On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, Jim Lindsey wrote:
(snip)> I might also say that I strongly object to the stars and significance
> levels in summary (sorry, Martin, we already discussed this). I
> consider fixed level testing to be bad statistics; at worst, a P-value
> should be given if nothing better (confidence or credibility
> intervals) is available. I do not want my students seeing such stars
> and fixed levels. Make it an option if you like but not the default
> display with summary().
> Jim
I agree! Is there a good way to set an option which goes to a print
method (in this case print.summary.lm)? Would it have to be a global
option?
Jim Robison-Cox ____________
Department of Math Sciences | | phone: (406)994-5340
2-214 Wilson Hall \ BZN, MT | FAX: (406)994-1789
Montana State University | *_______|
Bozeman, MT 59717 \_| e-mail: jimrc at math.montana.edu
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-help-request at
stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._