Alex L
2015-Apr-28 16:56 UTC
[LLVMdev] RFC: Machine Level IR text-based serialization format
Hi all, I would like to propose a text-based, human readable format that will be used to serialize the machine level IR. The major goal of this format is to allow LLVM to save the machine level IR after any code generation pass and then to load it again and continue running passes on the machine level IR. The primary use case of this format is to enable easier testing process for the code generation passes, by allowing the developers to write tests that load the IR, then invoke just a specific code gen pass and then inspect the output of that pass by checking the printed out IR. The proposed format has a number of key features: - It stores the machine level IR and the optional LLVM IR in one text file. - The connections between the machine level IR and the LLVM IR are preserved. - The format uses a YAML based container for most of the data structures. The LLVM IR is embedded in the YAML container. - The format also uses a new, text-based syntax to serialize the machine instructions. The instructions are embedded in YAML. This is an incomplete example of a YAML file containing the LLVM IR, the machine level IR and the instructions: --- ir: | define i32 @fact(i32 %n) { %1 = alloca i32, align 4 store i32 %n, i32* %1, align 4 %2 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4 %3 = icmp eq i32 %2, 0 br i1 %3, label %10, label %4 ; <label>:4 ; preds = %0 %5 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4 %6 = sub nsw i32 %5, 1 %7 = call i32 @fact(i32 %6) %8 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4 %9 = mul nsw i32 %7, %8 br label %10 ; <label>:10 ; preds = %0, %4 %11 = phi i32 [ %9, %4 ], [ 1, %0 ] ret i32 %11 } ... --- number: 0 name: fact alignment: 4 regInfo: .... frameInfo: .... body: - bb: 0 llbb: '%0' successors: [ 'bb#2', 'bb#1' ] liveIns: [ '%edi' ] instructions: - 'push64r undef %rax, %rsp, %rsp' - 'mov32mr %rsp, 1, %noreg, 4, %noreg, %edi' - .... .... - bb: 1 llbb: '%4' successors: [ 'bb#2' ] instructions: - '%edi = mov32rm %rsp, 1, %noreg, 4, %noreg' - .... .... - .... .... ... The example above shows a YAML file with two YAML documents (delimited by `---` and `...`) containing the LLVM IR and the machine function information for the function `fact`. When a specific format is chosen, I'll start with patches that serialize the embedded LLVM IR. Then I'll add support for things like machine functions and machine basic blocks, and I think that an intrusive implementation will work best for data structures like these. After that I will continue adding support for serialization of the remaining data structures. Thanks for reading through the proposal. What are you thoughts about this format? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150428/c647b3ef/attachment.html>
Krzysztof Parzyszek
2015-Apr-28 17:09 UTC
[LLVMdev] RFC: Machine Level IR text-based serialization format
Looks good. How are you planning to "assemble" the MI-level YAML description into the actual in-memory IR? -Krzysztof -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Quentin Colombet
2015-Apr-28 17:14 UTC
[LLVMdev] RFC: Machine Level IR text-based serialization format
Hi Alex, Thanks for working on this. Personally I would rather not have to write YAML inputs but instead resort on the what the machine dumps look like. That being said, I can live with YAML :). More importantly, how do you plan to report syntax errors to the users? Things like invalid instruction, invalid registers, etc.? What about unallocated code, i.e., virtual registers, invalid SSA form, etc.? Cheers, Q.> On Apr 28, 2015, at 9:56 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I would like to propose a text-based, human readable format that will be used to > serialize the machine level IR. The major goal of this format is to allow LLVM > to save the machine level IR after any code generation pass and then to load > it again and continue running passes on the machine level IR. The primary use case > of this format is to enable easier testing process for the code generation passes, > by allowing the developers to write tests that load the IR, then invoke just a > specific code gen pass and then inspect the output of that pass by checking the > printed out IR. > > > The proposed format has a number of key features: > - It stores the machine level IR and the optional LLVM IR in one text file. > - The connections between the machine level IR and the LLVM IR are preserved. > - The format uses a YAML based container for most of the data structures. The LLVM > IR is embedded in the YAML container. > - The format also uses a new, text-based syntax to serialize the machine instructions. > The instructions are embedded in YAML. > > This is an incomplete example of a YAML file containing the LLVM IR, the machine level IR > and the instructions: > > --- > ir: | > define i32 @fact(i32 %n) { > %1 = alloca i32, align 4 > store i32 %n, i32* %1, align 4 > %2 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4 > %3 = icmp eq i32 %2, 0 > br i1 %3, label %10, label %4 > > ; <label>:4 ; preds = %0 > %5 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4 > %6 = sub nsw i32 %5, 1 > %7 = call i32 @fact(i32 %6) > %8 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4 > %9 = mul nsw i32 %7, %8 > br label %10 > > ; <label>:10 ; preds = %0, %4 > %11 = phi i32 [ %9, %4 ], [ 1, %0 ] > ret i32 %11 > } > > ... > --- > number: 0 > name: fact > alignment: 4 > regInfo: > .... > frameInfo: > .... > body: > - bb: 0 > llbb: '%0' > successors: [ 'bb#2', 'bb#1' ] > liveIns: [ '%edi' ] > instructions: > - 'push64r undef %rax, %rsp, %rsp' > - 'mov32mr %rsp, 1, %noreg, 4, %noreg, %edi' > - .... > .... > - bb: 1 > llbb: '%4' > successors: [ 'bb#2' ] > instructions: > - '%edi = mov32rm %rsp, 1, %noreg, 4, %noreg' > - .... > .... > - .... > .... > ... > > The example above shows a YAML file with two YAML documents (delimited by `---` > and `...`) containing the LLVM IR and the machine function information for the function `fact`. > > > When a specific format is chosen, I'll start with patches that serialize the > embedded LLVM IR. Then I'll add support for things like machine functions and > machine basic blocks, and I think that an intrusive implementation will work best > for data structures like these. After that I will continue adding support for > serialization of the remaining data structures. > > > Thanks for reading through the proposal. What are you thoughts about this format? > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150428/6f40e8eb/attachment.html>
Hal Finkel
2015-Apr-28 17:15 UTC
[LLVMdev] RFC: Machine Level IR text-based serialization format
----- Original Message -----> From: "Alex L" <arphaman at gmail.com> > To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 11:56:42 AM > Subject: [LLVMdev] RFC: Machine Level IR text-based serialization > format> Hi all, > I would like to propose a text-based, human readable format that will > be used to serialize the machine level IR. The major goal of this > format is to allow LLVM to save the machine level IR after any code > generation pass and then to load it again and continue running > passes on the machine level IR. The primary use case of this format > is to enable easier testing process for the code generation passes, > by allowing the developers to write tests that load the IR, then > invoke just a specific code gen pass and then inspect the output of > that pass by checking the printed out IR.> The proposed format has a number of key features: - It stores the > machine level IR and the optional LLVM IR in one text file. - The > connections between the machine level IR and the LLVM IR are > preserved. - The format uses a YAML based container for most of the > data structures. The LLVM IR is embedded in the YAML container. - > The format also uses a new, text-based syntax to serialize the > machine instructions. The instructions are embedded in YAML. > This is an incomplete example of a YAML file containing the LLVM IR, > the machine level IR and the instructions: > --- ir: | define i32 @fact(i32 %n) { %1 = alloca i32, align 4 store > i32 %n, i32* %1, align 4 %2 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4 %3 = icmp > eq i32 %2, 0 br i1 %3, label %10, label %4 > ; <label>:4 ; preds = %0 %5 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4 %6 = sub nsw > i32 %5, 1 %7 = call i32 @fact(i32 %6) %8 = load i32, i32* %1, align > 4 %9 = mul nsw i32 %7, %8 br label %10 > ; <label>:10 ; preds = %0, %4 %11 = phi i32 [ %9, %4 ], [ 1, %0 ] ret > i32 %11 } > ... --- number: 0 name: fact alignment: 4 regInfo: .... frameInfo: > .... body: - bb: 0 llbb: '%0' successors: [ 'bb#2', 'bb#1' ] > liveIns: [ '%edi' ] instructions: - 'push64r undef %rax, %rsp, %rsp' > - 'mov32mr %rsp, 1, %noreg, 4, %noreg, %edi'Hi Alex, I think this looks promising. What are the 1 an 4 above? How are you proposing to serialize operand flags (dead, etc.)? -Hal> - .... .... - bb: 1 llbb: '%4' successors: [ 'bb#2' ] instructions: - > '%edi = mov32rm %rsp, 1, %noreg, 4, %noreg' - .... .... - .... .... > ... > The example above shows a YAML file with two YAML documents > (delimited by `---` and `...`) containing the LLVM IR and the > machine function information for the function `fact`.> When a specific format is chosen, I'll start with patches that > serialize the embedded LLVM IR. Then I'll add support for things > like machine functions and machine basic blocks, and I think that an > intrusive implementation will work best for data structures like > these. After that I will continue adding support for serialization > of the remaining data structures.> Thanks for reading through the proposal. What are you thoughts about > this format?> _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev-- Hal Finkel Assistant Computational Scientist Leadership Computing Facility Argonne National Laboratory -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150428/11d88a1a/attachment.html>
Alex L
2015-Apr-28 17:46 UTC
[LLVMdev] RFC: Machine Level IR text-based serialization format
2015-04-28 10:09 GMT-07:00 Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org>:> Looks good. How are you planning to "assemble" the MI-level YAML > description into the actual in-memory IR?I plan on developing a parser for the new text format for the machine instructions. This parser will parse instructions, operands and memory operands, and it will after run the machine function and the embedded LLVM IR are parsed, so that the references to the basic blocks, constant pools, frame indices, etc. can be resolved immediately. Each string literal in a list of instructions in a machine basic blocks will be parsed using this parser and then they will be assembled together into a list of instructions for that basic block. I hope that answers your question, Alex.> > > -Krzysztof > > -- > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted > by The Linux Foundation > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150428/0446bb66/attachment.html>
Alex L
2015-Apr-28 18:00 UTC
[LLVMdev] RFC: Machine Level IR text-based serialization format
2015-04-28 10:14 GMT-07:00 Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com>:> Hi Alex, > > Thanks for working on this. > > Personally I would rather not have to write YAML inputs but instead resort > on the what the machine dumps look like. That being said, I can live with > YAML :). > > More importantly, how do you plan to report syntax errors to the users? > Things like invalid instruction, invalid registers, etc.? > What about unallocated code, i.e., virtual registers, invalid SSA form, > etc.? > > Cheers, > Q. >Thanks, Unfortunately, the machine dumps are quite incomplete (and tricky to parse too!), and thus some sort of new syntax has to be developed. I think that a YAML based container is a good candidate for this purpose, as it has a structured format that represents things like machine functions, frame information, register information, target specific machine function details, etc in a clear and readable way. I haven't thought about error reporting that much, as I've been mostly working on developing the syntax and making sure that all the data structures can be represented by it. But I believe that the errors that crop up in an invalid machine instruction syntax, like invalid basic block references, invalid instructions, etc. can be reported quite well and I can rely on already existing error reporting facilities in LLVM to help me. The more structural errors, like missing attributes will be handled by the YAML parser automatically, and I might extend it to provide better/more specific error messages. And I think that it's possible to use the machine verifier to catch the other errors that you've mentioned. Alex> On Apr 28, 2015, at 9:56 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > I would like to propose a text-based, human readable format that will be used to > > serialize the machine level IR. The major goal of this format is to allow LLVM > > to save the machine level IR after any code generation pass and then to load > > it again and continue running passes on the machine level IR. The primary use case > > of this format is to enable easier testing process for the code generation passes, > > by allowing the developers to write tests that load the IR, then invoke just a > > specific code gen pass and then inspect the output of that pass by checking the > > printed out IR. > > > > The proposed format has a number of key features: > > - It stores the machine level IR and the optional LLVM IR in one text file. > > - The connections between the machine level IR and the LLVM IR are preserved. > > - The format uses a YAML based container for most of the data structures. The LLVM > > IR is embedded in the YAML container. > > - The format also uses a new, text-based syntax to serialize the machine instructions. > > The instructions are embedded in YAML. > > > This is an incomplete example of a YAML file containing the LLVM IR, the machine level IR > > and the instructions: > > > --- > > ir: | > > define i32 @fact(i32 %n) { > > %1 = alloca i32, align 4 > > store i32 %n, i32* %1, align 4 > > %2 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4 > > %3 = icmp eq i32 %2, 0 > > br i1 %3, label %10, label %4 > > > ; <label>:4 ; preds = %0 > > %5 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4 > > %6 = sub nsw i32 %5, 1 > > %7 = call i32 @fact(i32 %6) > > %8 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4 > > %9 = mul nsw i32 %7, %8 > > br label %10 > > > ; <label>:10 ; preds = %0, %4 > > %11 = phi i32 [ %9, %4 ], [ 1, %0 ] > > ret i32 %11 > > } > > > ... > > --- > > number: 0 > > name: fact > > alignment: 4 > > regInfo: > > .... > > frameInfo: > > .... > > body: > > - bb: 0 > > llbb: '%0' > > successors: [ 'bb#2', 'bb#1' ] > > liveIns: [ '%edi' ] > > instructions: > > - 'push64r undef %rax, %rsp, %rsp' > > - 'mov32mr %rsp, 1, %noreg, 4, %noreg, %edi' > > - .... > > .... > > - bb: 1 > > llbb: '%4' > > successors: [ 'bb#2' ] > > instructions: > > - '%edi = mov32rm %rsp, 1, %noreg, 4, %noreg' > > - .... > > .... > > - .... > > .... > > ... > > > The example above shows a YAML file with two YAML documents (delimited by `---` > > and `...`) containing the LLVM IR and the machine function information for the function `fact`. > > > > When a specific format is chosen, I'll start with patches that serialize the > > embedded LLVM IR. Then I'll add support for things like machine functions and > > machine basic blocks, and I think that an intrusive implementation will work best > > for data structures like these. After that I will continue adding support for > > serialization of the remaining data structures. > > > > Thanks for reading through the proposal. What are you thoughts about this format? > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150428/cfb2abda/attachment.html>
Bevin Hansson
2015-Apr-28 18:09 UTC
[LLVMdev] RFC: Machine Level IR text-based serialization format
On 2015-04-28 19:14, Quentin Colombet wrote:> Personally I would rather not have to write YAML inputs but instead > resort on the what the machine dumps look like. That being said, I can > live with YAML :). >YAML is what is suggested in the FIXME for the textual Machine IR, so that might be the motivation behind Alex's choice. I sort of agree that it could be better to go with a "proprietary" format based off of the dumps. This means that a dedicated Machine IR parser could be implemented for the purposes of library users who want to open the files. I also think that the dumps are much easier to diff and read. There are parts of the suggested YAML format that seem to require some parsing anyway, like the instruction strings. If YAML is going to be used, I think it would be better to let the instructions be encoded in YAML instead of leaving them as a string, if that makes sense. / Bevin
Alex L
2015-Apr-28 18:18 UTC
[LLVMdev] RFC: Machine Level IR text-based serialization format
2015-04-28 10:15 GMT-07:00 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov>:> > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Alex L" <arphaman at gmail.com> > *To: *"LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > *Sent: *Tuesday, April 28, 2015 11:56:42 AM > *Subject: *[LLVMdev] RFC: Machine Level IR text-based serialization format > > > Hi all, > > > I would like to propose a text-based, human readable format that will be used to > > serialize the machine level IR. The major goal of this format is to allow LLVM > > to save the machine level IR after any code generation pass and then to load > > it again and continue running passes on the machine level IR. The primary use case > > of this format is to enable easier testing process for the code generation passes, > > by allowing the developers to write tests that load the IR, then invoke just a > > specific code gen pass and then inspect the output of that pass by checking the > > printed out IR. > > > > The proposed format has a number of key features: > > - It stores the machine level IR and the optional LLVM IR in one text file. > > - The connections between the machine level IR and the LLVM IR are preserved. > > - The format uses a YAML based container for most of the data structures. The LLVM > > IR is embedded in the YAML container. > > - The format also uses a new, text-based syntax to serialize the machine instructions. > > The instructions are embedded in YAML. > > > This is an incomplete example of a YAML file containing the LLVM IR, the machine level IR > > and the instructions: > > > --- > > ir: | > > define i32 @fact(i32 %n) { > > %1 = alloca i32, align 4 > > store i32 %n, i32* %1, align 4 > > %2 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4 > > %3 = icmp eq i32 %2, 0 > > br i1 %3, label %10, label %4 > > > ; <label>:4 ; preds = %0 > > %5 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4 > > %6 = sub nsw i32 %5, 1 > > %7 = call i32 @fact(i32 %6) > > %8 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4 > > %9 = mul nsw i32 %7, %8 > > br label %10 > > > ; <label>:10 ; preds = %0, %4 > > %11 = phi i32 [ %9, %4 ], [ 1, %0 ] > > ret i32 %11 > > } > > > ... > > --- > > number: 0 > > name: fact > > alignment: 4 > > regInfo: > > .... > > frameInfo: > > .... > > body: > > - bb: 0 > > llbb: '%0' > > successors: [ 'bb#2', 'bb#1' ] > > liveIns: [ '%edi' ] > > instructions: > > - 'push64r undef %rax, %rsp, %rsp' > > - 'mov32mr %rsp, 1, %noreg, 4, %noreg, %edi' > > > Hi Alex, > > I think this looks promising. What are the 1 an 4 above? How are you > proposing to serialize operand flags (dead, etc.)? > > -Hal >Hi Hal, The 1 and 4 above are constants that are specific to x86 memory addressing, I believe they basically compute the address RSP + 1 * 0 + 4. I haven't settled on a final version of the operand flags (for registers) syntax, but at the moment I'm thinking of something like this: - The IsDef flag is implied by the use of the register before the '=', unless it's implicit. - TiedTo and IsEarlyClobber aren't not serialized, as they are defined by the instruction description. (I believe that's true in all cases, but I'm not 100% sure). - IsUndef, IsImp, IsKill, IsDead, IsInternalRead, IsDebug - keywords like 'implicit', 'undef', 'kill', 'dead' are used before the register e.g. 'undef %rax', 'implicit-def kill %eflags'. I don't have a syntax for the SubReg_TargetFlags at the moment. Alex> > - .... > > .... > > - bb: 1 > > llbb: '%4' > > successors: [ 'bb#2' ] > > instructions: > > - '%edi = mov32rm %rsp, 1, %noreg, 4, %noreg' > > - .... > > .... > > - .... > > .... > > ... > > > The example above shows a YAML file with two YAML documents (delimited by `---` > > and `...`) containing the LLVM IR and the machine function information for the function `fact`. > > > > When a specific format is chosen, I'll start with patches that serialize the > > embedded LLVM IR. Then I'll add support for things like machine functions and > > machine basic blocks, and I think that an intrusive implementation will work best > > for data structures like these. After that I will continue adding support for > > serialization of the remaining data structures. > > > > Thanks for reading through the proposal. What are you thoughts about this format? > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > > > > -- > Hal Finkel > Assistant Computational Scientist > Leadership Computing Facility > Argonne National Laboratory >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150428/0ef63547/attachment.html>
Adrian Prantl
2015-Apr-30 19:54 UTC
[LLVMdev] RFC: Machine Level IR text-based serialization format
> > On Apr 28, 2015, at 9:56 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I would like to propose a text-based, human readable format that will be used to > serialize the machine level IR. The major goal of this format is to allow LLVM > to save the machine level IR after any code generation pass and then to load > it again and continue running passes on the machine level IR. The primary use case > of this format is to enable easier testing process for the code generation passes, > by allowing the developers to write tests that load the IR, then invoke just a > specific code gen pass and then inspect the output of that pass by checking the > printed out IR. > > > The proposed format has a number of key features: > - It stores the machine level IR and the optional LLVM IR in one text file. > - The connections between the machine level IR and the LLVM IR are preserved. > - The format uses a YAML based container for most of the data structures. The LLVM > IR is embedded in the YAML container. > - The format also uses a new, text-based syntax to serialize the machine instructions. > The instructions are embedded in YAML. > > This is an incomplete example of a YAML file containing the LLVM IR, the machine level IR > and the instructions: > > --- > ir: | > define i32 @fact(i32 %n) { > %1 = alloca i32, align 4 > store i32 %n, i32* %1, align 4 > %2 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4 > %3 = icmp eq i32 %2, 0 > br i1 %3, label %10, label %4 > > ; <label>:4 ; preds = %0 > %5 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4 > %6 = sub nsw i32 %5, 1 > %7 = call i32 @fact(i32 %6) > %8 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4 > %9 = mul nsw i32 %7, %8 > br label %10 > > ; <label>:10 ; preds = %0, %4 > %11 = phi i32 [ %9, %4 ], [ 1, %0 ] > ret i32 %11 > } > > ... > --- > number: 0 > name: fact > alignment: 4 > regInfo: > .... > frameInfo: > .... > body: > - bb: 0 > llbb: '%0' > successors: [ 'bb#2', 'bb#1' ] > liveIns: [ '%edi' ] > instructions: > - 'push64r undef %rax, %rsp, %rsp' > - 'mov32mr %rsp, 1, %noreg, 4, %noreg, %edi' > - .... > .... > - bb: 1 > llbb: '%4' > successors: [ 'bb#2' ] > instructions: > - '%edi = mov32rm %rsp, 1, %noreg, 4, %noreg' > - .... > .... > - .... > .... > ... > > The example above shows a YAML file with two YAML documents (delimited by `---` > and `...`) containing the LLVM IR and the machine function information for the function `fact`. > > > When a specific format is chosen, I'll start with patches that serialize the > embedded LLVM IR. Then I'll add support for things like machine functions and > machine basic blocks, and I think that an intrusive implementation will work best > for data structures like these. After that I will continue adding support for > serialization of the remaining data structures. > > > Thanks for reading through the proposal. What are you thoughts about this format?I’m really looking forward to this; it will be extremely useful for testing the debug info backend. For debug nodes referenced via DBG_VALUE intrinsics, it looks like they could just point to the corresponding nodes in the optional IR. Are there any plans to represent metadata such as the DebugLoc(ations) attached to the machine instructions? -- adrian
Alex L
2015-Apr-30 20:28 UTC
[LLVMdev] RFC: Machine Level IR text-based serialization format
2015-04-30 12:54 GMT-07:00 Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com>:> > > > On Apr 28, 2015, at 9:56 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to propose a text-based, human readable format that will be > used to > > serialize the machine level IR. The major goal of this format is to > allow LLVM > > to save the machine level IR after any code generation pass and then to > load > > it again and continue running passes on the machine level IR. The > primary use case > > of this format is to enable easier testing process for the code > generation passes, > > by allowing the developers to write tests that load the IR, then invoke > just a > > specific code gen pass and then inspect the output of that pass by > checking the > > printed out IR. > > > > > > The proposed format has a number of key features: > > - It stores the machine level IR and the optional LLVM IR in one text > file. > > - The connections between the machine level IR and the LLVM IR are > preserved. > > - The format uses a YAML based container for most of the data > structures. The LLVM > > IR is embedded in the YAML container. > > - The format also uses a new, text-based syntax to serialize the machine > instructions. > > The instructions are embedded in YAML. > > > > This is an incomplete example of a YAML file containing the LLVM IR, the > machine level IR > > and the instructions: > > > > --- > > ir: | > > define i32 @fact(i32 %n) { > > %1 = alloca i32, align 4 > > store i32 %n, i32* %1, align 4 > > %2 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4 > > %3 = icmp eq i32 %2, 0 > > br i1 %3, label %10, label %4 > > > > ; <label>:4 ; preds = %0 > > %5 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4 > > %6 = sub nsw i32 %5, 1 > > %7 = call i32 @fact(i32 %6) > > %8 = load i32, i32* %1, align 4 > > %9 = mul nsw i32 %7, %8 > > br label %10 > > > > ; <label>:10 ; preds = %0, %4 > > %11 = phi i32 [ %9, %4 ], [ 1, %0 ] > > ret i32 %11 > > } > > > > ... > > --- > > number: 0 > > name: fact > > alignment: 4 > > regInfo: > > .... > > frameInfo: > > .... > > body: > > - bb: 0 > > llbb: '%0' > > successors: [ 'bb#2', 'bb#1' ] > > liveIns: [ '%edi' ] > > instructions: > > - 'push64r undef %rax, %rsp, %rsp' > > - 'mov32mr %rsp, 1, %noreg, 4, %noreg, %edi' > > - .... > > .... > > - bb: 1 > > llbb: '%4' > > successors: [ 'bb#2' ] > > instructions: > > - '%edi = mov32rm %rsp, 1, %noreg, 4, %noreg' > > - .... > > .... > > - .... > > .... > > ... > > > > The example above shows a YAML file with two YAML documents (delimited > by `---` > > and `...`) containing the LLVM IR and the machine function information > for the function `fact`. > > > > > > When a specific format is chosen, I'll start with patches that serialize > the > > embedded LLVM IR. Then I'll add support for things like machine > functions and > > machine basic blocks, and I think that an intrusive implementation will > work best > > for data structures like these. After that I will continue adding > support for > > serialization of the remaining data structures. > > > > > > Thanks for reading through the proposal. What are you thoughts about > this format? > > I’m really looking forward to this; it will be extremely useful for > testing the debug info backend. > For debug nodes referenced via DBG_VALUE intrinsics, it looks like they > could just point to the corresponding nodes in the optional IR. > Are there any plans to represent metadata such as the DebugLoc(ations) > attached to the machine instructions? > > -- adrianYes, the debug location that's attached to the machine instruction will be serialized as well. I will describe how when I will send out a patch that serializes it. Alex. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20150430/ff032299/attachment.html>
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [LLVMdev] RFC: Machine Level IR text-based serialization format
- [LLVMdev] RFC: Machine Level IR text-based serialization format
- [LLVMdev] RFC: Machine Level IR text-based serialization format
- [LLVMdev] Problem with MachineFunctionPass and JMP
- [LLVMdev] Code Generation Problem llvm 1.9