Thursday October 31 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:53PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
11:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm.sqrt intrinsic undefined behaviour |
9:38PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Symbolized ASan output on Android |
8:58PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Symbolized ASan output on Android |
8:54PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Preserving accurate stack traces with optimization? |
8:24PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] SCEV and GEP NSW flag |
8:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Why does cmake use LLVMBuild.txt to specify the LLVM-libs link order? |
7:17PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Why does cmake use LLVMBuild.txt to specify the LLVM-libs link order? |
6:54PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
6:53PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Add a 'notrap' function attribute? |
5:59PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] The order of GVN and IndVarSimplify |
5:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer misses opportunity, exploit |
5:34PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer misses opportunity, exploit |
5:24PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer misses opportunity, exploit |
5:16PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
5:12PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
4:50PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer misses opportunity, exploit |
4:42PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer misses opportunity, exploit |
4:35PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer misses opportunity, exploit |
3:01PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer misses opportunity, exploit |
2:38PM |
6 |
[LLVMdev] Add a 'notrap' function attribute? |
1:16PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] llvm.sqrt intrinsic undefined behaviour |
1:06PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] LICM and SCEV AA? |
12:13PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Add support for ldr pseudo instruction in ARM integrated assembler |
12:01PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Current state of the lld project |
8:28AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
7:06AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Shrink Wrap for ARM architecture? |
6:34AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Shrink Wrap for ARM architecture? |
6:21AM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer |
5:34AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Shrink Wrap for ARM architecture? |
4:22AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Get Different Result for ScalarEvolution through ModulePass and FunctionPass |
3:58AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Preserving accurate stack traces with optimization? |
3:22AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Moderators needed for LLVM Dev Meeting!! |
2:44AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM BoF at SC13 |
2:25AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Preserving accurate stack traces with optimization? |
2:21AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM BoF at SC13 |
2:09AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Preserving accurate stack traces with optimization? |
1:40AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer |
1:16AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer |
1:10AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer |
12:08AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Shrink Wrap for ARM architecture? |
12:08AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Android build patch |
|
Wednesday October 30 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
9:10PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Shrink Wrap for ARM architecture? |
9:08PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Propose] Add address-taken bit to GlobalVariable for disambiguation purpose |
9:08PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Symbolized ASan output on Android |
9:05PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Optimization bug - spurious shift in partial word test |
8:59PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Alias should not point to declarations |
8:56PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer |
8:47PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Shrink Wrap for ARM architecture? |
8:29PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Alias should not point to declarations |
8:16PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Alias should not point to declarations |
8:04PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Missed optimization opportunity with piecewise load shift-or'd together? |
7:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer |
7:50PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Alias should not point to declarations |
7:38PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Using MCJIT in a dynamic REPL environment |
7:35PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Alias should not point to declarations |
7:25PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Using MCJIT in a dynamic REPL environment |
7:20PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Using MCJIT in a dynamic REPL environment |
7:14PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer |
7:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Announcement] LLVM 3.4 |
6:55PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer |
6:21PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Preserving accurate stack traces with optimization? |
6:15PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer |
6:13PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer |
6:00PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Preserving accurate stack traces with optimization? |
5:50PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer |
5:40PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer |
5:37PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [Propose] Add address-taken bit to GlobalVariable for disambiguation purpose |
5:28PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer |
5:24PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Preserving accurate stack traces with optimization? |
5:22PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Setting called value for an indirect function call |
4:56PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Preserving accurate stack traces with optimization? |
4:25PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer |
4:20PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Propose] Add address-taken bit to GlobalVariable for disambiguation purpose |
4:13PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling ELF section groups/.gnu.linkonce sections. |
4:05PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer |
3:24PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] how can I compile gnu find utilities |
3:22PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Interfacing llvm with a precise, relocating GC |
2:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [AVX512] Inconsistent mask types for intrinsics? |
12:13PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is there pass to break down <4 x float> to scalars |
9:04AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Is there pass to break down <4 x float> to scalars |
8:32AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Machine Dependence of Liveness Analysis |
8:28AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Machine Dependence of Liveness Analysis |
6:54AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Will GetElementPtr work as expected |
5:53AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling ELF section groups/.gnu.linkonce sections. |
4:53AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ELLCC is both self hosting and can compile its entire tool chain. |
4:52AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling ELF section groups/.gnu.linkonce sections. |
3:20AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Propose] Add address-taken bit to GlobalVariable for disambiguation purpose |
2:40AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
2:11AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [Propose] Add address-taken bit to GlobalVariable for disambiguation purpose |
1:42AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
1:24AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
1:11AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
12:53AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
12:35AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Propose] Add address-taken bit to GlobalVariable for disambiguation purpose |
12:23AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [Propose] Add address-taken bit to GlobalVariable for disambiguation purpose |
12:02AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Propose] Add address-taken bit to GlobalVariable for disambiguation purpose |
|
Tuesday October 29 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:53PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Missed optimization opportunity with piecewise load shift-or'd together? |
11:39PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] [Propose] Add address-taken bit to GlobalVariable for disambiguation purpose |
11:25PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Missed optimization opportunity with piecewise load shift-or'd together? |
8:31PM |
6 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
8:17PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
7:49PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [compiler-rt] lit tests without x86 |
6:38PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] undefined symbol: _ZTIN4llvm10ModulePassE |
6:04PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [compiler-rt] lit tests without x86 |
5:58PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Add support for ldr pseudo instruction in ARM integrated assembler |
5:55PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [compiler-rt] lit tests without x86 |
5:21PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Add support for ldr pseudo instruction in ARM integrated assembler |
5:17PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Interfacing llvm with a precise, relocating GC |
3:54PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Performance tracking and benchmarking infrastructure BoF |
1:50PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] JIT'ing 2 functions with inter-dependencies |
1:05PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] .align 0 |
11:02AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Getting TargetData and TargetLibraryInfo for determining Malloc size |
4:39AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] conference |
3:51AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Interfacing llvm with a precise, relocating GC |
3:18AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Are Opcode and register mappings exposed anywhere? |
2:58AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
1:29AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [compiler-rt] lit tests without x86 |
1:23AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Loop vectorizer dosen't find loop bounds |
1:15AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Two questions about MergeFunctions pass |
1:07AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
12:53AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
12:42AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Non-deterministic behavior when using LoopInfo pass in LLVM |
12:27AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
12:21AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Loop vectorizer dosen't find loop bounds |
12:13AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
12:06AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
12:01AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
|
Monday October 28 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:52PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
11:47PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
11:20PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
10:12PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
9:56PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Preserving accurate stack traces with optimization? |
9:31PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
9:19PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
8:58PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer says Bad stride |
8:38PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] loop vectorizer says Bad stride |
8:00PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] .align 0 |
7:27PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Loop vectorizer dosen't find loop bounds |
7:23PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Loop vectorizer dosen't find loop bounds |
7:11PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Loop vectorizer dosen't find loop bounds |
7:06PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Loop vectorizer dosen't find loop bounds |
6:54PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] .align 0 |
6:23PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Are Opcode and register mappings exposed anywhere? |
6:03PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Interfacing llvm with a precise, relocating GC |
6:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Are Opcode and register mappings exposed anywhere? |
5:53PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] .align 0 |
4:24PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
4:00PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Are Opcode and register mappings exposed anywhere? |
3:27PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] CodeExtractor is not aware of debugger debugger intrinsics |
3:20PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
10:55AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
9:18AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
9:09AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Missed optimization opportunity with piecewise load shift-or'd together? |
5:11AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Extracting libmachine from libcodegen (bug 1121) |
5:04AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
4:45AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
4:13AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
4:07AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
4:03AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Is there any tutorial about using Clang to find all the basic control block? |
2:16AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-objdump fails on bunch of archs |
12:09AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] __fastcall jitting |
|
Sunday October 27 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:07PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
10:53PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
10:41PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.4 Pre-Announcement! |
10:39PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
10:25PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
9:20PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
9:09PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
6:46PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
6:30PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Two questions about MergeFunctions pass |
6:30PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
6:18PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
2:13PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Missed optimization opportunity with piecewise load shift-or'd together? |
1:57PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
12:34PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
9:24AM |
16 |
[LLVMdev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers |
5:57AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Add support for ldr pseudo instruction in ARM integrated assembler |
1:42AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Why is the loop vectorizer not working on my function? |
12:45AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Add support for ldr pseudo instruction in ARM integrated assembler |
12:43AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Why is the loop vectorizer not working on my function? |
12:02AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Add support for ldr pseudo instruction in ARM integrated assembler |
|
Saturday October 26 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:29PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Why is the loop vectorizer not working on my function? |
7:54PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Why is the loop vectorizer not working on my function? |
7:47PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Why is the loop vectorizer not working on my function? |
7:16PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Why is the loop vectorizer not working on my function? |
7:08PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Why is the loop vectorizer not working on my function? |
6:40PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Why is the loop vectorizer not working on my function? |
5:03PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Why is the loop vectorizer not working on my function? |
4:08PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Interfacing llvm with a precise, relocating GC |
3:03PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Why is the loop vectorizer not working on my function? |
2:40PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Interfacing llvm with a precise, relocating GC |
1:36PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Bug #16941 |
4:37AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Interfacing llvm with a precise, relocating GC |
1:14AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Add support for ldr pseudo instruction in ARM integrated assembler |
12:35AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Interfacing llvm with a precise, relocating GC |
12:25AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Bug #16941 |
12:22AM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] Add support for ldr pseudo instruction in ARM integrated assembler |
|
Friday October 25 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:30PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Add support for ldr pseudo instruction in ARM integrated assembler |
10:53PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Add support for ldr pseudo instruction in ARM integrated assembler |
10:04PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Add support for ldr pseudo instruction in ARM integrated assembler |
9:45PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [compiler-rt] lit tests without x86 |
9:35PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Add support for ldr pseudo instruction in ARM integrated assembler |
9:33PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] verbose check-all with cmake? |
9:16PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Bug #16941 |
8:11PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Add support for ldr pseudo instruction in ARM integrated assembler |
8:10PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Interfacing llvm with a precise, relocating GC |
6:50PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Interfacing llvm with a precise, relocating GC |
5:33PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] Add support for ldr pseudo instruction in ARM integrated assembler |
4:44PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Question About Function Cloning |
3:35PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Question About Function Cloning |
3:10PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Question About Function Cloning |
2:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is there pass to break down <4 x float> to scalars |
2:19PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is there pass to break down <4 x float> to scalars |
2:14PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Is there pass to break down <4 x float> to scalars |
1:49PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Is there pass to break down <4 x float> to scalars |
1:15PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is there pass to break down <4 x float> to scalars |
12:53PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Is there pass to break down <4 x float> to scalars |
10:06AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Is there pass to break down <4 x float> to scalars |
5:18AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] bugs on llvm 2.5 |
3:02AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Is there pass to break down <4 x float> to scalars |
|
Thursday October 24 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:42PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Interfacing llvm with a precise, relocating GC |
10:16PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Vectorizing alloca instructions |
10:00PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Vectorizing alloca instructions |
9:56PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Interfacing llvm with a precise, relocating GC |
9:50PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Interfacing llvm with a precise, relocating GC |
9:32PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] Interfacing llvm with a precise, relocating GC |
9:15PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Vectorizing alloca instructions |
9:04PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Vectorizing alloca instructions |
6:59PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] installation problems with latest sources |
6:05PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Exploiting 'unreachable' for optimization purposes |
5:05PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Exploiting 'unreachable' for optimization purposes |
4:31PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal |
2:43PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM use chains |
2:37PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM use chains |
12:22PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Exploiting 'unreachable' for optimization purposes |
8:48AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [OT] ARMv8 (AArch64) server |
7:40AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] First attempt at recognizing pointer reduction |
7:13AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM use chains |
5:03AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal |
2:41AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM use chains |
2:26AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal |
12:38AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal |
12:27AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal |
12:23AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [OT] ARMv8 (AArch64) server |
|
Wednesday October 23 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:05PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] First attempt at recognizing pointer reduction |
9:24PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ld: Assertion failed: (memberIndex != 0), function makeObjectFileForMember |
8:32PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Attach state from clang to LLVM |
8:10PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] First attempt at recognizing pointer reduction |
7:29PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Attach state from clang to LLVM |
5:34PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] On printing Value |
4:37PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Size limitations in MCJIT / ELF Dynamic Linker/ ELF codegen? |
3:22PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Extracting a value from an union |
3:05PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] First attempt at recognizing pointer reduction |
2:41PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] First attempt at recognizing pointer reduction |
2:31PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Loop Rerolling Pass |
2:15PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Contribute a new precise pointer analysis to LLVM |
12:52PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Contribute a new precise pointer analysis to LLVM |
9:58AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Buildslave atom1-buildbot |
9:50AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Size limitations in MCJIT / ELF Dynamic Linker/ ELF codegen? |
9:40AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Size limitations in MCJIT / ELF Dynamic Linker/ ELF codegen? |
9:32AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Size limitations in MCJIT / ELF Dynamic Linker/ ELF codegen? |
8:17AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] GC StackMaps (was Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal) |
8:02AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ld: Assertion failed: (memberIndex != 0), function makeObjectFileForMember |
7:32AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Size limitations in MCJIT / ELF Dynamic Linker/ ELF codegen? |
7:04AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Call for Lightening Talks |
6:12AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] GC StackMaps (was Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal) |
5:48AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal |
5:42AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] How to use clang -intergrated-as to compile cross-(os/target) assembly file. |
3:12AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to use clang -intergrated-as to compile cross-(os/target) assembly file. |
2:58AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to use clang -intergrated-as to compile cross-(os/target) assembly file. |
2:07AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] JIT functions' signature known only at runtime |
1:24AM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal |
|
Tuesday October 22 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:22PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Size limitations in MCJIT / ELF Dynamic Linker/ ELF codegen? |
11:18PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal |
11:14PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] SmallPtrSet patch for MCJIT |
10:24PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] ld: Assertion failed: (memberIndex != 0), function makeObjectFileForMember |
10:08PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal |
9:58PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM buildmaster will be restarted today after 5 PM PT |
9:41PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Bug #16941 |
9:14PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Starting implementation of 'inalloca' parameter attribute for MS C++ ABI pass-by-value |
8:55PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Size limitations in MCJIT / ELF Dynamic Linker/ ELF codegen? |
8:48PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal |
8:40PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Size limitations in MCJIT / ELF Dynamic Linker/ ELF codegen? |
6:46PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] SmallPtrSet patch for MCJIT |
6:22PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 112, Issue 59 |
5:41PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Size limitations in MCJIT / ELF Dynamic Linker/ ELF codegen? |
5:35PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to use clang -intergrated-as to compile cross-(os/target) assembly file. |
5:34PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal |
5:16PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Size limitations in MCJIT / ELF Dynamic Linker/ ELF codegen? |
5:07PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Contribute a new precise pointer analysis to LLVM |
4:55PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Contribute a new precise pointer analysis to LLVM |
4:53PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal |
4:44PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Size limitations in MCJIT / ELF Dynamic Linker/ ELF codegen? |
3:17PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Removing function params. |
3:12PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Size limitations in MCJIT / ELF Dynamic Linker/ ELF codegen? |
2:08PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to use clang -intergrated-as to compile cross-(os/target) assembly file. |
1:35PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Contribute a new precise pointer analysis to LLVM |
12:03PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Fwd: Re: [lldb-dev] Has Fast register allocation been finished in 3.3 version? |
5:56AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] SmallPtrSet patch for MCJIT |
5:41AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] An enhancement for MCJIT::getFunctionAddress |
4:23AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] in personality, why is landingpad null? |
2:11AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] An enhancement for MCJIT::getFunctionAddress |
12:18AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] System call miscompilation using the fast register allocator |
|
Monday October 21 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:55PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] An enhancement for MCJIT::getFunctionAddress |
11:39PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] An enhancement for MCJIT::getFunctionAddress |
9:27PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 112, Issue 56 |
9:27PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info + LTO] Type Uniquing for C types? |
9:09PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm.org bug trend |
8:47PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handle _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE symbol |
8:40PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] First attempt at recognizing pointer reduction |
8:16PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handle _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE symbol |
8:08PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handle _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE symbol |
7:58PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] First attempt at recognizing pointer reduction |
7:09PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Bug #16941 |
6:43PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Feature request for include llvm-mc in llvm.org/builds |
6:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Feature request for include llvm-mc in llvm.org/builds |
6:18PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Bug #16941 |
6:12PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Bug #16941 |
6:00PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] First attempt at recognizing pointer reduction |
5:14PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] An enhancement for MCJIT::getFunctionAddress |
4:29PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] First attempt at recognizing pointer reduction |
4:00PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] First attempt at recognizing pointer reduction |
3:23PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] First attempt at recognizing pointer reduction |
3:01PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Bug #16941 |
11:15AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Instruction Emitter crash when emitting glued InlineAsm SDNode |
11:07AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to fix the operand references of cloned instruction |
11:04AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Bug #16941 |
9:25AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] MI scheduler produce badly code with inline function |
4:22AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] can an alias Value be created? |
3:52AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] creating InvokeInst without branch locations |
12:06AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Unwanted r11 in push/pop on Cortex-M. |
|
Sunday October 20 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:33PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Parsing C++ headers with Clang bindings for Python |
6:10PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Some news about apt, QA, Coverity, etc |
3:22PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] A new builtin: __builtin_stack_pointer() |
|
Saturday October 19 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:16PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] An enhancement for MCJIT::getFunctionAddress |
4:25PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Who else is at Google Summer of Code Mentors' Summit? |
2:58PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Feature request for include llvm-mc in llvm.org/builds |
12:33PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Feature request for include llvm-mc in llvm.org/builds |
12:20PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Name of Virtual Registers |
10:01AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Feature request for include llvm-mc in llvm.org/builds |
9:11AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Downstream distributions as first class citizens in the LLVM repository |
9:09AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Cambridge LLVM Day |
4:29AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Parsing C++ headers with Clang bindings for Python |
3:51AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Parsing C++ headers with Clang bindings for Python |
3:38AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal |
3:37AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Downstream distributions as first class citizens in the LLVM repository |
2:07AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Downstream distributions as first class citizens in the LLVM repository |
|
Friday October 18 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:47PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Downstream distributions as first class citizens in the LLVM repository |
11:35PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Downstream distributions as first class citizens in the LLVM repository |
11:28PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Downstream distributions as first class citizens in the LLVM repository |
11:07PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Downstream distributions as first class citizens in the LLVM repository |
11:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ELLCC has self hosted. |
10:47PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Downstream distributions as first class citizens in the LLVM repository |
9:59PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal |
9:56PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Contribute a new precise pointer analysis to LLVM |
8:41PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal |
8:37PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal |
7:39PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal |
6:11PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Copy instruction from one function to another |
6:08PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal |
5:09PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Downstream distributions as first class citizens in the LLVM repository |
5:09PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal |
5:01PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] EE, JIT, MCJIT class structure |
4:37PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal |
3:41PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Contribute a new precise pointer analysis to LLVM |
2:27PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Contribute a new precise pointer analysis to LLVM |
2:24PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Unable to evaluate clang on linux or windows |
12:33PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Unable to evaluate clang on linux or windows |
11:57AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Iterate through a Module's StructTypes |
10:10AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] EE, JIT, MCJIT class structure |
8:36AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] mixing PIC/static with exception handling |
7:49AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ASan testing on Android |
6:39AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Contribute a new precise pointer analysis to LLVM |
5:51AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Contribute a new precise pointer analysis to LLVM |
5:43AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Contribute a new precise pointer analysis to LLVM |
5:39AM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal |
4:51AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Contribute a new precise pointer analysis to LLVM |
4:51AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] post-link Dwarf information appears wrong, works in JIT |
4:37AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] post-link Dwarf information appears wrong, works in JIT |
3:47AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] post-link Dwarf information appears wrong, works in JIT |
2:24AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] post-link Dwarf information appears wrong, works in JIT |
2:15AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Contribute a new precise pointer analysis to LLVM |
1:50AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Iterate through a Module's StructTypes |
1:10AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Using clang/LLVM to build Linux C++ programs with no gnu licensed libraries. |
12:20AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Contribute a new precise pointer analysis to LLVM |
|
Thursday October 17 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:27PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] ASan testing on Android |
11:05PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-objdump disassembling jmp |
10:54PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Feature request for include llvm-mc in llvm.org/builds |
9:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] post-link Dwarf information appears wrong, works in JIT |
7:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ExecutionEngine should have a non-Module creator |
7:46PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] ExecutionEngine should have a non-Module creator |
6:35PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] post-link Dwarf information appears wrong, works in JIT |
6:11PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
5:22PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Feature request for include llvm-mc in llvm.org/builds |
5:15PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Feature request for include llvm-mc in llvm.org/builds |
2:55PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-objdump disassembling jmp |
2:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] libprofile_rt.dylib deprecated in darwin cmake build? |
1:42PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] get the value of a Constant in LLVM IR |
11:13AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] module level assembly optimization |
8:53AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Converting a i32 pointer to a vector of i32 ( C array to LLVM vector) |
6:55AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ASan testing on Android |
6:30AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Feature request for include llvm-mc in llvm.org/builds |
5:32AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
4:13AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
4:10AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
2:56AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Multiple modules JITting |
12:59AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Converting a i32 pointer to a vector of i32 ( C array to LLVM vector) |
12:28AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Converting a i32 pointer to a vector of i32 ( C array to LLVM vector) |
|
Wednesday October 16 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
9:18PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Multiple modules JITting |
9:00PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
8:58PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
8:36PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Unexpected behaviour of the LLVM gold plugin with --allow-multiple-definition |
8:33PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
8:21PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
7:52PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
7:38PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
7:36PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] ASan testing on Android |
6:54PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
6:10PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
5:54PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
3:14PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Converting a i32 pointer to a vector of i32 ( C array to LLVM vector) |
12:13PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Unable to evaluate clang on linux or windows |
9:34AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] builtin_apply? |
9:19AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] builtin_apply? |
5:38AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] MI scheduler produce badly code with inline function |
4:28AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] MI scheduler produce badly code with inline function |
2:10AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Unable to evaluate clang on linux or windows |
12:59AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
12:46AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
12:22AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
|
Tuesday October 15 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:59PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
11:52PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling a whole bunch of readers |
11:49PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] r192750 - Enable MI Sched for x86. |
11:44PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Enabling MI Scheduler on x86 (was Experimental Evaluation of the Schedulers in LLVM 3.3) |
9:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
9:41PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] MCJIT and DWARF debugging info and lldb |
9:24PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
8:56PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
8:49PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] module level assembly optimization |
8:39PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] module level assembly optimization |
8:37PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
8:31PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
8:30PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] module level assembly optimization |
8:29PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
8:22PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
6:34PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
6:05PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] module level assembly optimization |
5:51PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
5:26PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] MCJIT and DWARF debugging info and lldb |
5:10PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
5:05PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
4:01PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling a whole bunch of readers |
3:33PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Unwanted push/pop on Cortex-M. |
3:32PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling a whole bunch of readers |
3:11PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] A weird, reproducable problem with MCJIT |
3:01PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] A weird, reproducable problem with MCJIT |
2:59PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Unwanted push/pop on Cortex-M. |
2:22PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Unable to evaluate clang on linux or windows |
2:01PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RTSC - Real-Time Systems Compiler |
1:13PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] RTSC - Real-Time Systems Compiler |
9:59AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Unwanted push/pop on Cortex-M. |
4:38AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] MI scheduler produce badly code with inline function |
4:08AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] A weird, reproducable problem with MCJIT |
4:01AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Reverse engineering for LLVM bit-code |
3:33AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling a whole bunch of readers |
3:28AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] A weird, reproducable problem with MCJIT |
2:31AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Reverse engineering for LLVM bit-code |
1:56AM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] module level assembly optimization |
1:35AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Unwanted push/pop on Cortex-M. |
1:20AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling a whole bunch of readers |
12:41AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling a whole bunch of readers |
|
Monday October 14 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:14PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info + LTO] Type Uniquing for C types? |
10:49PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info + LTO] Type Uniquing for C types? |
8:51PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RTSC - Real-Time Systems Compiler |
8:16PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] A weird, reproducable problem with MCJIT |
8:08PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info + LTO] Type Uniquing for C types? |
7:53PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LiveInterval Questions |
7:40PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] A weird, reproducable problem with MCJIT |
6:53PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Vectorization of pointer PHI nodes |
6:36PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] A weird, reproducable problem with MCJIT |
6:34PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Runtime Array-Length |
6:31PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Vectorization of pointer PHI nodes |
6:28PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Vectorization of pointer PHI nodes |
6:21PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] pointer alias |
5:18PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] A weird, reproducable problem with MCJIT |
5:15PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Vectorization of pointer PHI nodes |
5:11PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Fwd: Vectorization of pointer PHI nodes |
4:47PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Generate code for ARM Cortex m0, m3, and m4. |
4:44PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Vectorization of pointer PHI nodes |
4:39PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Building for a specific target, corei7 |
4:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Generate code for ARM Cortex m0, m3, and m4. |
4:29PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Fwd: Vectorization of pointer PHI nodes |
2:22PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Generating New Functions |
10:53AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Generating New Functions |
10:27AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] MI scheduler produce badly code with inline function |
9:46AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Runtime Array-Length |
5:51AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] A weird, reproducable problem with MCJIT |
3:47AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] CodeGen Context |
3:23AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] CodeGen Context |
|
Sunday October 13 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:05PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [MSVC] Adding LLVM build target support in VS2013 projects |
9:35PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] CodeGen Context |
2:03PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] git repos |
|
Saturday October 12 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:28PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Generate code for ARM Cortex m0, m3, and m4. |
10:00PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Generate code for ARM Cortex m0, m3, and m4. |
6:13PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Runtime Array-Length |
12:28PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] dragonegg: switch from old TBAA format to the new struct-path aware TBAA format |
11:21AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Strange error when building dragonegg 2.9 |
9:55AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] "target-features" and "target-cpu" attributes |
8:55AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [RFC] CodeGen Context |
7:33AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Fwd: unsupported gc: vmkit |
3:48AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Building for a specific target, corei7 |
3:28AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] module level asm printer |
|
Friday October 11 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:41PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
11:35PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
9:47PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] "target-features" and "target-cpu" attributes |
9:22PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] where to put the constant island pass? |
9:16PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] where to put the constant island pass? |
8:14PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Call for Removal: remove BreakpointPrinter and print-breakpoints-for-testing |
8:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Building for a specific target, corei7 |
7:40PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info + LTO] Type Uniquing for C types? |
7:19PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info + LTO] Type Uniquing for C types? |
7:07PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info + LTO] Type Uniquing for C types? |
7:01PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info + LTO] Type Uniquing for C types? |
6:54PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info + LTO] Type Uniquing for C types? |
6:48PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info + LTO] Type Uniquing for C types? |
6:39PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info + LTO] Type Uniquing for C types? |
6:32PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] "target-features" and "target-cpu" attributes |
6:23PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Generate code for ARM Cortex m0, m3, and m4. |
5:40PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Converting a i32 pointer to a vector of i32 ( C array to LLVM vector) |
5:27PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Converting a i32 pointer to a vector of i32 ( C array to LLVM vector) |
4:53PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM LTO |
4:39PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM LTO |
4:18PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Request for comments: TBAA on call |
3:58PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Mixing multiple targets in llvm IR |
3:39PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Mixing multiple targets in llvm IR |
11:10AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] "target-features" and "target-cpu" attributes |
9:06AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Question on License/GitHub |
7:36AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Request for comments: TBAA on call |
7:17AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Request for comments: TBAA on call |
7:16AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Request for comments: TBAA on call |
5:53AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Ambiguity in LLVM IR for global variable sections |
5:52AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Building for a specific target, corei7 |
4:56AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Request for comments: TBAA on call |
4:34AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Request for comments: TBAA on call |
3:53AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Request for comments: TBAA on call |
3:08AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling a whole bunch of readers |
2:52AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Implementing traditional Available Expressions Analysis? |
2:44AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling a whole bunch of readers |
2:01AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM LTO |
1:24AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling a whole bunch of readers |
1:21AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling a whole bunch of readers |
|
Thursday October 10 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
10:00PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling a whole bunch of readers |
9:07PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] How to handle aliases? |
9:01PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] A new builtin: __builtin_stack_pointer() |
8:03PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to define 'kill' in traditional Available Expressions analysis? |
7:32PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] A new builtin: __builtin_stack_pointer() |
6:16PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] "target-features" and "target-cpu" attributes |
5:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [MSVC] Adding LLVM build target support in VS2013 projects |
5:34PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Request for comments: TBAA on call |
4:41PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Are there implicit rules or conventions for an llvm frontend to generate llvm IR? |
4:16PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Missing optimization - constant parameter |
4:16PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling a whole bunch of readers |
4:06PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Are there implicit rules or conventions for an llvm frontend to generate llvm IR? |
3:43PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Are there implicit rules or conventions for an llvm frontend to generate llvm IR? |
2:59PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Missing optimization - constant parameter |
2:44PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Illegal BitCast assertion failed |
2:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RTSC - Real-Time Systems Compiler |
1:36PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] R600/SI: Embed disassembly in ELF object |
1:05PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-ld file not recognized: File format not recognized |
12:13PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] reading from memory |
11:22AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] "target-features" and "target-cpu" attributes |
11:19AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] compile error |
7:48AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] basic-arm-instruction tests fail on trunk |
4:19AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling a whole bunch of readers |
2:57AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling a whole bunch of readers |
1:41AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] assertion when -sse2 on x86-64 |
1:06AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] R600/SI: Embed disassembly in ELF object |
12:22AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
|
Wednesday October 9 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
9:19PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling a whole bunch of readers |
8:34PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] "target-features" and "target-cpu" attributes |
8:32PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
8:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Implementing a new feature in LVVM |
8:09PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling a whole bunch of readers |
8:03PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Subregister liveness tracking |
6:42PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling a whole bunch of readers |
6:36PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
6:36PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling a whole bunch of readers |
6:23PM |
7 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Handling a whole bunch of readers |
5:45PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
3:13PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Backend vs JIT : GPU |
2:43PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Related constant folding of floating point values |
1:32PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Question about anti-dependence breaker |
1:17PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Question about anti-dependence breaker |
11:53AM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] Related constant folding of floating point values |
10:54AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM at FOSDEM 2014 - Call for papers and participation |
3:38AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [NVPTX] Assertion `RegNo < NumRegs && "Attempting to access record for invalid register number!"' failed. |
2:13AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [MSVC] Adding LLVM build target support in VS2013 projects |
12:54AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Immutable Pass in Analysis Group |
|
Tuesday October 8 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
9:06PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Subregister liveness tracking |
9:05PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Enabling MI Scheduler on x86 (was Experimental Evaluation of the Schedulers in LLVM 3.3) |
8:04PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Subregister liveness tracking |
7:51PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Add target-specific entries to the dynamic table |
7:48PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Request for comments: TBAA on call |
7:45PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Request for comments: TBAA on call |
7:42PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Add target-specific entries to the dynamic table |
4:53PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] C constructs to generate some of LLVM IR instructions? |
4:50PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM Dev Meeting Registration Deadline Extended! |
1:36PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM Pass usable by all types of Passes |
1:29PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] openmp.llvm.org announcement |
1:25PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] The new MCTargetStreamer interface |
1:22PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] basic-arm-instruction tests fail on trunk |
1:18PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] basic-arm-instruction tests fail on trunk |
1:07PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] basic-arm-instruction tests fail on trunk |
1:01PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] basic-arm-instruction tests fail on trunk |
12:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] basic-arm-instruction tests fail on trunk |
12:30PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Open work items with a small scope |
12:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Suggestion on simple optimization pass for a beginner? |
9:43AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LiveVariables at LLVM IR |
9:39AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Post Increment Indirect Move Instructions |
8:31AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] What makes register allocation expensive? |
6:49AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Request for comments: TBAA on call |
2:34AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Request for comments: TBAA on call |
2:03AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Diagnostics |
2:02AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] What makes register allocation expensive? |
1:41AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Diagnostics |
12:47AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] dragonegg: switch from old TBAA format to the new struct-path aware TBAA format |
12:15AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Diagnostics |
|
Monday October 7 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Request for comments: TBAA on call |
11:22PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Request for comments: TBAA on call |
11:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Diagnostics |
10:59PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Diagnostics |
10:49PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Request for comments: TBAA on call |
10:36PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Diagnostics |
10:19PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Diagnostics |
10:13PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Verifying the Architecture of files read |
8:50PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Verifying the Architecture of files read |
8:49PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [lld][failing test] the reason of ifunc.test failing |
8:43PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [lld][failing test] the reason of ifunc.test failing |
8:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Verifying the Architecture of files read |
8:11PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Subregister liveness tracking |
8:08PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [lld][Windows] Warning during builds |
6:51PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [lld][failing test] the reason of ifunc.test failing |
5:33PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] basic-arm-instruction tests fail on trunk |
3:13PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] llvm jit |
2:59PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [polly] static link |
2:45PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Ambiguity in LLVM IR for global variable sections |
1:36PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] llvm jit |
9:58AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Typecasting int32ty to int64ty |
4:07AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [lld][failing test] the reason of ifunc.test failing |
3:54AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [lld][failing test] the reason of ifunc.test failing |
3:21AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] [lld][Windows] Warning during builds |
2:38AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Verifying the Architecture of files read |
2:12AM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] Open work items with a small scope |
1:28AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Pass sequence |
|
Sunday October 6 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:25PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.3 in llvm.org Ubuntu APT repository |
9:48PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] JIT has no EH, what RegisterTable and friends doing there? |
8:40PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.3 in llvm.org Ubuntu APT repository |
5:54PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Resolving a function symbol using JIT. |
5:52PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.3 in llvm.org Ubuntu APT repository |
5:45PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.3 in llvm.org Ubuntu APT repository |
5:22PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.3 in llvm.org Ubuntu APT repository |
4:33PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Suggestion on simple optimization pass for a beginner? |
4:12PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.3 in llvm.org Ubuntu APT repository |
2:13PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] LLVM 3.3 in llvm.org Ubuntu APT repository |
1:25PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] how to runtime link to shared library symbols in the JIT? |
12:23PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Suggestion on simple optimization pass for a beginner? |
4:17AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Pass sequence |
|
Saturday October 5 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
12:06PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Codegen performance issue: LEA vs. INC. |
6:01AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Enabling MI Scheduler on x86 (was Experimental Evaluation of the Schedulers in LLVM 3.3) |
6:00AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Codegen performance issue: LEA vs. INC. |
4:34AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] How to supply a non-default constructor to RegisterPass ? |
4:16AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Verifying the Architecture of files read |
3:50AM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Verifying the Architecture of files read |
3:41AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [lld] Diagnostics |
2:00AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [Debug Info PATCH] for support of ref_addr and removal of DIE duplication |
|
Friday October 4 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
9:29PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Runtime optimizer |
5:32PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [polly] static link |
3:41PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Setting up array ordering dwarf for arrays |
9:42AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] ADDE to use branch registers |
9:42AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Inserting a synchronisation before volatile and atomic loads |
8:40AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] question about -coverage |
4:52AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] A way to write new pass by keeping source and build directories separate |
3:01AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] looking for tutorial/introduction on linking |
|
Thursday October 3 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ThreadLocal and constness |
10:14PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Question about PseudoInstExpansion |
9:57PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Setting up array ordering dwarf for arrays |
8:12PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Setting up array ordering dwarf for arrays |
7:59PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] ScalarEvolution::createNodeForPHI |
7:45PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] A way to write new pass by keeping source and build directories separate |
6:26PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ScalarEvolution::createNodeForPHI |
6:06PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] ScalarEvolution::createNodeForPHI |
5:14PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ScalarEvolution::createNodeForPHI |
4:55PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ScalarEvolution::createNodeForPHI |
4:34PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] "target-features" and "target-cpu" attributes |
3:41PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Question about DAGCombiner::MatchRotate function |
3:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] libclang JIT frontend |
3:34PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Convert a function to "main" |
3:31PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Question about DAGCombiner::MatchRotate function |
2:47PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] question about -coverage |
2:15PM |
4 |
[LLVMdev] ScalarEvolution::createNodeForPHI |
12:34PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Exceptions do not work with MCJIT on Windows 7 |
11:17AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Move Polly's execution later |
10:49AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Help with a Microblaze code generation problem. |
8:22AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] runtime performance benchmarking tools for clang |
6:48AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Codegen performance issue: LEA vs. INC. |
5:27AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] builtin_malloc? |
|
Wednesday October 2 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:30PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] ScalarEvolution::createNodeForPHI |
11:22PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] ScalarEvolution::createNodeForPHI |
9:50PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [CLang] Comparing vector types - invalid error and proposed fix |
6:51PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] builtin_apply? |
6:21PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] builtin_malloc? |
5:36PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] builtin_malloc? |
5:11PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] builtin_apply? |
4:13PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] JITMemoryManager |
3:38PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Codegen performance issue: LEA vs. INC. |
1:25PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [CLang] Comparing vector types - invalid error and proposed fix |
1:23PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [CLang] Comparing vector types - invalid error and proposed fix |
12:45PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Implementing the ARM NEON Intrinsics for PowerPC |
12:36PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Implementing the ARM NEON Intrinsics for PowerPC |
12:07PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Implementing the ARM NEON Intrinsics for PowerPC |
11:34AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Implementing the ARM NEON Intrinsics for PowerPC |
11:17AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Implementing the ARM NEON Intrinsics for PowerPC |
11:09AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Reminder : Paris LLVM Social is today ! |
10:40AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] Implementing the ARM NEON Intrinsics for PowerPC |
10:11AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] [TableGen][AsmParser][MC] isAsmParserOnly flag in class Instruction |
9:12AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Implementing the ARM NEON Intrinsics for PowerPC |
8:54AM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] Implementing the ARM NEON Intrinsics for PowerPC |
7:32AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] builtin_apply? |
5:21AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] builtin_apply? |
4:58AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] builtin_apply? |
3:26AM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] builtin_malloc? |
3:14AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Implementing the ARM NEON Intrinsics for PowerPC |
2:59AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] mode(byte) |
2:46AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] [TableGen][AsmParser][MC] isAsmParserOnly flag in class Instruction |
2:41AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] JITMemoryManager |
12:02AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RFH: passing options from clang down to opt |
|
Tuesday October 1 2013 |
Time | Replies | Subject |
11:51PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] RFH: passing options from clang down to opt |
10:16PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Pass to simplify struct select? |
9:15PM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] jit code linkage at run time |
8:59PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Add Support For .bss Named Section Directive For Darwin Targets |
8:35PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Proposal: type uniquing of debug info for LTO |
7:53PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RFH: passing options from clang down to opt |
7:48PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] RFH: passing options from clang down to opt |
7:42PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] RFH: passing options from clang down to opt |
7:40PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Add Support For .bss Named Section Directive For Darwin Targets |
7:31PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] RFH: passing options from clang down to opt |
5:44PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] JITMemoryManager |
5:13PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Proposal: type uniquing of debug info for LTO |
4:14PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] Implementing the ARM NEON Intrinsics for PowerPC |
2:09PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] JIT compiler on ARM issue |
1:49PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] JIT compiler on ARM issue |
1:45PM |
3 |
[LLVMdev] ScalarEvolution::createNodeForPHI |
1:31PM |
5 |
[LLVMdev] JIT compiler on ARM issue |
12:54PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Proposal: type uniquing of debug info for LTO |
12:52PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Post Increment Indirect Move Instructions |
12:36PM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] [TableGen][AsmParser][MC] isAsmParserOnly flag in class Instruction |
12:02PM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Tblgen and computed expressions |
8:02AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] Post Increment Indirect Move Instructions |
7:39AM |
0 |
[LLVMdev] Proposal: type uniquing of debug info for LTO |
5:11AM |
2 |
[LLVMdev] How to supply a non-default constructor to RegisterPass ? |
2:06AM |
1 |
[LLVMdev] llvm-ar does not generates symbol table for contained bitcode files |