search for: ulimit

.../etc/security/limits.conf icecast2 hard nofile 90000 icecast2 soft nofile 50000 icecast2 hard nproc 90000 icecast2 soft nproc 50000 How do I know? ps aux | grep icecast2 cat /proc/ICECAST2_PID/limits max open file is still 1024 In the end, I have to add the following line to /etc/init.d/icecast2 ulimit -n 20000 And I can stream over 1k users now. There is no config about ulimit for icecast2, and therefore, I suggest that we add something like this in /etc/init.d/icecast2 # Check if the ULIMIT is set in /etc/default/icecast2 if [ -n "$ULIMIT" ]; then # Set the ulimits u...

...les dnssrv Max open files 16384 16384 files However, if I run samba-tools ntacl sysvolcheck or reset, they are using system default (Soft Limit 1024) and sysvolcheck failed (not sysvolreset) A quick solution is to run "ulimit -n 16384 && samba-tool ntacl sysvolcheck" A deeper solution will be to play with /etc/security/limits.conf or other.... Best regards

...e.d": ensure => directory, purge => true, force => true, recurse => true, owner => root, group => root, mode => 644; } } } class profile::ulimit inherits profile { if ("$operatingsystem" == "Ubuntu") { define set_ulimit($limit="null") { file { "/etc/profile.d/ulimit.sh": ensure => file, mode => 64...

Running across some curious stuff with ulimit on CentOS 5.10. We have a non CentOS packaged version of Asterisk (using their packages) that we start at boot time with a typical RC script. Recently it started whining that it couldn't open enough file handles. As we dug further into this, it appears that at boot time, it inherits ulimit f...

> Why does fork-exec for llvm-symbolizer work, but simple exec(self) does not? Because the llvm-symbolizer the runtime finds is built for the host architecture. This is weird, yes, but once we integrate the symbolizer, it goes away. > Could we write a ulimit-like utility that would do setrlimit and then > exec the specified binary > %run %ulimit -s 8192 %t? I like that idea. How do you feel about this short-term solution: %run sh -c "ulimit -s 8192 && %t" -Greg On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 12:05 PM, Evgeniy Stepanov <euge...

...socket [Feb 13 16:47:00] WARNING[9283] rtp.c: Unable to allocate RTCP socket: Too many open files [Feb 13 16:47:00] WARNING[14732] acl.c: Cannot create socket [Feb 13 16:47:00] WARNING[14732] channel.c: Channel allocation failed: Can't create alert pipe! Try increasing max file descriptors with ulimit -n [Feb 13 16:47:00] WARNING[14732] chan_sip.c: Unable to allocate AST channel structure for SIP channel [Feb 13 16:47:00] WARNING[14732] app_dial.c: Unable to create channel of type 'SIP' (cause 0 - Unknown) [Feb 13 16:47:00] ERROR[14732] rtp.c: Unable to allocate socket: Too many open fil...

...to debian9 # 2.2.36.4 (baf9232c1): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # Pigeonhole version 0.4.24.2 (aaba65b7) # OS: Linux 4.9.0-13-amd64 x86_64 Debian 9.13 All works fine but sometimes I get: Sep 16 09:17:00 dovecot4 dovecot: master: Error: service(pop3): fork() failed: Resource temporarily unavailable (ulimit -u 257577 reached?) Sep 16 09:17:00 dovecot4 dovecot: master: Error: service(imap): fork() failed: Resource temporarily unavailable (ulimit -u 257577 reached?) Sep 16 09:17:00 dovecot4 dovecot: master: Error: service(doveadm): fork() failed: Resource temporarily unavailable (ulimit -u 257577 reache...

When restarting Dovecot 2.2.10 (via atrpms) on RHEL 6, I get the error: Warning: fd limit (ulimit -n) is lower than required under max. load (1024 < 4096), because of default_client_limit # doveconf default_internal_user default_internal_user = dovecot Should dovecot print this warning based on $default_internal_user, or based on root? As root: # ulimit -n 1024 As user dovecot: $ ulimit...

...s that system calls route to the host system. That can be useful if, for example, the executable invokes llvm-symbolizer. While execv(argv[0]) may be the right way to restart, this process doesn't need to be restarted. It needs to be configured before the first invocation. > Propagating ulimit setting in %run wrapper sounds wrong. In my opinion, propagating ulimit settings in the wrapper is consistent with whitelisting environment variables. -Greg On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis at google.com> wrote: > execv(argv[0]) is a canonical way to restart th...

...llvm-3.6.0/rc2/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-3.6.0-rc2.obj/tools/clang/test' Making Clang 'lit.site.cfg' file... Making Clang 'Unit/lit.site.cfg' file... gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/home/dim/llvm-3.6.0/rc2/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-3.6.0-rc2.obj/tools/clang/test' ( ulimit -t 600 ; ulimit -d 512000 ; ulimit -m 512000 ; ulimit -s 8192 ; \ /usr/local/bin/python /home/dim/llvm-3.6.0/rc2/llvm.src/utils/lit/lit.py -s -v . /home/dim/llvm-3.6.0/rc2/Phase3/Release/llvmCore-3.6.0-rc2.obj/test/../tools/clang/test ) lit.py: lit.cfg:271: note: Did not find llvm-go in /...

I need to to change the ulimit to 16384(ulimit -n 16384) on boot on Centos 5.4 64 bit. How do I do that? Been searching and have yet to find a good answer. Tried to do it in rc.local but it appears to happen to late there. Matt

...>> # Pigeonhole version 0.4.24.2 (aaba65b7) >> # OS: Linux 4.9.0-13-amd64 x86_64 Debian 9.13 >> >> All works fine but sometimes I get: >> >> Sep 16 09:17:00 dovecot4 dovecot: master: Error: service(pop3): fork() >> failed: Resource temporarily unavailable (ulimit -u 257577 reached?) >> Sep 16 09:17:00 dovecot4 dovecot: master: Error: service(imap): fork() >> failed: Resource temporarily unavailable (ulimit -u 257577 reached?) >> Sep 16 09:17:00 dovecot4 dovecot: master: Error: service(doveadm): >> fork() failed: Resource temporarily...

Hi! Question from the novice. I have to permanently increase number of opened files ( ulimit -n 16384 and ulimit -Hn 16384) for some application. I did custom kernel based on https://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-3-Manual/sysadmin-guide/s1-custom-kernel-modularized.html and application documentation ( written for RH 9), no error during all makes but I have panic during th...

I am having a problem with running utorrent on wine. After running for a little while I eventually get: Error: Too many files open. I have set ulimit -n unlimited which gives me: Code: root@???: 02:43 AM :~# ulimit -n 1048576 root@???: 02:43 AM :~# Also its got plenty of file descriptors so it doesn't seem like wine is truly using up to that amount: Code: root@???: 02:43 AM :~# cat /proc/sys/fs/file-nr 11904 0 2097152...

I get this when I reload dovecot after any changes. How can I fix it? I can?t find any reference to it anywhere. master: Warning: fd limit (ulimit -n) is lower than required under max. load (256 < 1000), because of default_client_limit thanks Robert

On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 10:00:39PM +0800, Yusuf Goolamabbas wrote: > Hi Andrea, The following is a thread on ext3-users in which sct mentions > that this is due to a core VFS bug introduced in 2.4.10 which applies > ulimits to block devices. Maybe this could be due to some interaction > with your blockdevice in pagecache > > I don't know if you already have a fix in your tree. Maybe sct can > provide you with more info You need to upgrade glibc to something recent like 2.2.1, so that the ulimit will...

...): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf > # Pigeonhole version 0.4.24.2 (aaba65b7) > # OS: Linux 4.9.0-13-amd64 x86_64 Debian 9.13 > > All works fine but sometimes I get: > > Sep 16 09:17:00 dovecot4 dovecot: master: Error: service(pop3): fork() > failed: Resource temporarily unavailable (ulimit -u 257577 reached?) > Sep 16 09:17:00 dovecot4 dovecot: master: Error: service(imap): fork() > failed: Resource temporarily unavailable (ulimit -u 257577 reached?) > Sep 16 09:17:00 dovecot4 dovecot: master: Error: service(doveadm): > fork() failed: Resource temporarily unavailable (uli...

Hi Thomas, > Could anybody point me in the right direction for setting the kernel > parameter, max_stack_depth, to 10240 for database tuning? > > I have currently set it by running 'ulimit -s 10240' but this does not > survive a reboot. > > Thanks for the response, I've been nosing around that file recently but noted the first two lines; #This file sets the resource limits for the users logged in via PAM. #It does not affect resource limits of the system services....

Dear for having an stable system which limit option is good for ulimit comand ? 2-is any option for making asterisk crash-free? Best -- Pezhman Lali -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110810/365d9d56/attachment.htm>

Hi All, Could anybody point me in the right direction for setting the kernel parameter, max_stack_depth, to 10240 for database tuning? I have currently set it by running 'ulimit -s 10240' but this does not survive a reboot. I've Googled plenty and can't find any solution, thanks Michael