Hi, everyone I know that this has been asked to death on the list, and in the past few days I''ve been trying to see if there were other options for getting a xen host to use more than 4GB of RAM. I''ve tried xen-unstable x86_64 on Xeon EM64Ts as well as xen-unstable with the initial PAE support but neither got me too far from booting: the former hangs when using the supplied binaries in xen-unstable-x86_64 and the latter a known bug at domain_build.c:327. And I know that the developers (who are really hard at work) have said that xen 3.0 may be coming out really soon now, but was wondering if there were anys suggestions for the impatient ones. ;-) Many thanks! - gino _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> I know that this has been asked to death on the list, and in the past > few days I''ve been trying to see if there were other options for > getting a xen host to use more than 4GB of RAM.Under Xen 2.0, I''m afraid you''re stuck. xen-unstable''s support for >4Gig is coming along nicely, though.> I''ve tried xen-unstable x86_64 on Xeon EM64Ts as well as xen-unstable > with the initial PAE support but neither got me too far from booting: > the former hangs when using the supplied binaries in > xen-unstable-x86_64 and the latter a known bug at domain_build.c:327. > And I know that the developers (who are really hard at work) have said > that xen 3.0 may be coming out really soon now, but was wondering if > there were anys suggestions for the impatient ones. ;-)Patience, study the teachings of Xen and you will achieve enlightenment. Ooops, that''s the wrong [ZX]en :-) Try the latest revision / tomorrow''s snapshot (Keir checked in a fix today that corrected several known bugs) and see if that improves things for you. Cheers, Mark _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
I have forgotten. is xen itself ok with managing more than 4gig of memory? And it is just the individual guests (including dom0) that are limited to 4 gig? -Tom _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>I have forgotten. is xen itself ok with managing more than 4gig of memory? >And it is just the individual guests (including dom0) that are limited to >4 gig?Nope; for > 4Gig physical memory you need either a PAE Xen (and PAE guests) or an x86_64 Xen (and x86_64 guests). Cheers, Mark _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Seems like there''s a lot of activity going on with x86_64. :-) Today I got the latest seed archive to attempt to get a Dell SC1425 (Dual Xeon EM64T) up and running with Xen. Without trying the default install, I tried building a with a custom kernel config and found out that compiling in SMP and HyperThreading support causes the boot process to barf. Rolling back to the default build, I get stuck with an error pointing to: arch/xen/x86_64/mm/hypervisor.c:64 BUG_ON(HYPERVISOR_mmu_update(&u, 1, NULL, DOMID_SELF) < 0); Well, at least it got farther than my last attempt. :-) -gino On 8/10/05, Mark Williamson <mark.williamson@cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:> > I know that this has been asked to death on the list, and in the past > > few days I''ve been trying to see if there were other options for > > getting a xen host to use more than 4GB of RAM. > > Under Xen 2.0, I''m afraid you''re stuck. xen-unstable''s support for >4Gig is > coming along nicely, though. > > > I''ve tried xen-unstable x86_64 on Xeon EM64Ts as well as xen-unstable > > with the initial PAE support but neither got me too far from booting: > > the former hangs when using the supplied binaries in > > xen-unstable-x86_64 and the latter a known bug at domain_build.c:327. > > And I know that the developers (who are really hard at work) have said > > that xen 3.0 may be coming out really soon now, but was wondering if > > there were anys suggestions for the impatient ones. ;-) > > Patience, study the teachings of Xen and you will achieve enlightenment. > Ooops, that''s the wrong [ZX]en :-) Try the latest revision / tomorrow''s > snapshot (Keir checked in a fix today that corrected several known bugs) and > see if that improves things for you. > > Cheers, > Mark > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > Xen-users@lists.xensource.com > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users >_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Reasonably Related Threads
- [PATCH] arm: allocate top level p2m page for all non-idle VCPUs
- One shared folder to be HA over CIFS to windows clients
- [PATCH] x86: allow Dom0 read-only access to IO-APICs
- [PATCH v6 00/16] xen: arm: 64-bit guest support and domU FDT autogeneration
- [PATCH v2 00/14] xen: arm: 64-bit guest support and domU FDT autogeneration