llvm dev - Jun 2011 - [LLVMdev] Is LLVM expressive enough to represent asynchronous exceptions?

On 13 June 2011 22:27, John McCall <rjmccall at apple.com>
wrote:
> But yes, I am not inclined to support asynchronous exceptions from signals.
Ah, ok. I was beginning to wonder... ;)

--renato

On Jun 13, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Renato Golin wrote:
> On 13 June 2011 22:27, John McCall <rjmccall at apple.com> wrote:
>> But yes, I am not inclined to support asynchronous exceptions from
signals.
> 
> Ah, ok. I was beginning to wonder... ;)
> 
You laugh, but we support it (or at least we did at one point with gcc-4.2).

-bw

On 14 June 2011 02:03, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com>
wrote:
> You laugh, but we support it (or at least we did at one point with
gcc-4.2).
In IR? In the form of synchronous exceptions?

How can you possible represent a "signal cfg" in IR? Is there a need
for unwinding information at all?

cheers,
--renato