Sorry ... I missed mentioning the details -
this is the error I get -
root at no1slu398:~/Documents/LLVM/tmp# clang++ -std=c++0x hello.cpp
In file included from hello.cpp:1:
In file included from
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/thread:38:
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:535:6:
error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'duration' (aka
'std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1, 1000000>
>')
: __d(__t.time_since_epoch())
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/condition_variable:106:42:
note: in instantiation of function template specialization
'std::chrono::time_point<std::chrono::system_clock,
std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1, 1000000>
>>::time_point<std::chrono::duration<long,
std::ratio<1, 1000000000> > >' requested here
const __clock_t::time_point __s_atime = __s_entry + __delta;
^
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:234:12:
note: candidate constructor not viable: no known conversion from
'duration<[...], ratio<[...], 1000000000>>' to
'const duration<[...],
ratio<[...], 1000000>>' for 1st argument
constexpr duration(const duration&) = default;
^
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:237:19:
note: candidate template ignored: disabled by 'enable_if' [with _Rep2
std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1, 1000000000> >]
enable_if<is_convertible<_Rep2, rep>::value
^
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:244:19:
note: candidate template ignored: disabled by 'enable_if' [with _Rep2
long, _Period2
= std::ratio<1, 1000000000>]
enable_if<treat_as_floating_point<rep>::value
^
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:232:12:
note: candidate constructor not viable: requires 0 arguments, but 1 was
provided
constexpr duration() : __r() { }
^
1 error generated.
root at no1slu398:~/Documents/LLVM/tmp# cat hello.cpp
#include <thread>
int main() {
return 0;
}
Regards,
Kashyap
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Ben Pope <benpope81 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 15/10/13 22:22, C K Kashyap wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'd like to try out the new c++11 features using clang. However, I
am
> > running into some issue or the other on both Windows and Linux. In
both
> > cases, it looks like the problem is due to headers from VC/g++.
> > I was wondering if someone can point me to some steps on setting up a
> > Windows or Linux(ubuntu 12.04 LTS) box for exploring clang.
> > I was able to successfully build clang on my ubuntu but that did not
> > help in building my sample CPP files.
>
> It might help if you give us the compiler error and version of clang
> you've compiled.
>
> I can compile C++ programs with libstdc++ or libc++ without issue.
>
> Windows support is experimental at the moment, so let's stick with
> Ubuntu for now.
>
> Ben
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131016/2a6a4a9f/attachment.html>
Hi, I'd really appreciate some pointers in this regard. Regards, Kashyap On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 5:43 PM, C K Kashyap <ckkashyap at gmail.com> wrote:> Sorry ... I missed mentioning the details - > > this is the error I get - > > root at no1slu398:~/Documents/LLVM/tmp# clang++ -std=c++0x hello.cpp > In file included from hello.cpp:1: > In file included from > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/thread:38: > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:535:6: > error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'duration' (aka > 'std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1, 1000000> >') > : __d(__t.time_since_epoch()) > ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/condition_variable:106:42: > note: in instantiation of function template specialization > 'std::chrono::time_point<std::chrono::system_clock, > std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1, 1000000> > > >::time_point<std::chrono::duration<long, > std::ratio<1, 1000000000> > >' requested here > const __clock_t::time_point __s_atime = __s_entry + __delta; > ^ > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:234:12: > note: candidate constructor not viable: no known conversion from > 'duration<[...], ratio<[...], 1000000000>>' to 'const > duration<[...], ratio<[...], 1000000>>' for 1st argument > constexpr duration(const duration&) = default; > ^ > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:237:19: > note: candidate template ignored: disabled by 'enable_if' [with _Rep2 > std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1, 1000000000> >] > enable_if<is_convertible<_Rep2, rep>::value > ^ > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:244:19: > note: candidate template ignored: disabled by 'enable_if' [with _Rep2 > long, _Period2 > = std::ratio<1, 1000000000>] > enable_if<treat_as_floating_point<rep>::value > ^ > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:232:12: > note: candidate constructor not viable: requires 0 arguments, but 1 was > provided > constexpr duration() : __r() { } > ^ > 1 error generated. > root at no1slu398:~/Documents/LLVM/tmp# cat hello.cpp > #include <thread> > > int main() { > return 0; > } > > > Regards, > Kashyap > > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Ben Pope <benpope81 at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 15/10/13 22:22, C K Kashyap wrote: >> > Hi, >> > I'd like to try out the new c++11 features using clang. However, I am >> > running into some issue or the other on both Windows and Linux. In both >> > cases, it looks like the problem is due to headers from VC/g++. >> > I was wondering if someone can point me to some steps on setting up a >> > Windows or Linux(ubuntu 12.04 LTS) box for exploring clang. >> > I was able to successfully build clang on my ubuntu but that did not >> > help in building my sample CPP files. >> >> It might help if you give us the compiler error and version of clang >> you've compiled. >> >> I can compile C++ programs with libstdc++ or libc++ without issue. >> >> Windows support is experimental at the moment, so let's stick with >> Ubuntu for now. >> >> Ben >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >> > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131018/96507e7e/attachment.html>
James Courtier-Dutton
2013-Oct-18 14:07 UTC
[LLVMdev] Unable to evaluate clang on linux or windows
I think there might be something wrong with your installation. clang++ -std=c++0x hello.cpp clang++ -std=c++11 hello.cpp Both works fine here and creates an exe a.out Which version of clang/llvm are you using? On 18 October 2013 13:33, C K Kashyap <ckkashyap at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi, > I'd really appreciate some pointers in this regard. > Regards, > Kashyap > > > On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 5:43 PM, C K Kashyap <ckkashyap at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Sorry ... I missed mentioning the details - >> >> this is the error I get - >> >> root at no1slu398:~/Documents/LLVM/tmp# clang++ -std=c++0x hello.cpp >> In file included from hello.cpp:1: >> In file included from >> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/thread:38: >> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:535:6: >> error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'duration' (aka >> 'std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1, 1000000> >') >> : __d(__t.time_since_epoch()) >> ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/condition_variable:106:42: >> note: in instantiation of function template specialization >> 'std::chrono::time_point<std::chrono::system_clock, >> std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1, 1000000> > >> >::time_point<std::chrono::duration<long, >> std::ratio<1, 1000000000> > >' requested here >> const __clock_t::time_point __s_atime = __s_entry + __delta; >> ^ >> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:234:12: >> note: candidate constructor not viable: no known conversion from >> 'duration<[...], ratio<[...], 1000000000>>' to 'const >> duration<[...], ratio<[...], 1000000>>' for 1st argument >> constexpr duration(const duration&) = default; >> ^ >> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:237:19: >> note: candidate template ignored: disabled by 'enable_if' [with _Rep2 >> std::chrono::duration<long, std::ratio<1, 1000000000> >] >> enable_if<is_convertible<_Rep2, rep>::value >> ^ >> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:244:19: >> note: candidate template ignored: disabled by 'enable_if' [with _Rep2 >> long, _Period2 >> = std::ratio<1, 1000000000>] >> enable_if<treat_as_floating_point<rep>::value >> ^ >> /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6/../../../../include/c++/4.6/chrono:232:12: >> note: candidate constructor not viable: requires 0 arguments, but 1 was >> provided >> constexpr duration() : __r() { } >> ^ >> 1 error generated. >> root at no1slu398:~/Documents/LLVM/tmp# cat hello.cpp >> #include <thread> >> >> int main() { >> return 0; >> } >> >> >> Regards, >> Kashyap >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Ben Pope <benpope81 at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 15/10/13 22:22, C K Kashyap wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > I'd like to try out the new c++11 features using clang. However, I am >>> > running into some issue or the other on both Windows and Linux. In both >>> > cases, it looks like the problem is due to headers from VC/g++. >>> > I was wondering if someone can point me to some steps on setting up a >>> > Windows or Linux(ubuntu 12.04 LTS) box for exploring clang. >>> > I was able to successfully build clang on my ubuntu but that did not >>> > help in building my sample CPP files. >>> >>> It might help if you give us the compiler error and version of clang >>> you've compiled. >>> >>> I can compile C++ programs with libstdc++ or libc++ without issue. >>> >>> Windows support is experimental at the moment, so let's stick with >>> Ubuntu for now. >>> >>> Ben >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> LLVM Developers mailing list >>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >>> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131018/32ebc15d/attachment.html>
Óscar Fuentes
2013-Oct-18 14:24 UTC
[LLVMdev] Unable to evaluate clang on linux or windows
C K Kashyap <ckkashyap at gmail.com> writes:> I'd really appreciate some pointers in this regard.Possibly gcc 4.6 libstdc++ is incompatible with Clang's C++11 mode. I remember having problems with Clang, C++11 and libstdc++ until some Kubuntu release "fixed" them.