llvm dev - May 2008 - [LLVMdev] Limits in RunSafely.sh

Dear All,

Is the lack of virtual memory limits for Darwin in RunSafely.sh 
intentional or accidential?  What about Cygwin?  It seems to me that 
some of the limits should be applied for all operating system targets.

-- John T.

On 27 May 2008, at 23:57, John Criswell wrote:
> Is the lack of virtual memory limits for Darwin in RunSafely.sh
> intentional or accidential?
At least on Darwin most memory limits set with ulimit are not  
honoured. See
http://lists.apple.com/archives/unix-porting/2005/Jun/msg00115.html


Jonas