Geoff Manning
2005-Oct-06 13:07 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Results of an incorrect crossover pinout??
Say I had a crossover cable that connected a Mitel SX200 to a TE110P and the pinout was done as such: 1 - 4 2 - 5 5 - 1 4 - 2 (the 5 and 4 are transposed on the left side) Instead of the proper way of: 1 - 4 2 - 5 4 - 1 5 - 2 What would the results be? We have had the former as our cabling for a few months and the connection has been fine. Slip errors here and there. But we have had major issues the last few days where there were excessive slip errors culminating in the Mitel taking it's T1 card offline. 1) Could the pinouts I have been using have actually worked? Or am I smoking crack? 2) Could that have been the source of my problem? If so why didn't it surface earlier? We put a new cable in place today so only time will tell if it fixes it (it seems to have major alarms on the Mitel every 12 hours or so). I'm just curious. Thanks, Geoff
Steve Totaro
2005-Oct-06 20:58 UTC
[Asterisk-Users] Results of an incorrect crossover pinout??
I bet it's the crack ;) How could you have a pinout listed first? If the wire on one side of the cable is going from pin one to pin four on the other side and two is going to five on the other side then its correct and complete. I never understood why the second set of numbers. 1-4 2-5 Thats it. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Geoff Manning" <gmanning@zoom.com> To: "Asterisk Users (E-mail)" <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 1:07 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Results of an incorrect crossover pinout??> Say I had a crossover cable that connected a Mitel SX200 to a TE110P andthe> pinout was done as such: > > 1 - 4 > 2 - 5 > 5 - 1 > 4 - 2 > > (the 5 and 4 are transposed on the left side) > > Instead of the proper way of: > > 1 - 4 > 2 - 5 > 4 - 1 > 5 - 2 > > What would the results be? We have had the former as our cabling for a few > months and the connection has been fine. Slip errors here and there. Butwe> have had major issues the last few days where there were excessive slip > errors culminating in the Mitel taking it's T1 card offline. > > 1) Could the pinouts I have been using have actually worked? Or am Ismoking> crack? > > 2) Could that have been the source of my problem? If so why didn't it > surface earlier? > > We put a new cable in place today so only time will tell if it fixes it(it> seems to have major alarms on the Mitel every 12 hours or so). I'm just > curious. > > Thanks, > Geoff > > _______________________________________________ > --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/118 - Release Date: 10/3/05 > >
Seemingly Similar Threads
- Asterisk and Mitel SX 200 Slip and Frame Errors causing Major Ala rms
- TE11OP -> Mitel 200Sx??
- Interconnect with Mitel PBX
- Explain Yellow Alarm in a Legacy Integration
- Pinouts for T1/E1 crossover cable WAS "RE: whatcable to connect a legacy PBX to a TE410P ?"