On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Bruce Ferrell wrote:> Yes, 7 does track upstream. upstream 6 uses systemd also and Scientific > Linux 6 does not. I would say that indicates a solution.Upstream 6 uses systemd? jh
On 06/08/2017 04:59 AM, John Hodrien wrote:> On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > >> Yes, 7 does track upstream. upstream 6 uses systemd also and Scientific >> Linux 6 does not. I would say that indicates a solution. > > Upstream 6 uses systemd? > > jh > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >yes, 6.6 and above
On 8 June 2017 at 13:02, Bruce Ferrell <bferrell at baywinds.org> wrote:> On 06/08/2017 04:59 AM, John Hodrien wrote: >> >> On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Bruce Ferrell wrote: >> >>> Yes, 7 does track upstream. upstream 6 uses systemd also and Scientific >>> Linux 6 does not. I would say that indicates a solution. >> >> >> Upstream 6 uses systemd? >> >> jh >> _______________________________________________ >> CentOS mailing list >> CentOS at centos.org >> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >> > yes, 6.6 and above > >Uh I'd urge you to recheck your sources as EL6 has never in any part of its lifespan made use of systemd
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 05:02:38AM -0700, Bruce Ferrell wrote:> > On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > > > > > Yes, 7 does track upstream. upstream 6 uses systemd also and Scientific > > > Linux 6 does not. I would say that indicates a solution. > > > > Upstream 6 uses systemd? > > > > jh > > yes, 6.6 and aboveRHEL6 has used Upstart since RHEL 6.0, and continues to use it in RHEL 6.9. I have no idea where you'd get this kind of information. -- Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org>