If your logger level is set above debug, you shouldn''t see the
messages output in the fragment you''ve posted.... does that sound like
a reasonable solution? There is a fair peppering of the user engine
(and engines plugin) code at the moment with logger statements, so I
do appreciate the issue.
- james
On 1/12/06, Steve Ross <cwdinfo@gmail.com> wrote:> I know about logger.silence but here is the issue: I''m comfortable
with
> the way the user engine is working, but it generates quite a bit of SQL
> noise in the logs. I''d like, for that engine, to suppress the SQL
> logging.
>
> Code in it has return statements in conditionals, e.g.,
>
> if !user?
> RAILS_DEFAULT_LOGGER.debug "checking guest authorisation for
> #{controller}/#{action}"
> if User.guest_user_authorized?(controller, action)
> yield block if block != nil
> return true
> end
> else
> RAILS_DEFAULT_LOGGER.debug "checking user:#{session[:user].id}
> authorisation for #{controller}/#{action}"
> if current_user.authorized?(controller, action)
> yield block if block != nil
> return true
> end
> end
> return false
>
> so... bracketing it in logger.silence do blocks may cause the logger to
> remain off if the early out return statement is executed.
>
> Suggestions for leaving SQL logging on for the app in general but off
> for the user engine?
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
> _______________________________________________
> Rails mailing list
> Rails@lists.rubyonrails.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails
>