Colin Anderson
2006-Jun-09 07:23 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Re: Audio problems on Zap & SIP, local netwo rk, not IRQ related?
> On further investigation, the SMP affinity on ALL of the IRQs is set to > 00000001. This implies that everything is handled by CPU0, which itclearly> is not! > > I'll do some more research on this but in the meantime if anyone has any > advice on this issue I would appreciate it.There is a kernel bug in Fedora flavors < 2.6.15 that prevents SMP affinity from being set. Sorry, don't have the link right now but bugs.redhat.com should have it.
whois wes
2006-Jun-09 13:23 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Re: Audio problems on Zap & SIP, local netwo rk, not IRQ related?
Interesting - we're running FC4, and without IRQ balance, all interrupts default to the highest numbered CPU (CPU3 with hyperthreading on, CPU1 with it off...) i have added an echo statement to our startup scripts that moves the T1 card to interrupt on CPU0 and it has worked wonderfully for us...watching /proc/interrupts shows that the digium/sangoma card is only hitting CPU0 while everything else hits CPU1 we're running a stock FC4 install, kernel 2.6.11.x, FWIW... On 6/9/06, Colin Anderson <ColinA@landmarkmasterbuilder.com> wrote:> > On further investigation, the SMP affinity on ALL of the IRQs is set to > > 00000001. This implies that everything is handled by CPU0, which it > clearly > > is not! > > > > I'll do some more research on this but in the meantime if anyone has any > > advice on this issue I would appreciate it. > > There is a kernel bug in Fedora flavors < 2.6.15 that prevents SMP affinity > from being set. Sorry, don't have the link right now but bugs.redhat.com > should have it.