John Todd
2003-Oct-09 00:51 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Sasquatch, the Loch Ness Monster, UFOs and...
Mythical Asterisk Creatures, oft-discussed, rarely seen: 1) An "advanced" graphical user interface 2) An IAX2 hardware device 3) A Radius CDR report module 4) A live-method, robust SQL-based dialplan 5) LDAP/SQL/Radius authentication for SIP phones 6) Robust R2 signalling support 7) Multilingual language recordings of all existing * .gsm files 8) Free exchange of PSTN gateways in a centralized routing arbiter model 9) Speech recognition support Care to add your own unicorns to the list? I make no judgement nor do I cast aspersions on any of these items, but I seem to recall seeing comments about "I'm working on..." or "It would be really great if..." on all of these without seeing real evidence on any of them other than talk. The only well-remembered myth I can say for certain that has been dispelled is the SCCP channel driver, and that has been moved out of "Loch Ness" status to "peer-reviewed" status. JT
Michael Bielicki
2003-Oct-09 02:54 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Sasquatch, the Loch Ness Monster, UFOs and...
wan't to add DS3 and SS7 to that ? also licensed g723.1 and working g729 softfax and softmodem that's what comes to my mind on the spot ... On Thursday 09 October 2003 9:51 am, John Todd wrote:> Mythical Asterisk Creatures, oft-discussed, rarely seen: > > 1) An "advanced" graphical user interface > > 2) An IAX2 hardware device > > 3) A Radius CDR report module > > 4) A live-method, robust SQL-based dialplan > > 5) LDAP/SQL/Radius authentication for SIP phones > > 6) Robust R2 signalling support > > 7) Multilingual language recordings of all existing * .gsm files > > 8) Free exchange of PSTN gateways in a centralized routing arbiter model > > 9) Speech recognition support > > > Care to add your own unicorns to the list? I make no judgement nor > do I cast aspersions on any of these items, but I seem to recall > seeing comments about "I'm working on..." or "It would be really > great if..." on all of these without seeing real evidence on any of > them other than talk. The only well-remembered myth I can say for > certain that has been dispelled is the SCCP channel driver, and that > has been moved out of "Loch Ness" status to "peer-reviewed" status. > > JT > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users-- Michael Bielicki Managing Director TAAN Consultants Ltd http://www.global-gateway.net/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------- This correspondence is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential or legally privileged information or both. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this correspondence in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or rely on any part of this correspondence if you are not the intended recipient. Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the individual sender.
> >Mythical Asterisk Creatures, oft-discussed, rarely seen: > >1) An "advanced" graphical user interface > >2) An IAX2 hardware device > >3) A Radius CDR report module > >4) A live-method, robust SQL-based dialplan > >5) LDAP/SQL/Radius authentication for SIP phones > >6) Robust R2 signalling support > >7) Multilingual language recordings of all existing * .gsm files > >8) Free exchange of PSTN gateways in a centralized routing arbiter model > >9) Speech recognition support10) Database abstraction module for ...CDR, SQL Dial Plan, DBGet/Put, * config files 11) SoftFaxModem 12) SS7 Signaling 13) WEB Interface for Users/Admin
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2003-Oct-14 09:50 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Sasquatch, the Loch Ness Monster, UFOs and...
> 1) An "advanced" graphical user interface > 4) A live-method, robust SQL-based dialplanI beleive these two are the most important ones. Possibly web-based to make it portable. A GUI written in perl or php working down on a postgresql db? It shouldn't be too hard to write that if 4) is implemented. I can do some of it myself too... roy