Dear All,
Just an FYI that I've updated this patch with a few fixes that I made
after running the transform passes within Clang (the fixes mainly deal
with the fact that using getGlobalContext() isn't the right thing to do;
I didn't notice it before since it works in opt). The files to add to
the LLVM source tree can be found in the following tarball:
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/~criswell/sc.tar.gz
I've also added a patch that allows the memory safety passes to be
loaded into opt and bugpoint (I think I omitted this in the last patch):
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/~criswell/llvmpatch
I have also added a preliminary patch that I'll submit to Clang when the
above code is approved that adds a -memsafety option that runs the
instrumentation passes; hopefully this will make testing easier if
reviewers want to do that:
http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/~criswell/clangpatch
-- John T.
On 6/23/11 1:18 PM, John Criswell wrote:> Dear All,
>
> I've developed a patch for mainline LLVM that integrates parts of the
> SAFECode memory safety compiler (http://sva.cs.illinois.edu) into LLVM.
> The patch includes transforms that add run-time safety checks to loads
> and stores and GetElementPtr instructions, a run-time library that
> implements the checks, a transform that enhances the run-time checks
> with source file debugging information (essentially making the compiler
> a valgrind-like tool), and one of the simpler but more critical run-time
> check optimization passes.
>
> Working under the assumption that people are interested in memory safety
> transforms being in LLVM, we'd like to integrate this code into LLVM
and
> would like to know if someone is willing to review the patch and provide
> feedback. I have commit access already, so I can commit the code myself
> provided that it passes review.
>
> The patch is available as a tar archive at
> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/~criswell/sc.tar.gz and can be extracted into
> the top-level LLVM source tree (*). I have also created two new test
> Makefiles for the test-suite that run the transforms on programs in the
> LLVM test suite; those can be found (as a regular patch to test-suite)
> at http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/~criswell/patch.
>
> BTW, there are more optimizations and other code from SAFECode that
we'd
> like to integrate (including some memory safety check optimizations, the
> simple static array bounds checking passes, and the control-flow
> integrity pass), but I wanted to start with a small initial patch and
> work from there.
>
> -- John T.
>
> (*) I apologize for not creating a normal "diff" patch; I used
svn copy
> to preserve the revision history when moving files from the SAFECode
> source tree to my LLVM working directory; a side effect of this is that
> the result of "svn diff" merely shows what changed relative to
the
> original source files in the SAFECode source tree and not the
> differences relative to the LLVM source tree.
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev