Austin Govella
2006-Jul-20 20:22 UTC
[Rails] Recipes versus Ruby for Rails: what''s best after Agile?
For expats from other languages, what''s the next best step after the Agile Web Dev book: Rails Recipes or Ruby for Rails? Thanks, -- Austin -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Greg Donald
2006-Jul-20 20:34 UTC
[Rails] Recipes versus Ruby for Rails: what''s best after Agile?
On 7/20/06, Austin Govella <austin.govella@gmail.com> wrote:> For expats from other languages, what''s the next best step after the > Agile Web Dev book: > > Rails Recipes or Ruby for Rails?I''ve read all three and if I had it to again I''d prefer to read them in this order: Ruby for Rails Agile Web Dev Rails Recipes Ruby for Rails is for Ruby beginners as much as it''s for Rails in general. Rails Recipes becomes very useful once you''re into Rails a bit. -- Greg Donald http://destiney.com/
Ola Bini
2006-Jul-20 20:41 UTC
[Rails] Recipes versus Ruby for Rails: what''s best after Agile?
Greg Donald wrote:> On 7/20/06, Austin Govella <austin.govella@gmail.com> wrote: >> For expats from other languages, what''s the next best step after the >> Agile Web Dev book: >> >> Rails Recipes or Ruby for Rails? > > > I''ve read all three and if I had it to again I''d prefer to read them > in this order: > > Ruby for Rails > Agile Web Dev > Rails Recipes > > Ruby for Rails is for Ruby beginners as much as it''s for Rails in general. > > Rails Recipes becomes very useful once you''re into Rails a bit. > > >The Recipes book have been EXTREMELY valuable to me. Easily worth the investment many times over. -- Ola Bini (http://ola-bini.blogspot.com) JvYAML, RbYAML, JRuby and Jatha contributor System Developer, Karolinska Institutet (http://www.ki.se) OLogix Consulting (http://www.ologix.com) "Yields falsehood when quined" yields falsehood when quined.
Geoffrey Lessel
2006-Jul-20 20:49 UTC
[Rails] Recipes versus Ruby for Rails: what''s best after Agile?
My next step was Ruby for Rails and I''ve highly enjoyed it. In fact, I stopped midway through Agile to move to Ruby for Rails because I wanted a more thorough introduction to the language itself before jumping too far into rails. But I''ve enjoyed both books and just received my Recipes book in the mail on Monday of this week. I am looking forward to using some of the recipes contained within. Hope that helps. -geoffrey On Jul 20, 2006, at 3:21 PM, Austin Govella wrote:> For expats from other languages, what''s the next best step after the > Agile Web Dev book: > > Rails Recipes or Ruby for Rails? > > > > Thanks, > -- > Austin > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
Bala Paranj
2006-Jul-20 21:06 UTC
[Rails] Recipes versus Ruby for Rails: what''s best after Agile?
Recipes is a very good resource book. I would go for the Ruby for Rails before Recipes. --- Austin Govella <austin.govella@gmail.com> wrote:> For expats from other languages, what''s the next best step after the > Agile Web Dev book: > > Rails Recipes or Ruby for Rails? > > > > Thanks, > -- > Austin > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >
Stephen Smith
2006-Jul-20 21:09 UTC
[Rails] Recipes versus Ruby for Rails: what''s best after Agile?
Hi Austin, If you''re a hardened veteran and you''ve already read the Agile Dev book, you might consider Programming Ruby. The reference material is all there, and you can find it pretty easily. Much easier to use and read out of order than Ruby for Rails, in my opinion. On 7/20/06, Geoffrey Lessel <geoffrey@hydromint.com> wrote:> > My next step was Ruby for Rails and I''ve highly enjoyed it. In fact, > I stopped midway through Agile to move to Ruby for Rails because I > wanted a more thorough introduction to the language itself before > jumping too far into rails. But I''ve enjoyed both books and just > received my Recipes book in the mail on Monday of this week. I am > looking forward to using some of the recipes contained within. > > Hope that helps. > -geoffrey > > > On Jul 20, 2006, at 3:21 PM, Austin Govella wrote: > > > For expats from other languages, what''s the next best step after the > > Agile Web Dev book: > > > > Rails Recipes or Ruby for Rails? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > -- > > Austin > > > > -- > > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > _______________________________________________ > > Rails mailing list > > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060720/eb1d1de2/attachment-0001.html
Zack Chandler
2006-Jul-20 21:17 UTC
[Rails] Recipes versus Ruby for Rails: what''s best after Agile?
+1 for Programming Ruby. On 7/20/06, Stephen Smith <4fires@gmail.com> wrote:> > Hi Austin, > > If you''re a hardened veteran and you''ve already read the Agile Dev book, you > might consider Programming Ruby. The reference material is all there, and > you can find it pretty easily. Much easier to use and read out of order than > Ruby for Rails, in my opinion. > > > > > > On 7/20/06, Geoffrey Lessel <geoffrey@hydromint.com> wrote: > > My next step was Ruby for Rails and I''ve highly enjoyed it. In fact, > > I stopped midway through Agile to move to Ruby for Rails because I > > wanted a more thorough introduction to the language itself before > > jumping too far into rails. But I''ve enjoyed both books and just > > received my Recipes book in the mail on Monday of this week. I am > > looking forward to using some of the recipes contained within. > > > > Hope that helps. > > -geoffrey > > > > > > On Jul 20, 2006, at 3:21 PM, Austin Govella wrote: > > > > > For expats from other languages, what''s the next best step after the > > > Agile Web Dev book: > > > > > > Rails Recipes or Ruby for Rails? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > -- > > > Austin > > > > > > -- > > > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Rails mailing list > > > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > > > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Rails mailing list > > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails > > >
Giles Bowkett
2006-Jul-20 21:35 UTC
[Rails] Recipes versus Ruby for Rails: what''s best after Agile?
If you''re new to Ruby, get Ruby for Rails, if you''re good with Ruby, Rails Recipes. They''re both good but you''ll get a lot more out of Rails if you understand Ruby. I actually didn''t get that much out of the Pickaxe book, it was way too beginner-oriented and I got impatient with it. Likewise the Poignant Guide to Ruby, the cartoon foxes are cool but I got impatient with that as well. If you''re a competent, seasoned programmer, but new to Ruby the language, I would actually recommend "The Ruby Way" by Hal Fulton before any books on Rails or any other books on Ruby. That book basically assumes that you know how to do stuff but you don''t know how to do stuff **in Ruby**. It even has an appendix "Coming to Ruby from Perl" and another "Coming to Ruby from Python" which when taken together were a **huge** timesaver for me personally. It is in fact a pretty kickass book. -- Giles Bowkett http://www.gilesgoatboy.org
carmen
2006-Jul-20 21:43 UTC
[Rails] Recipes versus Ruby for Rails: what''s best after Agile?
> Fulton before any books on Rails or any other books on Ruby. That book > basically assumes that you know how to do stuff but you don''t know how > to do stuff **in Ruby**. It even has an appendix "Coming to Ruby from > Perl" and another "Coming to Ruby from Python" which when taken > together were a **huge** timesaver for me personally.you know of any Smalltalk for Rubyist books? this Croquet thing has me intrigued...and how integrated the development tools with the rest of the environment.. i want to make a way to expose parts of the world via Seaside..but need to bone up on Smalltalk first.. cheers any books for ''coming to lisp from python/perl/ruby'' would be interested in too...
Giles Bowkett
2006-Jul-20 22:30 UTC
[Rails] Recipes versus Ruby for Rails: what''s best after Agile?
Hooray for random tangents! All the Smalltalk books I have are free downloads. To be honest my Smalltalk skills are basically nil, I have Cincom VisualWorks Smalltalk and I''m not thrilled with it at all. I need a better SmallTalk to work in. The best books on Lisp I''m aware of are the purple wizard book from MIT and Paul Graham''s books. You can also find a series of videos recorded at Hewlett-Packard in Palo Alto in the 80s by the purple wizard guys which are available free online and really funny for all the 80s fashion and old-school computer displays. http://www.swiss.ai.mit.edu/classes/6.001/abelson-sussman-lectures/ Fair warning, it''s a good 20 hours of video. James Edward Gray of the Ruby quiz did a pretty kickass series of blog articles on Lisp-style programming in Ruby. He was reading a book called "Higher-Order Perl," about Lisp-style programming in Perl, and did some translations into Ruby, along with pretty interesting commentary/ideas/etc. I''m getting weird http errors but the link is: http://blog.grayproductions.net/articles/category/higher-order-ruby On 7/20/06, carmen <_@whats-your.name> wrote:> > Fulton before any books on Rails or any other books on Ruby. That book > > basically assumes that you know how to do stuff but you don''t know how > > to do stuff **in Ruby**. It even has an appendix "Coming to Ruby from > > Perl" and another "Coming to Ruby from Python" which when taken > > together were a **huge** timesaver for me personally. > > you know of any Smalltalk for Rubyist books? this Croquet thing has me intrigued...and how integrated the development tools with the rest of the environment.. i want to make a way to expose parts of the world via Seaside..but need to bone up on Smalltalk first.. > cheers > > any books for ''coming to lisp from python/perl/ruby'' would be interested in too... > > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >-- Giles Bowkett http://www.gilesgoatboy.org
Michael Schuerig
2006-Jul-20 23:09 UTC
[Rails] Re: Recipes versus Ruby for Rails: what''s best after Agile?
On Thursday 20 July 2006 23:42, carmen wrote:> any books for ''coming to lisp from python/perl/ruby'' would be > interested in too...Try Peter Seibel''s Practical Common Lisp http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book/ Michael -- Michael Schuerig mailto:michael@schuerig.de http://www.schuerig.de/michael/
Michael Genereux
2006-Jul-20 23:25 UTC
[Rails] Recipes versus Ruby for Rails: what''s best after Agile?
Supposedly Amy Hoy''s book is going to help fill part of this gap. Not open yet. In the mean time, Recipies. On 7/20/06, Austin Govella <austin.govella@gmail.com> wrote:> > For expats from other languages, what''s the next best step after the > Agile Web Dev book: > > Rails Recipes or Ruby for Rails? > > > > Thanks, > -- > Austin > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060720/0ec1a98a/attachment-0001.html
Peter Michaux
2006-Jul-20 23:33 UTC
[Rails] Recipes versus Ruby for Rails: what''s best after Agile?
Hi, I think Pickaxe was a good choice after Agile for me. Peter On 7/20/06, Austin Govella <austin.govella@gmail.com> wrote:> For expats from other languages, what''s the next best step after the > Agile Web Dev book: > > Rails Recipes or Ruby for Rails? > > > > Thanks, > -- > Austin > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >
Howard Roberts
2006-Jul-21 00:33 UTC
[Rails] Recipes versus Ruby for Rails: what''s best after Agile?
On 7/20/06, Peter Michaux <petermichaux@gmail.com> wrote:> > Hi, > > I think Pickaxe was a good choice after Agile for me. >I''ll risk sounding a heretic here :) To this day I''ve not been able to read Pickaxe, whereas I found Ruby For Rails very helpful, as was Why''s Poignant Guide. I believe it is a learning style thing. Black''s book uses more narrative to explain concepts, piece by piece, while the Thomas book, I feel, tends to let lots of little code examples speak for themselves. Not that this is a bad thing, mind you, just a "different strokes for different folks" kind of thing. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060721/22bcc235/attachment-0001.html
Alan Francis
2006-Jul-21 09:15 UTC
[Rails] Re: Recipes versus Ruby for Rails: what''s best after Agile?
carmen wrote:>> Fulton before any books on Rails or any other books on Ruby. That book >> basically assumes that you know how to do stuff but you don''t know how >> to do stuff **in Ruby**. It even has an appendix "Coming to Ruby from >> Perl" and another "Coming to Ruby from Python" which when taken >> together were a **huge** timesaver for me personally. > > you know of any Smalltalk for Rubyist books? this Croquet thing has meMy favourite Smalltalk book is Kent Beck''s "Smalltalk Best Practice Patterns" alongside an article ( http://www.eli.sdsu.edu/courses/spring01/cs635/readingSmalltalk.pdf ) by Wilf LaLonde that introduces basic syntax. Disclaimer: I am namechecked in that article because I wrote to Wilf demanding he write it : The article is only really required reading if Smalltalk sysntax is entirely alien to you. I needed it to figure out what SBPP was teaching me. Alan -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Dr Nic
2006-Jul-21 09:20 UTC
[Rails] Re: Recipes versus Ruby for Rails: what''s best after Agile?
+1 for Pickaxe (retrospectively) - learning Ruby makes Rails fun Though to be honest, truly honest, it was fun getting each new installment/draft of the Rails Recipes as they came out and looking at the new recipies. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Brian Hutchison
2006-Jul-21 17:23 UTC
[Rails] Re: Recipes versus Ruby for Rails: what''s best after Agile?
Having the Recipes arrive a few at a time *was* fun. I''ve read all these, and I think there has been enough advice on the suggested order of reading. I just wanted to say how much I really appreciate the Rails Recipes book lately. I always get the PDF+Book option, and I''ll print out a recipe or two and just bring them to the beach or wherever - mark them up, fold them, etc. I''ve been dragging the book around a lot too, and reading the recipes is really strengthening one of my big Rails weaknesses... learning how to first attack a problem. I can extend easily, and given enough time I can build... but I''m still grokking the whole system & process and the Recipes book is lowering my personal thrash time. Hope that makes sense. I''ve been very impressed with the quality of the Pragmatic Programmers books, *and* the Manning Publications books. I recommend them to anyone who will listen. :) On 7/21/06, Dr Nic <drnicwilliams@gmail.com> wrote:> > +1 for Pickaxe (retrospectively) - learning Ruby makes Rails fun > > Though to be honest, truly honest, it was fun getting each new > installment/draft of the Rails Recipes as they came out and looking at > the new recipies. > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/20060721/63ed1cf8/attachment.html
Tom Trebisky
2006-Jul-21 18:18 UTC
[Rails] Recipes versus Ruby for Rails: what''s best after Agile?
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 02:16:58PM -0700, Zack Chandler wrote:> +1 for Programming Ruby.Likewise, I can''t say enough good things about the Pickaxe book. One of my all time favorite books, and I would call it essential if you are doing anything serious with Ruby.
dblack@wobblini.net
2006-Jul-21 20:22 UTC
[Rails] Recipes versus Ruby for Rails: what''s best after Agile?
Hi -- On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, Tom Trebisky wrote:> On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 02:16:58PM -0700, Zack Chandler wrote: >> +1 for Programming Ruby. > > Likewise, I can''t say enough good things about the Pickaxe book. > One of my all time favorite books, and I would call it essential > if you are doing anything serious with Ruby.Definitely. I discovered Ruby through it, and consider it the classic Ruby compendium and reference work. In fact, I admire it so much that when I undertook to write a Ruby book of my own, I made damn sure to write one that didn''t try to compete directly with it :-) Happily for me, the "for Rails" approach to Ruby was becoming topical and was in need of an expositor. I hope you''ll all enjoy all the Ruby and Rails books out there, and then some. Buy them, borrow them, please don''t steal them... and learn what you need from each. (I know I''m not addressing the original question of what order to read things in -- but the consensus arising from the thread, namely that it depends on what your needs and interests are, seems to me to answer that question correctly.) David -- http://www.rubypowerandlight.com => Ruby/Rails training & consultancy http://www.manning.com/black => RUBY FOR RAILS (reviewed on Slashdot, 7/12/2006!) http://dablog.rubypal.com => D[avid ]A[. ]B[lack''s][ Web]log dblack@wobblini.net => me
Dark Ambient
2006-Jul-21 20:49 UTC
[Rails] Recipes versus Ruby for Rails: what''s best after Agile?
I''ve jumped around the last few weeks. First starting the AWDWR tutorial a few times, continuing on into the framework section and then adjuncting with Ruby for Rails. However the last week I''ve made it a priority to read R4R front to back and in between. I''ve also read the big section (whichever one that is) of the Pickaxe. The section that really goes into the language. All of these books are different in many ways from the writing style to the progression and distillation of information. At this point I''m finding R4R more digestable then AWDWR. For my own learning I still recommend authors moving away from the "application / tutorial" way of teaching to more exercise driven chapters. Chris Pine''s book LTP is for newbs to Ruby and programming but each chapter end with a few exercises to challenge and grow your programming confidence. On 7/21/06, dblack@wobblini.net <dblack@wobblini.net> wrote:> Hi -- > > On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, Tom Trebisky wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 02:16:58PM -0700, Zack Chandler wrote: > >> +1 for Programming Ruby. > > > > Likewise, I can''t say enough good things about the Pickaxe book. > > One of my all time favorite books, and I would call it essential > > if you are doing anything serious with Ruby. > > Definitely. I discovered Ruby through it, and consider it the classic > Ruby compendium and reference work. > > In fact, I admire it so much that when I undertook to write a Ruby > book of my own, I made damn sure to write one that didn''t try to > compete directly with it :-) Happily for me, the "for Rails" approach > to Ruby was becoming topical and was in need of an expositor. > > I hope you''ll all enjoy all the Ruby and Rails books out there, and > then some. Buy them, borrow them, please don''t steal them... and > learn what you need from each. (I know I''m not addressing the > original question of what order to read things in -- but the consensus > arising from the thread, namely that it depends on what your needs and > interests are, seems to me to answer that question correctly.) > > > David > > -- > http://www.rubypowerandlight.com => Ruby/Rails training & consultancy > http://www.manning.com/black => RUBY FOR RAILS (reviewed on > Slashdot, 7/12/2006!) > http://dablog.rubypal.com => D[avid ]A[. ]B[lack''s][ Web]log > dblack@wobblini.net => me > _______________________________________________ > Rails mailing list > Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails >