builtin_ia32_pcmpeqd128 doesn't work anymore |
11:29AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Clang 3.1 __builtin_ia32_pcmpeqd128 doesn't work anymore |
11:28AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Clang 3.1 __builtin_ia32_pcmpeqd128 doesn't work anymore |
11:00AM |
3 |
Have you guys met an issue about "typeinfo & vtable"? |
9:04AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Clang 3.1 __builtin_ia32_pcmpeqd128 doesn't work anymore |
8:45AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Clang 3.1 __builtin_ia32_pcmpeqd128 doesn't work anymore |
8:25AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llc unhandled attribute |
7:35AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] probleam about ThreadLocalImpl of llvm |
7:23AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Big endian ARM? |
3:37AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] probleam about ThreadLocalImpl of llvm |
2:12AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Allow per-thread re-direction of outs()/errs() |
|
Sunday June 3 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:30PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-commits] r157890 - /cfe/trunk/unittests/Tooling/ToolingTest.cpp |
11:15PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Allow per-thread re-direction of outs()/errs() |
11:15PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-commits] r157890 - /cfe/trunk/unittests/Tooling/ToolingTest.cpp |
11:08PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Big endian ARM? |
8:23PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Constant::getAllOnesValue(): expected behaviour or bug? |
7:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Allow per-thread re-direction of outs()/errs() |
6:39PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Big endian ARM? |
3:17PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Remove instruction within a bundle |
1:00PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [question] IR<-->native program state mode switch how / where is it done |
12:55PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Predicate registers/condition codes question |
12:11PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Predicate registers/condition codes question |
6:20AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] clang -ast-dump-xml.... |
3:35AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Big endian ARM? |
|
Saturday June 2 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
6:17PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM markup for LaTeX lstlisting |
6:01PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Allow per-thread re-direction of outs()/errs() |
5:14PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] dynamic linkage for jit |
5:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Allow per-thread re-direction of outs()/errs() |
3:56PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Allow per-thread re-direction of outs()/errs() |
3:20PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Big endian ARM? |
1:33PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Buildbot: Use CMake instead of configure? |
1:02PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM/Clang SVN: 2 Questions |
12:45PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] alloc_size metadata |
12:28PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] alloc_size metadata |
7:56AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] alloc_size metadata |
6:13AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Allow per-thread re-direction of outs()/errs() |
5:17AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Allow per-thread re-direction of outs()/errs() |
2:46AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] update simple style checker... handle globs and recursion now |
2:41AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Allow per-thread re-direction of outs()/errs() |
2:30AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Allow per-thread re-direction of outs()/errs() |
2:08AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Allow per-thread re-direction of outs()/errs() |
12:49AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] DFG of machine functions |
12:33AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-tv |
|
Friday June 1 2012 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:28PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Allow per-thread re-direction of outs()/errs() |
11:28PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Heads up: MCRegisterInfo register list functions going away |
10:48PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Allow per-thread re-direction of outs()/errs() |
8:41PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Buildbot exception get_builddir? |
6:46PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] PRIx64 issue on SLES 11 |
5:59PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] alloc_size metadata |
4:19PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Predicate registers/condition codes question |
12:22PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Predicate registers/condition codes question |
11:54AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Clang Checkers |
9:21AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Using LLVM code in projects/compiler-rt |
8:56AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Using LLVM code in projects/compiler-rt |
8:49AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Using LLVM code in projects/compiler-rt |
8:20AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Using LLVM code in projects/compiler-rt |
7:59AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] legalization of truncating stores in LegalizeDAG.cpp |
7:59AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Using LLVM code in projects/compiler-rt |
7:43AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] clang: error: argument unused during compilation: '--analyze' |
6:37AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] alloc_size metadata |
6:17AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Using LLVM code in projects/compiler-rt |
6:14AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Using LLVM code in projects/compiler-rt |
6:10AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Using LLVM code in projects/compiler-rt |
5:21AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Allow per-thread re-direction of outs()/errs() |
3:13AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Using LLVM code in projects/compiler-rt |
3:06AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [PATCH] Allow per-thread re-direction of outs()/errs() |
1:48AM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] Using LLVM code in projects/compiler-rt |
12:39AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Using LLVM code in projects/compiler-rt |
12:27AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] legalization of truncating stores in LegalizeDAG.cpp |