Ivan Porro
2007-Nov-08 14:46 UTC
[Xen-users] XEN HVMs on LVM over iSCSI - test results, (crashes) and questions
Hi all, some results from my configuration. I''ve this configuration (I''m not interested in raw top performances but in reliability.. so, I can accept slow MB/sec and prefer to rely on a RAID6, for example): 1 Infortrend iSCSI Array A16E-G2130-4 with: - 1GB DDR cache - RAID6 - 7 x 500GB sataII Seagate ST3500630NS with 16mb (no budget for SAS) - one of the logic volumes (about 1TB) is actually bounded to a single channel 1 DELL PE1950 server with: - QLogic iSCSI HBA QLA 4060C - 2 x Quad core x5335 2GHz Xeon - 8GB RAM - 2 x 73GB SAS drives (raid1 software) 1 DELL 2716 gigabit switch in the middle The array, tha HBA and the switch are Jumbo frame enabled. CHAP authentication enabled. I''ve successfully installed XEN 3.1.0 from source (kernel 2.6.18-xen) and the QLogic ISP4XXX iSCSI Host Bus Adapter driver 5.01.00.08-2. I have successfully installed a windows XP HVM, a Scientific Linux CERN - SLC - 4 and 3 (RedHat EL 4 and 3) HVMs and other non HVM machines. The volume I imported from the iSCSI is used with LVM: each HVM domain has a 8GB drive partitioned with a 1GB swap and rest on /. These are performance for bonnie++ (Per Chr column write and read): iSCSI dom0: w: 54M, r: 47M (no domU) Local disk dom0: w: 59M, r: 51M (3 idle domU) HVM single : w: 18M, r: 37M I''ve then launched bonnie++ on two separate SLC4 HVM (cloned): HVM 1 : w: 8M, r: 33M HVM 2 : w: 8.5M, r: 38M The same on three HVM: HVM 1 : w: 4.4M, r: 11M HVM 2, crashed, lost ssh, error: "hda: lost interrupt", need "xm reboot" HVM 3, crashed, lost ssh, error: "hda: lost interrupt", need "xm reboot" So, where is the limit of my configuration? How can this scale up in your opinions in real applications (not just stressing it with bonnie++)? I''m quite confident that HVM performance should be slow. My problem eventually is that iSCSI performance are not so bad compared on Local disk performance (which could lead to a "really poor local disk perf!"). Any suggestion on this is appreciated. Thank you in advance, Ivan -- http://www.bio.dist.unige.it voice: +39 010 353 2789 fax: +39 010 353 2948 _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Errol Neal
2007-Nov-08 17:18 UTC
Re: [Xen-users] XEN HVMs on LVM over iSCSI - test results, (crashes) and questions
Quoting Ivan Porro <pivan@dist.unige.it>:> Hi all, > > some results from my configuration. > > I''ve this configuration (I''m not interested in raw top performances but > in reliability.. so, I can accept slow MB/sec and prefer to rely on a > RAID6, for example): > > 1 Infortrend iSCSI Array A16E-G2130-4 with: > - 1GB DDR cache > - RAID6 > - 7 x 500GB sataII Seagate ST3500630NS with 16mb (no budget for SAS) > - one of the logic volumes (about 1TB) is actually bounded to a > single channel > > 1 DELL PE1950 server with: > - QLogic iSCSI HBA QLA 4060C > - 2 x Quad core x5335 2GHz Xeon > - 8GB RAM > - 2 x 73GB SAS drives (raid1 software) > > 1 DELL 2716 gigabit switch in the middleNice hardware you have there... I''m jealous :)> The array, tha HBA and the switch are Jumbo frame enabled. CHAP > authentication enabled.For initial testing, I''d turn off CHAP and jumbo frames...> > I''ve successfully installed XEN 3.1.0 from source (kernel 2.6.18-xen) > and the QLogic ISP4XXX iSCSI Host Bus Adapter driver 5.01.00.08-2.What distribution are you using on the host platform?> > I have successfully installed a windows XP HVM, a Scientific Linux CERN > - SLC - 4 and 3 (RedHat EL 4 and 3) HVMs and other non HVM machines. > The volume I imported from the iSCSI is used with LVM: each HVM domain > has a 8GB drive partitioned with a 1GB swap and rest on /. > > These are performance for bonnie++ (Per Chr column write and read): > > <SNIP> >Frankly, I think you have waaaayyy to many variables. Since this is the "Xen" forums, lets try to limit your configuration to the local system. Move/copy/recreate your LVM/ISCSI images onto the PE1950 and run them locally. Run the same test and see how it goes. -Errol ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Possibly Parallel Threads
- Xen HVMs run VERY slowly on SAN box
- HW experience
- using LVM inside HVMs
- linux-image-5.10.0-6-amd64: VGA Intel IGD Passthrough to Debian Xen HVM DomUs not working, but Windows Xen HVMs do work
- linux-image-5.10.0-6-amd64: VGA Intel IGD Passthrough to Debian Xen HVM DomUs not working, but Windows Xen HVMs do work