Chris Epicier
2006-May-05 11:04 UTC
[Xen-users] Re: Re: Suse 10.1 RC3: cannot configure my nics: now solved!
Hi Shimizu --- Shimizu Miki <> schrieb:> Hello, > > Doesn''t the vircual nic work at all?After the hint of Timo (http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2006-05/msg00091.html) I got the virtual xen network card show up in yast. However, when I configured it, yast came up with an error message that''no driver module for the device found'' (message loosely translated from german). Now in DomU eth0 (no longer eth5) shows up and ifconfig returns: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr AA:CC:00:00:00:01 inet addr:192.168.0.101 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 .... So one should expect pings to work but no: base:~ # ping 192.168.0.99 PING 192.168.0.99 (192.168.0.99) 56(84) bytes of data.>From 192.168.0.101: icmp_seq=1 Destination HostUnreachable At this stage I did disable firewalling completely. I think, lsmod | grep xennet should return a module count >= 1 but: base:~ # lsmod | grep xen xenblk 20048 1 xennet 24320 0 So my conclusion is: xennet is loaded but no instance initialised, hence the yast error message. could the error be in dom0? brctl show brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces xenbr0 8000.feffffffffff no vif1.0 whereas in my suse 9.3 dom0 brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces xen-br0 8000.000c76550535 no eth0 vif1.0 vif4.0 So the eth0 is missing in the bridge How can I fix this? rcxend stop ifdown vif1.0 ifdown xenbr0 brctl delif xenbr0 vif1.0 brctl delbr xenbr0 rcxend start ifconfig now shows peth0, vif0.0 ... all as it should dep breath and fire xm create base ping 192.168.0.101 PING 192.168.0.101 (192.168.0.101) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.0.101: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=3.62 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.0.101: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.214 ms Yipee ai yeah!!! I don''t know whay I had to manually bring down the bridge and connetcted if''s and whay it does not work when rebooting. But since its a server supposed to run forever :-), I don''t care too much.> For example, how is it if you temporary configure it > by > > #ifconfig eth5 192.168.0.2 > > And for pinging, how is your firewall conditions?thanks to all for your help. ___________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 1GB Speicher kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Noniko
2006-May-08 01:46 UTC
[Xen-users] Re: Suse 10.1 RC3: cannot configure my nics: now solved!
Hi, Chris Sorry, I used my other address(Shimizu Miki) by mistake. Anyway, congratulations to have network working! And these discussions were very instructive to me. noniko _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Seemingly Similar Threads
- HVM + IGD Graphics + 4GB RAM = Soft Lockup
- HVM + IGD Graphics + 4GB RAM = Soft Lockup
- Network issue with vif-route method
- [Xense-devel] [RFC][PATCH][ACM] enforcing ACM policy on network traffic between virtual network interfaces
- What's wrong with these mail headers?