thr3ads.net - samba - [Samba] 'security = ads' & 'valid users =' [Jan 2005]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Ryan Frantz

2005-Jan-25 19:04 UTC

[Samba] 'security = ads' & 'valid users ='

I will be upgrading my Samba server from 2.2.8a to 3.0.10.  I currently
have security set to 'share' and plan on migrating to 'ads' for
improved
authentication.  I have one snag, though...

I have remote users who reside in and are managed by a Windows domain
that is not in my control.  There is no trust relationship at all.  If I
use 'ads' security, can I add a 'valid users' line for shares
they need
to access?  So that when they fail domain authentication, Samba would
check against UNIX accounts I set up specifically for those (2) users...

Example smb.conf:

[global]
  security = ads

[share1]
  comment = share for local users
  path = /some/path/share1
  ...

[share2]
  comment = share for remote users
  path = /some/path/share2
  valid users = fred,barney
  ...

ry

Kaplan, Marc

2005-Jan-25 19:19 UTC

head link

[Samba] 'security = ads' & 'valid users ='

I think as long as the passwords are the same, your approach of creating
the domain users you need as local users will work.

		-Marc
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Frantz [mailto:RyanFrantz@informed-llc.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 11:04 AM
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: [Samba] 'security = ads' & 'valid users ='
> 
> I will be upgrading my Samba server from 2.2.8a to 3.0.10.  I
currently> have security set to 'share' and plan on migrating to 'ads'
for
improved> authentication.  I have one snag, though...
> 
> I have remote users who reside in and are managed by a Windows domain
> that is not in my control.  There is no trust relationship at all.  If
I> use 'ads' security, can I add a 'valid users' line for
shares they
need> to access?  So that when they fail domain authentication, Samba would
> check against UNIX accounts I set up specifically for those (2)
users...> 
> Example smb.conf:
> 
> [global]
>   security = ads
> 
> [share1]
>   comment = share for local users
>   path = /some/path/share1
>   ...
> 
> [share2]
>   comment = share for remote users
>   path = /some/path/share2
>   valid users = fred,barney
>   ...
> 
> ry
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Ryan Frantz

2005-Jan-25 19:28 UTC

head link

[Samba] 'security = ads' & 'valid users ='

Would it be feasible to use the options 'guest account' and 'guest
ok'
for shares along with ADS security?

Or is additional configuration even necessary?  When domain
authentication fails, Samba will prompt the user for a username/password
combination
(http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/smb.conf.5.html#VALIDATIONSECT),
correct?  The user can then enter credentials I have given them that
will match UNIX accounts I will create for them.

ry

-----Original Message-----
From: Kaplan, Marc [mailto:marc_kaplan@adaptec.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 2:19 PM
To: Ryan Frantz; samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: [Samba] 'security = ads' & 'valid users ='

I think as long as the passwords are the same, your approach of creating
the domain users you need as local users will work.

		-Marc
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Frantz [mailto:RyanFrantz@informed-llc.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 11:04 AM
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: [Samba] 'security = ads' & 'valid users ='
> 
> I will be upgrading my Samba server from 2.2.8a to 3.0.10.  I
currently> have security set to 'share' and plan on migrating to 'ads'
for
improved> authentication.  I have one snag, though...
> 
> I have remote users who reside in and are managed by a Windows domain
> that is not in my control.  There is no trust relationship at all.  If
I> use 'ads' security, can I add a 'valid users' line for
shares they
need> to access?  So that when they fail domain authentication, Samba would
> check against UNIX accounts I set up specifically for those (2)
users...> 
> Example smb.conf:
> 
> [global]
>   security = ads
> 
> [share1]
>   comment = share for local users
>   path = /some/path/share1
>   ...
> 
> [share2]
>   comment = share for remote users
>   path = /some/path/share2
>   valid users = fred,barney
>   ...
> 
> ry
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Kaplan, Marc

2005-Jan-25 19:35 UTC

head link

[Samba] 'security = ads' & 'valid users ='

If you're fine with users being prompted to enter their login
credentials, then yes the passwords can be different. If you want it to
be seamless, keep the passwords synced.

	-Marc
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Frantz [mailto:RyanFrantz@informed-llc.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 11:28 AM
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: RE: [Samba] 'security = ads' & 'valid users ='
> 
> Would it be feasible to use the options 'guest account' and
'guest ok'
> for shares along with ADS security?
> 
> Or is additional configuration even necessary?  When domain
> authentication fails, Samba will prompt the user for a
username/password> combination
> (http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/smb.conf.5.html#VALIDATIONSECT),
> correct?  The user can then enter credentials I have given them that
> will match UNIX accounts I will create for them.
> 
> ry
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kaplan, Marc [mailto:marc_kaplan@adaptec.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 2:19 PM
> To: Ryan Frantz; samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: RE: [Samba] 'security = ads' & 'valid users ='
> 
> I think as long as the passwords are the same, your approach of
creating> the domain users you need as local users will work.
> 
> 		-Marc
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ryan Frantz [mailto:RyanFrantz@informed-llc.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 11:04 AM
> > To: samba@lists.samba.org
> > Subject: [Samba] 'security = ads' & 'valid users
='
> >
> > I will be upgrading my Samba server from 2.2.8a to 3.0.10.  I
> currently
> > have security set to 'share' and plan on migrating to
'ads' for
> improved
> > authentication.  I have one snag, though...
> >
> > I have remote users who reside in and are managed by a Windows
domain> > that is not in my control.  There is no trust relationship at all.
If> I
> > use 'ads' security, can I add a 'valid users' line for
shares they
> need
> > to access?  So that when they fail domain authentication, Samba
would> > check against UNIX accounts I set up specifically for those (2)
> users...
> >
> > Example smb.conf:
> >
> > [global]
> >   security = ads
> >
> > [share1]
> >   comment = share for local users
> >   path = /some/path/share1
> >   ...
> >
> > [share2]
> >   comment = share for remote users
> >   path = /some/path/share2
> >   valid users = fred,barney
> >   ...
> >
> > ry
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Ryan Frantz

2005-Jan-25 20:02 UTC

head link

[Samba] 'security = ads' & 'valid users ='

I don't mind the users being prompted; there are only two of them.  This
is a real pain because they're accessing my site through a dedicated
line and they reside in their own domain...

-----Original Message-----
From: Kaplan, Marc [mailto:marc_kaplan@adaptec.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 2:35 PM
To: Ryan Frantz; samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: [Samba] 'security = ads' & 'valid users ='

If you're fine with users being prompted to enter their login
credentials, then yes the passwords can be different. If you want it to
be seamless, keep the passwords synced.

	-Marc
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ryan Frantz [mailto:RyanFrantz@informed-llc.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 11:28 AM
> To: samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: RE: [Samba] 'security = ads' & 'valid users ='
> 
> Would it be feasible to use the options 'guest account' and
'guest ok'
> for shares along with ADS security?
> 
> Or is additional configuration even necessary?  When domain
> authentication fails, Samba will prompt the user for a
username/password> combination
> (http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/smb.conf.5.html#VALIDATIONSECT),
> correct?  The user can then enter credentials I have given them that
> will match UNIX accounts I will create for them.
> 
> ry
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kaplan, Marc [mailto:marc_kaplan@adaptec.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 2:19 PM
> To: Ryan Frantz; samba@lists.samba.org
> Subject: RE: [Samba] 'security = ads' & 'valid users ='
> 
> I think as long as the passwords are the same, your approach of
creating> the domain users you need as local users will work.
> 
> 		-Marc
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ryan Frantz [mailto:RyanFrantz@informed-llc.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 11:04 AM
> > To: samba@lists.samba.org
> > Subject: [Samba] 'security = ads' & 'valid users
='
> >
> > I will be upgrading my Samba server from 2.2.8a to 3.0.10.  I
> currently
> > have security set to 'share' and plan on migrating to
'ads' for
> improved
> > authentication.  I have one snag, though...
> >
> > I have remote users who reside in and are managed by a Windows
domain> > that is not in my control.  There is no trust relationship at all.
If> I
> > use 'ads' security, can I add a 'valid users' line for
shares they
> need
> > to access?  So that when they fail domain authentication, Samba
would> > check against UNIX accounts I set up specifically for those (2)
> users...
> >
> > Example smb.conf:
> >
> > [global]
> >   security = ads
> >
> > [share1]
> >   comment = share for local users
> >   path = /some/path/share1
> >   ...
> >
> > [share2]
> >   comment = share for remote users
> >   path = /some/path/share2
> >   valid users = fred,barney
> >   ...
> >
> > ry
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> > instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions:  https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/samba

Possibly Parallel Threads

Search for more maybe matching threads

samba - Jan 2005 - 'security = ads' & 'valid users ='

[Samba] 'security = ads' & 'valid users ='

[Samba] 'security = ads' & 'valid users ='

[Samba] 'security = ads' & 'valid users ='

[Samba] 'security = ads' & 'valid users ='

[Samba] 'security = ads' & 'valid users ='

Possibly Parallel Threads