Alexander Lopez
2006-Apr-24 06:45 UTC
Shielding of T1/E1 cables WAS RE: Pinouts for T1/E1 crossover cable WAS "RE: [Asterisk-Users] what cable to connect a legacy PBX to a TE410P ?"
I was once told by a lineman that the cables they use didn't have that many twists in them because it wasn't needed, and that the extra twists would effectively use more cable and thus cost and weigh more than triple what they do now. He told me that with the number of twists in the Cat 5 cable it would cancel out any interference, but he also stated that the effective length was calculated using a cable with less twists and subsequently 'less dense' and that if using a Cat5e cable you must factor that in. so if you use cat5e cable your are fine but you can't go as far. Regarding the Smart Jack it is mostly used as a location at the CPE where the Telco can loop and make sure that the problem is at your end. So your assumption is correct that you can plug anything you want into it, its one your side of the demark, so if it doesn't work it's YOUR problem.> > Totally agree with you, unshielded cables are only usable if the > > distance is short. Just curious, how should one ground the shield?Do> > you ground it to the ground bar in the server room? Any special > > requirements? > > That would be one way to do it, at both ends. > > Personally, I would not try to install an rj45 on each end of ashielded> T1 cable, but rather terminate the cable on a patch panel. > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Rich Adamson
2006-Apr-24 07:50 UTC
Shielding of T1/E1 cables WAS RE: Pinouts for T1/E1 crossover cable WAS "RE: [Asterisk-Users] what cable to connect a legacy PBX to a TE410P ?"
Alexander Lopez wrote:> I was once told by a lineman that the cables they use didn't have that > many twists in them because it wasn't needed, and that the extra twists > would effectively use more cable and thus cost and weigh more than > triple what they do now.Good thing he doesn't work for a cable manufacturer as that's a total crock of crap that even an inexperienced person should be able to detect. (You can't twist two wires to make them weight three times as much, or cost three times as much.)> He told me that with the number of twists in > the Cat 5 cable it would cancel out any interference, but he also stated > that the effective length was calculated using a cable with less twists > and subsequently 'less dense' and that if using a Cat5e cable you must > factor that in. so if you use cat5e cable your are fine but you can't go > as far.Essentially true, but the impedance of a T1 cable is different from Cat5 cables, which is one of the primary factors in limiting distance. Has nothing to do with the twists. Shielded vs non-shielded has to do with the environment, and how much electrical noise there is near the T1 cable. Nothing more, nothing less.> Regarding the Smart Jack it is mostly used as a location at the CPE > where the Telco can loop and make sure that the problem is at your end. > So your assumption is correct that you can plug anything you want into > it, its one your side of the demark, so if it doesn't work it's YOUR > problem.
Possibly Parallel Threads
- Shielding of T1/E1 cables WAS RE: Pinouts for T1/E1 crossover cable WAS "RE: what cable to connect a legacy PBX to a TE410P ?"
- Pinouts for T1/E1 crossover cable WAS "RE: what cable to connect a legacy PBX to a TE410P ?"
- Shielding of T1/E1 cables WAS RE: Pinouts for T1/E1 crossovercable WAS "RE: what cable to connect a legacy PBX to aTE410P ?"
- Pinouts for T1/E1 crossover cable WAS "RE: what cable to connect a legacy PBX to a TE410P ?"
- Pinouts for T1/E1 crossover cable WAS "RE: whatcable to connect a legacy PBX to a TE410P ?"