search for: share2

...te all users directly to openldap directory but my users clearly have been able to access share that are not under /home (that were mounted on /opt or /usr/local). [root@polaris2 home]# strace -f /etc/init.d/smb start [pid 4646] geteuid32() = 10024 [pid 4646] stat64("/home/share2", 0xbfc79dc8) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied) [pid 4646] time(NULL) = 1235688608 [pid 4646] stat64("/etc/localtime", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2819, ...}) = 0 [pid 4646] geteuid32() = 10024 [pid 4646] write(22, "[2009/02/26 14:50:08, 0]...

I encountered strange behaviour of "msdfs" when using together with "netbios aliases". E.g I have in smb.conf: [global] netbios name = server netbios aliases = server-oldname .... host msdfs = Yes [share1] path = /var/samba/share1 [share2] msdfs root = Yes msdfs proxy = \penguin\share2 .... From a windows (XP) machine I can now see: \\server\share1 and \\server\share2 where share2 is succesfully redirected as a DFS to \\penguin\share2. But when trying to connect via the aliased name to \\server-oldname\share1 and \\server-old...

...at I remember, I don?t think this is possible. Whenever I search for "two mount points" or "multiple mount points," I get hits for "multiple users," but not for mount points. I have the following directories I want to share through Samba: /share1/DVR /share1/Audio /share2/Video /share2/Backups /share1 is on /dev/sdb /share2 is on /dev/sdc Due to the amount of data on each one and the size of the devices, I can?t put all the shares on one device. I want to have one mount point, media, and it would have: /medium/DVR /medium/Audio /medium/Video /medium/Backups If...

Hello Jeremy, I think you missed a "/" in: mount --bind /share1/DVR /medium/DVR mount --bind /share1/Audio /medium/Audio mount --bind /share2/Video /medium/Video mount --bind /share2/Backups /medium/Backups BR, Matt On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 5:15 PM Jeremy Allison via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 04:45:16PM -0500, Hal Vaughan via samba wrote: > > I haven?t used Samba for over a decad...

...oved a share from one Windows server to another. I am now getting error 13 when trying to mount the share from the new server. The following worked before the server was replaced: mount.cifs //ipaddress1/share1$ /mnt/share1 -o credientials/home/whatever/.smbcredentials,rw mount.cifs //ipaddress2/share2$ /mnt/share2 -o credientials/home/whatever/.smbcredentials,ro Change: server ipaddress2 was replaced with server ipaddress3 and share2$ was created on that server. mount.cifs //ipaddress1/share1$ /mnt/share1 -o credientials/home/whatever/.smbcredentials,rw Still works! mount.cifs //ipaddress3/sha...

Hi, Can anyone tell me if the following is possible I need 2 Samba Shares for example share1 and share2, both sharing an identical location, however I want once PC to connect using share1 and everyone else to use share2 so far so good this works. However, at 1am in the morning I want to stop share2 and disconnect users whilst not effecting access via share1. Then at 2am restart share2.

Hi list! I've read some remarks here and in other places that it would be good practice to not edit the smb.conf file directly but rather keep a smb.conf.master file, edit that and then do a testparm -s > smb.conf. Here comes my problem: My smb.conf file uses some include statements. When using testparm those include lines are still in the output directly followed by the content of the

Hello, I have problems removing the permission settings on a directory/folder after configuration of a share. My folders look like: /var/folder1/folder2/ I created share1 on folder1 and share2 on folder2. Afterwards, I activated ACLs and set permission on folder1 to domain/group1 and on folder2 to domain/group2. I couldn't access share2 with a user from group2 and I figured out that Samba doesn't support SeChangeNotifyPrivilege (bypass traverse checking). Because user2 from gro...

...mann (Speed4Trade GmbH) via samba wrote: >> Hello, >> I have problems removing the permission settings on a directory/folder >> after configuration of a share. >> >> My folders look like: >> /var/folder1/folder2/ >> >> I created share1 on folder1 and share2 on folder2. >> Afterwards, I activated ACLs and set permission on folder1 to >> domain/group1 and on folder2 to domain/group2. >> >> I couldn't access share2 with a user from group2 and I figured out >> that Samba doesn't support SeChangeNotifyPrivilege? (byp...

...rs. Testparm says the Samba is the domain PDC. My PC successfully boots into the domain with me (or root, as the case may be) as the logged in user. So, how can I tell whether I've correctly joined the domain? The second part of this is that with each of two shares (<share1> and <share2>), set up as below (I've only used bandwidth on one share; their set up is identical), I get BAD_NETWORK_NAME from an smbclient //<server>/<share1> -U <user> call. With valid user set to @group in <share1> only, this changes to a bad login error (ACCESS_DENIED) fo...

...kend = tdb acl group control = Yes dos filemode = Yes hide unreadable = Yes map acl inherit = Yes printing = bsd strict allocate = Yes vfs objects = acl_xattr recycle [Users] comment = "User home directories" path = /share2/Users read only = No vfs objects = recycle recycle:exclude = *.tmp recycle:touch = yes recycle:versions = yes recycle:keeptree = yes recycle:repository = %U/Papperskorg [Profiles] comment = "Roaming profiles" path =...

I have 2 different shares one with [Share1] valid users = @"DOMAINA+Domain Users" [Share2] valid users = @"DOMAINA+SpecialGroup" Members of the latter group cannot access Share2. No one can. #getent group |grep Special DOMAINA+SpecialGroup:x:10001:DOMAINA+User1,DOMAINA+User2,DOMAINA+User3 #wbinfo -g |grep Special DOMAINA+SpecialGroup I changed the shares propert...

Hi, On the Debian Linux server, followings had been istalled since May, 2006. Group1 users on Windows 2003 AD are able to access the share e.g. share1. I added a new share, share2 for group2 users, but none of user from group2 can access the new share. They always prompted for password. group1 and group2 are on same AD. ii samba 3.0.20b a LanManager-like file and printer server fo ii samba-common 3.0.20b Samba common files used by both the server a ii winbi...

.... Well, is it possible to hide to my browsing the 6 shares that I can not access. Thank you very much Srinivasa Vempati My Partial Configuration File looks like this: #This config file contains all samba shares [share1] path=/usr/dir1 comment=Nas Share dir1 valid users = user1, user3, user6 [share2] path=/usr/dir2 comment=Nas Share dir2 valid users = user2, user4, user6 If I try to access using user1, now i'm seeing all shares on client machine. because of share2 is not having access permissions to user1, this share should not be visible. Can anybody help to solve this

...' line for shares they need to access? So that when they fail domain authentication, Samba would check against UNIX accounts I set up specifically for those (2) users... Example smb.conf: [global] security = ads [share1] comment = share for local users path = /some/path/share1 ... [share2] comment = share for remote users path = /some/path/share2 valid users = fred,barney ... ry

...mathog@seqaxp.bio.caltech.edu > To: mlist-samba@nntp-server.caltech.edu > Subject: W95/98 connect to any SMB share as another user? > Message-ID: <73uuq3$s7j@gap.cco.caltech.edu> > > map H: as \\machine1\share1 as username=John, password=JohnsPassword map > M: as \\machine2\share2 as username=Jane, password=JanesPassword > > Even logging out and back in will only allow one of these to be mounted > at a time. Some of these shares are on Samba, but some are not. On Samba you can try this: Net Use \\Machine1\share1%John Net Use \\Machine2\share2%Jane Best regards...

Hi all, I have a Samba share set up using POSIX ACLs as the permissions backend. I am seeing an issue where files created via the Samba get execute permissions whereas files created via shell do not. Here’s my demonstration using “share2” as the root of my share: [root at samba srv]# ls -l total 0 drwxrwx---+ 2 root root 65 Dec 17 18:40 share2 [root at samba srv]# getfacl share2/ # file: share2/ # owner: root # group: root user::rwx group::rwx group:share2_ro:r-x group:share2_rw:rwx mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:g...

...re able to create new roaming profiles and they cannot browse each others' profiles, so all that is working. The only issue is that the group "domain admins" does not have privileges to read or delete user profiles. The acls on the profiles directory look right to me: [root at gecko share2]# getfacl profiles/ # file: profiles/ # owner: root # group: domain\040admins user::rwx user:root:rwx group::rwx group:domain\040users:rwx group:domain\040admins:rwx mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:user:root:rwx default:group::--- default:group:domain\040admins:rwx default:mask::rwx...

...s possible. Whenever I search for "two mount points" or "multiple mount points," I get hits for "multiple users," but not for mount points. > > I have the following directories I want to share through Samba: > > /share1/DVR > /share1/Audio > > /share2/Video > /share2/Backups > > /share1 is on /dev/sdb > /share2 is on /dev/sdc > > Due to the amount of data on each one and the size of the devices, I can?t put all the shares on one device. > > I want to have one mount point, media, and it would have: > > /medium/DV...

...idmap config * : backend = tdb [share1] comment = share1 force create mode = 0770 force directory mode = 02770 force group = +example:domains:share1 path = /samba_share/share1 read only = No valid users = +example:domains:share1 veto oplock files = /*.mdb/*.MDB/*.dbf/*.DBF/*.xls/*.XLS/ [share2] comment = share2 force create mode = 0770 force directory mode = 02770 force group = +example:domains:share2 path = /samba_share/share2 read only = No valid users = +example:domains:share2 scannerut veto oplock files = /*.mdb/*.MDB/*.dbf/*.DBF/*.xls/*.XLS/ [...] follow four more shares, b...