llvm dev - Oct 2013 - [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] RFC: A proposal to move toward using C++11 features in LLVM & Clang / bounding support for old host compilers

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com>
wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2013, at 10:12 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at
linaro.org>
> wrote:
>
> On 31 October 2013 09:41, Douglas Gregor <dgregor at apple.com>
wrote:
>
>> Not quite :). At present, we (= Apple) still have some dependencies on
>> building top-of-tree Clang with VS2010. We’re currently investigating
how
>> quickly we can move those to VS2012 or newer.
>>
>
> Hi Doug,
>
> Good to know. Since this is mostly related to 3.5, we still have
> half-a-year to make sure it won't break big things.
>
>
> Yeah. I’d like to hear about regarding Chrome’s dependencies as well; we
> don’t want to break them.

As discussed in a bunch of different places, Chrome should be fine here.

You'll note that I replied directly to Ted's post asking whether the
timeframe would be reasonable or what would be reasonable, and will
naturally be waiting to hear back from him before anything happens. =]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131031/cc1060cb/attachment.html>

On Oct 31, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com>
wrote:
> 
> You'll note that I replied directly to Ted's post asking whether
the timeframe would be reasonable or what would be reasonable, and will
naturally be waiting to hear back from him before anything happens. =]
After some internal investigation and discussion, dropping support for VS 2010
no longer appears to be an issue for us.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131031/6df1c4d4/attachment.html>

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Ted Kremenek <kremenek at apple.com>
wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at
google.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> You'll note that I replied directly to Ted's post asking whether
the
> timeframe would be reasonable or what would be reasonable, and will
> naturally be waiting to hear back from him before anything happens. =]
>
>
> After some internal investigation and discussion, dropping support for VS
> 2010 no longer appears to be an issue for us.
>
*cheers* :)

-eric
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131031/eda730a9/attachment.html>

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Ted Kremenek <kremenek at apple.com>
wrote:
> On Oct 31, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at
google.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> You'll note that I replied directly to Ted's post asking whether
the
> timeframe would be reasonable or what would be reasonable, and will
> naturally be waiting to hear back from him before anything happens. =]
>
>
> After some internal investigation and discussion, dropping support for VS
> 2010 no longer appears to be an issue for us.
>
Thanks for working on this Ted!

I'll plan to commit the relnotes change soon, and will send a new email to
llvmdev summarizing the result for folks that didn't wade through the whole
thread.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131101/6cbf2c16/attachment.html>