search for: intentional

Hello list, I'm trying to make sure that I'm performing a path analysis correctly using the sem package. the figure at http://flame.cs.dal.ca/~sstewart/regressDiag.png has a detailing of the model. The challenge I'm having is that reuse is an indicator (0/1) variable. Here's the code I'm using: corr =

Note I'm not asking for any legal advice here obviously, simply what the intention of the R foundation is with regard to allowing commercial connection to R. I've looked at various threads on the r-devel archive and it looks like this may have been discussed before, but as far as could tell, not to any great resolution, and not, it seems, specifically covering this angle. In the

...Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm Debug: Skipping module doveadm_acl_plugin, because dlopen() failed: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: Undefined symbol "acl_user_module" (this is usually intentional, so just ignore this message) Debug: Skipping module doveadm_expire_plugin, because dlopen() failed: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_expire_plugin.so: Undefined symbol "expire_set_lookup" (this is usually intentional, so just ignore this message) Debug: Skipping module dovead...

I can create a small dataset, "x" below, and subset out rows based on values of a certain variable. However, on the dataset I'm working on now, "latdata" below, I get a subscript error. Any advice is appreciated! Ryan Successful: > is.data.frame(x) [1] TRUE > x X1 X2 X3 1 1 3 5 2 2 4 6 > x[x$X2 %in% c(3),] X1 X2 X3 1 1 3 5 Unsuccessful: >

why does dovecot touch any ever used fuse-mountpoint and scream at the next start that is no longer mounted? "If this is intentional, remove it with doveadm mount" why if i never called "doveadm" on any setup at all? Jul 10 09:10:56 rh dovecot: master: Dovecot v2.1.8 starting up (core dumps disabled) Jul 10 09:10:56 rh dovecot: master: Warning: /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu is no longer mounted. If this is intentional, remo...

...Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/lib/dovecot/modules/doveadm Debug: Skipping module doveadm_acl_plugin, because dlopen() failed: /usr/lib/dovecot/modules/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: undefined symbol: acl_lookup_dict_iterate_visible_next (this is usually intentional, so just ignore this message) Debug: Skipping module doveadm_expire_plugin, because dlopen() failed: /usr/lib/dovecot/modules/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_expire_plugin.so: undefined symbol: expire_set_deinit (this is usually intentional, so just ignore this message) Debug: Sk...

...>>>> >>>> Otherwise, I will "blanket-add" --allow-unused-prefixes=true to the remaining failing tests. >>> >>> >>> If/when you do that, probably worth adding a comment at each site to clarify that this was added automatically, not vetted/intentionally added by a human. Something like "// FIXME: Verify that unused prefixes are used intentionally" or the like. >> >> Ack. or, we can grep for -allow-unused-prefixes=true, wdyt? > > > Not sure I understand who/when they would grep for that? > > I was suggesting a...

Hi, I am trying to understand how assume shaped arrays are received and processed in LLVM IR. I am using "flang" for my front end. There seems to be an array descriptor received as implicit argument for every assume shaped array. For my test routine: ---snip-- SUBROUTINE test(a,b,Li,Lj,Istr,Iend,Jstr,Jend) INTEGER, INTENT(IN) :: Li,Lj INTEGER, INTENT(IN) :: Istr, Iend,

...ch with the rest of lld. So, as long as it works just like GNU, it's fine, but if not, it is hard to say whether it is intended or not, just as you explained. This is an area that we need to improve. > I think it would be helpful if we could come up with some user-level documentation on the intentional differences between LLD and GNU ld, particularly in the less well specified areas like orphan section assignment and program header generation. I think we'd have to be very careful with what we wrote down though, to a first approximation we have differences that are intentional or non-intention...

...Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm > Debug: Skipping module doveadm_acl_plugin, because dlopen() failed: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: Undefined symbol "acl_user_module" (this is usually intentional, so just ignore this message) > Debug: Skipping module doveadm_expire_plugin, because dlopen() failed: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_expire_plugin.so: Undefined symbol "expire_set_lookup" (this is usually intentional, so just ignore this message) > Debug: Skipping mod...

...is point I think Phabricator should be disabled and patches > should be send to the mailing lists *until* the technical issue is > confirmed resolved. > > It's really uncool that code is entering ToT through this > back-channel -- I appreciate that it might not be intentional, but > every single patch that gets committed this way is a real problem > for the project. > > > Phabricator has certainly had its share of technical difficulties > lately. Just last week it suppressed all email to llvm-commits for > many hours. These problems should...

I think it would make more sense to add it at each individual call site. This ensures that all cases are fixed, rather than just one in a file. It also ensures that in the (hopefully unlikely) event that there are both intentional and unintentional use-cases within a file, each one gets checked. On Thu, 5 Nov 2020 at 20:29, Mircea Trofin via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Thanks! > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 11:50 AM Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray at google.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov...

...om directory: > /usr/lib/dovecot/modules/doveadm > > Debug: Skipping module doveadm_acl_plugin, because dlopen() failed: > /usr/lib/dovecot/modules/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: > undefined symbol: acl_lookup_dict_iterate_visible_next (this is > usually intentional, so just ignore this message) > > Debug: Skipping module doveadm_expire_plugin, because dlopen() > failed: > /usr/lib/dovecot/modules/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_expire_plugin.so: > undefined symbol: expire_set_deinit (this is usually intentional, so > just ignor...

Possibly more of a legal question than a technical development question, but here goes. In the doc\COPYRIGHTS file it is made clear that the intention is that you can write R packages and distribute them under licenses not compatible with GPL, by making the relevant header files available under the LGPL. This was an explicit change that was made in February 2001, and allows for DLLs that

...y* program that knows how to invoke ssh-askpass is ssh-add. Not ssh itself, nor scp understand how to invoke ssh-askpass. This is a direct contrast to ssh-1.2.27, in which all clients know how to invoke ssh-askpass. My question: is the limitation that only ssh-add knows how to invoke ssh-askpass intentional (i.e., a deliberate design decision)? If so, why? If it is *not* intentional, then I am going to patch ssh and scp to understand how to invoke ssh-askpass, as I routinely have to login to machines for which I *must* fall back to password authentication. (Meaning, they will refuse my RSA/DSA key n...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On CentOS 6 I noticed very high load after installing and while the md raid 1 array was syncing. I found lots of complaints about performance degradation for md raid with enabled write-intent bitmap. See http://blog.liw.fi/posts/write-intent-bitmaps/ for example. So I wanted to it off. I let it sync and then removed the bitmap. Do you know of a

> > If you can convince openssl to use it. Does anybody have any hints on how it may be done, if possible at all? Stavros

...l/lib/dovecot/lib20_virtual_plugin.so Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm Debug: Skipping module doveadm_acl_plugin, because dlopen() failed: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_acl_plugin.so: Undefined symbol "acl_user_module" (this is usually intentional, so just ignore this message) Debug: Skipping module doveadm_expire_plugin, because dlopen() failed: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/doveadm/lib10_doveadm_expire_plugin.so: Undefined symbol "expire_set_lookup" (this is usually intentional, so just ignore this message) Debug: Skipping module do...

...>>> >>>> I think it would make more sense to add it at each individual call >>>> site. This ensures that all cases are fixed, rather than just one in a >>>> file. It also ensures that in the (hopefully unlikely) event that there are >>>> both intentional and unintentional use-cases within a file, each one gets >>>> checked. >>>> >>>> That would be better indeed, but may be trickier to automate - the >>> challenge, in my mind, comes from multi-line RUN statements, but maybe I'm >>> missing so...

...370.2008 at my.bristol.ac.uk> wrote: > >> I think it would make more sense to add it at each individual call site. >> This ensures that all cases are fixed, rather than just one in a file. It >> also ensures that in the (hopefully unlikely) event that there are both >> intentional and unintentional use-cases within a file, each one gets >> checked. >> >> That would be better indeed, but may be trickier to automate - the > challenge, in my mind, comes from multi-line RUN statements, but maybe I'm > missing something / maybe there aren't that ma...