I work exclusively in the area of small LANS (5-10 machines max) where security is not a major issue. Therefore I have always created simple smb.conf files with share based security. I am also a newbee to Linux - most of my experience has been with SAMBA. Re: My current problem, I have set up the system with both open and root only shares. All clients can view and write to the open folder shares. I have also tried to make the printer available to everyone - but only the NT based clients (NT4.0, 2000, XP) can print! 9x clients can see the printer, they can connect to it and/or capture it, but no matter what settings I use on the client side the print process locks up. As you might expect, I am using client side drivers. Any help would be greatly appreciated. The smb.conf file follows. Thanks much! Vince Warde SAMBA Version 2.2.1a Red Hat 7.2 # Samba config file created using SWAT # from 192.168.1.51 (192.168.1.51) # Date: 2002/08/01 07:47:12 # Global parameters [global] workgroup = HOME netbios name = MICROSERVER server string = MicroServer security = SHARE encrypt passwords = Yes log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 0 socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192 dns proxy = No guest account = root printing = lprng [homes] comment = Home Directories valid users = %S read only = No create mask = 0664 directory mask = 0775 browseable = No [printers] comment = All Printers path = /var/spool/samba guest ok = Yes printable = Yes browseable = No [webfiles] path = /var/www/html read only = No [shares] path = /shares read only = No [data] path = /shares/data read only = No guest ok = Yes [programs] path = /shares/programs read only = No guest ok = Yes -------------- next part -------------- HTML attachment scrubbed and removed -------------- next part -------------- Vince Warde, A+ Certified Tech. Computer Consulting and Service VISA and M/C Accepted 3406 Bristol Ct Cameron Park CA 95682 vince@douloscomputer.com http://www.douloscomputer.com Toll Free Voice: (888) 932-3315 Fax: (707) 516-2602
Bradley W. Langhorst
2002-Aug-02 10:50 UTC
[Samba] Re:Samba] NT, 2000, and XP can print - 9x can't!
On Fri, 2002-08-02 at 13:37, Vince Warde wrote: I almost skipped your mail since my spam checker flagged it...> SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ---------------------- > SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered > SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. > SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. > SPAM: > SPAM: Content analysis details: (6.7 hits, 5 required) > SPAM: Hit! (0.5 points) Subject has an exclamation mark > SPAM: Hit! (1.1 points) BODY: Contains a tollfree number > SPAM: Hit! (3.0 points) URI: Uses a dotted-decimal IP address in URL > SPAM: Hit! (2.1 points) BODY: FONT Size +2 and up or 3 and up > SPAM: > SPAM: -------------------- End of SpamAssassin results --------------------- > > --=====================_296186633==_ > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed > > I work exclusively in the area of small LANS (5-10 machines max) where > security is not a major issue. Therefore I have always created simple > smb.conf files with share based security. I am also a newbee to Linux - > most of my experience has been with SAMBA. > > Re: My current problem, I have set up the system with both open and root > only shares. All clients can view and write to the open folder shares. I > have also tried to make the printer available to everyone - but only the NT > based clients (NT4.0, 2000, XP) can print! 9x clients can see the printer, > they can connect to it and/or capture it, but no matter what settings I use > on the client side the print process locks up. > > As you might expect, I am using client side drivers. > > Any help would be greatly appreciated. The smb.conf file follows. > > Thanks much! > > Vince Warde > > SAMBA Version 2.2.1athis is quite old now ... you should consider upgrading to 2.2.5 (where various printing problem have been fixed) guest account = root uh this is a BAD idea everything else looks reasonable you need to examine your logs (after increasing log level) to see what is happening when the 98box tries to print. are the permissions on /var/log/samba appropriate did you try a map to guest = bad user parameter? brad