search for: dispelled

Hi, I've been using samba for a while now with relatively simple configurations. I do however have a few questions: * When using encrypted passwords with samba, is it possible to authenticate users using the Unix user password(/etc/passwd)? * When using smbclient I get the error NT_STATUS_LOGON_FAILURE: added interface ip=192.168.1.1 bcast=192.168.1.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Password:

I've just done some rudimentary testing to see how Vorbis degrades at absurdly low bitrates without downsampling. In summary, don't hope for anything decent below -q 0 for now. I tried oggenc -b <bitrate> -M <bitrate> for the below and a few in between: 24k - spectral energy "floor" captured decently, but many pure-tone blips (think old computer movie sound effects)

On 16/01/2023 19:55, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: > Ah, ok, just saw it. Sorry, I missed that. > > I can only add then, all three DC's in my little net are installed with > bind 9.18 and working all the same without errors. That would tend to dispel my worries, so it is possible that it is some misconfiguration on Stefan's machine. I know I once joined a DC and forgot the

...sions on any of these items, but I seem to recall seeing comments about "I'm working on..." or "It would be really great if..." on all of these without seeing real evidence on any of them other than talk. The only well-remembered myth I can say for certain that has been dispelled is the SCCP channel driver, and that has been moved out of "Loch Ness" status to "peer-reviewed" status. JT

I''m trying to create a basic web page where people can register. Before they are approved they are emailed a link where that they must click in order to verify their info is correct (or at least their email). Should I use acts as authenticated or the login engine for this? http://technoweenie.stikipad.com/plugins/show/Acts+as+Authenticated http://rails-engines.org/login_engine TIA

On 1/29/23 05:49, Philip Wyett wrote: > On Sun, 2023-01-29 at 09:16 +0000, Philip Wyett wrote: >> On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 07:45 -0600, Bill Gee wrote: >>> On 1/26/23 20:25, Philip Wyett wrote: >>>> On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 13:16 -0600, Bill Gee wrote: >>>>> I have been running boinc client on CentOS7 hosts for some years. C7 is >>>>> getting

Hello, I'm new to the list, just want to say thanks a head of time to who ever can help me out with some streaming problems Hareware/software: Athlon 700 128megs of RAM 256megs swap FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE 100mbit connection icecast 1.3.10 ices (beta) My setup: I am running 2 spawns of icecast and 2 spawns of ices. one ices process is reencoding to 24bit and the other to 128bit and both are

Hi all, I'm quite new to R and have a very basic question regarding how one gets the standard error of the mean for factor levels under aov. I was able to get the factor level means using: summary(print(model.tables(rawfixtimedata.aov,"means"),digits=3)), where rawfixtimedata.aov is my aov model. It doesn't appear that there is an equivalent function to get the standard

I'm cross-posting the message below (from GCC list) because I believe it would (at some point) be very beneficial to build an evolutionary optimization pass into LLVM. The idea would be to discover the perfect set of optimizations for a given program by trying them all and analyzing the execution times of each. This would be somewhat like profile driven optimization except the profile is

> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-vorbis-dev@xiph.org [mailto:owner-vorbis-dev@xiph.org]On > Behalf Of Steve Underwood > Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 10:58 AM > To: vorbis-dev@xiph.org > Subject: Re: [vorbis-dev] Fixed vs. Floating Point primer. was: > Implementing Vorbis in hardware > > > "Borgerding, Mark A." wrote: > > [...] > >

On Sep 26, 2011, at 4:22 AM, Leo Romanoff wrote: > Hi Jakob, > > Thanks for a very interesting description of the new register allocation algorithm in LLVM!!! > > Could you elaborate a bit on the following topics: > > 1) Do you have any plans to publish something more formal and detailed about this algorithm, e.g. a paper or something similar? It would be nice to better

On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 07:45 -0600, Bill Gee wrote: > On 1/26/23 20:25, Philip Wyett wrote: > > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 13:16 -0600, Bill Gee wrote: > > > I have been running boinc client on CentOS7 hosts for some years. C7 is > > > getting close to end of life. Time to upgrade to C9 ... > > > > > > But I cannot find a package for the boinc client.

This is a hot topic in the compiler research community, but the focus there is on (a) choosing the right optimization sequences internally and transparently, rather than through combinations of options, (b) performance prediction techniques so you don't actually have to run gazillion different choices, and perhaps can even avoid the problem of choosing representative inputs, as you talked

As I said, both DC are installed via Vagrent, starting the setup with 9.18 I have the problem, starting with 9.16 everything is running. The configuration is always the same. Am 16.01.23 um 21:36 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > > > On 16/01/2023 19:55, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: >> Ah, ok, just saw it. Sorry, I missed that. >> >> I can only add then, all three

I administer an NT network. My boss administers the Unix side. He runs a box that runs Samba. Our NT users have a share on the Samba box that is mapped by their NT profile. It contains their profile and personal file storage. We are planning a move to Windows 2000. It will be in native mode (no NT boxes, no WINS, no netbios). Can Samba handle authentication with Win 2000? What version of Samba

Hi Jakob, Hi Andy, First of all, thanks a lot for very elaborative and interesting answers! > It may be more helpful to explain how LLVM's register allocator came > into existence before debating the high level algorithm. > > When I began working on LLVM last October, Jakob was developing an > infrastructure for global live range splitting. It was just becoming > clear

Hi Thanks for your answers so far. I am currently stumbling into new questions. Naive as i am, i thought that the llvm-bytecode is allways in SSA form. But this doesn't seem to be the case. At least there are no phi instructions embedded if the bytecode drops out of llvm-gcc? Looking into the archives this has been discussed before:

Folks: Granted, this slipped past my review too, but do *not* submit patches that have not been tested. This bug was a no brainer; running the code only even once would have found it. The mainline of Vorbis is our face to the world. A simple mistake like this costs us credibility when we're already going to be fighting hard against some of the most powerful media organizations in the

Ah, ok, just saw it. Sorry, I missed that. I can only add then, all three DC's in my little net are installed with bind 9.18 and working all the same without errors. Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Stefan Kania via samba schrieb am 16.01.2023 um 20:47: > > > Am 16.01.23 um 20:35 schrieb Ingo Asche via samba: >> Hi Stefan, >> >> I have exact that running:

Let me chime in with a few facts regarding DSPs. It may be review to anyone who has programmed DSPs, but some may find it informative. Fixed-Point vs. Floating Point DSP chips Floating Point DSPs make the best/easiest compiler targets. Most of the standard operations present in ANSI C translate fairly well into floating point DSP assembly. This reduces the need for assembly