I think having diagnostics interface similar to Clang's would be good. I
think the total number of defined warnings would be much smaller than Clang.
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Shankar Easwaran <shankare at
codeaurora.org>wrote:
> Ping ?
>
>
> On 10/4/2013 10:41 PM, Shankar Easwaran wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> lld doesnot have a Diagnostics interface, It uses llvm::errs() to
display
>> errors after linking has been done.
>>
>> I think the Diagnostics interface follow similiar interface patterns as
>> followed by clang (using Diagnostic td files).
>>
>> What do you think ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Shankar Easwaran
>>
>>
>
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted
> by the Linux Foundation
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/**mailman/listinfo/llvmdev<http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20131007/219957ae/attachment.html>