Hey guys, Is there a reason for the following naming quirk in the x86 SSE intrinsics: int_x86_sse2_pcmpeq_b int_x86_sse2_pcmpeq_w int_x86_sse2_pcmpeq_d int_x86_sse41_pcmpeqq I anticipated a "_q" suffix for the quadword variant, but was surprised to see the intrinsic named above. Just FYI..., Cameron -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120622/6ed6c744/attachment.html>
On Jun 22, 2012, at 1:20 PM, Cameron McInally <cameron.mcinally at nyu.edu> wrote:> Hey guys, > > Is there a reason for the following naming quirk in the x86 SSE intrinsics: > > int_x86_sse2_pcmpeq_b > int_x86_sse2_pcmpeq_w > int_x86_sse2_pcmpeq_d > int_x86_sse41_pcmpeqq > > I anticipated a "_q" suffix for the quadword variant, but was surprised to see the intrinsic named above.Nope, nothing comes to mind, looks like it was removed in r149367 anyhow. -eric