Thursday June 30 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:41PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] sparse typedef int v8qi __attribute__ ((mode(V8QI))) warning |
10:41PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] clang -emit-llvm uses system ld |
10:24PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [Segmented Stacks] Week 1 |
9:21PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Segfault calling LLVM libs from a clang-compiled executable |
8:26PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] inefficiencies in ConstantUniqueMap ? |
6:55PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Generating DFG or CDFG from C code |
5:03PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Test suite with other compilers |
4:21PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] MC-JIT (any progress?) |
3:56PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] inefficiencies in ConstantUniqueMap ? |
3:19PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] inefficiencies in ConstantUniqueMap ? |
2:48PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] iosfwd problems |
2:33PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] iosfwd problems |
2:24PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] GCC 4.1 ABI and clang |
2:00PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] GCC 4.1 ABI and clang |
1:43PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] GCC 4.1 ABI and clang |
1:37PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] inefficiencies in ConstantUniqueMap ? |
1:17PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] inefficiencies in ConstantUniqueMap ? |
1:13PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] GCC 4.1 ABI and clang |
1:07PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] inefficiencies in ConstantUniqueMap ? |
1:05PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] GCC 4.1 ABI and clang |
12:49PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] GCC 4.1 ABI and clang |
12:44PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] GCC 4.1 ABI and clang |
12:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] inefficiencies in ConstantUniqueMap ? |
12:20PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Test suite with other compilers |
12:03PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] GCC 4.1 ABI and clang |
11:48AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] GCC 4.1 ABI and clang |
11:26AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] GCC 4.1 ABI and clang |
9:16AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] specint2000 as external tests |
9:06AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] SDNode enum |
6:32AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] clang -emit-llvm uses system ld |
6:01AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] SDNode enum |
3:57AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Introduction to git-bisect with "llvm-project.git" |
3:55AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] New target for Microblaze clone with two threads. |
3:08AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] specint 2000 with llvm as test-suite |
12:56AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] clang -emit-llvm uses system ld |
|
Wednesday June 29 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:36PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] MC-JIT (any progress?) |
8:35PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] specint2000 as external tests |
8:25PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] hello world error |
8:20PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] hello world error |
6:43PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] New Certificate Installed; llvm.org Back Up; Issues Linger |
6:32PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-ld and native executables |
5:53PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] specint2000 as external tests |
4:33PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to disable pass grouping(scheduling) |
4:13PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] New Certificate Installed; llvm.org Back Up; Issues Linger |
3:12PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] hello world error |
3:05PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to disable pass grouping(scheduling) |
8:23AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Box removal |
7:07AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Segfault calling LLVM libs from a clang-compiled executable |
7:05AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] specint2000 as external tests |
5:45AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] specint2000 as external tests |
5:23AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] clang -emit-llvm uses system ld |
4:35AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to disable pass grouping(scheduling) |
2:45AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] clang -emit-llvm uses system ld |
12:38AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] HOWTO use llvm lit tool |
|
Tuesday June 28 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:55PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to make X86FastISel generate code for some intrinsic functions |
8:56PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] New Certificate Installed; llvm.org Back Up; Issues Linger |
7:56PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Reminder: New Certificate Install Starts in 4 minutes |
6:25PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Box removal |
5:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Web Server Restarts Starting at 3:00 pm Central Time |
3:40PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] retrieve information from a macro inlined as x86_64 asm in LLVM IR |
10:58AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Generating different assembly code for the same LLVM instruction depending on the metadata. |
10:29AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM vector code generation for standard functions |
9:50AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Generating different assembly code for the same LLVM instruction depending on the metadata. |
1:32AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Segfault calling LLVM libs from a clang-compiled executable |
12:46AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Where is the SVA code located? |
|
Monday June 27 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
5:58PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] inefficiencies in ConstantUniqueMap ? |
4:41PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 84, Issue 44 |
11:10AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Recommended GCC version for ARM/Linux platform for LLVM compilation. |
10:46AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Recommended GCC version for ARM/Linux platform for LLVM compilation. |
4:48AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Can LLVM jitter emit the native code in continuous memory addresses ? |
|
Sunday June 26 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:15PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] dragonegg pb05 for gcc 4.5.4 vs 4.6.1 |
7:52PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] ARM instructions clobbering frame pointer |
7:47PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm.org back up |
7:37PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llvm.org back up |
4:57PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Inliners |
4:33PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm.org Down |
3:44PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ARM instructions clobbering frame pointer |
11:21AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Can LLVM jitter emit the native code in continuous memory addresses ? |
9:16AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Recommended GCC version for ARM/Linux platform for LLVM compilation. |
6:39AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] ARM instructions clobbering frame pointer |
|
Saturday June 25 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
8:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] dump a module from inside GDB to a file |
7:37PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] dump a module from inside GDB to a file |
6:59PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] inefficiencies in ConstantUniqueMap ? |
5:55PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] dump a module from inside GDB to a file |
4:43PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Argument to optimization pass |
4:34PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] dump a module from inside GDB to a file |
12:00PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] inefficiencies in ConstantUniqueMap ? |
8:34AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Segfault calling LLVM libs from a clang-compiled executable |
7:49AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Loop Unrolling |
5:51AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Segfault calling LLVM libs from a clang-compiled executable |
12:36AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] multiple return value assembler regression? |
|
Friday June 24 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:31PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Source Feature Extraction |
10:21PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] multiple return value assembler regression? |
9:21PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] multiple return value assembler regression? |
8:49PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] inefficiencies in ConstantUniqueMap ? |
8:45PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] multiple return value assembler regression? |
8:40PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM autovectorization support |
8:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] MC-JIT (any progress?) |
8:13PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM autovectorization support |
7:44PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] MC-JIT (any progress?) |
6:04PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Missing symbols in pass stack trace |
5:41PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Infinite loop in llc on ARMv7 (LLVM HEAD from June 17) |
5:06PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Infinite loop in llc on ARMv7 (LLVM HEAD from June 17) |
4:53PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Infinite loop in llc on ARMv7 (LLVM HEAD from June 17) |
4:49PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Missing symbols in pass stack trace |
4:36PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Missing symbols in pass stack trace |
4:29PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] multiple return value assembler regression? |
4:12PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Infinite loop in llc on ARMv7 (LLVM HEAD from June 17) |
3:45PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Memory dependence analysis |
3:28PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] inefficiencies in ConstantUniqueMap ? |
3:17PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Missing symbols in pass stack trace |
3:03PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Missing symbols in pass stack trace |
2:56PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Missing symbols in pass stack trace |
2:49PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Missing symbols in pass stack trace |
2:44PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Missing symbols in pass stack trace |
2:34PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Missing symbols in pass stack trace |
2:25PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Missing symbols in pass stack trace |
2:14PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Missing symbols in pass stack trace |
11:02AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] ARM ATPCS ABI support |
10:52AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ARM ATPCS ABI support |
10:20AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Memory dependence analysis |
9:57AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] ARM ATPCS ABI support |
5:08AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] unmodeled side effects |
|
Thursday June 23 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
9:14PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Segmented Stacks] Week 1 |
8:29PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Strange Failure in LLVM Test Suite |
8:18PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] llvm compilation of libc? |
7:21PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [Segmented Stacks] Week 1 |
6:18PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Request for Review: SAFECode Patch |
3:47PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] type promotion i16 -> i32 |
1:55PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm compilation of libc? |
1:51PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Instr Description Problem of MCore Backend |
1:23PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Instr Description Problem of MCore Backend |
6:07AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] llvm compilation of libc? |
1:07AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ARM thumb-2 instruction used for non-thumb2 CPUs |
12:54AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Register class proliferation |
12:01AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Register class proliferation |
|
Wednesday June 22 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:24PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ARM thumb-2 instruction used for non-thumb2 CPUs |
11:13PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] ARM thumb-2 instruction used for non-thumb2 CPUs |
11:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ARM thumb-2 instruction used for non-thumb2 CPUs |
10:48PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Mips backend -- Incorrect globaladdr/constpool address generation when bit 15 of address is set? |
10:01PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] ARM thumb-2 instruction used for non-thumb2 CPUs |
9:08PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ARM thumb-2 instruction used for non-thumb2 CPUs |
7:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ConstantRange::sub |
7:51PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] ConstantRange::sub |
7:41PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] __clear_cache on arm |
6:39PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ConstantRange::sub |
6:18PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] ARM thumb-2 instruction used for non-thumb2 CPUs |
5:42PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ARM thumb-2 instruction used for non-thumb2 CPUs |
5:27PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] ARM thumb-2 instruction used for non-thumb2 CPUs |
5:03PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ARM thumb-2 instruction used for non-thumb2 CPUs |
4:15PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] ARM thumb-2 instruction used for non-thumb2 CPUs |
4:00PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ARM thumb-2 instruction used for non-thumb2 CPUs |
3:50PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] ARM thumb-2 instruction used for non-thumb2 CPUs |
3:39PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ARM thumb-2 instruction used for non-thumb2 CPUs |
3:29PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] ARM thumb-2 instruction used for non-thumb2 CPUs |
3:03PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Memory dependence analysis |
2:22PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ARM thumb-2 instruction used for non-thumb2 CPUs |
1:33PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] ARM thumb-2 instruction used for non-thumb2 CPUs |
1:16PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ARM thumb-2 instruction used for non-thumb2 CPUs |
1:01PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] getting file name from Module |
11:13AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ARM thumb-2 instruction used for non-thumb2 CPUs |
10:49AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] ARM thumb-2 instruction used for non-thumb2 CPUs |
10:34AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Memory dependence analysis |
5:39AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Register class proliferation |
4:15AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Register class proliferation |
2:54AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Improving cast<> failure messages. |
1:42AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Announcing ispc: a SPMD-on-SIMD compiler built on top of LLVM |
|
Tuesday June 21 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
9:13PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Instantiating a JIT on win64 |
6:39PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM job opportunity at Unisys |
5:20PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Register class proliferation |
4:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Register class proliferation |
3:51PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Register class proliferation |
3:05PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker |
2:41PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] atomic (memory ordered) operations |
2:13PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Get DCE to consider livein PhysRegs to successor basic blocks. |
7:51AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Get DCE to consider livein PhysRegs to successor basic blocks. |
6:09AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] ConstantRange::sub |
1:41AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] AsmPrinter directory |
|
Monday June 20 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
7:39PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] C struct as function argument |
6:33PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] C struct as function argument |
6:01PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Simple clang + llc crash on Windows 7 |
5:08PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] New Configure Option for LLVM Builds |
5:00PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Context of DW_TAG_member |
4:51PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Cross compilation question |
3:53PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] New Configure Option for LLVM Builds |
3:47PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] New Configure Option for LLVM Builds |
3:42PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] PBQP & register pairing |
3:39PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] New Configure Option for LLVM Builds |
10:35AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] committing with the git mirror |
9:37AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] committing with the git mirror |
8:53AM |
6 |
[LLVMdev] committing with the git mirror |
8:08AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Problem regarding AsmPrinter registration |
3:19AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] run -mem2reg and -reg2mem programmably from within a Pass |
3:03AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] run -mem2reg and -reg2mem programmably from within a Pass |
|
Sunday June 19 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:20PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Simple clang + llc crash on Windows 7 |
10:10PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Enhancement: Use Git & GitHub instead of SVN |
6:22PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Question about IndVarSimplify |
6:20PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: Integer saturation intrinsics |
5:09PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: Integer saturation intrinsics |
3:02PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] No Signed Wrap |
2:21PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Question about IndVarSimplify |
1:46PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] No Signed Wrap |
1:08PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Phase Interactions |
12:44PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Phase Interactions |
12:34PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Problem with building Polly with PoCC |
5:40AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] No Signed Wrap |
5:06AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Closing in on an initial release of Tart |
|
Saturday June 18 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:10PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Cross compilation question |
10:14PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Context of DW_TAG_member |
4:46PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] git Mirrors |
12:25PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Custom lowering DYNAMIC_STACKALLOC |
9:18AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Make dragonegg work with gcc-4.6 |
8:48AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: Integer saturation intrinsics |
7:26AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Custom Static Scheduling |
5:49AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] loop only executes once |
3:26AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Custom Static Scheduling |
12:49AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: Integer saturation intrinsics |
|
Friday June 17 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:50PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: Integer saturation intrinsics |
11:22PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: Integer saturation intrinsics |
10:42PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: Integer saturation intrinsics |
10:40PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] replaceUsesOfWithOnConstant |
10:08PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: Integer saturation intrinsics |
8:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ARM support status (GHC/ARM new calling convention) |
8:49PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] ARM support status (GHC/ARM new calling convention) |
8:41PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ARM support status (GHC/ARM new calling convention) |
8:31PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] ARM support status (GHC/ARM new calling convention) |
8:16PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] how to let loop induction variable count down |
8:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Custom lowering DYNAMIC_STACKALLOC |
7:25PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Simple clang + llc crash on Windows 7 |
6:42PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] can GlobalAlias point to a middle of a structure? |
6:27PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Simple clang + llc crash on Windows 7 |
6:07PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Simple clang + llc crash on Windows 7 |
4:09PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Problem regarding llc command line option |
4:07PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] can GlobalAlias point to a middle of a structure? |
2:31PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Custom lowering DYNAMIC_STACKALLOC |
12:34PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker |
8:42AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker |
8:14AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker |
8:04AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker |
7:55AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker |
7:48AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker |
7:37AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] PBQP & register pairing |
3:21AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Loop Unroll Factor |
2:33AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Problem regarding llc command line option |
|
Thursday June 16 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
9:09PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] ARM support status (GHC/ARM new calling convention) |
9:00PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ARM support status (GHC/ARM new calling convention) |
8:35PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] ARM support status (GHC/ARM new calling convention) |
8:20PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM analysis of Linux programs |
7:57PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker |
7:30PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker |
7:20PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker |
7:14PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker |
7:10PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker |
7:00PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker |
5:30PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Loop Unroll Factor |
5:22PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Cannot use function pass in a module pass |
4:30PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Difficulties in using gold plugin. ( |
3:30PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Difficulties in using gold plugin. ( |
3:27PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH]: PowerPC64 register/instruction fixes |
2:25PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Cannot use function pass in a module pass |
9:09AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Difficulties in using gold plugin. ( |
8:27AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM-based address sanity checker |
8:10AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] get LPPassManager to use it in llvm::CloneLoop |
4:32AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Confusion about excessive reads in the PowerPC assembly generated by LLVM |
4:13AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Loop Unroll Factor |
1:23AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Connection llvm ir |
|
Wednesday June 15 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:46PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Cannot use function pass in a module pass |
10:06PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Difficulties in using gold plugin. ( |
9:40PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Haswell New Instructions |
8:11PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] get LPPassManager to use it in llvm::CloneLoop |
7:32PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Difficulties in using gold plugin. ( |
7:31PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Haswell New Instructions |
6:10PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Difficulties in using gold plugin. ("ar" not working properly) |
3:32PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Custom allocation orders |
1:54PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Inconsistency between LLVM Jit and pandaboard |
1:21PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Connection llvm ir |
1:15PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] nightly test suite failure: ms_struct-bitfield-init-1.c |
1:08PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] nightly test suite failure: ms_struct-bitfield-init-1.c |
1:03PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Difficulties in using gold plugin. ("ar" not working properly) |
12:01PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] PBQP & register pairing |
10:20AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] get LPPassManager to use it in llvm::CloneLoop |
8:37AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] nightly test suite failure: ms_struct-bitfield-init-1.c |
8:30AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Connection llvm ir |
8:28AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
7:41AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] "Splitting" live values |
6:09AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] struct passing on X86-64 |
4:05AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM interpreter does not support fmod |
3:05AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Connection llvm ir |
2:59AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Connection llvm ir |
2:57AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM interpreter does not support fmod |
2:49AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Connection llvm ir |
2:33AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM interpreter does not support fmod |
1:35AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
|
Tuesday June 14 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
10:29PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] struct passing on X86-64 |
9:32PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] code generation for ARM |
7:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] code generation for ARM |
6:07PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
5:53PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] code generation for ARM |
5:38PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Avoiding Constant Folding |
5:34PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] code generation for ARM |
5:27PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
5:15PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] "Splitting" live values |
5:07PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Avoiding Constant Folding |
5:01PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] code generation for ARM |
4:20PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
4:18PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
4:17PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] "Splitting" live values |
1:20PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Too many load/store in Machine code represtation |
9:32AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to get an LLVM-compiled executable which could be debugged using gdb |
9:11AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
8:50AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to get an LLVM-compiled executable which could be debugged using gdb |
8:41AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to get an LLVM-compiled executable which could be debugged using gdb |
8:37AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
8:07AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
7:55AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] How to get an LLVM-compiled executable which could be debugged using gdb |
7:44AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Machine Function pass |
7:33AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Avoiding Constant Folding |
7:16AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
6:18AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
6:02AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Adding Polly tester to LLVM buildbot |
5:12AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Avoiding Constant Folding |
2:11AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Reading Instructions from Ocaml |
1:03AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
12:33AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Avoiding Constant Folding |
|
Monday June 13 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:49PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
11:33PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
11:13PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] producing a single LLVM bitcode file using the LLVM gold plugin |
10:43PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
10:37PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] producing a single LLVM bitcode file using the LLVM gold plugin |
10:17PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
10:15PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
9:56PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
9:52PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
9:37PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
9:27PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
9:23PM |
8 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
9:12PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
7:09PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Reading Instructions from Ocaml |
6:37PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
5:50PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
5:46PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Segmented Stacks] Week 1 |
5:30PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
4:41PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Haswell New Instructions |
3:21PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Modifying DAG in TargetLowering::ReplaceNodeResults() |
1:48PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Haswell New Instructions |
12:37PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Haswell New Instructions |
11:41AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Haswell New Instructions |
7:53AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
7:29AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
6:24AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
4:39AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
12:53AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
12:31AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
|
Sunday June 12 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:40PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
10:13PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
9:14PM |
6 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
8:51PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] contraction of FP operations |
8:17PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] struct passing on X86-64 |
6:22PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Doubt on phi nodes |
5:28PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Getting x86-64 assembly listing |
3:22PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] AVX Status? |
8:25AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
6:54AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
4:01AM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions? |
|
Saturday June 11 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
7:40PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Build of C++ project with clang++ fails (local symbol 1: discarded in section `xxx') |
7:17PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] alpha assembler with llc |
5:28PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Solaris 11 (i386) build fails |
5:22PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Build of C++ project with clang++ fails (local symbol 1: discarded in section `xxx') |
5:01PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] llvm fails on MinGW-32 (Windows) because Python is not supported there |
4:32PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm fails on MinGW-32 (Windows) because Python is not supported there |
3:49PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llvm fails on MinGW-32 (Windows) because Python is not supported there |
5:27AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Kaleidoscope Build Error |
|
Friday June 10 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
6:31PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Advice on architecture research project? |
5:51PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Register Allocator based on Live Range Growth |
5:40PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] struct passing on X86-64 |
5:29PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] struct passing on X86-64 |
3:40PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Annotating resulting assembly code from an LLVM pass |
3:01PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Polly test and example |
2:00PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns status |
12:58PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [VMKit] Bug in J3 User.Name detection |
12:20PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [VMKit] Bug in J3 User.Name detection |
11:38AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Polly test and example |
11:29AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Polly test and example |
8:07AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] struct passing on X86-64 |
7:38AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Polly test and example |
6:48AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to Cross compile llvm to ARM ? |
5:57AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Polly test and example |
5:31AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Advice on architecture research project? |
5:01AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Polly test and example |
4:52AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Polly test and example |
4:25AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Polly test and example |
3:00AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Polly test and example |
12:47AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns status |
12:09AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Advice on architecture research project? |
12:00AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] struct passing on X86-64 |
|
Thursday June 9 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
9:16PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns status |
8:48PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Advice on architecture research project? |
6:59PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] struct passing on X86-64 |
6:41PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Polly test and example |
6:30PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Advice on MachineMoves and SEH |
5:52PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Employment opportunity - Antix Labs |
5:47PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM front-end tests |
2:30PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns status |
2:20PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns status |
1:44PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns status |
1:18PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns status |
10:58AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] bitcode to make math expression parse faster |
7:51AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns status |
5:12AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-enable-gcc-optzns status |
3:16AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] cmake and testsuite |
1:14AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Traverse SelectionDAG in gdb |
1:07AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] gcroot intrinsic |
12:20AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] gcroot intrinsic |
|
Wednesday June 8 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:50PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Thinking about a profile-guided LTO inliner |
8:25PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] cmake and testsuite |
5:37PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] change program names (configure --program-prefix=xxx) |
12:49PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Different Runtimes using clang-gcc and clang-opt-llc-gcc |
12:14PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Different Runtimes using clang-gcc and clang-opt-llc-gcc |
4:17AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Polly test and example |
|
Tuesday June 7 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:08PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] AVX Status? |
10:04PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gfortran |
9:33PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gfortran |
9:19AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] PBQP & register pairing |
9:02AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] PBQP & register pairing |
5:30AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] a problem of jit debug |
5:18AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] a problem of jit debug |
4:19AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] a problem of jit debug |
3:42AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] a problem of jit debug |
3:29AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] a problem of jit debug |
3:17AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] a problem of jit debug |
3:09AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] a problem of jit debug |
|
Monday June 6 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
8:48PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Explanation |
8:35PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Test suite with gold/LTO |
7:28PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] PBQP & register pairing |
7:14PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] PBQP & register pairing |
5:53PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Left-to-right push of formal parameters |
5:43PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Problem with SelectionDAG ordering |
5:05PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Explanation |
4:49PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] What is the optimization level means? |
4:08PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Explanation |
2:24PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] PBQP & register pairing |
2:07PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] PBQP & register pairing |
1:03PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Understanding resolving external/built-in function references |
12:36PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Understanding resolving external/built-in function references |
11:01AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Understanding resolving external/built-in function references |
10:51AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Understanding resolving external/built-in function references |
9:53AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Understanding SelectionDAG construction |
8:54AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Understanding SelectionDAG construction |
|
Sunday June 5 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
6:01PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] Branch Probability |
5:24PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] MachineSink and EFLAGS |
1:11PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] MachineSink and EFLAGS |
11:51AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] PRE optimization in LLVM |
7:21AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Fwd: Advice on MachineMoves and SEH |
|
Saturday June 4 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
7:53PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Fwd: Re: How to identify LLVM version? [updated patch] |
11:09AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] AVX Status? |
4:47AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Compiling whole programs to bitcode |
4:43AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Compiling whole programs to bitcode |
4:39AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Compiling whole programs to bitcode |
4:29AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Compiling whole programs to bitcode |
4:27AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Compiling whole programs to bitcode |
4:21AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Compiling whole programs to bitcode |
4:12AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Compiling whole programs to bitcode |
4:01AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Function name changes in .bc on running llvm-g++ |
3:55AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Function name changes in .bc on running llvm-g++ |
2:19AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] Branch Probability |
12:06AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Thinking about "whacky" backends |
|
Friday June 3 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:56PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Thinking about "whacky" backends |
11:52PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Thinking about "whacky" backends |
10:31PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] MachineSink and EFLAGS |
9:46PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] AVX Status? |
9:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Thinking about "whacky" backends |
8:18PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to bootstrap a bitcode file? |
7:04PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to identify LLVM version? [updated patch] |
6:44PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Thinking about "whacky" backends |
5:38PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Thinking about "whacky" backends |
9:59AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] MachineSink and EFLAGS |
9:35AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] AVX Status? |
7:19AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to identify LLVM version? [correction] |
12:42AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] How to identify LLVM version? [correction] |
|
Thursday June 2 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:53PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] MachineSink and EFLAGS |
11:47PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [Segmented Stacks] Week 1 |
9:55PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] AVX Status? |
8:26PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Thinking about "whacky" backends |
7:58PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] MachineSink and EFLAGS |
7:22PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Advice on MachineMoves and SEH |
5:37PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM Instruction Operands |
5:11PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Advice on MachineMoves and SEH |
4:46PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM Instruction Operands |
4:37PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] problems with lipo on macos |
4:11PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Advice on MachineMoves and SEH |
2:13PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Thinking about "whacky" backends |
1:37PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] symbol not found (running passes by tools) |
1:20PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Advice on MachineMoves and SEH |
11:36AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] arm processor support by llvm |
10:56AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Advice on MachineMoves and SEH |
10:53AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] MachineSink and EFLAGS |
2:27AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Advice on MachineMoves and SEH |
|
Wednesday June 1 2011 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
9:25PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Thinking about "whacky" backends |
8:01PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Thinking about "whacky" backends |
7:59PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] MachineSink and EFLAGS |
6:24PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How best to time passes using the API instead of opt? Also, memory leaks when trying to do timing in the API. |
6:19PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How best to time passes using the API instead of opt? Also, memory leaks when trying to do timing in the API. |
5:51PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How best to time passes using the API instead of opt? Also, memory leaks when trying to do timing in the API. |
5:19PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How best to time passes using the API instead of opt? Also, memory leaks when trying to do timing in the API. |
5:18PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Fw: Thinking about "whacky" backends |
4:53PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Fw: Thinking about "whacky" backends |
4:18PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] MachineSink and EFLAGS |
2:28PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] How to identify LLVM version? |
12:52PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] AVX Status? |
9:39AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Bug in FoldingSetNodeID::AddInteger(unsigned long long I)? |
2:57AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Thinking about "whacky" backends |
2:36AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Fw: Thinking about "whacky" backends |
1:00AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Question about debugging dwarf generated by LLVM |
12:30AM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] Thinking about "whacky" backends |
12:04AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Can not compile using llvm-gfortran |