search for: copyright

...sync error: syntax or usage error (code 1) at main.c(994) # ./rsync --help Segmentation Fault - core dumped Here is log of compilation. Script started on Sat Jun 21 05:56:15 2003 # make cc -I. -I. -g -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I./popt -c rsync.c -o rsync.o NCR High Performance C Compiler R3.0c (c) Copyright 1994-97, NCR Corporation (c) Copyright 1987-97, MetaWare Incorporated cc -I. -I. -g -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I./popt -c generator.c -o generator.o NCR High Performance C Compiler R3.0c (c) Copyright 1994-97, NCR Corporation (c) Copyright 1987-97, MetaWare Incorporated cc -I. -I. -g -DHAV...

The ticket clinic, What Is U.S. Copyright Law? The US Copyright Law grants rights to individuals for the works they create. The US Copyright Act of 1790 has changed over the years. The current basis of US copyright law is based on the Copyright Act of 1976. US copyright law is relatively automatic. Once someone has an idea and produces i...

My company recently started using a R library from RCRAN that is licensed under the LGPL Version 2 or greater per the DESCRIPTION file, but contains no copy of the LGPL notice, or any copyright notice. I've grown accustomed to paying attention to copyright and licensing as a Debian package maintainer, and sent the author of the package an email expressing my concern. The author believed that assigning themselves copyright was incompatible with licensing the library under the terms of...

Hi all, Some history. Samba has historically only accepted code with personal, not corporate copyright attached. There were a couple of good reasons for this in the past, one of which was that we preferred GPL enforcement decisions to be made by individuals, not by corporations. Under GPLv2, a license violator loses all rights under the license and these have to be reinstated by the copyright hold...

Source: xen Version: 4.17.3+36-g54dacb5c02-1 Severity: serious Justification: Policy 2.3, 4.5, 12.5 X-Debbugs-CC: ftpmaster at debian.org Dear maintainer, Copyright 2022-present Keir Fraser and/or many others" is not a valid copyright claim. Copyright is always time-limited, so it simply does not make sense to say "-present". Also, our copyright format is already implicitly "and/or" for names under a given stanza, so it should be ju...

Hi All, I updated the copyright section of the developer policy: http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#copyright This change doesn't affect any llvm policies, it just makes the developer policy reflect reality. The previous version (archived here: http://llvm.org/releases/2.7/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#copyright) used to...

At the top of src/nmath/qnorm.c it is stated: * Copyright (C) 1998 Ross Ihaka * Copyright (C) 2000--2005 The R Development Core Team * based on AS 111 (C) 1977 Royal Statistical Society * and on AS 241 (C) 1988 Royal Statistical Society The routine is in fact an f2c'd version of AS241 from StatLib: http://lib.stat.cmu.edu/apstat/241 and...

Dear all, This is a little bit off-topic, but I was wondering if anyone has any informed opinion on whether data (ie. a dataset) is copyrightable? Hadley

Hi, I installed Samba on Solaris to enable me print from the solaris workstation to a windows print server. When I start smbd and nmbd , smbd does not run but nmbd runs

...tions(+) create mode 100644 OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/E820.h diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/E820.h b/OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/E820.h new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e7e0c25 --- /dev/null +++ b/OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/E820.h @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +/** @file + +Copyright (c) 2006 - 2013, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR> +Copyright (c) 2013, Citrix Systems UK Ltd. + +This program and the accompanying materials +are licensed and made available under the terms and conditions +of the BSD License which accompanies this distribution. The +full text of t...

...2 +- tests/test-zero.sh | 2 +- 41 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/make-links.sh b/docs/make-links.sh index ccf4554..048bb6c 100755 --- a/docs/make-links.sh +++ b/docs/make-links.sh @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -#!/bin/bash - +#!/usr/bin/env bash # nbdkit # Copyright (C) 2018 Red Hat Inc. # All rights reserved. diff --git a/nbdkit.in b/nbdkit.in index fc269d1..0469f1a 100644 --- a/nbdkit.in +++ b/nbdkit.in @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -#!/bin/bash - +#!/usr/bin/env bash # @configure_input@ # Copyright (C) 2017-2018 Red Hat Inc. diff --git a/tests/make-pki.sh b/tests/ma...

...tabase developers caused a lot of media-press and discussions and created some kind of precedence in the USA [3]. But also it imho showed that similar attacks might happen in the future, and possibly against data sets which are not that obviously "factual" thus after all might fall under copyright or IP protection if not in the states then in some other jurisdictions. And 'data copyright/license' question comes over and over again, I just wanted to ask based on what policies or advisories datasets were selected to be shipped with R. From a very very brief look at the datasets, ma...

Sorry for the off-topic post, but I guess someone else may hit the same issue.... Having developed a rails application, I now need to put GPL text and a copyright notice at the start of each source file. For the .rb files, this will look like: # Copyright 2006 Robert Jones........... and for the .rhtml files it will look like: <!-- Copyright 2006 Robert Jones......... Can anyone think of a neat way to do this prepending programatically on Linux, rath...

...growing rapidly and is one of the highlights of the free software effort. I have heard from several people who started using R because it was included with Debian Linux. Since vendors are encouraged to make CD-ROM's from the entire distribution, the Debian organization is very careful about copyrights for the code. The base R language is covered by the GNU Public License (GPL) but some of the contributed libraries have other copyright statements. As a result I have divided the libraries into r-cran, the contributed libraries that are covered by a copyright that follows the Debian Free Softw...

I will be taking over as maintainer of the its package from Giles Heywood. The code was originally written while he was working at Commerzbank. I have added the header below to the top of the R source file to indicate the changes in the copyrights for the code. The package was originally released under GPL2. I have no experience with copyright issues, and would appreciate it if someone who does would kindly indicate whether the header below is correct and conforms with normal practice. Thanks in advance, Whit Armstrong <header in R...

...,0,3,0x0,0,0x0) - stub! fixme:advapi:LsaOpenPolicy ((null),0x33efe0,0x00000001,0x33effc) stub fixme:advapi:LsaClose (0xcafe) stub fixme:advapi:LsaOpenPolicy ((null),0x33e684,0x00000001,0x33e6ac) stub fixme:advapi:LsaClose (0xcafe) stub Microsoft (R) CLR Native Image Generator - Version 2.0.50727.42 Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation 1998-2002. All rights reserved. The .NET Runtime Optimization Service is started and paused. fixme:mountmgr:harddisk_ioctl unsupported ioctl 2d0c00 fixme:advapi:LsaOpenPolicy ((null),0x33ddf4,0x00000001,0x33de1c) stub fixme:advapi:LsaClose (0xcafe) stub fixme:advapi:Looku...

Sorry to bring up this old topic again but ... The 2.0 release of Debian Linux is about to happen and the release team requires copyright statements on any code included in the release. Presently there are 4 packages that I have created from R source code and libraries and contributed to the release. I think this will help with the visibility of R when there is a well-regarded release of an operating system that includes R as an in...

I thought about committing this change to all .c files: Removed all Copyright Timo Sirainen comments. They weren't always correct and the year numbers were rarely updated when something was changed. Copyright is owned by the creator by default in practically all countries, there's no need to advertise it everywhere. Can anyone think of reasons why this wouldn't...

...ently I noticed that although the wxruby2 LICENSE file contains a simple MIT-style license, the actual source files (mostly .i and .rb) still referred to the older "wxWidgets license". I have updated all the source files to be consistent with the intended LICENSE. Another issue is the copyright. Almost all the files (still) had my name as the copyright holder. Because this software is released under a very liberal license, it''s not a huge deal. I mean, it would be pretty hard for someone to use it in a way that''s not allowed. So it''s unlikely that we would a...

This updates one rather important mention of the copyright year (the encoding/decoding progress display) and a few in the documentation. Furthermore, it updates the open bug list --- doc/html/documentation_bugs.html | 7 ------- doc/html/faq.html | 4 ++-- doc/html/id.html | 4 ++-- src/flac/main.c | 2 +- 4...