Boris Derzhavets
2009-Sep-16 06:56 UTC
[Xen-devel] Serial logs for 2.6.31 (commit 12e8537b6b29807cb9e13d728b2e5bab40424df7) under Xen Unstable on top of Ubuntu 9.04 Server
Are you expecting improvement after 09/15/2009 new-swiotlb commits ?
4097,6144, "No_dom0_mem_specified" don''t look to me to have
any.
Boris.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Boris Derzhavets
2009-Sep-16 09:37 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Serial logs for 2.6.31 (commit 12e8537b6b29807cb9e13d728b2e5bab40424df7) under Xen Unstable on top of Ubuntu 9.04 Server
I''ve also built fresh 2.6.31 on F11. Behaviour 2.6.31 when loading
under Xen 3.4.1 on
top of F11 seems to be the same.
Presence 1024M <=dom0_mem<=4096M ant xen-3.4.1.gz line is still required.
If serial outputs are desired, i can get them.
Boris.
--- On Wed, 9/16/09, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Serial logs for 2.6.31 (commit
12e8537b6b29807cb9e13d728b2e5bab40424df7) under Xen Unstable on top of Ubuntu
9.04 Server
To: "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com"
<xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Date: Wednesday, September 16, 2009, 2:56 AM
Are you expecting improvement after 09/15/2009 new-swiotlb commits ?
4097,6144, "No_dom0_mem_specified" don''t look to me to have
any.
Boris.
-----Inline Attachment Follows-----
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Pasi Kärkkäinen
2009-Sep-16 10:15 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Serial logs for 2.6.31 (commit 12e8537b6b29807cb9e13d728b2e5bab40424df7) under Xen Unstable on top of Ubuntu 9.04 Server
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 02:37:08AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:> I''ve also built fresh 2.6.31 on F11. Behaviour 2.6.31 when loading under Xen 3.4.1 on > top of F11 seems to be the same. > Presence 1024M <=dom0_mem<=4096M ant xen-3.4.1.gz line is still required. > If serial outputs are desired, i can get them. >Yes, please post 3 serial console logs: 1) Xen-3.4.1 + 2.6.31 pv_ops dom0 (no dom0_mem set) 2) Xen 3.4.1 + 2.6.31 pv_ops dom0 (dom0_mem=4096M) 3) 2.6.31 pv_ops dom0 kernel on baremetal, no Xen -- Pasi> Boris. > > --- On Wed, 9/16/09, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> wrote: > > From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> > Subject: [Xen-devel] Serial logs for 2.6.31 (commit 12e8537b6b29807cb9e13d728b2e5bab40424df7) under Xen Unstable on top of Ubuntu 9.04 Server > To: "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> > Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> > Date: Wednesday, September 16, 2009, 2:56 AM > > Are you expecting improvement after 09/15/2009 new-swiotlb commits ? > 4097,6144, "No_dom0_mem_specified" don''t look to me to have any. > > Boris. > > > > > > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Boris Derzhavets
2009-Sep-16 12:02 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Serial logs for 2.6.31 (commit 12e8537b6b29807cb9e13d728b2e5bab40424df7) under Xen Unstable on top of Ubuntu 9.04 Server
Plus failure to start xend ( dom0_mem=1024M,4096M) with 2.6.31 with recent commits at 09/15 . Xen 3.4.1 & Libvirt Dom0 on F12 rawhide still starts xend with 2.6.31 with the most recent commits at 09/10. Boris --- On Wed, 9/16/09, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@iki.fi> wrote: From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@iki.fi> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Serial logs for 2.6.31 (commit 12e8537b6b29807cb9e13d728b2e5bab40424df7) under Xen Unstable on top of Ubuntu 9.04 Server To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Date: Wednesday, September 16, 2009, 6:15 AM On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 02:37:08AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:> I''ve also built fresh 2.6.31 on F11. Behaviour 2.6.31 when loading under Xen 3.4.1 on > top of F11 seems to be the same. > Presence 1024M <=dom0_mem<=4096M ant xen-3.4.1.gz line is still required. > If serial outputs are desired, i can get them. >Yes, please post 3 serial console logs: 1) Xen-3.4.1 + 2.6.31 pv_ops dom0 (no dom0_mem set) 2) Xen 3.4.1 + 2.6.31 pv_ops dom0 (dom0_mem=4096M) 3) 2.6.31 pv_ops dom0 kernel on baremetal, no Xen -- Pasi> Boris. > > --- On Wed, 9/16/09, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> wrote: > > From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> > Subject: [Xen-devel] Serial logs for 2.6.31 (commit 12e8537b6b29807cb9e13d728b2e5bab40424df7) under Xen Unstable on top of Ubuntu 9.04 Server > To: "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> > Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> > Date: Wednesday, September 16, 2009, 2:56 AM > > Are you expecting improvement after 09/15/2009 new-swiotlb commits ? > 4097,6144, "No_dom0_mem_specified" don''t look to me to have any. > > Boris. > > > > > > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Pasi Kärkkäinen
2009-Sep-16 12:11 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Serial logs for 2.6.31 (commit 12e8537b6b29807cb9e13d728b2e5bab40424df7) under Xen Unstable on top of Ubuntu 9.04 Server
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 05:02:41AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:> Plus failure to start xend ( dom0_mem=1024M,4096M) with 2.6.31 with recent commits > at 09/15 . Xen 3.4.1 & Libvirt Dom0 on F12 rawhide still starts xend with 2.6.31 with the > most recent commits at 09/10. >Thanks for the logs. There''s some problem with them though.. there''s a lot of empty extra lines, and really long lines.. dunno why. It''s difficult to read. Hopefully Konrad has all the required info in them. -- Pasi> Boris > > --- On Wed, 9/16/09, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@iki.fi> wrote: > > From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@iki.fi> > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Serial logs for 2.6.31 (commit 12e8537b6b29807cb9e13d728b2e5bab40424df7) under Xen Unstable on top of Ubuntu 9.04 Server > To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> > Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> > Date: Wednesday, September 16, 2009, 6:15 AM > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 02:37:08AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > > I''ve also built fresh 2.6.31 on F11. Behaviour 2.6.31 when loading under Xen 3.4.1 on > > top of F11 seems to be the same. > > Presence 1024M <=dom0_mem<=4096M ant xen-3.4.1.gz line is still required. > > If serial outputs are desired, i can get them. > > > > Yes, please post 3 serial console logs: > > 1) Xen-3.4.1 + 2.6.31 pv_ops dom0 (no dom0_mem set) > 2) Xen 3.4.1 + 2.6.31 pv_ops dom0 (dom0_mem=4096M) > 3) 2.6.31 pv_ops dom0 kernel on baremetal, no Xen > > -- Pasi > > > Boris. > > > > --- On Wed, 9/16/09, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@yahoo.com> > > Subject: [Xen-devel] Serial logs for 2.6.31 (commit 12e8537b6b29807cb9e13d728b2e5bab40424df7) under Xen Unstable on top of Ubuntu 9.04 Server > > To: "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> > > Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> > > Date: Wednesday, September 16, 2009, 2:56 AM > > > > Are you expecting improvement after 09/15/2009 new-swiotlb commits ? > > 4097,6144, "No_dom0_mem_specified" don''t look to me to have any. > > > > Boris. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xen-devel mailing list > > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xen-devel mailing list > > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > > >_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2009-Sep-16 13:19 UTC
[Xen-devel] Re: Serial logs for 2.6.31 (commit 12e8537b6b29807cb9e13d728b2e5bab40424df7) under Xen Unstable on top of Ubuntu 9.04 Server
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:56:03PM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:> Are you expecting improvement after 09/15/2009 new-swiotlb commits ?The patch is not yet in the Jeremy''s git tree.> 4097,6144, "No_dom0_mem_specified" don''t look to me to have any. > > Boris. > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2009-Sep-16 13:20 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] Serial logs for 2.6.31 (commit 12e8537b6b29807cb9e13d728b2e5bab40424df7) under Xen Unstable on top of Ubuntu 9.04 Server
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 03:11:00PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 05:02:41AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > > Plus failure to start xend ( dom0_mem=1024M,4096M) with 2.6.31 with recent commits > > at 09/15 . Xen 3.4.1 & Libvirt Dom0 on F12 rawhide still starts xend with 2.6.31 with the > > most recent commits at 09/10. > > > > Thanks for the logs. There''s some problem with them though.. there''s > a lot of empty extra lines, and really long lines.. dunno why. It''s > difficult to read. > > Hopefully Konrad has all the required info in them.The patch I posted hasn''t yet made it in the git tree. Let me ping Jeremy to make sure it does. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Reasonably Related Threads
- Re: Re: Xorg on JF 2.6.31-rc8 with xen 3.5 unstable
- Dmesg log for 2.6.31-rc8 kernel been built on F12 (rawhide) vs log for same kernel been built on F11 and installed on F12
- Troubleshooting Xen 4.0 + 2.6.32.16 pv_ops install
- FC11 and pv_ops kernel
- Re: i686 vs i586 glibc segfault issue on 64-bit AMD Xen paravirt guests