Just so that it gets into the archives for future googlers: If you get 'system error 64' on a windows xp machine trying to connect to samba, then make sure you have nothing running on port 445. I had an apache ssl instance running on that port. Doh! Had to scratch my head a bit over it. XP doesn't actually need anything to be on 445, it just gets confused and gives up if there is. Matt
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, mlh wrote:> > Just so that it gets into the archives for > future googlers: > > If you get 'system error 64' on a windows xp > machine trying to connect to samba, then > make sure you have nothing running on port 445. > > I had an apache ssl instance running on that port.Really? The well known port for that is 443.> > Doh! Had to scratch my head a bit over it. > > XP doesn't actually need anything to be on 445, > it just gets confused and gives up if there is.Port 445 is the port Win2K and WinXP use for netbiosless SMB. It is the correct well known TCP port that Microsoft have registered for the purpose. - John T. -- John H Terpstra Email: jht@samba.org
Apparently Analagous Threads
- Xp without netbios - few questions with samba 3 - smbldap_open: cannot access LDAP when not root
- NetBIOS over TCP/IP versus direct hosting over TCP/IP
- RC1 binaries
- very low speed local network browsing from win xp clients
- Win XP 'Network path was not found' Error when connecting to Samba share