I work exclusively in the area of small LANS (5-10 machines max) where
security is not a major issue. Therefore I have always created simple
smb.conf files with share based security. I am also a newbee to Linux -
most of my experience has been with SAMBA.
Re: My current problem, I have set up the system with both open and root
only shares. All clients can view and write to the open folder shares. I
have also tried to make the printer available to everyone - but only the NT
based clients (NT4.0, 2000, XP) can print! 9x clients can see the printer,
they can connect to it and/or capture it, but no matter what settings I use
on the client side the print process locks up.
As you might expect, I am using client side drivers.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. The smb.conf file follows.
Thanks much!
Vince Warde
SAMBA Version 2.2.1a
Red Hat 7.2
# Samba config file created using SWAT
# from 192.168.1.51 (192.168.1.51)
# Date: 2002/08/01 07:47:12
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup = HOME
netbios name = MICROSERVER
server string = MicroServer
security = SHARE
encrypt passwords = Yes
log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log
max log size = 0
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
dns proxy = No
guest account = root
printing = lprng
[homes]
comment = Home Directories
valid users = %S
read only = No
create mask = 0664
directory mask = 0775
browseable = No
[printers]
comment = All Printers
path = /var/spool/samba
guest ok = Yes
printable = Yes
browseable = No
[webfiles]
path = /var/www/html
read only = No
[shares]
path = /shares
read only = No
[data]
path = /shares/data
read only = No
guest ok = Yes
[programs]
path = /shares/programs
read only = No
guest ok = Yes
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
-------------- next part --------------
Vince Warde, A+ Certified Tech.
Computer Consulting and Service
VISA and M/C Accepted
3406 Bristol Ct
Cameron Park CA 95682
vince@douloscomputer.com
http://www.douloscomputer.com
Toll Free Voice: (888) 932-3315
Fax: (707) 516-2602
Bradley W. Langhorst
2002-Aug-02 10:50 UTC
[Samba] Re:Samba] NT, 2000, and XP can print - 9x can't!
On Fri, 2002-08-02 at 13:37, Vince Warde wrote: I almost skipped your mail since my spam checker flagged it...> SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ---------------------- > SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered > SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. > SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. > SPAM: > SPAM: Content analysis details: (6.7 hits, 5 required) > SPAM: Hit! (0.5 points) Subject has an exclamation mark > SPAM: Hit! (1.1 points) BODY: Contains a tollfree number > SPAM: Hit! (3.0 points) URI: Uses a dotted-decimal IP address in URL > SPAM: Hit! (2.1 points) BODY: FONT Size +2 and up or 3 and up > SPAM: > SPAM: -------------------- End of SpamAssassin results --------------------- > > --=====================_296186633==_ > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed > > I work exclusively in the area of small LANS (5-10 machines max) where > security is not a major issue. Therefore I have always created simple > smb.conf files with share based security. I am also a newbee to Linux - > most of my experience has been with SAMBA. > > Re: My current problem, I have set up the system with both open and root > only shares. All clients can view and write to the open folder shares. I > have also tried to make the printer available to everyone - but only the NT > based clients (NT4.0, 2000, XP) can print! 9x clients can see the printer, > they can connect to it and/or capture it, but no matter what settings I use > on the client side the print process locks up. > > As you might expect, I am using client side drivers. > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. The smb.conf file follows. > > Thanks much! > > Vince Warde > > SAMBA Version 2.2.1athis is quite old now ... you should consider upgrading to 2.2.5 (where various printing problem have been fixed) guest account = root uh this is a BAD idea everything else looks reasonable you need to examine your logs (after increasing log level) to see what is happening when the 98box tries to print. are the permissions on /var/log/samba appropriate did you try a map to guest = bad user parameter? brad