search for: limits

For some reason proftpd stopped authentication for users. Anonymous access still works but when someone tries to access the server via their login it no longer authenticates them. I recently ran yum where proftpd was updated (that said, I'm not sure that caused the problem). I uninstalled the new version and and installed a prior version with no change. Below is a look at my config, a

This is a second version of the limit filter. v1 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-March/msg00015.html I didn't bother to repost the other three patches because they are the same. The difference is this version of the filter takes security more seriously. It shouldn't be possible for malicious clients to connect more than limit=N times to the plugin now,

Ok, so, I''ve written my first app in rails. It''s pretty nifty. Only one problem. Slower than you could possibly comprehend. Processing PersonController#show (for 67.138.254.231 at Thu Mar 03 21:04:16 Eastern Standard Time 2005) Parameters: {:id=>"1", :controller=>"person", :action=>"show"} [4;35mPerson Load (0.219000) [0;37mSELECT

Rowland, Did some editing in smb.conf that I had to reverse. Now I'm back to being able to connect with the firewall disabled. When I enable the firewall I get as far as windows network -> workgroup but no connection. I have only the rules you recommended in your last email. Louis, The information you requested is below: martin at radio:~$ dpkg -l|egrep "iptables|ufw" ii 

...decb --- /dev/null +++ b/filters/limit/nbdkit-limit-filter.pod @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +=head1 NAME + +nbdkit-limit-filter - limit number of clients that can connect + +=head1 SYNOPSIS + + nbdkit --filter=limit PLUGIN [limit=N] + +=head1 DESCRIPTION + +C<nbdkit-limit-filter> is an nbdkit filter that limits the number of +clients which can connect concurrently. If more than C<limit=N> +(default: 1) clients try to connect at the same time then later +clients are rejected. + +=head1 PARAMETERS + +=over 4 + +=item B<limit=>N + +Limit the number of concurrent clients to C<N>. This para...

Hi, Rails 2.3.2 class TestD < ActiveRecord::Base default_scope :limit => 12 named_scope :limit, lambda { |num| { :limit => num} } end ruby script/console >> TestD.all TestD Load (0.7ms) SELECT * FROM "test_ds" LIMIT 12 => [] >> TestD.limit(14) TestD Load (0.3ms) SELECT * FROM "test_ds" LIMIT 12 => [] Any ideas why the default limit

...at can connect Is this number of clients that can connect in parallel, or number of clients that connect in series? > + > +=head1 SYNOPSIS > + > + nbdkit --filter=limit PLUGIN [limit=N] > + > +=head1 DESCRIPTION > + > +C<nbdkit-limit-filter> is an nbdkit filter that limits the number of > +clients which can connect concurrently. If more than C<limit=N> > +(default: 1) clients try to connect at the same time then later > +clients are rejected. > + > +=head1 PARAMETERS > + > +=over 4 > + > +=item B<limit=>N > + > +Limit the...

I've come across a handful of tests that fail at our site. I consider this one the worst because the process does not return. The patch below simply bypasss the test, but the errors in the out file are included as well. I suspect this is due to more or tighter ulimits on this system. But I'm not sure if this is result of different expectations (kernel/userland) of what should be done in the curcumstance. // George NetBSD chime 4.0_STABLE NetBSD 4.0_STABLE (CHIME) #6: Tue Apr 29 16:49:55 EDT 2008 root at chime:/usr/obj/sys/arch/amd64/compile/CHIME amd64...

I was wondering if anyone had implemented rules like this in shorewall: http://blog.andrew.net.au/tech I see tons of brute force attempts on the machines I administer, and I like the idea of limiting them without the need for extra daemons scanning for attacks. Thanks, Dale -- Dale E. Martin - dale@the-martins.org http://the-martins.org/~dmartin

Rowland, OK. Should I delete these lines? diff yours mine 63d62 yours# -A ufw-after-logging-output -m limit --limit 3/min --limit-burst 10 -j LOG --log-prefix "[UFW ALLOW] " 85,87d83 yours# -A ufw-before-logging-forward -m conntrack --ctstate NEW -m limit --limit 3/min --limit-burst 10 -j LOG --log-prefix "[UFW AUDIT] " yours# -A ufw-before-logging-input -m conntrack

I tried to use ''rake db_schema_dump'' from old MySQL database and then use ''rake db_schema_import'' to rebuild the database in PostgreSQL. The issue here is that only some of tables can be imported successfully. For example, in the dumped schema.rb: create_table "profiles", :force => true do |t| t.column "ticker", :string, :limit

Hi -- I''m getting started with Rails by rewriting a little web-app I wrote last year in PHP. (I have a bit of prior Ruby experience, and have been working with SQLite for about a year.) My app is up and running, but on looking through the development.log I noticed that Rails is making a lot of identical SELECT queries while handling a single request. These are just the simple

Hi! I wrote a small patch to enable /etc/limits support in openssh. nice thing when you don't have PAM installed.. It is based on Ultor's openssh 1.x patch (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=secure-shell&m=96427677022741&w=2) Works fine on slackware7.1. define USE_ETC_LIMITS in config.h , and compile as usual. Sagi ------------...

Full_Name: Shigeru Mase Version: 2.0.1 OS: Linux (Debian) Submission from: (NULL) (222.149.162.192) help.search("Mem") shows there is an object "Memory-limits" in the base package. But commads "Memory-limits", or "Memory-limits()", causes an error message: Error: Object "Memory" not found. In addition, help(Memory-limits) displays the document for Arithmetic.

I am trying to create a routine that would take a time series and generate monthly 25%tile and 75%tile limits based on 12 calendar months. I have succeeded to create a do loop to do this, but can't figure out how to initiate the receiving datafile (in this case "limit.list") without sticking an initial set of zeroes in. I'd like to be able to insert a new column "i.value" for e...

I am playing with memory limits and trying to understand how R allocates and increases available memory. Here is what I have: > memory.limit() [1] 536068096 > memory.limit(size = memory.limit()*2) Error in memory.size(size) : cannot decrease memory limit > memory.limit(size = 1024^3) Error in memory.size(size) : canno...

I think it would be nice to be able to rate limit an action, too.. suppose I have an action named Accept_good_source : ACCEPT - - tcp - 1024:65535 ACCEPT - - udp - 1024:65535 and that i want to use it in an action called AllowCVS, i can''t limit the cvs usage, but only the general use of Accept_good_source... same goes for userset... as each rule will give one iptables command, I

...sages are different, I am posting them separately. The second error is with the installation of lpSolve. The core error message is: ======================================================================== In file included from /usr/include/bits/posix1_lim.h:153, from /usr/include/limits.h:145, from /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.2.1/include/limits.h:122, from /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.2.1/include/syslimits.h:7, from /usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.2.1/include/limits.h:11, from colamd.c:677: /usr/in...

Hi all, I''m sure I''m soing something wrong here. I am trying to set up a rate limit inside another rate limit. eg. I have a 512K rate limit on a particular VLAN. I am using an IFB so that packets passing through the bridge are counted at each port.(ie the throughput is limited to 512K, not just the traffic in one direction.) This part works OK, but I also want to limit a

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1170 Bug ID: 1170 Summary: limit-burst is not fully consumed and rule stops matching Product: netfilter/iptables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: