| Friday May 30 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 8:13PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Possible VirtRegMap Bug |
| 7:58PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] notes on llvmc2 |
| 5:40PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Plans considering first class structs and multiple return values |
| 5:20PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] implementing PIC for linux x86-64 |
| 4:43PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] grue-x86-64-pic i386 nightly tester results |
| 4:11PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Plans considering first class structs and multiple return values |
| 2:31PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Possibly Vista-related Windows/MinGW Compilation Issues |
| 1:28PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Odd problem with command line options |
| 11:50AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Odd problem with command line options |
| 10:33AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] implementing PIC for linux x86-64 |
| 10:26AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] notes on llvmc2 |
| 8:59AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] PATCH: clang: fix description for -Wimplicit-function-declaration |
| 8:51AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] PATCH: -dry-run option for llvmc2 |
| 8:49AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] notes on llvmc2 |
| 7:45AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 7:34AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] llvm triggered a GCC bug |
| 5:17AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Patches for Solaris on x86 solaris |
| 4:36AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Possibly Vista-related Windows/MinGW Compilation Issues |
| 3:14AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Possibly Vista-related Windows/MinGW Compilation Issues |
| |
| Thursday May 29 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 5:53PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Files were renamed |
| 5:30PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 4:45PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] bugpoint question |
| 4:18PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] bugpoint question |
| 8:18AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] data exchange between loadable pass and backend |
| 6:53AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 1:49AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] problems compiling gcc frontend: Error: bad register name `%rbp' |
| 12:53AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] problems compiling gcc frontend: Error: bad register name `%rbp' |
| 12:22AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] problems compiling gcc frontend: Error: bad register name `%rbp' |
| |
| Wednesday May 28 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 8:21PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Asm output while executing |
| 6:53PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 10:27AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] X86TargetMachineModule not helping |
| 9:33AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] DejaGnu test-suite coverage |
| 6:01AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM project binary size |
| 5:11AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 4:28AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] A quick update on FreeBSD support |
| 4:21AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] DejaGnu test-suite coverage |
| 4:19AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Advice on CFG pre-analysis |
| 3:50AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] DejaGnu test-suite coverage |
| 3:47AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] DejaGnu test-suite coverage |
| 3:44AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Advice on CFG pre-analysis |
| 3:41AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Advice on CFG pre-analysis |
| 12:36AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Possible VirtRegMap Bug |
| |
| Tuesday May 27 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:54PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] JIT question: Inner workings of getPointerToFunction() |
| 10:33PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 9:57PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Limits in RunSafely.sh |
| 9:48PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Iterator issue in BranchFolder::RemoveBlocksWithHash? |
| 9:47PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] JIT question: Inner workings of getPointerToFunction() |
| 9:01PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Iterator issue in BranchFolder::RemoveBlocksWithHash? |
| 8:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Advice on CFG pre-analysis |
| 8:40PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Iterator issue in BranchFolder::RemoveBlocksWithHash? |
| 4:48PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Float compare-for-equality andselect optimizationopportunity |
| 3:35PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Float compare-for-equality and select optimizationopportunity |
| 12:06PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Float compare-for-equality and select optimizationopportunity |
| 9:49AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Min and max |
| 9:09AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Float compare-for-equality and select optimization opportunity |
| 6:55AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] DejaGnu test-suite coverage |
| 6:27AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] DejaGnu test-suite coverage |
| 4:05AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] DejaGnu test-suite coverage |
| |
| Monday May 26 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 10:53PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] use after free [was: A quick update on FreeBSD support] |
| 10:10PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] X86TargetMachineModule not helping |
| 10:05PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] use after free [was: A quick update on FreeBSD support] |
| 1:48PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM project binary size |
| 11:23AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Making optimization passes do less |
| 8:25AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] A quick update on FreeBSD support |
| 6:29AM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM project binary size |
| |
| Sunday May 25 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 8:39PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] A quick update on FreeBSD support |
| 8:38AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] A quick update on FreeBSD support |
| 7:58AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] A quick update on FreeBSD support |
| |
| Saturday May 24 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:25PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] A quick update on FreeBSD support |
| 7:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] A quick update on FreeBSD support |
| 6:43PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] A quick update on FreeBSD support |
| 5:18PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Advice on CFG pre-analysis |
| 6:53AM |
8 |
[LLVMdev] Advice on CFG pre-analysis |
| 3:52AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Testing documentation and terminology |
| 12:12AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Testing documentation and terminology |
| |
| Friday May 23 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:00PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] mem2reg & reg2mem |
| 10:27PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 10:10PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] possibly missing documentation? |
| 7:53PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 5:19PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Iterator issue in BranchFolder::RemoveBlocksWithHash? |
| 12:06PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Testing documentation and terminology |
| 11:10AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Iterator issue in BranchFolder::RemoveBlocksWithHash? |
| 5:00AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle size_t in front ends? |
| 3:16AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle size_t in front ends? |
| 2:28AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Eliminate Store-Load pair even the LoadInst is volatile |
| 1:58AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] DebugInfoBuilder? |
| 1:40AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle size_t in front ends? |
| 12:37AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] SSE intrinsic alignment bug? |
| 12:02AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] SSE intrinsic alignment bug? |
| |
| Thursday May 22 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:59PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] SSE intrinsic alignment bug? |
| 11:47PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] SSE intrinsic alignment bug? |
| 11:36PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] SSE intrinsic alignment bug? |
| 11:24PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] SSE intrinsic alignment bug? |
| 11:14PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Problem running llvm generated a.out |
| 10:40PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Second Annual LLVM Developers' Meeting |
| 9:12PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] VirtRegMap Error |
| 6:47PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] fix for FreeBSD/powerpc build breakage |
| 3:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to get a return type of a function with LLVM-C API |
| 2:07PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] How to get a return type of a function with LLVM-C API |
| 12:56PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Eliminate Store-Load pair even the LoadInst is volatile |
| 11:30AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Using the test suite to benchmark patches |
| 10:57AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Deleting order and acquiring generated function |
| 5:36AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Latest SVN head (gcc front end) build failed |
| 5:29AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Latest SVN head (gcc front end) build failed |
| 3:26AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle size_t in front ends? |
| 2:17AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle size_t in front ends? |
| |
| Wednesday May 21 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:25PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Pre-release available for testing |
| 11:22PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Using the test suite to benchmark patches |
| 10:39PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Pre-release available for testing |
| 10:32PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Optimization passes organization and tradeoffs |
| 9:31PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Pre-release available for testing |
| 9:21PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Pre-release available for testing |
| 9:09PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Optimization passes organization and tradeoffs |
| 9:09PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle size_t in front ends? |
| 9:03PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Loops over operands |
| 8:52PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] MultiSource/Applications/lemon slow in JIT |
| 8:48PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Optimization passes organization and tradeoffs |
| 8:43PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Using the test suite to benchmark patches |
| 8:01PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Using the test suite to benchmark patches |
| 6:45PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] MultiSource/Applications/lemon slow in JIT |
| 6:27PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] MultiSource/Applications/lemon slow in JIT |
| 6:18PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VirtRegMap Error |
| 6:16PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] DebugInfoBuilder? |
| 6:15PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Deleting order and acquiring generated function |
| 5:35PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Compiling FreeBSD kernels with LLVM 2.3-pre |
| 5:24PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Pre-release available for testing |
| 4:07PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Pre-release available for testing |
| 3:09PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Using the test suite to benchmark patches |
| 2:05PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Pre-release available for testing |
| 1:09PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] MultiSource/Applications/lemon slow in JIT |
| 12:44PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Pre-release available for testing |
| 9:48AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Deleting order and acquiring generated function |
| 9:29AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Optimization passes organization and tradeoffs |
| 8:43AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle size_t in front ends? |
| 4:53AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] DebugInfoBuilder? |
| |
| Tuesday May 20 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 10:45PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [ia64] Assertion failed: (!OpInfo.AssignedRegs.Regs.empty() && "Couldn't allocate input reg!") |
| 9:16PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 8:59PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [ia64] Assertion failed: (!OpInfo.AssignedRegs.Regs.empty() && "Couldn't allocate input reg!") |
| 8:45PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [ia64] Assertion failed: (!OpInfo.AssignedRegs.Regs.empty() && "Couldn't allocate input reg!") |
| 8:06PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 6:33PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Optimization passes organization and tradeoffs |
| 6:28PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Optimization passes organization and tradeoffs |
| 5:49PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Pre-release available for testing |
| 4:10PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM on small MCUs? |
| 3:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Optimization passes organization and tradeoffs |
| 12:45PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Making use of SSE intrinsics |
| 12:03PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Making use of SSE intrinsics |
| 12:03PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Optimization passes organization and tradeoffs |
| 9:34AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM on small MCUs? |
| 8:34AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Pre-release available for testing |
| 4:40AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Pre-release available for testing |
| 4:13AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Pre-release available for testing |
| 12:17AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Forward: Discussion about custom memory allocators for STL |
| |
| Monday May 19 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:24PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM on small MCUs? |
| 9:09PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 7:19PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM on small MCUs? |
| 6:56PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM on small MCUs? |
| 6:51PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [llvm-gcc-4.2] r51220 - in /llvm-gcc-4.2/trunk/gcc: cgraphunit.c passes.c |
| 6:45PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM on small MCUs? |
| 6:42PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM on small MCUs? |
| 6:38PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM on small MCUs? |
| 6:00PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Pre-release available for testing |
| 5:45PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM on small MCUs? |
| 5:40PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM on small MCUs? |
| 5:18PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Assembling the output of llc |
| 4:45PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM on small MCUs? |
| 3:48PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] cmake build system was "Re: VS build is broken again" |
| 3:27PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Wrapping ::print() in LLVM-C. |
| 3:19PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] cmake build system was "Re: VS build is broken again" |
| 9:52AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Forward: Discussion about custom memory allocators for STL |
| 9:50AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VS build is broken again |
| 7:08AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] VS build is broken again |
| 6:51AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Assembling the output of llc |
| 2:42AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] VS build is broken again |
| 2:25AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VS build is broken again |
| 1:33AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 12:39AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Forward: Discussion about custom memory allocators for STL |
| |
| Sunday May 18 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:59PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Forward: Discussion about custom memory allocators for STL |
| 8:07PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] VS build is broken again |
| 6:24PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Opaque type usage to represent foreign types |
| 5:20PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Duplicate wrapper function in LLVM-C. |
| 5:10PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VS build is broken again |
| 2:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Forward: Discussion about custom memory allocators for STL |
| 8:36AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Forward: Discussion about custom memory allocators for STL |
| 8:23AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Assembling the output of llc |
| 6:51AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] VS build is broken again |
| 4:49AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VS build is broken again |
| 4:18AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] More info, was Help needed after hiatus |
| 2:41AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Forward: Discussion about custom memory allocators for STL |
| 2:05AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Forward: Discussion about custom memory allocators for STL |
| 1:28AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Forward: Discussion about custom memory allocators for STL |
| 1:25AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VS build is broken again |
| 1:02AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VS build is broken again |
| 12:17AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VS build is broken again |
| |
| Saturday May 17 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:34PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] VS build is broken again |
| 10:04PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Assembling the output of llc |
| 10:00PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] VS build is broken again |
| 9:44PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VS build is broken again |
| 9:31PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] More info, was Help needed after hiatus |
| 9:31PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Assembling the output of llc |
| 9:08PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] VS build is broken again |
| 9:00PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VS build is broken again |
| 8:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] More info, was Help needed after hiatus |
| 7:07PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VS build is broken again |
| 7:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] More info, was Help needed after hiatus |
| 7:00PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] VS build is broken again |
| 6:34PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] More info, was Help needed after hiatus |
| 6:06PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] A non-JIT tutorial? |
| 4:48PM |
7 |
[LLVMdev] Forward: Discussion about custom memory allocators for STL |
| 4:36AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] I'm new to LLVM |
| 3:42AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| |
| Friday May 16 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:07PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 10:00PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 8:56PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] API CHANGE: create*() --> Create |
| 8:00PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 7:19PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 6:42PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 6:12PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 4:50PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 3:45PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 2:55PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Iterator protocols |
| 2:50PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Iterator protocols |
| 1:54PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Iterator protocols |
| 1:11PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 11:47AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Matching struct layouts. |
| 11:06AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Matching struct layouts. |
| 9:25AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Size and performance figures for LLVM? |
| 8:40AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Matching struct layouts. |
| 7:01AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Matching struct layouts. |
| 1:06AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 64-bit to 32-bit conversion of pointers |
| 12:45AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] 64-bit to 32-bit conversion of pointers |
| |
| Thursday May 15 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 8:44PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Size and performance figures for LLVM? |
| 7:14PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 6:11PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 5:58PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 4:48PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 4:09PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [HEADS UP] Upcoming API change (create --> Create) |
| 3:59PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Solaris port to be contributed by Sun Labs |
| 11:44AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Header problem on GCC 4.3 |
| 11:23AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Header problem on GCC 4.3 |
| 10:48AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Solaris port to be contributed by Sun Labs |
| 10:31AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Header problem on GCC 4.3 |
| 9:34AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Matching struct layouts. |
| 8:38AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Size and performance figures for LLVM? |
| 8:29AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Header problem on GCC 4.3 |
| 4:38AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Fix dobison.cmd when bison is not found |
| |
| Wednesday May 14 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 10:41PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] malloc, magic, and embedded compilation |
| 9:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] malloc, magic, and embedded compilation |
| 7:35PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] patch for building llvm on Windows with MSVC 2008 |
| 7:06PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 5:43PM |
7 |
[LLVMdev] Troubling promotion of return value to Integer ... |
| 5:26PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 5:20PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] malloc, magic, and embedded compilation |
| 5:00PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] malloc, magic, and embedded compilation |
| 2:46PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 2:45PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] malloc, magic, and embedded compilation |
| 2:31PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] test/LLVMC should be guarded by a check for llvm-gcc/llvm-g++ |
| 2:26PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Useless check in TailDuplication |
| 2:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 2:15PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] malloc, magic, and embedded compilation |
| 1:31PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 1:31PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Duplicate file name |
| 1:27PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] malloc, magic, and embedded compilation |
| 12:36PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Help needed after hiatus |
| 11:55AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM as a DLL |
| 11:46AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Help needed after hiatus |
| 11:46AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Size and performance figures for LLVM? |
| 9:56AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] GPL licensing issues or can GCC be used with llvm for a commercial application? |
| 9:54AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] GPL licensing issues or can GCC be used with llvm for a commercial application? |
| 8:35AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] GPL licensing issues or can GCC be used with llvm for a commercial application? |
| 7:32AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] -loop-deletion commandline option inconsistent? |
| 7:27AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] GPL licensing issues or can GCC be used with llvm for a commercial application? |
| 6:36AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] GPL licensing issues or can GCC be used with llvm for a commercial application? |
| 5:04AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] GPL licensing issues or can GCC be used with llvm for a commercial application? |
| 4:20AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] where's UnrollLoop.h |
| 3:34AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM as a DLL |
| 3:12AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM as a DLL |
| 2:44AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM as a DLL |
| 2:22AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM as a DLL |
| 2:03AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM as a DLL |
| 12:26AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Split LoopUnroll pass into mechanism and policy |
| |
| Tuesday May 13 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:38PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM as a DLL |
| 11:09PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Iterator protocols |
| 10:28PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Iterator protocols |
| 9:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] patch for building llvm on Windows with MSVC 2008 |
| 9:43PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Flamewars! |
| 9:27PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] win32 assemblers and linkers for llvm |
| 9:18PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] -loop-deletion commandline option inconsistent? |
| 6:54PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] trouble with 32-bit promotion of return value |
| 6:50PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Size and performance figures for LLVM? |
| 5:25PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Python bindings available. |
| 4:34PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Integer promotion of return node operand |
| 3:16PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] win32 assemblers and linkers for llvm |
| 1:53PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Preferring to use GCC instead of LLVM |
| 1:30PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] win32 assemblers and linkers for llvm |
| 1:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] win32 assemblers and linkers for llvm |
| 12:59PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] win32 assemblers and linkers for llvm |
| 12:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Preferring to use GCC instead of LLVM |
| 12:47PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Emotional responses to feedback |
| 12:34PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] patch for building llvm on Windows with MSVC 2008 |
| 11:49AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Preferring to use GCC instead of LLVM |
| 11:31AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Python bindings available. |
| 11:01AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Python bindings available. |
| 10:39AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM as a DLL |
| 10:39AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Preferring to use GCC instead of LLVM |
| 10:17AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Split LoopUnroll pass into mechanism and policy |
| 9:38AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Size and performance figures for LLVM? |
| 9:24AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Size and performance figures for LLVM? |
| 8:31AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Python bindings available. |
| 8:23AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] -loop-deletion commandline option inconsistent? |
| 8:22AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Internalize improvements |
| 7:52AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Python bindings available. |
| 7:42AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Size and performance figures for LLVM? |
| 7:34AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM as a DLL |
| 7:25AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Pre-release available for testing |
| 7:21AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Preferring to use GCC instead of LLVM |
| 6:57AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM as a DLL |
| 6:55AM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] Preferring to use GCC instead of LLVM |
| 6:30AM |
7 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM as a DLL |
| 6:12AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Python bindings available. |
| 5:49AM |
9 |
[LLVMdev] Preferring to use GCC instead of LLVM |
| 5:42AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Size and performance figures for LLVM? |
| 5:19AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] win32 assemblers and linkers for llvm |
| 5:09AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] memcpy and bootstrapping |
| 4:21AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] memcpy and bootstrapping |
| 1:57AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] win32 assemblers and linkers for llvm |
| 1:49AM |
6 |
[LLVMdev] Iterator protocols |
| |
| Monday May 12 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:46PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Debugger support |
| 10:47PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] Debugger support |
| 9:12PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM Exception Handling Changes |
| 6:39PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle divide-by-zero exception? |
| 6:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] building llvm on Windows |
| 5:48PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Size and performance figures for LLVM? |
| 5:19PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Size and performance figures for LLVM? |
| 4:30PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Python bindings available. |
| 4:20PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Python bindings available. |
| 4:08PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Size and performance figures for LLVM? |
| 4:00PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Python bindings available. |
| 3:28PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] FW: Integer promotion of return node operand |
| 3:21PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Integer promotion of return node operand |
| 2:25PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Python bindings available. |
| 9:59AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Size and performance figures for LLVM? |
| 6:58AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Python bindings available. |
| 5:16AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Python bindings available. |
| 1:37AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Python bindings available. |
| |
| Sunday May 11 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 7:59PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] building llvm on Windows |
| 4:42PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Preferring to use GCC instead of LLVM |
| 3:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Python bindings available. |
| 2:36PM |
9 |
[LLVMdev] Preferring to use GCC instead of LLVM |
| 12:30PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] ELFWriter and libelf. |
| 11:36AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Python bindings available. |
| 8:05AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Preferring to use GCC instead of LLVM |
| 5:04AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Preferring to use GCC instead of LLVM |
| 3:41AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Preferring to use GCC instead of LLVM |
| 2:55AM |
8 |
[LLVMdev] Preferring to use GCC instead of LLVM |
| |
| Saturday May 10 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 9:07PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle divide-by-zero exception? |
| 4:27PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Python bindings available. |
| 2:16PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle divide-by-zero exception? |
| 12:43PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc debug info on mingw32msvc? |
| 10:06AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Preferring to use GCC instead of LLVM |
| 9:44AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Python bindings available. |
| 9:42AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM as a DLL |
| 6:48AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Branch Created! |
| 5:04AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle divide-by-zero exception? |
| 4:38AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Vector code |
| 4:37AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Branch Created! |
| 4:05AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Branch Creation - NOW |
| 12:55AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] trouble finding symbols |
| 12:42AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Vector code |
| 12:35AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] trouble finding symbols |
| 12:09AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Branch Creation TODAY! |
| 12:03AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Vector code |
| |
| Friday May 9 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 10:30PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm gcc 4.0 not compiling |
| 9:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Split LoopUnroll pass into mechanism and policy |
| 9:43PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] llvm gcc 4.0 not compiling |
| 9:04PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Split LoopUnroll pass into mechanism and policy |
| 8:17PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] VirtRegMap Error |
| 8:15PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Complicated Remat Question |
| 7:49PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Complicated Remat Question |
| 7:41PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VirtRegMap Error |
| 7:21PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Complicated Remat Question |
| 7:16PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Branch Creation TODAY! |
| 7:01PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle divide-by-zero exception? |
| 6:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Branch Creation TODAY! |
| 6:20PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Complicated Remat Question |
| 3:37PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Branch Creation TODAY! |
| 3:06PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc debug info on mingw32msvc? |
| 2:05PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Internalize improvements |
| 11:25AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-gcc debug info on mingw32msvc? |
| 10:47AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Split LoopUnroll pass into mechanism and policy |
| 10:10AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Vector code |
| 4:35AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle divide-by-zero exception? |
| 2:17AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle divide-by-zero exception? |
| |
| Thursday May 8 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 10:31PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Possible LiveIntervals bug |
| 10:28PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Reverting broken patches |
| 9:56PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Vector code |
| 9:32PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] VirtRegMap Error |
| 9:30PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Vector code |
| 9:25PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] VirtRegMap Error |
| 8:46PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Vector code |
| 7:38PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Vector code |
| 6:40PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Vector code |
| 6:36PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] VirtRegMap Error |
| 6:13PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Vector code |
| 5:58PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Vector code |
| 5:52PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Missing passes |
| 5:47PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Vector code |
| 5:17PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle size_t in front ends? |
| 5:14PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Vector code |
| 5:09PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Vector code |
| 4:58PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] PPC Isel complex patterns |
| 4:33PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Unnatural loops with O0 |
| 3:24PM |
7 |
[LLVMdev] Vector code |
| 1:04PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] How to submit large patches? |
| 11:17AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] What's the BasicInliner for? |
| 9:53AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] StructRetPromotion and linkage |
| 9:50AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Missing passes |
| 6:32AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Split LoopUnroll pass into mechanism and policy |
| 1:07AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle size_t in front ends? |
| 12:21AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle size_t in front ends? |
| |
| Wednesday May 7 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:09PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle size_t in front ends? |
| 10:04PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] bitcast function calls |
| 9:59PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Split LoopUnroll pass into mechanism and policy |
| 9:34PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] bitcast function calls |
| 9:31PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle size_t in front ends? |
| 9:25PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle size_t in front ends? |
| 8:34PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Missing passes |
| 8:24PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle size_t in front ends? |
| 8:24PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Two new 'llvmnotes' |
| 8:11PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle size_t in front ends? |
| 8:08PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Split LoopUnroll pass into mechanism and policy |
| 7:20PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle size_t in front ends? |
| 6:40PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] debugging LLVM generated executables??? |
| 6:28PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Creation of Intrinsics with Pointer Return Types |
| 6:18PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] debugging LLVM generated executables??? |
| 6:09PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] debugging LLVM generated executables??? |
| 6:01PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Path to AutoRegen.sh |
| 5:58PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Two new 'llvmnotes' |
| 5:57PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Path to AutoRegen.sh |
| 5:13PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Path to AutoRegen.sh |
| 4:26PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Path to AutoRegen.sh |
| 4:25PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Creation of Intrinsics with Pointer Return Types |
| 3:53PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Two new 'llvmnotes' |
| 2:55PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Path to AutoRegen.sh |
| 2:13PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] -loop-deletion commandline option inconsistent? |
| 2:04PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Missing passes |
| 12:42PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Missing passes |
| 8:08AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Split LoopUnroll pass into mechanism and policy |
| 7:40AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle size_t in front ends? |
| 7:05AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle size_t in front ends? |
| 6:49AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle size_t in front ends? |
| 6:18AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle size_t in front ends? |
| 6:12AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle size_t in front ends? |
| 3:30AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Split LoopUnroll pass into mechanism and policy |
| 12:56AM |
8 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Split LoopUnroll pass into mechanism and policy |
| |
| Tuesday May 6 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 8:06PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] code generation order |
| 5:42PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] code generation order |
| 4:46PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] ARM TargetLowering broken? |
| 4:14PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Problem about "llc -march=msil" |
| 2:36PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] debugging LLVM generated executables??? |
| 10:41AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Problem about "llc -march=msil" |
| 10:11AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Split LoopUnroll pass into mechanism and policy |
| 9:03AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Split LoopUnroll pass into mechanism and policy |
| 1:31AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] debugging LLVM generated executables??? |
| 1:21AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] debugging LLVM generated executables??? |
| |
| Monday May 5 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:19PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] docs old version |
| 11:17PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] debugging LLVM generated executables??? |
| 10:02PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Two new 'llvmnotes' |
| 4:12PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LoopInfo::isAnalysis() unused? |
| 2:19PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Wanna contribute to LLVM .. |
| 2:00PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] nonlocal go to -- how? |
| 9:02AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Two new 'llvmnotes' |
| 8:13AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Two new 'llvmnotes' |
| 7:56AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] nonlocal go to -- how? |
| 2:53AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] nonlocal go to -- how? |
| 2:29AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| |
| Sunday May 4 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:56PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] nonlocal go to -- how? |
| 4:05PM |
7 |
[LLVMdev] nonlocal go to -- how? |
| 10:32AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Fixing prototypes in llvm-c/Core.h. |
| |
| Saturday May 3 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 5:04AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Unwind + lli |
| |
| Friday May 2 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 8:29PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Pointer sizes, GetElementPtr, and offset sizes |
| 7:32PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 6:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 6:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 2.3 Code Freeze 1 Week Away! |
| 6:22PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Pointer sizes, GetElementPtr, and offset sizes |
| 6:07PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 5:55PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 4:28PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] canonicalizing add in constant expressions |
| 1:30PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] canonicalizing add in constant expressions |
| |
| Thursday May 1 2008 |
| Time | Replies | Subject |
|---|
| 11:06PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] 2008 Dev Meeting Planning |
| 10:54PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 10:39PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 10:20PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] building cross llvm-gcc for new target |
| 10:11PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 9:24PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is it possible to write a llvm pass in OCaml? |
| 7:30PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 5:16PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 5:14PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 5:00PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 4:47PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 1:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 10:48AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] newbie question regarding llvm-mingw |
| 7:34AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Fixing prototypes in llvm-c/Core.h. |
| 6:19AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] building cross llvm-gcc for new target |
| 4:48AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Some positive feedback :) |
| 4:42AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Some positive feedback :) |
| 4:26AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 3:51AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 2:25AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 2:21AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 2:13AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How do you Build LLVM Statically Linked? |
| 1:35AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 1:01AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 12:57AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |
| 12:47AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] optimization assumes malloc return is non-null |