On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:15:12 +0200 Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:> On 02/05/2012 02:42 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > > I think that it would be a good idea to have a buildbot set up to > > run the test suite with -vectorize. Could one of the existing > > machines do this also? > > It took some time, but we have this now: > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-nt-O3-vectorize > > The first run shows that there are a couple of test-suite failures > with the vectorizer: > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-nt-O3-vectorize/builds/108/steps/lnt.nightly-test/logs/tests.FAIL > > Hal, interested to take a look?If I'm looking at this correctly, there are now no failures. http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-nt-O3-vectorize/builds/220/steps/lnt.nightly-test -Hal> > Tobi-- Hal Finkel Postdoctoral Appointee Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory
On 06/20/2012 11:07 PM, Hal Finkel wrote:> On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:15:12 +0200 > Tobias Grosser<tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > >> On 02/05/2012 02:42 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: >>> I think that it would be a good idea to have a buildbot set up to >>> run the test suite with -vectorize. Could one of the existing >>> machines do this also? >> >> It took some time, but we have this now: >> >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-nt-O3-vectorize >> >> The first run shows that there are a couple of test-suite failures >> with the vectorizer: >> >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-nt-O3-vectorize/builds/108/steps/lnt.nightly-test/logs/tests.FAIL >> >> Hal, interested to take a look? > > If I'm looking at this correctly, there are now no failures. > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-nt-O3-vectorize/builds/220/steps/lnt.nightly-testI believe there are: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-nt-O3-vectorize/builds/220/steps/lnt.nightly-test/logs/tests.XFAIL They are just automatically XFAILED after they occur a second time. ;-) Tobi
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 01:03:46 +0200 Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:> On 06/20/2012 11:07 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:15:12 +0200 > > Tobias Grosser<tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > > > >> On 02/05/2012 02:42 PM, Hal Finkel wrote: > >>> I think that it would be a good idea to have a buildbot set up to > >>> run the test suite with -vectorize. Could one of the existing > >>> machines do this also? > >> > >> It took some time, but we have this now: > >> > >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-nt-O3-vectorize > >> > >> The first run shows that there are a couple of test-suite failures > >> with the vectorizer: > >> > >> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-nt-O3-vectorize/builds/108/steps/lnt.nightly-test/logs/tests.FAIL > >> > >> Hal, interested to take a look? > > > > If I'm looking at this correctly, there are now no failures. > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-nt-O3-vectorize/builds/220/steps/lnt.nightly-test > > I believe there are: > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-nt-O3-vectorize/builds/220/steps/lnt.nightly-test/logs/tests.XFAIL > > They are just automatically XFAILED after they occur a second > time. ;-)OIC... then that's not good... So it seems that prior the build 108 the testing process always timed out (it looks like it had a timeout of 20 minutes which was not long enough). At build 108, it lists those applications as failing. I am pretty sure that there were no x86 test-suite failures when I committed the vectorizer. We'll need to investigate... -Hal> > Tobi-- Hal Finkel Postdoctoral Appointee Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory