Tal Galili
2011-Feb-12 19:57 UTC
[R] Regarding {KernSmooth} - Can a package on CRAN have non GPL copyrights?
Hi all, I'm not sure who to ask this, so I'm posting this here. I just ran: require(KernSmooth) And got (I bolded the text): Loading required package: KernSmooth KernSmooth 2.23 loaded *Copyright M. P. Wand 1997-2009* Warning message: package 'KernSmooth' was built under R version 2.12.1 What does that mean? Thanks, Tal ----------------Contact Details:------------------------------------------------------- Contact me: Tal.Galili@gmail.com | 972-52-7275845 Read me: www.talgalili.com (Hebrew) | www.biostatistics.co.il (Hebrew) | www.r-statistics.com (English) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Joshua Wiley
2011-Feb-12 20:18 UTC
[R] Regarding {KernSmooth} - Can a package on CRAN have non GPL copyrights?
AFAIK CRAN does not explicitly require use of a GPL license (though obviously the license needs to allow at least free access to the packages and source). On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Tal Galili <tal.galili at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi all, > I'm not sure who to ask this, so I'm posting this here. > > I just ran: > ?require(KernSmooth) > And got (I bolded the text): > Loading required package: KernSmooth > KernSmooth 2.23 loaded > *Copyright M. P. Wand 1997-2009* > Warning message: > package 'KernSmooth' was built under R version 2.12.1 > > What does that mean?Well, I think that is just a warning that it was built under a different version of R than you are currently running it under. If memory serves, the current KernSmooth is a port to R by Brian Ripley; that message suggests the original KernSmooth was copyrighted by M. P. Wand from 1997 until 2009 (probably the original author in S?). Cheers, Josh> > Thanks, > Tal > > > ----------------Contact > Details:------------------------------------------------------- > Contact me: Tal.Galili at gmail.com | ?972-52-7275845 > Read me: www.talgalili.com (Hebrew) | www.biostatistics.co.il (Hebrew) | > www.r-statistics.com (English) > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > ? ? ? ?[[alternative HTML version deleted]] > > ______________________________________________ > R-help at r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-help > PLEASE do read the posting guide http://www.R-project.org/posting-guide.html > and provide commented, minimal, self-contained, reproducible code.-- Joshua Wiley Ph.D. Student, Health Psychology University of California, Los Angeles http://www.joshuawiley.com/
Murray Stokely
2011-Feb-12 20:45 UTC
[R] Regarding {KernSmooth} - Can a package on CRAN have non GPL copyrights?
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Tal Galili <tal.galili at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi all, > I'm not sure who to ask this, so I'm posting this here. > > I just ran: > ?require(KernSmooth) > And got (I bolded the text): > Loading required package: KernSmooth > KernSmooth 2.23 loaded > *Copyright M. P. Wand 1997-2009* > Warning message: > package 'KernSmooth' was built under R version 2.12.1 > > What does that mean?There are many licenses used on CRAN, such as BSD, MIT, GPL, LGPL, and public domain. There are even some that aren't really open source at all such as 'akima' and 'SparseM'. These packages make additional restrictions such as that a license is only granted for academic / non-commercial use. It's particularly annoying that many other packages without such restrictions depend on these packages, making it pretty difficult to ensure license compliance for companies using R. The fact that the code is Copyright by that author is somewhat orthogonal to the license he chooses to distribute it under. See the LICENSE file. In this case, it's much more open than GPL -- it is completely unrestricted / public domain. After reading the license for the package you are interested in, you may like to read how those licenses are interpreted by e.g. http://www.opensource.org/licenses/index.html - Murray