On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 05:02:38AM -0700, Bruce Ferrell wrote:> > On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Bruce Ferrell wrote: > > > > > Yes, 7 does track upstream. upstream 6 uses systemd also and Scientific > > > Linux 6 does not. I would say that indicates a solution. > > > > Upstream 6 uses systemd? > > > > jh > > yes, 6.6 and aboveRHEL6 has used Upstart since RHEL 6.0, and continues to use it in RHEL 6.9. I have no idea where you'd get this kind of information. -- Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org>
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Jonathan Billings wrote:>>> Upstream 6 uses systemd? >>> >>> jh >> >> yes, 6.6 and above > > RHEL6 has used Upstart since RHEL 6.0, and continues to use it in RHEL > 6.9. I have no idea where you'd get this kind of information.If you really thought Redhat would switch from upstart of systemd, within a major release, I have no idea why you'd want to use anything based on Redhat. jh
I think we had enough of Systemd flaming last month. Please stop polluting my inbox and find an operating system compatible with your worldview. It is really tiresome to keep on hearing about it. On 8 June 2017 at 14:51, John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk> wrote:> On Thu, 8 Jun 2017, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > Upstream 6 uses systemd? >>>> >>>> jh >>>> >>> >>> yes, 6.6 and above >>> >> >> RHEL6 has used Upstart since RHEL 6.0, and continues to use it in RHEL >> 6.9. I have no idea where you'd get this kind of information. >> > > If you really thought Redhat would switch from upstart of systemd, within a > major release, I have no idea why you'd want to use anything based on > Redhat. > > jh > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >