Martin Maechler
2011-Aug-10 15:28 UTC
[R] [R-pkgs] New Matrix and lme4: Must reinstall lme4 if got new Matrix
We have released to CRAN a new version of the (recommended) package Matrix, and of package lme4 yesterday. Anyone who gets the new version of Matrix *MUST* re-install lme4 -- if (s)he is using lme4 at all. Technical details about that further below. The fact that yesterday's version number of Matrix is 0.9995875-2, indicates that Matrix' version is indeed approaching 1.0 (*), and I'd declare this version as "release candidate" for 1.0. As a recommended package, Matrix is part of every R distribution, our aim is to release Matrix_1.0-0 (or higher) with the next non-patch release of R, i.e., R-2.14.0 somewhere in October. For this reason, we are asking R useRs, programmeRs and provideRs, to ``hash at'' the package, trying to find problems / bugs, badly lacking (or wrong) documentation, etc, and report it to us (to 'Matrix-authors at ...' or possibly R-devel at ...), so we can prepare a shiny sparkling Matrix_1.0-0 in time. Thank you in advance for such a contribution to the Free Software universe. Martin Maechler and Doug Bates (and Ben Bolker for lme4). -- -- -- - Why must lme4 be re-installed as well ? [Technical !] This is because lme4 has a 'LinkingTo: Matrix' in its DESCRIPTION and indeed, lme4's C code is using part of Matrix' C code. The change in Matrix: Part of the C-level interface in Matrix is now (again, after several years) using the standard CHOLMOD typedef of UFlong. This means that the C API of Matrix should behave conformly with what other instances of CHOLMOD export. (*) For some, it may be amusing to read https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-packages/2008/000911.html which was the last announcement of Matrix on R-packages. _______________________________________________ R-packages mailing list R-packages at r-project.org https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-packages